Reducing Occurrence and Severity of Pneumonia Due to Pandemic H1N1 2009 by Early Oseltamivir Administration: A Retrospective Study in Mexico

Abstract

Background

Anti-viral treatment has been used to treat severe or progressive illness due to pandemic H1N1 2009. A main cause of severe illness in pandemic H1N1 2009 is viral pneumonia; however, it is unclear how effective antiviral treatment is against pneumonia when administered >48 hours after symptom onset. Therefore, we aimed to determine how time from symptom onset to antiviral administration affected the effectiveness of antiviral treatment against pneumonia due to pandemic (H1N1) 2009.

Methods/Principal Findings

A retrospective medical chart review of 442 patients was conducted in a hospital in Mexico. Subjects had tested positive for pandemic H1N1 2009 virus by real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction and were administered oseltamivir. Median time from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration was 5.0 days (range, 0–43). 442 subjects, 71 (16.1%) had severe pneumonia which required mechanical ventilation, 191 (43.2%) had mild to moderate pneumonia, and 180 (40%) did not have pneumonia. Subjects were divided into four groups based on time to oseltamivir administration: ≤2, 3–7, 8–14, and >14 days. Severity of respiratory features was associated with time to treatment, and multivariate analysis indicated that time to oseltamivir administration was associated with severity of respiratory features. A proportional odds model indicated that 50% probability for occurrence of pneumonia of any severity and that of severe pneumonia in patients who would develop pneumonia reached at approximately 3.4 and 21 days, respectively, after symptom onset. Patients with a shorter time to oseltamivir administration were discharged earlier from the hospital.

Conclusions

Earlier initiation of oseltamivir administration after symptom onset significantly reduced occurrence and severity of pneumonia and shortened hospitalization due to pandemic H1N1 2009. Even when administered >48 hours after symptom onset, oseltamivir showed considerable potential for reducing pneumonia. Application of these results would benefit patients affected by future influenza pandemics.

About the Authors:

Anjarath Lorena Higuera Iglesias

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

Koichiro Kudo

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Toshie Manabe

Affiliation: National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Alexander Enrique Corcho Berdugo

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

Ariel Corrales Baeza

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

Leticia Alfaro Ramos

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

René Guevara Gutiérrez

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

María Eugenia Manjarrez Zavala

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

Jin Takasaki

Affiliation: National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Shinyu Izumi

Affiliation: National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Edgar Bautista

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

José Rogelio Perez Padilla

Affiliation: National Institute for Respiratory Disease, Mexico City, Mexico

Introduction

Pandemic H1N1 2009 emerged in Mexico in March 2009 [1] and rapidly spread throughout the world. The fatality rate and the frequency of severe cases varied among countries and regions even among different regions within the same country [2], [3]. Mexico reported a number of cases with severe clinical presentations and deaths, especially in the early period of the outbreak. This occurred at least in part because the novelty of the influenza strain was not recognized until April 23, 2009 [1], [4]. The World Health Organization [5] and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention [6] recommended early initiation of treatment with antiviral drugs in patients with pandemic H1N1 2009 virus infection with severe or progressive illness as well as in high-risk populations. The main cause of severe illness in pandemic H1N1 2009 was viral pneumonia [1], [3], [7], [8], [9] which is relatively rare in seasonal influenza. Oseltamivir has been used to treat influenza virus infection. The efficacy of oseltamivir treatment commencing >48 h after symptom onset in seasonal influenza has not been established [10]. There has been concern whether the time-interval from symptom onset to administration of oseltamivir affects clinical features on patients with pandemic H1N1 2009 virus infection. This study investigated how the post-onset window to oseltamivir administration affected the occurrence and severity of pneumonia and the duration of hospitalization in patients treated at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (INER) in Mexico City, Mexico during the pandemic period.

Materials and Methods

Study design

INER is a national tertiary care organization that includes a research center devoted to respiratory diseases. INER provides medical services primarily for economically deprived and uninsured populations, many of whom are from the Mexico City Metropolitan area. Medical records of patients with RT-PCR confirmed pandemic H1N1 2009 infections who were treated at the INER between April 1, 2009 and January 31, 2010 and were administered oseltamivir, the only available antiviral drug in the INER during the pandemic period, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients who were administered oseltamivir during the study period were included in this study. The regular dosage and duration of oseltamivir treatment was 150 mg/day for 5 days. However, the duration was extended when deemed necessary because of the patient's clinical conditions.

