It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The recovery of large carnivores beyond protected areas presents significant conservation and management challenges as both wildlife and humans adapt to shared landscapes. This issue is particularly acute in working landscapes where carnivores, such as wolves, frequently prey on livestock, causing hardship for rural ranching communities and potentially hindering carnivore recovery efforts. Thus, research investigating the factors driving and mitigating carnivore depredation on livestock is needed to better inform conflict reduction management practices. This study takes place in a working lands frontier east of Yellowstone National Park in northwest Wyoming, near the towns of Cody and Meeteetse, where ranchers and wildlife managers have contended with wolf-livestock conflict for over two decades. Given that conflict dynamics are influenced by both wildlife behavior and management decisions, this research employs both quantitative and qualitative methods to investigate ecological and social dimensions of conflict. The first two chapters focus on predator-prey dynamics between wolves and migratory elk, as prey availability and distribution are believed to impact wolf-livestock conflict patterns. In Chapter 1, I use elk and wolf GPS collar data to investigate how wolves respond to seasonal elk migrations and describe conditions conducive to migratory coupling and decoupling. In Chapter 2, I collected wolf predation data from kill sites in winter and summer to characterize wolf seasonal predation patterns. In Chapter 3, I delve into the human dimensions of conflict mitigation using data from in-depth interviews with ranchers and wildlife managers, relationships developed during the course of the ecological research. I investigated the socioeconomic challenges of mitigating conflict by identifying factors that influence the adoption of conflict reduction practices and examining the roots of social conflict and intolerance towards wolves. Highlighting social constraints to conflict mitigation offers valuable lessons for communities facing similar challenges with recovering wolf populations. These findings can guide wildlife managers, wolf conservationists, and researchers in developing effective conflict mitigation strategies that balance the needs of both wolves and people, as wolves, already the most widespread large carnivore in the Northern Hemisphere, continue to expand their range.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer