Content area
Abstract
Repatriation of human remains to indigenous peoples has been a controversial issue worldwide, but how repatriation plays out in practice has not been as well documented. The process of repatriation of human remains to Native Americans in the United States is compared to how Sámi human remains are returned in Norway, and how Māori human remains are returned in New Zealand. Associated legislation in each country was reviewed. Interviews with eight individuals involved with repatriation were conducted. Qualitative data analysis methods were used to examine responses. The processes developed in each country reflect their legal, social, and cultural histories; that of the United States is the most prescribed and complex. Repatriation efforts have generally been met with support and agreement on the part of the communities involved, but resistance remains in some quarters. The most significant barrier to repatriation was resource availability. Outcomes include increased collaboration between all parties involved.
