It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The subject of the article is to compare and evaluate the stiffness of the proposed structures relative to the section of the individual rods. The study is applicable to the additive technology of metal production by the 316L (1.4404) by SLM method. In the SLM process the design supports serves as the transporter of the heat generated in the melting bath to the substrate, the secondary function of the structures is for support the powder layer. The article focuses on the supportive function and weight ratio. A total of 4 structures were designed in iteration with three different rod diameters. During construction, the suitability of structures for the SLM method was determined and then the samples were subjected to a mechanical tensile test and the mechanical properties evaluated. In conclusion the most appropriate structure for the supportive function was identified.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer