It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The current study examined the effects of Rethink Autism's web-based video modeling program on the behavior of paraeducators as it relates to discrete trial teaching and on student performance of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in a special education school environment. In addition, a cost analysis was conducted to assess the cost of training paraeducators under the supervision of a special education teacher compared to training special education teachers under the same condition to fulfill similar teaching functions. For the main component of the study, a multiple baseline design across subjects was employed; there were 4 primary participants (paraeducators) who were each matched with a separate student with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (secondary subjects). Every paraeducator began the three-phase intervention with the viewing of their student's unique specific skill Rethink Autism lesson video. This was completed prior to implementing each teaching session. (Each phase of the study included four teaching sessions.) In response to the expectations of the special education setting where the study was being held, more intensive interventions were added in phases 2 and 3 dependent on the paraeducator's performance related to discrete trial teaching (DTT) accuracy (90% over two sessions). These "retraining" interventions included the addition of Rethink Autism's general DTT training video and corrective verbal feedback. Results indicated that the Rethink Autism intervention was effective in increasing the DTT skill level of paraeducators as well as in increasing student performance. Effect sizes were large for all primary participants (DTT skills) and percentage gain was notable for all students' performance. Participants' treatment acceptability ratings indicated that the Rethink Autism web-based intervention was acceptable. Also, results of the cost analysis showed benefits of training paraeducators over special education teachers. Implications for practice, study limitations, and possible directions for future research are discussed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer