It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This mixed methods study investigated the teachers' concerns of the sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP) model (Echevarria, Short and Vogt, 2008) as a means to differentiate instruction for LEP students in public school classrooms. This study took place in one central Georgia school district with a sample of 16 teachers who volunteered to participate in this study and completed surveys concerning the implementation and perceptions of the SIOP model. The sample of elementary teachers who participate had varied ranges of experiences and backgrounds which included bachelor's, master's and specialist degrees as well as varied types of certifications such as ESOL, special education, ESOL, reading, science and others. The concerns-based adoption model (CBAM) was utilized, which includes the levels of use survey (LoU), (Dirksen, George and Hall, 2008) and the stages of concern questionnaire (SoCQ), (George, Hall and Steigelbauer, 2008). The LoU and SoCQ were used to collect qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously. The sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP) checklist was utilized as a second instrument for quantitative data collection. The theoretical context related to research that focused on positive teacher concerns that facilitated positive delivery of differentiated instruction in the classroom setting for English language learners (ELLs). Based on the data collected using the LoU, the findings and conclusions are that not all teachers use the SIOP model as a means to differentiate instruction. The findings of the data collected from the SoCQ indicated that the sample of teachers in this study had high concerns relating to Stages 0-3 and low concerns relating to Stages 4-6. The SIOP observation tool findings indicated that not all teachers did use the SIOP model as differentiate instruction; however, the teachers did differentiate instruction by methods and strategies that were aligned to the SIOP model.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





