Content area
Full Text
ABSTRACT
Until recently surface humidity was predominantly measured using psychrometers (wet- and dry-bulb thermometers). In some countries, often in conjunction with increased automation, the measurement technique has changed-usually to capacitive sensors. The scale of the change in instrumentation and the error characteristics of the operational instruments have not been well documented. This paper provides an overview of these operational instruments and their error characteristics, intended to be useful for climate and forecast users of the data. It also includes detailed results from comparisons of psychrometers and capacitive sensors with a chilled mirror reference instrument at a site in the United Kingdom under (near) operational conditions. The psychrometers performed well near saturation but underread at lower humidities; any large errors tended to be positive because of insufficient water supply to the wet bulb. New capacitive sensors perform well but they usually driftto higher values during deployment (except in arid climates); they perform best at lower humidities and need regular adjustment and recalibration. The natural variation of relative humidity and the differences between instruments are larger in daytime than at night. Changes in the U.K. synoptic network are described in order to put the intercomparisons into context. The instruments used in selected other countries are surveyed. There is a need for better documentation and real-time exchange of metadata on the instruments used and any changes. Capacitive sensors are also used on some radiosondes and aircraft; relevant studies are briefly reviewed and some parallels with surface usage are drawn.
1. Introduction
Surface humidity reports are used increasingly in climate studies, numerical weather prediction (NWP), and other applications. Especially for climate studies, systematic errors (biases) in humidity are important and should be minimized or at least documented. The Met Office has changed from using psychrometers to capacitive sensors at most of its stations, as they have become completely automated (see section 3). We encourage other countries to document details of their humidity instruments, observing practices, and error characteristics and any changes to them, as we found very little such documentation.
Surface humidity has been examined by Dai (2006), Willett et al. (2007, 2013), and Simmons et al. (2010) in the context of climate change. Dai (2006) noted particular problems in very cold conditions (see also Lin and Hubbard...