Content area
Abstract
Traumatic disruption of the pelvis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. ATLS^sup ^ guidance advocates temporary stabilisation or 'closure' of the disrupted pelvis with a compression device or sheet. We undertook a best evidence equipment review to assess the ease and efficacy of the application of two leading commercially available devices, the T-POD^sup ^ and the SAM Pelvic Sling(TM) II.
Fifty health care professionals and medical students participated in pelvic circumferential compression device (PCCD) education and assessment. Participants received a 10-min lecture on the epidemiology and aetiology of pelvic fractures and the principles of circumferential compression, followed by a practical demonstration. Three volunteers acted as trauma victims. Assessment included the time taken to secure the devices and whether this was achieved correctly. All participants completed a post-assessment survey.
Both devices were applied correctly 100% of the time. The average time taken to secure the SAM Pelvic Sling(TM) II was 18 s and for the T-POD^sup ^, it was 31 s (p ≤ 0.0001). Forty-four participants (88%) agreed or strongly agreed that the SAM Pelvic Sling(TM) II was easy to use compared to 84% (n = 42) for the T-POD^sup ^. Thirty-nine participants (78%) reported that they preferred and, given the choice in the future, would select the T-POD^sup ^ over the SAM Pelvic Sling(TM) II (n = 11, 22%).
The results of this study indicate that both PCCDs are easy and acceptable to use and, once learned, can be applied easily and rapidly. Participants applied both devices correctly 100% of the time, with successful application taking, on average, less than 60 s.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]