Skip to main content

A 2018 peer-reviewed journal article highlights a preference for ProQuest’s ebook platform 

Before conducting a small usability study on ebook platforms, the authors of “Academic E-book Usability from the Student’s Perspective” said they expected students to prefer publisher platforms over aggregator platforms because “they rarely impose limits on printing and downloading.”

However, the results of their study showed otherwise. According to the article published by three academic librarians, University of Colorado Boulder students who participated in the study found aggregators easier to use – and they chose Ebook Central as their preferred platform. 

 In the study, university students performed several common tasks on each platform, including evaluating the landing page, navigating to a specific page, finding citation tools, and searching and evaluating results. An observer recorded their behavior and asked them questions about if and how they accomplished the task.

Learn more about this study by reading the article in the open-access journal “Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, published quarterly by the University of Alberta Learning Services.

Since the study’s conclusion, Ebook Central added more than 130,000 DRM-free ebooks, which have no download, print and copy restrictions.  

 

 

22 Feb 2019

Related Posts

Lessons from the Chifley Library Flood

How an Australian library is rebuilding after losing an entire floor in an unprecedented natural disaster.…

Learn More

ProQuest Platform Changes: Q&A with Brie Betz

Betz discusses why customers will now see more video, ebooks, literature and other content on the ProQuest platform – and what’s driving one of the platform’s biggest enhancements in years.…

Learn More

Introducing ProQuest One Academic

A new product brings four critical multidisciplinary resources into one place, creating the best destination for research, teaching and learning.…

Learn More

Search the Blog

Archive

Follow