SUMMARY
Three tomato varieties (Robin-F,. Amati-F, and Elpida-F, ) were grown in the greenhouse condition (Northeastern Greece) using organic and conventional cultivation methods. The differences between production systems were in the pest control and fertilizer. We used goat manure (301 ha^sup -1^) in organic system and 400 kg/ha slow release mineral fertilizer NPK 12-12-17 + 2MgO + 8S + trace elements in conventional growing system. The objective of this study was to investigate whether there were any differences in the TSS, citric acids and mineral content (K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu) in organic and conventional tomatoes.
The differences were more dependent on the cultivars than on the production system. The cultivar 'Elpida' had the highest content of micronutrient compared to the two other varieties grown under the same conditions. We found significantly greater concentrations of P, K, Ca and Mg in organic tomatoes but in conventionally grown tomato we found greater content of Zn, Fe and Cu. Growing method have no influence on concentrations of B and Mn in tomato fruit. 'Elpida' cultivar had the highest content of TSS and citric acid (0.48%) of the three different varieties grown under same conditions. Also, the taste index in organic 'Elpida' (1.10) was much more pleasant because the ratio of total soluble solid and total acid more favorable than the tomatoes from conventional production.
Keywords: tomato, production, organic, conventional, micronutrients.
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)
INTRODUCTION
The nutritional quality of organic and conventional products has been evaluated mainly in terms of macronutrients, vitamins and mineral contents. The results of over 150 studies reviewed (Woese et al, 1997) demonstrated inconsistent differences in nutritional quality of conventional and organic produced vegetables. Moreover, Heaton (2001) considered some 400 previous papers comparing organic and conventional foods and concluded that organic foods appear to be higher in vitamin C and some essential minerals. Using statistical methods, Worthington (2001) showed that organic crops contained significantly more vitamin C, iron, magnesium and phosphorus than conventional crops.
The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the world's most important vegetables, with an estimated total production of about 141.40 million tonnes in 2009 (FAOSTAT 2009). It is the second most widely consumed vegetable after the potato, with an average annual per capita consumption of 12 kg (Lugasi et al, 2003). In the human diet, it is an important source of micronutrients, notably lycopene, ß-carotene, a-tocopherol, phenolic compounds, certain minerals (notably potassium) and carboxylic acids, including ascorbic, citric, malic, fumaric and oxalic acids (Caputo et al, 2004; Hernandez Suarez et al, 2007). The benefits of tomatoes and tomato products have been attributed mostly to the significant amount of lycopene contained, which constitutes 80- 90% of the total carotenoid content in tomatoes. Increased interest in organic tomato production imposed the need to evaluate the quality and nutritional value of organic tomato. One major problem in comparative studies might be that genuine organic and conventional production systems differ in many factors and that a simple measurement of food composition does not reflect its quality. Other scientists have argued that a valid comparison of nutritional quality would, for example, require that the same cultivars are grown at the same location, in the same soil and with the same amounts of nutrients. The effect of variety, season, harvest time, maturity, as well as environmental factors such as light, water and nutrient supply on the antioxidant content of tomatoes are reviewed by Dumas et al (2003). Kelly and Bateman (2010) found significantly greater concentrations of minerals in organic tomatoes. The absence of proven differences in nutritional properties between organic and conventional products may be attributed at least in part to methodological issues. For example, many studies of organic and conventional products have compared different crop varieties (i.e. genetically different products) or crops grown in different locations (thus introducing environmental variation) or crops managed in ways that differed in aspects that are not intrinsically part of the difference between organic and conventional production (e.g. harvesting time, postharvest handling and storage conditions (Bourn and Prescott, 2002; and Caris Veyrat et al, 2004). Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the content in some microconstituents of tomato fruits collected from organic and conventionally production system.
