Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Method
- Participants
- Interviews and Procedures
- Analysis
- Theme 1: Stereotype awareness
- Theme 2: Reactions to stigmatizing stereotypes
- A. Degree of stereotype agreement
- B. Degree of disagreement/resistance with stereotypes
- Theme 3: Support from peers
- Theme 4: Treatment avoidance
- Theme 5: Differences with other mental disorders
- Discussion
- Limitations
- Conclusions and Implications for Practice
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Objective: Although stigma associated with serious mental illness, substance abuse disorders, and depression has been studied very little is known about stigma associated with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This study explored stigma related to PTSD among treatment-seeking Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) combat veterans. Method: Sixteen treatment-seeking OEF/OIF veterans with combat-related PTSD participated in focus groups. We used qualitative methods to explore PTSD-related stigma. Results: Common perceived stereotypes of treatment-seeking veterans with PTSD included labels such as “dangerous/violent,” or “crazy,” and a belief that combat veterans are responsible for having PTSD. Most participants reported avoiding treatment early on to circumvent a label of mental illness. Participants initially reported experiencing some degree of self-stigma; however, following engagement in treatment they predominantly resisted these stereotypes. Although most participants considered combat-related PTSD as less stigmatizing than other mental illnesses, they reported difficulties with reintegration. Such challenges likely stem from both PTSD symptoms and veterans’ perceptions of how the public views them. Most reported that fellow combat veterans best understood them. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Awareness of public stereotypes impacts help seeking at least early in the course of illness. Peer-based outreach and therapy groups may help veterans engage in treatment early and resist stigma.
Stigmatizing views of mental illness (VA-NIMH-DoD Working Group to Inform Research on Deployment Related Adjustment & Mental Disorders, 2006) can result in discriminatory actions by those in powerful positions, such as employers and landlords. Research shows that people labeled with mental illness lose opportunities for housing (Wahl, 1999) and work (Cechnicki, Angermeyer, & Bielanska, 2011), receive poorer quality primary health care (Druss & Rosenheck, 1998), and are less likely to receive fair treatment in the criminal justice system (Watson, Corrigan, & Ottati, 2004). Despite strong national advocacy campaigns over the last two decades (Pescosolido et al., 2010