It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Traditional demand response (DR) programs for energy-intensive industries (EIIs) primarily rely on electricity price signals and often overlook carbon emission factors, limiting their effectiveness in supporting low-carbon transitions. To address this challenge, this paper proposes an electricity–carbon integrated DR strategy based on a bi-level collaborative optimization framework that coordinates the interaction between the grid and EIIs. At the upper level, the grid operator minimizes generation and curtailment costs by optimizing unit commitment while determining real-time electricity prices and dynamic carbon emission factors. At the lower level, EIIs respond to these dual signals by minimizing their combined electricity and carbon trading costs, considering their participation in medium- and long-term electricity markets, day-ahead spot markets, and carbon emissions trading schemes. The model accounts for direct and indirect carbon emissions, distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation, and battery energy storage systems. This interaction is structured as a Stackelberg game, where the grid acts as the leader and EIIs as followers, enabling dynamic feedback between pricing signals and load response. Simulation studies on an improved IEEE 30-bus system, with a cement plant as a representative user form EIIs, show that the proposed strategy reduces user-side carbon emissions by 7.95% and grid-side generation cost by 4.66%, though the user’s energy cost increases by 7.80% due to carbon trading. The results confirm that the joint guidance of electricity and carbon prices effectively reshapes user load profiles, encourages peak shaving, and improves PV utilization. This coordinated approach not only achieves emission reduction and cost efficiency but also offers a theoretical and practical foundation for integrating carbon pricing into demand-side energy management in future low-carbon power systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Dali Power Supply Bureau, Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd., Dali, 671000, China
2 Center of Power Grid Planning and Constructing, Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd., Kunming, 650011, China
3 School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, China





