It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This dissertation presents exploratory research on computational thinking in elementary science classrooms. The research presented here attempts to bring knowledge and awareness of computational thinking in elementary science to elementary teachers, administrators, curriculum developers, researchers, and policy makers by learning about descriptions of CT and the different concepts and approaches involved with it. In addition, this research aims to gain a better understanding of the computational thinking concepts and approaches that are occurring in science classrooms across a northeast state and the different variables that predict integration within instruction. This information will be used to determine the areas of need for future implementation efforts.
Through a close examination of literature on computational thinking integrated in elementary science, survey data, and analysis of work performed by a Design-Based Implementation Research (DBIR) Team this dissertation adds to a growing body of literature regarding the integration of CT into elementary science. Chapter 1 is an introduction to the dissertation. Chapters 2, 3, and 4 are written in manuscript format, and are titled as follows: Chapter 2 is entitled “How is Computational Thinking Defined in Elementary Science?” Chapter 3 is entitled “Predicting Computational Thinking in Elementary Science using a Multilevel Model Approach.” Chapter 4 is entitled “Teacher Practices for CT Implementation in Elementary Science.” Chapter 5 is the conclusion of the major findings from this research, policy implications, limitations, and future recommendations.
Three of the chapters in this dissertation are meant to serve as stand-alone, publishable manuscripts. Each chapter uses a different methodology and analytical framework and offers its own distinct findings. At the same time, each individual manuscript is intended to build upon and is informed by findings from the other manuscripts. Policy implications across the three manuscripts and recommendations for future study are shared.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer