It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
College is hard and proven harder for students who do not fit traditional-student norms. The new majority of college students are working part-time or more, over the age of 25, and/or supporting a family while balancing requirements to fulfill a degree. Students today who balance multiple roles face unique challenges that can either hinder or contribute to their academic functioning while putting them at risk for the harmful and deteriorating effects of burnout. Although little research exists at the moment, there is evidence that working while enrolled can have some benefits under certain conditions. Working around 15 hours per week or more has been reported as ideal for a thriving bi-directional relationship between work and school. However, working only 15 hours a week is not feasible for some of our new majority students. Other factors that may impact academic functioning are just starting to be explored through research. One of these factors is psychological flexibility, which involves engaging in effective, meaningful action, even when that action fosters contact with painful or unwanted thoughts and feelings. It is supported as a fundamental aspect of psychological health and an important predictor of academic functioning. The current study observes moderating effects of psychological flexibility and valued living in relation to burnout and academic performance. Results strongly suggested that valued living and psychological flexibility may be more important than workload in predicting academic functioning and burnout symptoms. Students in this study displayed better academic performance when they were experiencing meaning in either their school or work domain or reported engaging in general valued based living, even when working 16 hours a week or more. On the other hand, consistent with previous findings, students were found to be more at risk for burnout overall if a heavy workload was reported. Several implications for future directions of how best to assess the needs of our current working student population are discussed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