Clinical data, chest radiologic findings and laboratory findings were reviewed in terms of time from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration. Socioeconomic background of patients was classified into 6 levels based on their daily income. The study patients were divided into the following 4 groups based on the number of days from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration: Group 1 (≤2 days), Group 2 (3–7 days), Group 3 (8–14 days), and Group 4 (>14 days). The groups were compared in terms of clinical symptoms and findings, severity of the respiratory features and the duration of hospitalization. Severity of respiratory features was classified into three categories: severe pneumonia, mild to moderate pneumonia, or upper respiratory tract involvement without pneumonia. Pneumonia was confirmed on the basis of abnormal shadows on chest radiographs and was considered severe if it required mechanical ventilation, and mild to moderate if it did not. The third category consisted of upper respiratory tract involvement without pneumonia. How these aspects were influenced by the time to oseltamivir administration from symptom onset was subsequently examined.

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the INER, Mexico and National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Japan. Written informed consent was obtained from all hospitalized study patients or their relatives and verbal consent from all study outpatients was obtained in accordance with the Review Boards in the INER. Investigators kept the datasets in password-protected systems and presented data with the anonymity of study patients.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by comparing Groups 1 through 4, and testing the linearity of incidence. Patient background data (qualitative and quantitative values) and clinical laboratory values were summarized, and the linearity of incidence of each symptom according to the number of days to oseltamivir administration was analyzed using Cochran-Armitage test. The severity of the respiratory features was analyzed using Jonckheere's test. Severe pneumonia, mild to moderate pneumonia, and upper respiratory tract involvement without pneumonia were handled as ordinal variables and were analyzed using proportional odds models with the time-interval from the symptom onset to the oseltamivir administration as the explanatory and continuous variable [11]. A graph of the probability of severe pneumonia and the probability of mild to severe (any severity) pneumonia, which were estimated by varying the number of days from the symptom onset from 0 to 50 days with the estimated regression coefficient, was depicted. The calculation formula was provided in the figure legend. The multivariate analysis using a proportional odds model was performed to identify profound factors that affected the severity of respiratory features. The explanatory variables were Groups 1 through 4, the socioeconomic background, gender, age and comorbidities.

The cumulative rate of hospital discharge for Groups 1 through 4 was calculated by Kaplan-Meier's method using mortality data as censored data and then comparatively analyzed using Tarone's test.

Data analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). For all analyses, significance levels were two tailed, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study patients

Among patients suspected of having pandemic H1N1 2009 virus infection and admitted to the INER during the study period, 528 were confirmed to have pandemic H1N1 2009 virus infection by RT-PCR. There were no resistant viral strains involved in this study. Of these 528 patients, 442 received oseltamivir treatment during either ambulatory care (45.5%) or hospitalization (54.5%), these included 24 individuals who died. The 442 patients comprised the study subjects from whom clinical data were collected. Their characteristics are shown in Table 1. Data were obtained at the time of patients' presentation to the INER before oseltamivir administration. Median days from symptoms onset to oseltamivir administration was 5.0 (range, 0–43). Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised 92 (20.8%), 213 (48.2%), 101 (22.9%), and 36 (8.1%) patients, respectively.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Characteristics of study patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.t001

Median age of study patients (193 females and 249 males) was 36 years with a range of 4 months to 85 years. Of the 442 study patients, 75 (17%) were aged <18 years, and 292 (66.1%) were aged 18 to 50 years. A total of 399 (90.3%) earned less than $15 US per day (<level 2). Only 11 (2.5%) had a history of vaccination for seasonal influenza in 2008 and/or 2009. The number of hospitalized patients (P<0.001), mortality (P = 0.004), older age (P = 0.01), and lower socioeconomic level (P = 0.001) were associated with the Groups. The presence of comorbidities was not associated with the Groups; however, smoking (P<0.05), drug dependency (P = 0.002), and alcohol dependency (P<0.04) were associated.

Symptoms of the study patients were shown in Table 2. The main symptoms were cough (76.9%), arthralgia (52.0%), dyspnea (50.7%), myalgia (50.0%), purulent sputum (19.0%), cyanosis (17.0%), and sore throat(15.4%). A total of 59% of study patients had pneumonia with abnormal shadows on chest radiographs, and 16% required mechanical ventilation.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Clinical features of the study patients on admission.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.t002

Clinical symptoms and findings that increased significantly with time to oseltamivir administration (P<0.05) were included abnormal respiratory sounds; hemoptysis; abnormal pulmonary shadows, pneumothorax and pleurisy on chest radiographs; dyspnea; cyanosis; and need for intubation. On the other hand, incidence of nasal obstruction, sore throat, and conjunctivitis decreased as the time to oseltamivir administration increased.

Among the laboratory findings (Table 3), oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry decreased significantly as the time to oseltamivir administration increased. Although within the normal range, serum albumin decreased significantly, and serum sodium, platelets, and body temperature differed significantly among the Groups.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Laboratory data and physical findings for study patients at presentation*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.t003

Severity of respiratory features

Severe pneumonia was present in 71 (16.1%) patients. Mild to moderate pneumonia was present in 191 (43.2%), and upper respiratory tract involvement without pneumonia was present in 180 (40.7%) (Table 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Severity of respiratory features in each group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.t004

The proportions of patients with severe pneumonia or mild to moderate pneumonia increased from Groups 1 to 4 (Table 4). By the contrast, the proportions of patients with upper respiratory tract infection without pneumonia decreased from Groups 1 to 4. These results indicated that the severity of respiratory features reflected the time to oseltamivir administration (P<0.001, Jonckheere's test).

The results obtained by the multivariate analysis using a proportional odds model indicated that severity of respiratory features was also affected by socioeconomic level, gender, hypertension, obesity, asthma and smoking (Table 5). The proportional odds ratios for severities of respiratory features for Groups 2–4 were 5.17, 15.02, and 20.40 times higher, respectively, than that for Group 1. The grouping, which indicated days to oseltamivir administration, showed a high level of significance in terms of the severity of respiratory features.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 5. Multivariate analysis of the severity of respiratory features using a proportional odds model.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.t005

Occurrence of pneumonia

The number of patients who developed radiographic pneumonia was 262 (59.3%). The probability of pneumonia occurrence was estimated in relation to time from symptom onset using a proportional odds model (Figure 1). Figure 1 shows the time to occurrence of pneumonia. Both the probability of any severity of pneumonia and the probability of severe pneumonia increased gradually with the time from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration. The 50% probability for occurrence of any severity of pneumonia and that of severe pneumonia in patients who would develop pneumonia reached at approximately 3.4 and 21 days, respectively, after symptom onset.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Model of the probability of occurrence of pneumonia.

The probability of developing pneumonia is depicted using a proportional odds model. p1, the probability of severe pneumonia; p2, the probability of mild/moderate pneumonia; x, time until oseltamivir administration from symptom onset.The solid line indicates the probability of occurrence of severe pneumonia (p1). The dotted line indicates the probability of occurrence of any severity of pneumonia (mild to severe pneumonia, p1+p2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.g001

Duration of hospitalization

Of the 442 patients evaluated, 241 (54.5%) were hospitalized. The numbers of hospitalized patients in each group are shown in Table 1. The cumulative discharge rate in each group on a Kaplan-Meier's curve using death data as censored data is shown in Figure 2. Patients with a shorter time to oseltamivir administration were discharged earlier from the hospital (p<0.001, Tarone's test).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Cumulative rate of hospital discharge as a function of the time of oseltamivir administration.

The cumulative rate of hospital discharge in each group using Kaplan-Meier's method was calculated using data on death as censored data. The groups of patients with earlier oseltamivir administration were discharged from the hospital significantly earlier (p<0.001, Tarone's test). Grouping of patients was based on days from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration: Group 1, ≤2 ; Group 2, 3–7; Group 3, 8–14; Group 4, >14days.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838.g002

Discussion

Severe pneumonia caused by pandemic H1N1 2009 has been frequently found [1], [3], [7], [8], [9], . Severity of pneumonia can be assumed to be a main indicator of overall disease severity. We hypothesized that the number of days to oseltamivir administration from symptom onset was one of the primary factors affecting the severity of pneumonia due to pandemic H1N1 2009.

Patients with pandemic H1N1 2009 infection in the INER had various time-intervals between the symptom onset and oseltamivir administration. Median days from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration was 5.0 (range 0–43) (Table 1), even though 92.5% of study patients was administered oseltamivir within one day after admission (median 0, range 0–12).

The study findings indicated that the following symptoms and clinical findings, associated with the severity of illness, increased significantly with the number of days to oseltamivir administration: abnormal respiratory sounds; hemoptysis; pulmonary infiltrative shadows, pneumothorax and pleurisy on chest radiographs; dyspnea; cyanosis; and need for intubation (Table 2). Conversely, SpO2 decreased with time to oseltamivir administration, as did the incidence of upper respiratory tract symptoms, including nasal obstruction, sore throat and conjunctivitis (Table 3). These findings suggest that the viral infection began in the upper respiratory tract and descended to the lower respiratory tract, and then the virus proliferated in the alveolar lung tissues in most pneumonia.

In this study, severity of respiratory features ranged from upper respiratory tract involvement without pneumonia to severe pneumonia. The proportions of patients with severe pneumonia and mild to moderate pneumonia increased from Groups 1 to 4. (Table 4). By contrast, the proportions of patients with upper respiratory tract involvement without pneumonia decreased from Groups 1 to 4. The association between severity of respiratory features and time to oseltamivir administration was found to be highly significant even after adjusting for socioeconomic levels, gender, hypertension, obesity, asthma and smoking (Table 5). Analysis of the probabilities of developing pneumonia indicated that the occurrence of any severity of pneumonia as well as that of severe pneumonia was associated with a longer interval from symptom onset to oseltamivir administration (Figure 1). The probability of occurrence of any severity of pneumonia was 50% at 3.4 days. The probability of severe pneumonia increased gradually and was approximately 10% at 3 days after symptom onset. These results indicate that early initiation of oseltamivir administration after the symptom onset is the significant factor for the reduction of severity of pneumonia. The probability of occurrence of severe pneumonia and any severity of pneumonia at 48 hours were <10% and <50%, respectively, and increased gradually in this study. The estimations suggest that oseltamivir administration, even >2 days following symptom onset, still had considerable potential for reducing the occurrence of pneumonia of any severity. This study also found that the shorter the delay in starting oseltamivir, the shorter the length of hospitalization (Figure 2). This finding is compatible with previous studies [14], [15].

Oseltamivir is a neuraminidase inhibitor that prevents cleavage of sialic acid on the surfaces of host cells, thus preventing new viral particles from being released by infected cells [10]. Viral neuraminidase is also known to play a role in the initial stages of airway epithelial cell infection [16] and to assist in hemagglutinin fusion [17]. Therefore, oseltamivir reduces viral cell entry as well as release. Seasonal influenza has been shown to replicate in humans for approximately 7 days post infection [18]. In pandemic H1N1 2009, it is likely that either the virus had an evasive phenotype [19] or the patient was predisposed to severe disease. This may lead to the assumption that patients who respond to oseltamivir at a later time after symptom onset still harbor actively replicating influenza virus [20]. This study might include patients who had difficulty in controlling influenza virus replication once it had taken hold within patients' bodies. The study also might constitute the population who has various host responses to the novel H1N1 influenza virus.

An important issue revealed in this study is the late access to medical care in Mexico. One of the main reasons for this may have been the cost consciousness of the patients; another may have been a lack of education. Such issues may have strongly influenced the severity of illness and need to be further investigated.

The present study has several limitations. First, the study was retrospective and there were no clear criteria for oseltamivir administration when patients presented. Second, there were also patients who were not administered oseltamivir and were excluded from this study. Since we only included patients administered oseltamivir, there is a potential bias. Most patients with influenza recovered without antiviral treatment. The study patients, who visited the INER, were likely to be representative of those patients with more severe disease. Third, some patients may have had secondary bacterial infection in addition to primary viral infection [3]. This study was also unable to evaluate bacterial infection or antibiotic treatments because of insufficient data.

Regardless, the findings of this study will be valuable across many fields of medicine, science, and public health. Clinically, the present results support the initiation of treatment as soon as a patient presents, regardless of whether 48 hours have passed since disease onset. In addition, the effect of oseltamivir on the occurrence and severity of pneumonia shows that inhibition of infection of new cells is linked to better clinical outcomes. Moreover, these findings will help planning for future pandemics and may result in an increase in the availability of oseltamivir treatment to individuals in the community who have not recovered significantly after 2 days when afflicted with influenza-like illness.

In conclusion, the present findings indicate that earlier initiation of oseltamivir administration after symptom onset significantly reduced the occurrence and severity of pneumonia and shortened the length of hospitalization in patients with pandemic H1N1 2009. In addition, even when administered >48 hours after symptom onset, oseltamivir showed considerable potential to reduce the occurrence and severity of pneumonia. The results from this retrospective study which indicated the effectiveness of earlier administration of antiviral agents at any time after symptom onset for reducing the occurrence of pneumonia should benefit patients affected by the next influenza pandemic. However, continued investigation and further prospective studies to more fully define the effectiveness of early antiviral treatment are required.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kimio Abe for supporting the statistical analysis and Takuro Shimbo, Kenji Yamamoto, Fumihide Kanaya and Matias Vera for cooperating with this work. The authors also thank Angela Morben for editorial assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ALHI KK. Performed the experiments: ALHI KK TM AECB ACB LAR RGG MEMZ JT SI EB JRPP. Analyzed the data: ALHI KK TM. Wrote the paper: KK TM.

Citation: Higuera Iglesias AL, Kudo K, Manabe T, Corcho Berdugo AE, Baeza AC, Ramos LA, et al. (2011) Reducing Occurrence and Severity of Pneumonia Due to Pandemic H1N1 2009 by Early Oseltamivir Administration: A Retrospective Study in Mexico. PLoS ONE6(7): e21838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021838

References

1. Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, Hernandez M, Quiñones-Falconi F, et al. (2009) Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med 361: 680–689.R. Perez-PadillaD. de la Rosa-ZamboniS. Ponce de LeonM. HernandezF. Quiñones-Falconi2009Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico.N Engl J Med361680689

2. World Health Organization (2010) Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 – update 94. World Health Organization2010Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 – update 94.Available: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2010_4_23a/en/index.html. Accessed 2010 April 24. Available: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2010_4_23a/en/index.html. Accessed 2010 April 24.

3. Bautista E, Chotpitayasunondh T, Gao Z, Harper SA, Shaw M, et al. Writing Committee of the WHO Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza (2010) Clinical aspects of Pandemic 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. N Engl J Med 362: 1708–1719.E. BautistaT. ChotpitayasunondhZ. GaoSA HarperM. ShawWriting Committee of the WHO Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza2010Clinical aspects of Pandemic 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection.N Engl J Med36217081719

4. SALUDE (2010) Situación actual de la epidemia. SALUDE2010Situación actual de la epidemia.Available: http://portal.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/noticias/influenza/estadisticas.html. Accessed 2010 September 1. (In Spanish.). Available: http://portal.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/noticias/influenza/estadisticas.html. Accessed 2010 September 1. (In Spanish.).

5. World Health Organization (2010) WHO guidelines for pharmacological management of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza and other influenza viruses. World Health Organization2010WHO guidelines for pharmacological management of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza and other influenza viruses.Available: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/h1n1_guidelines_pharmaceutical_mngt.pdf. Accessed 2010 September 1. Available: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/h1n1_guidelines_pharmaceutical_mngt.pdf. Accessed 2010 September 1.

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Updated interim recommendations for the use of antiviral medications in the treatment and prevention of influenza for the 2009–2010 season. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention2010Updated interim recommendations for the use of antiviral medications in the treatment and prevention of influenza for the 2009–2010 season.Available: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm. Accessed 2010 July 29. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm. Accessed 2010 July 29.

7. Webb SA, Pettilä V, Seppelt I, Bellomo R, Bailey M, et al. The ANZIC Influenza Investigators (2009) Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med 361: 1925–1934.SA WebbV. PettiläI. SeppeltR. BellomoM. BaileyThe ANZIC Influenza Investigators2009Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand.N Engl J Med36119251934

8. Louie JK, Acosta M, Winter K, Jean C, Gavali S, et al. (2009) Factors associated with death or hospitalization due to pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in California. JAMA 302: 1896–1902.JK LouieM. AcostaK. WinterC. JeanS. Gavali2009Factors associated with death or hospitalization due to pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in California.JAMA30218961902

9. Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R, Cook DJ, Marshall J, et al. (2009) Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA 302: 1872–1879.A. KumarR. ZarychanskiR. PintoDJ CookJ. Marshall2009Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) infection in Canada.JAMA30218721879

10. Roche Laboratories, Inc. (2010) Tamiflu product information. Prescribing information document from Roche. Last updated September 2010. Roche Laboratories, Inc.2010Tamiflu product information. Prescribing information document from Roche. Last updated September 2010.Available: http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/tamiflu/pdf/pi.pdf) Accessed 2010 December 3. Available: http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/tamiflu/pdf/pi.pdf) Accessed 2010 December 3.

11. Agresti Alan (2010) Alan Agresti2010Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, 2nd Edition. April 2010, Wiley. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, 2nd Edition. April 2010, Wiley.

12. Domínguez-Cherit G, Lapinsky SE, Macias AE, Pinto R, Espinosa-Perez L, et al. (2009) Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA 302: 1880–1887.G. Domínguez-CheritSE LapinskyAE MaciasR. PintoL. Espinosa-Perez2009Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico.JAMA30218801887

13. Shieh WJ, Blau DM, Denison AM, Deleon-Carnes M, Adem P, et al. (2010) 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): pathology and pathogenesis of 100 fatal cases in the United States. Am J Pathol 177: 166–175.WJ ShiehDM BlauAM DenisonM. Deleon-CarnesP. Adem20102009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): pathology and pathogenesis of 100 fatal cases in the United States.Am J Pathol177166175

14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Patients hospitalized with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) – New York City, May 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58: 1436–1440.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention2010Patients hospitalized with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) – New York City, May 2009.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep5814361440

15. Lee N, Choi KW, Chan PK, Hui DS, Lui GC, et al. (2010) Outcomes of adults hospitalised with severe influenza. Thorax 65: 510–515.N. LeeKW ChoiPK ChanDS HuiGC Lui2010Outcomes of adults hospitalised with severe influenza.Thorax65510515

16. Matrosovich MN, Matrosovich TY, Gray T, Roberts NA, Klenk HD (2004) Neuraminidase is important for the initiation of influenza virus infection of human airway epithelium. J Virol 78: 12665–12667.MN MatrosovichTY MatrosovichT. GrayNA RobertsHD Klenk2004Neuraminidase is important for the initiation of influenza virus infection of human airway epithelium.J Virol781266512667

17. Su B, Wurtzer S, Rameix-Welti MA, Dwyer D, van der Werf S, et al. (2009) Enhancement of the influenza A hemagglutinin (HA)-mediated cell-cell fusion and virus entry by the viral neuraminidase. PLoS One 4: e8495.B. SuS. WurtzerMA Rameix-WeltiD. DwyerS. van der Werf2009Enhancement of the influenza A hemagglutinin (HA)-mediated cell-cell fusion and virus entry by the viral neuraminidase.PLoS One4e8495

18. Hayden FG, Fritz R, Lobo MC, Alvord W, Strober W, et al. (1998) Local and systemic cytokine responses during experimental human influenza A virus infection. Relation to symptom formation and host defense. J Clin Invest 101: 643–649.FG HaydenR. FritzMC LoboW. AlvordW. Strober1998Local and systemic cytokine responses during experimental human influenza A virus infection. Relation to symptom formation and host defense.J Clin Invest101643649

19. Safronetz D, Rockx B, Feldmann F, Belisle SE, Palermo RE, et al. (2010) Pandemic swine-origin H1N1 influenza A virus isolates show heterogeneous virulence in macaques. J Virol. D. SafronetzB. RockxF. FeldmannSE BelisleRE Palermo2010Pandemic swine-origin H1N1 influenza A virus isolates show heterogeneous virulence in macaques.J Virol

20. To KK, Hunh IF, Li IW, Lee K-L, Koo C-K, et al. (2010) Delayed clearance of viral load and marked cytokine action in severe cases of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 50: 850–9.KK ToIF HunhIW LiK-L LeeC-K Koo2010Delayed clearance of viral load and marked cytokine action in severe cases of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection.Clin Infect Dis508509