Abstract
Objective(s)
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria have an important role in nosocomial infections. Due to the limited availability of information about the molecular epidemiology of ESBL producing bacteria in Mashhad, we decided to investigate about TEM, CTX and SHV ESBLs among urinary Escherichia coli isolates in Mashhad, a city in northeast Iran.
Materials and Methods
One hundred and eleven clinical isolates of E. coli were diagnosed from hospitalized patients in 2009. After performing antibiogram and phenotypic confirmation test, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX primers and restriction digestion was carried out using PstI and TaqI (Fermentas-Lithuania) for confirmation.
Results
ESBL producers of E. coli isolates were 33.3%. Among 37 ESBL-producing isolates, 35 (94.6%), 21 (56.8%) and 5 (13.5%) were shown to have blaCTX, blaTEM and blaSHV, genes respectively. Co-resistance to non-beta lactam antibiotics was observed more with ESBL producers (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
The results showed that the studied ESBL genes are found with high prevalence and among them blaCTX is more widespread in urine E. coli isolates in Mashhad.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, Escherichia coli, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, Urinary tract infection
Introduction
Production of beta-lactamases is the most important mechanism of resistance to penicillin, cephalosporin, and monobactam (1). Typically, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are derived from genes originally encoded for TEM- 1, TEM-2, or SHV-1 by point mutations (2, 3) that alter the amino acid configuration around the active site of these beta-lactamases. This extends the spectrum of beta-lactam antibiotics susceptible to hydrolysis by these enzymes (2).
ESBLs are usually described as enzymes that are mediated by genes located on plasmids. Some ESBL-encoding genes are located within transposons or integrons, which facilitate transfer between bacteria. ESBL-producing microorganisms have an important role in nosocomial infections (3, 4). CTX-M betalactamases have higher levels of hydrolytic activity against cefotaxime compared to ceftazidime, but are inhibited by clavulanate and tazobactam (4).
TEM, SHV and CTX-M-type of ESBLs are most often found in a wide range of Enterobacteriaceac with increasing frequency (7-10). However, the majority of ESBLproducing strains are Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (11). E. coli is an inhabitant of the colon of humans and other warm-blooded animals. Some strains cause gastroenteritis or urinary tract infections (5). E. coli is the most common cause of urinary infection (6).
There is limited information about the molecular epidemiology of ESBL in Enterobacteriaceae in Mashhad. In the present study we investigated urinary E. coli strains isolated from hospitalized patients in two local hospitals. The objectives included the determination of the prevalence of ESBL producers in urinary isolates of E. coli, phenotypically and genotypically, and to compare ESBL producers and non-producers susceptibility to non-beta lactam antibiotics.
Materials and Methods
Ethical Approval
This research was conducted in accordance with Ethical Principles on Clinical Specimens and all patients filled out an informed consent.
Bacterial isolates
One hundred eleven non-duplicate clinical isolates of E. coli from urine samples of hospitalized patients were collected during the 8- month period from February to October of 2009 at the Hefdah- Shahrivar and Ghaem Hospitals in Mashhad.
At first, bacteria were identified using biochemical tests including oxidase, ONPG, indole, H2S, gas production from glucose, MRVP, citrate, urease, and malonate. Confirmatory identification was performed by microgen kit (Microgen Bioproducts ID-GNAUK) beside positive and negative reference strains.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and ESBL detection
The susceptibility testing of the E. coli isolates to antibiotics were examined by agar diffusion method using standard paper disks according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (12). Antibiotic susceptibility test was carried out on Mueller- Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) to the fallowing agents: nalidixic acid (NA: 30 µg), imipenem (I: 10 µg), trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (SXT: 25 µg), ciprofloxacin (Cip: 5 µg), gentamicin (G: 10 µg), amikacin (AK: 30 µg), polymyxin (Pb: 300 Iu), nitrofurantoin (F: 300 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 µg), cefotaxime (Ce: 30 µg) from Liofilichem, Italy and amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid (Augmentin: 10/20 µg) from MAST Diagnostics, UK.
The detection of ESBL-mediated resistance was performed by the double-disk approximation or double disk synergy (DDS) test (13).
ESBL production is inferred when the zone of inhibition around the ceftazidime disk is expanded towards the disk containing clavunate. Phenotypic confirmation of ESBL presence was performed using ceftazidime/clavunate combination disk with ceftazidime according to the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (14, 15). An increase of ≥ 5 mm in the zone of the disk containing clavunate compared with the zone diameter of ceftazidime alone indicates the presence of ESBL.
