Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is challenging and relies on accurate cognitive testing. To improve the validity of cognitive test results, demographic normalisation is commonly used to adjust test scores for the effects of factors like age, sex and education. Many studies have developed normative tables/calculators based on these demographic factors for cognitive tests widely used to identify MCI ‐ the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). Although demographic normalisation aims to improve diagnostic accuracy, its effectiveness has been seldom studied. This is concerning because, while normalisation improves accuracy for variables unrelated to disease, the commonly adjusted demographic factors—age, sex, and education—are themselves risk factors for MCI and Alzheimer's disease.

Method

We hypothesized that demographic normalisation reduces diagnostic accuracy when the demographic variables used (age, sex, education) differ systematically between diagnostic groups due to their association with disease risk. We tested this hypothesis by assessing whether normalisation affects the ability of MoCA and MMSE to distinguish MCI and early dementia from cognitively normal (CN) individuals, using receiver operating characteristic analysis with paired bootstrapping across multiple normalisation methods (bin‐based, linear, quadratic and partial).

Result

Surprisingly, demographic normalisation worsened rather than improved diagnostic accuracy for detecting MCI with both MoCA and MMSE, reducing their effectiveness as diagnostic tools and confirming our hypothesis. Demographic normalisation significantly reduced diagnostic accuracy, with AUC decrements of 0.007–0.015 (2‐tailed p <0.001) in 7 of 8 CN vs MCI conditions, highlighting that disease‐related demographic shifts often negate normalisation benefits and lower the diagnostic performance of MoCA and MMSE. Normalisation failed to consistently improve accuracy for detecting early dementia, with significant decreases in 3 of 8 conditions and a mix of significant and non‐significant increases in the others, indicating inconsistent effects on test performance.

Conclusion

The current findings indicate that normalisation with the commonly used demographic variables (age, sex, and education) has little effect on the accuracy of MoCA & MMSE for identifying MCI and early dementia. Even this little effect often results in a significantly decreased test accuracy, suggesting that demographic normalisation does more harm than good.

Details

Title
Does Demographic Normalisation Improve the Accuracy of the MoCA and the MMSE for Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Dementia ?
Author
Venkatachalapathy, Kamlesh Perumal 1 ; Smith, Maurice 2 

 Harvard University, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India 
 Harvard University School of Enginering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA 
Section
PUBLIC HEALTH
Publication year
2025
Publication date
Dec 1, 2025
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ISSN
1552-5260
e-ISSN
1552-5279
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3285985364
Copyright
© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.