It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the spinal cord is relevant for studying sensation, movement, and autonomic function. Preprocessing of spinal cord fMRI data involves segmentation of the spinal cord on gradient-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) images. Current automated segmentation methods do not work well on these data, due to the low spatial resolution, susceptibility artifacts causing distortions and signal drop-out, ghosting, and motion-related artifacts. Consequently, this segmentation task demands a considerable amount of manual effort which takes time and is prone to user bias. In this work, we (i) gathered a multi-center dataset of spinal cord gradient-echo EPI with ground-truth segmentations and shared it on OpenNeuro [https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005143/versions/1.3.0], and (ii) developed a deep learning-based model, EPISeg, for the automatic segmentation of the spinal cord on gradient-echo EPI data. We observe a significant improvement in terms of segmentation quality compared to other available spinal cord segmentation models. Our model is resilient to different acquisition protocols as well as commonly observed artifacts in fMRI data. The training code is available at [https://github.com/sct-pipeline/fmri-segmentation/], and the model has been integrated into the Spinal Cord Toolbox as a command-line tool.
Competing Interest Statement
Since January 2024, Dr. Barry has been employed by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering at the National Institutes of Health. This work was co-authored by Robert Barry in his personal capacity. The opinions expressed in this study are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government. The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Footnotes
* The authors list and affiliations are the only changes made in this updated version of the manuscript.
* https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005143/versions/1.3.0
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





