Content area

Abstract

The Mondo, as in "The World," has a 3.5-inch (diagonal) screen with 360x240 resolution to the Squeezebox's 2.4-inch screen. Album art is easier to see from a distance on the Mondo, but type looks sharper on the Squeezebox. The bigger screen, though, will be an obvious difference-maker for some buyers.

Mondo uses the latest wireless standard (801.11n) for maximum speed potential and best signal range. Squeezebox uses the older, slower 802.11g standard. In most households, this shouldn't make much difference. The Squeezebox has a second, and likely fastest, option: an Ethernet port.

Both transform into a portable player with an add-on lithium-ion battery. The Mondo's costs $40, the Squeezebox's $50. (Both have identically styled indented carrying handles on the back.) The Mondo includes a midsize remote that's useful for volume or song changes and Pandora voting but problematic for tasks that require a close, clear view of the screen. With the Squeezebox, the remote is an option that comes with the battery pack.

Details

Title
MONDO VS. SQUEEZEBOX
Publication title
Daily Press; Newport News, Va.
First page
C.4
Publication year
2012
Publication date
Apr 17, 2012
Section
Life
Publisher
Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
Place of publication
Newport News, Va.
Country of publication
United States
Source type
Newspaper
Language of publication
English
Document type
News
ProQuest document ID
1001541367
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/mondo-vs-squeezebox/docview/1001541367/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
(Copyright 2012 by The Daily Press)
Last updated
2017-11-19
Database
2 databases
  • ProQuest One Academic
  • ProQuest One Academic