It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Literature on the subject of international comparisons of statistical agencies tends to emphasize their structural characteristics in terms of centralization and decentralization. This paper sets up a list of criteria and examines how the Canadian statistical system has performed using the criteria as standards. In particular it examines performance in terms of political interference with the system; the relationship between the Chief Statistician and the system's political masters; the agency's performance in terms of securing resources and specialized staff. The conclusions are that comparisons through performance criteria may be more fruitful than the traditional approach and that events in Eastern Europe and Europe 1992 may require a greater emphasis on comparative studies of statistical agencies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





