Content area

Abstract

Logistics: for the shoot, the photographer's studio con- tacted jewelers like chanel, van cleef & Arpels, chopard and Piaget, and requested "some of the more extrava- gant designs so as to be able to play with shapes and find some sharp angles to photograph," hamani says. given the cost of the pieces, the companies required extra se- curity, either sending their own guards or hiring special agents to keep an eye on the jewels. hamani adds that, when dealing with such expensive subjects, "one of the first precautions taken is discretion." the second precau- tion is to prep his studio in Paris by covering up the area around the jewelry so the pricy pieces don't break or get lost if they are bumped during the shoot. Because the rings, pins and other pieces of jewelry had to appear as if they were large works of art, for many of the shots, hamani says, the biggest challenge was to "fight against gravity" in order to position them in unique ways. often, small objects like jewelry can be sit- uated a certain way with the help of nylon thread, small wedges or hot glue, which the photographer explains, "doesn't leave marks and is easily taken off." these props are later removed in post-production. "i always prefer to fix the pieces in position rather than cheating on the angle and then having to use Photoshop after for integration," hamani explains. however, for his im- age of three colorful Boucheron rings, stacked atop one another in a sculptural column, no props were needed to keep the rings in place. to help "give the impression of a [larger than] life- size point of view, i had to shoot the pieces from a lower point of view than normal," the photographer explains. he aimed to have the stack of rings appear as if it was around ten feet tall. in reality, the stack was a little over two inches high, so he positioned the camera on a tripod almost at floor level.

Full text

Turn on search term navigation

Copyright Nielsen Business Media May 2013