Abstract

Doc number: 149

Abstract

Background: Lateral dislocation of the patella (LPD) leads to cartilaginous injuries, which have been reported to be associated with retropatellar complaints and the development of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of MRI for cartilage diagnostics after a first and recurrent LPD.

Methods: After an average of 4.7 days following an acute LPD, 40 patients (21 with first LPDs and 19 with recurrent LPDs) underwent standardized 1.5 Tesla MRI (sagittal T1-TSE, coronal STIR-TSE, transversal fat-suppressed PD-TSE, sagittal fat-suppressed PD-TSE). MRI grading was compared to arthroscopic assessment of the cartilage.

Results: Sensitivities and positive predictive values for grade 3 and 4 lesions were markedly higher in the patient group with first LPDs compared to the group with recurrent LPDs. Similarly, intra- and inter-observer agreement yielded higher kappa values in patients with first LPDs compared to those with recurrent LPDs. All grade 4 lesions affecting the subchondral bone (osteochondral defects), such as a fissuring or erosion, were correctly assessed on MRI.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated a comparatively good diagnostic performance for MRI in the evaluation of first and recurrent LPDs, and we therefore recommend MRI for the cartilage assessment after a LPD.

Details

Title
How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations?
Author
von Engelhardt, Lars V; Raddatz, Marthina; Bouillon, Bertil; Spahn, Gunter; Dàvid, Andreas; Haage, Patrick; Lichtinger, Thomas K
Pages
149
Publication year
2010
Publication date
2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
e-ISSN
14712474
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1460334120
Copyright
© 2010 von Engelhardt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.