Plasmid extraction
To evaluate gene producing ESBL, species plasmid extraction was necessary. Pure colonies were cultured in fresh Lauria Bertani borth (Merck, Germany) containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. Tubes were incubated at 37° C shaking 185 rmp for 16 hr. Plasmids were extracted using Perfect Prep-Spin Mini Kit (5 Prime-USA) according to procedure guidelines.
To assess correct process of plasmid extraction, the extracted material was run on 2% gel agarose beside DNA size marker (Gene Ruler 100 bp DNA Ladder) and then the gel was stained with ethidium bromide.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification
Ten µl of plasmid extracts were used as template DNA. PCR was performed in a 30 µl mixture of 3 µl 10x buffer in a thermal cycler (Esco, Singapore). 1 µl of 10 mM, MgCl2, 0.25 µl of 5 u/µl Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas-Lithuania), 0.5 µl of 10 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and 1µl of 10 µM of each primer. The PCR mixture was subjected to a 5 min hot start at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles at 30 sec at 94 °C denaturation, 30 sec at 50 °C (52 °C blaTEM and 56 °C for blaSHV) for annealing, 30 sec (60 s for blaSHV) at 72 °C for extension, and a final elongation step of 5 min at 72 °C. The specific primer sets which were used for amplification are shown in Table 1. In this study, blaCTX, blaTEM and blaSHV producing E. coli strains were obtained from Pasteur Institute of Iran and used as positive controls in PCR assays.
PCR products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. A 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas, Lithuania) was used as molecular weight marker.
Confirmation of the amplified products
The restriction enzymes were selected using CLC Main workbench 5 software. PCR products were extracted with Agarose Gel Extract Mini Kit-50 Prep (5 Prime-USA) according to procedure guidelines. Following PCR, the blaSHV and blaTEM PCR products were digested with PstI (Fermentas-Lithuania) for 3 hr at 37 °C and blaCTX PCR products were digested with Taq1 (Fermentas- Lithuania) for 3 hr at 65 °C. For restriction enzyme digestion 6 µl of the each PCR products were mixed with 2.5 µl buffer, 14.5 µl distilled water and 2 µl Taq1 or PstI restriction enzymes.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica software. Chi-square test used for determination of significance of association. The P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
All of 111 E. coli isolates were sensitive to imipenem. Isolates exhibited the lowest sensitivity (41.4%) to co-trimoxazole. The antimicrobial susceptibility results of ESBL producers and non-producers are shown in Table 2. There was significant difference between ESBL producing and non-producing isolates for resistance to ceftazidim, cefotaxime, co-trimoxazole, nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin (P< 0.05). More isolates of ESBL producers were found to be resistant to these antibiotics. Nitrofuration resistance was the same between the two groups. More isolates of ESBL producers were resistant to polymyxin and amikacin, however, there was no significant association. Co-resistance to non-beta-lactam antibiotics was observed more (P< 0.05) with ESBL producers.
ESBL production was observed in 33.3% (37/111) of E. coli isolates by approximation and CLSI confirmatory tests. The blaCTX was the most frequent gene (35/37, 94.6%) found in ESBL phenotypic positive isolates using PCR method (Figure 1). Of the 37 ESBLproducing isolates, 21 (56.8%) and 5 (13.5%) were blaTEM and blaSHV, respectively. Twenty isolates of ESBL producers co-harbored two of three bla genes and two co-harbored all of three studied bla genes.
The restriction digestion analysis showed that all of the blaTEM amplified products had the same patterns (Figure 2). Therefore, ESBL producers detected by PCR method were confirmed for all isolates carrying blaTEM gene in this study. According to the sequence presented in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) website, after enzymatic digestion of blaTEM amplified products by PstI, two fragments of 92 and 330 bp sizes are produced. Also, after digestion of blaSHV amplified products by PstI, two fragments of 615 and 245 bp sizes are generated (Figure 3), while the length of fragments produced after TaqI digestion of blaCTX amplified products are 270 and 323 bp.
Restriction enzyme patterns of isolate No 38 for blaSHV and of isolate No 2 for blaCTX genes were different from the pattern of other isolates. This difference may be due to a mutation in excision site of these enzymes that need to be examined in more details.
