It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences seems to have changed not only the manner in which people think about intelligence/intelligences, but also the way these are used in teaching. Student-centred school systems, such as Waldorf and Montessori have anticipated the multiple intelligences theory, developing all these different abilities in a child's learning. On the contrary, conventional schools seem to remain constrained into the old-fashioned and restrictive theories that focus mainly on logical-mathematical thinking and linguistic abilities. The aim of this study is to compare the views of teachers from Waldorf, Montessori, and regular schools concerning the topic of multiple intelligences, in relation to their way of teaching and learning. The findings of the research will tell us if, according to teachers' perception, Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences is applied in classroom teaching, if there are differences among these types of schools and whether the situation can be improved.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer