Abstract
Finding ways to support learners in becoming effective collaborators is a key challenge in higher education. Educational technologies can help to achieve this goal. However, the effectiveness of pedagogical design principles underlying these technologies needs to be tested empirically to inform evidence-based teaching in higher education. In the present study, we examine the effect of a technologically-supported collaborative reflection activity on learners’ knowledge gain about effective collaboration and about the quality of their interaction. To this end, we compare the results of a field study that was conducted in a course for civil engineering students (n = 66), with results of a laboratory study with n = 57 university students. Both field and laboratory study consisted of two collaborative problem-solving phases, in which students worked in small groups to solve information pooling problems. Multilevel modeling indicates that the technology-supported collaborative reflection activity between the two collaborative problem-solving phases increased explicit knowledge about effective collaboration. The quality of collaboration during subsequent collaboration, however, was not affected. Further, we found that groups’ self-assessments were in line with expert ratings of their collaboration quality. We discuss these findings in terms of the learning mechanisms behind technology-supported collaborative reflection and the extent to which these forms of support foster collaboration skills. Thus, our study adds insights on how to join educational technologies with pedagogical design principles to support collaborative learning.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Tunnigkeit, Isis 1
; Eberle, Julia 2
; Avdullahu, Arlind 1
; Block, Marlena 3
; König, Markus 3
; Rummel, Nikol 4
1 Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute for Educational Science, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)
2 Department of Educational Science, Paris-Lodron-University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (GRID:grid.7039.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6330)
3 Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)
4 Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute for Educational Science, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X); Center for Advanced Internet Studies (CAIS), Educational Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.512729.a)