Discussion
ESBL-producing organisms are now increasing among clinical isolates worldwide. Our finding showed that the prevalence of ESBL producing isolates of E. coli was 33.3% in studied patients in Mashhad. The prevalence was different between two hospitals (50% in Qhaem Hospital vs. 26.3% in Hefdah- Shahrivar Hospital). The prevalence of ESBL producers varies among clinical isolates from different geographic areas. The presence of ESBL was confirmed in 39% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in North and center of Portugal (18) over a 2 year period (2002-4) and 37 out of 133 E. coli isolates were ESBL producing. About 38-39% of E. coli isolates from Emirate (19) in 2005-6 were identified as having ESBL. Much higher prevalence of ESBL has been reported from Latin America: 30-60%, Turkey: 58%, and India: 56% (2, 20). However, low rates (5-8%) of ESBL-producing E. coli have been reported in Korea, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore (2, 21-23). Lower than 1% of E. coli isolates were reported to be ESBL positive in Netherlands (24).
According to a study in the United States of America, ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, were associated with resistance to cotrimoxazole, nalidixic acid, gentamicin and ciprofloxacine (25). Our study also showed that a higher percentage of ESBL positive isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacine, nalidixic acid and co-trimoxazole (43.2% versus 6.9%). Co-resistance to gentamicin and ciprofloxacin has been reported in Tanzania (26), to gentamicin, co-trimoxazole and quinolones in India (21, 27) and to quinolones and aminoglycosides in Portugal (28).
Isolation and detection of ESBL-producing strains are essential for the selection of most effective antibiotic for treatment. In this study, all of the ESBL producing isolates were identified as imipenem susceptible.
Our finding showed that CTX-M-type β-lactamases are widespread in Mashhad. The prevalence of CTX-M in France (29) and Portugal (28) were 68% (2007) and 66% (2007) respectively among ESBL positive of E. coli isolates. However, we found higher prevalence of CTX-M in Mashhad than these developed countries.
Among E. coli isolates in a Swedish Hospital, the frequency of CTX-type, TEMtype and SHV-type enzymes were 92%, 63% and 6%, respectively; a fact which is in accordance with the results of our survey: 94.6%, 56.8% and 13.5%, respectively (30).
Considering available research (3, 4), most of the ESBL production is carried via plasmids and these genes could easily transfer among hospitalized patients (4). This is a major factor for increasing spread of ESBL producers. Therefore, proper management for prescription of antibiotics and also identification of ESBLproducing bacteria in communities are important for prevention.
One isolate of each blaCTX and blaTEM genes did not have the same digestion pattern as others. Further investigation is required to identify the probable mutation in the area of enzyme excision site.
Conclusion
Our findings illustrated a higher prevalence of the ESBL carrying E. coli in our community, compared to the developed countries as well as the widespread presence the blaCTX in the uropathogenic E. coli isolates.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to appreciate the Research Deputy of Islamic Azad University- Mashhad Branch for the financial support of this research.
References
1. Sanders CC, Jr Sanders WE. Beta-lactamase in gram-negative bacteria: global trends and clinical impact. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 15:824-839.
2. Paterson DL, Bonoma RA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18:657-686.
3. Branger C, Zamfir O, Geoffroy S, Laurans G, Arlet G, Thien HV, et al. Genetic background of Escherichia coli and extended- spectrum β-lactamases type. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:54-61.
4. Bradford PA. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology and the detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14:933-951.
5. Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA. Microbiology. 5th ed. USA: Mc Graw Hill; 2002.
6. Peleg AY, Hooper DC. Hospital-acquired infections due to Gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1804-1813.
7. Livemore DM. Beta-lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8:557-584.
8. Prinarakis EE, Miriagou V, Tzelepi E, Gazouli M., Tzouvelekis LS. Emergence of an inhibitor-resistant betalactamases (SHV-10) derived from an SHV-5 variant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:838-840.
9. Tzouvelekis LS, Tzelepi E, Tassios PT, Legakis NJ. CTX-M-type beta-lactamases: an emerging group of extended spectrum enzymes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000; 14:137-142.
10. Bradford PA,Yang Y, Sahm D, Grope I, Gardovska D, Storch G. CTX-M-5, a novel cefotaxime-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase from an outbreak of S. typhimurium in Latvia. Antimicrob Agents Cehmother 1998; 42:1980- 1984.
11. Nathisuwan S, Burgess DS, Lewis JS. ESBLs: epidemiology, detection and treatment. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 21:920-928.
12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 12th informational supplement. M100-S12, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Wayne: PA. 2002.
13. Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis 1988; 10:867-878.
14. M'Zali FH, Chanawong A, Kerr G, Birkenhead D, Hawkey PM. Detection of extended- spectrum betalactamases in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of the MAST DD test, the double disk and the E test ESBL. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 45:881-885.
15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility test, 7th ed. Approved standards, NCCLS Doucument M2-A7, Vol; 20, no.1; Wayne, PA. 2000.
16. Sundsfjord A, Simonsen GS, Haldorsen BC, Haaheim H, Hjelmevoll SO, Littauer P, et al. Genetic methods for detection of antimicrobial resistance. APMIS 2004; 112:815-837.
17. Pagani L, Dell' Amico E, Migliavacca R, D'Andrea MM, Giacobone E, Amicosante G, et al. Multiple CTX-Mtype extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in nosocomial isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from a hospital in northern Italy. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:4264-4269.
18. Machado E, Coque TM, Canton R, Novais A, Sousa JC, Baquero F, et al. High diversity of extendedspectrum β-lactamases among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from Portugal. J Antimicrob Chemether 2007; 60:1370-1374.
19. Al-Zarouni M, Senok A, Rashid F, Al-Jesmi SM, Panigrahi D. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the United Arab Emirates. Med Princ Pract 2008; 17:32-36.
20. Malhotra VL, Khandpur N, Dass A, Mehta G. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases producing clinical isolates from patients of urinary tract infection in a tertiary care hospital in Dehli. J Commun Dis 2008; 40:269-272.
21. Babypadmini S, Appalaraju B. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae- Prevalence and susceptibility patients in a tertiary care Hospital. Ind J Med Microbiol 2004; 22:172-174.
22. Yagi T, Krukawa H, Shibata N, Shibayama K, Arkawa Y. A preliminary survey of extended spectrum β- lactamases in clinical isolated of K. pneumonia and E. coli in Japan. FEMS Microbiol 2000; 184:53-56.
23. Lewis MT, Yamaguchi K, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. In vitro evaluation of cefepime and other broad-spectrum beta-lactams in 22 medical centers in Japan: a phase II trial comparing two annual organism samples. The Japan Antimicrobial Resistance Study Group. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 35:307-315.
24. Stobberingh EE, Arends J, Hoggkamp-Korstanje JAA, Goessens WH, Visser MR, Buiting AG, et al. Occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Dutch hospitals. Infection 1999; 27:348-354.
25. Quinn JP, Bradford PA, Goering RV, Nathan C, Bush K, Weinstein RA. Multiple antibioticresistant Klebsiella and Escherichia coli in nursing homes. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281:517-523.
26. Ndugulile F, Jureen R, Harthuy S, Urassa W, Langeland N. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases among Gramnegative bacteria of nosocomial origin from an intensive care unit of a tertiary health facility in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 2005; 5:86.
27. Goyal A, Prasad KN, Prasad A, Gupta S, Ghoshal U, Ayyagari A. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae and associated risk factors. Indian J Med Res 2009; 129:695-700.
28. Mendonca N, Leitaco J, Manageiro V, Ferreira E, Canica M. Spread of ESBL CTX-M producing E. coli clinical isolates in community and nosocomial environments in Purtugal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:1946-1955.
29. Lavigne JP, Marchandin H, Delmas J, Moreau J, Bouziges N, Lecaillon E, et al. CTX-M beta-lactamasesproducing Escherichia coli in French Hospitals: prevalence molecular epidemiology and risk factors. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:620-626.
30. Fang H, Ataker F, Hedin G, Dornbusch K. Molecular epidemiology of ESBLs among Escherichia coli isolates collected in a Swedish Hospital and its associated health care facilities from 2001 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:707-712.
Mahboobeh Nakhaei Moghaddam*1, Mohammad Mahdi Forghanifard2, Sheila Moshrefi1
1Department of Biology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
*Corresponding author: Tel: +98-511-8435050; Fax: +98-511-8435050; email: [email protected]
2Department of Biology, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Mashhad University of Medical Sciences May/Jun 2012