It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Combined Aerobic exercise and Cognitive Training (ACT) may have synergistic effects on cognition, capitalizing on their different mechanisms of action. However, combined physical and cognitive activities showed mixed effects due to widely differing intervention components. To this end, the ACT Trial tested the efficacy of a 6‐month combined cycling and speed of processing (SOP) cognitive training on cognition in community‐dwelling older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
Methods
The ACT Trial used a 2x2 factorial design to randomize participants equally to four arms: control, cycling only, SOP only, and ACT (cycling+SOP). Executive function and episodic memory were measured with EXAMINER and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test‐Revised (BVMT‐R) at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months by trained data collectors blinded to group allocation. The mean of z‐transformed scores of EXAMINER and BVMT‐R was used to assess global cognition. Data were analyzed under intention‐to‐treat using linear mixed models with multiple imputed datasets in R.
Results
The sample (n = 146; 48% women; 91.8% White) was on average 73.72±5.73 years old, had 16.87±2.88 years of education, and scored 23.45±2.16 on Montreal Cognitive Assessment. All groups showed modest declines in outcomes from 3 months to 18 months (Cohen's ds=0.03–0.04 for executive function; ds=0.18–0.25 for delayed recall; ds=0.07–0.18 for global cognition). Baseline‐adjusted ACT group means on outcomes (0.18 for executive function, 41.7 for memory, and 0.00 for global cognition at 6 months; 0.02, 42.5, 0.20, respectively at 18 months) did not differ significantly from those for cycling only (ps = .19, .56, and .90, respectively at 6 months; ps = .66, .81, and .65, respectively at 18 months) or SOP only (ps=.59, .13, and .56, respectively at 6 months; ps = .72, .43, and .48, respectively at 18 months). There were 10 possibly study‐related, mild‐to‐moderate adverse events that did not differ between groups.
Conclusion
ACT did not show statistically significant superior effects on cognition relative to its components among older adults with aMCI, although observed values trended in the desired directions. The COVID‐19 pandemic contributed to higher attrition and lower dose delivery, especially in the ACT group, leading to smaller effect sizes than expected.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA,
2 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA,
3 University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA,
4 Arizona State University Clinical Research Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA,
5 University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA,
6 Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA,





