It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The debate on "multiple modernities" has focussed till so far either on finding plausible contrasts between different paths into modernity or on theorizing concepts like civilization, region etc. What is missing, however, is a systematic methodological discussion of how to compare different civilizations in the face of the so-called Small N-problem. This problem is the more pressing the better historical-sociological research on Asia and Europe shows how contingent the so-called Rise of the West actually was. The paper ends with some suggestions about the way how civilizational analysis could deal with these methodological problems and what sociological classics like Max Weber can teach us in this respect.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