In Sweden, Lundegardh and Martensson (2003) carried out an experiment over three years on the effect of cultivation methods on tomato quality. The results showed that organically produced tomatoes contained a higher level of vitamin C, lycopene and chlorine than conventionally cultivated ones. Research carried out by Borguini and Torres (2006) shows that tomatoes coming from organic cultivation procedures presented higher vitamin C content than the fruit by conventional cultivation. Significantly higher vitamin C content was observed with red shade netting technologies (Milenkovic etal, 2012).
Chassy et al (2006) reported, as well, a statistically significant higher content of ascorbic acid in organic tomatoes compared with conventional ones. Heeb (2005) in her Doctoral thesis found different levels of the nutritional compounds she investigated in every year of her studies on tomatoes. Heeb concluded that organic production methods by definition did not guarantee a higher quality product. In order to obtain uniform higher quality standards it is necessary to understand the processes influencing the chemical composition of vegetables - in this case tomato. The factors influencing tomato quality are complex and interrelated, and additional studies are necessary to consolidate the knowledge about the real interdependences.
Organic tomatoes achieve higher prices than conventional ones, because these products are often linked to protecting the environment and to having better quality (taste, storage) and most people believe that they are healthier. Research results on the effects of organic and conventional production on fruit quality are sometimes contradictory. In terms of quality, some studies report better taste, higher vitamin C contents and higher levels of other quality related compounds for organically grown products (Mitchell et al, 2007; Caris-Veyrat et al, 2004), whereas several other studies have found the opposite or no differences in quality characteristics between organically and conventionally grown vegetables (Caris- Veyrat et al, 2004). The identification of cultivars with high nutritive value, represent a useful approach to select tomato cultivars with better health- promoting properties. During tomato fruit ripening, a series of quantitative and qualitative changes take place, changing tomato flavor and aroma volatile profiles (Baldwin et al, 1991).
The aims of this paper were to determinate the content of several major chemical compounds in different tomato cultivars which contribute to the nutritive quality of the tomato and to evaluate the change of the chemical composition according to the cultivation method.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Experimental design and plant material
Three tomato varieties (Robin Fi, Amati Fi and Elpida Fi) have been tested in greenhouse production (plastic tunnels 3.5m high, covered with termolux 180 pm) during 2008-2010, located in the Sapes, Northeastern Greece, using two different growing systems: organic and conventional. Greenhouse technology and horticultural practices differ little. The main variations concerned pest control, fertilization and fertility of soil, which was of much better quality in the organic production. In conventional cultivation mineral fertilizers and chemical plant protection were applied. Tab 1.
The differences between production systems were the fertilizers used (organic: goat manure 3t/ha; conventional: mineral fertilizer NPK (12:12:17), nitrophos blue special + 2MgO +8S +Trace elements - 400 kg/ha), the number of phytosanitary (solarization) treatments (larger in organic system), the pesticide types applied (preventive in the organic systems and preventive or healing with variable period of effectiveness in the conventional one). It was an early-medium production; planting was done between April 15 and April 20 at a density of 2.64 plants/m2.
Quality trail
At the pink stage of ripening determined by visual inspection, samples were collected for quality analyses (color, firmness, total soluble solids, total sugar, total acidity content of vitamin C, content of carotenoids and lycopene). For sensory evaluation fruits were evaluated by trained descriptive panelists on the day of harvest (red stage). Tomato samples (20 fruits) were collected each year from June till August and were taken from the third to sixth floral branches. All analyzes were carried out in the Technological Faculty of Novi Sad and the Analytical Laboratory of Biolab Epirus (Tzimas s. Bioepirus Ltd), Ioannina - Greece. Determination of total soluble solids (TSS) was measured by a refractometer. The results were reported as °Brix at 20 °C. The titrable acidity (TA) was measured with 5 ml aliquots of juice that were titrated at pH 8,1 with 0,1N NaOH (required to neutralize the acids of tomatoes in phenolphthalein presence) and the results were expressed as citric acid percentages.
Determination of mineral elements
Approximately 0.5 g of freeze-dried sample was weighed into porcelain crucibles that had previously been heated for 3 h at 550° C and was converted to white ash at this same temperature over 12-18 h. Each ashed sample was dissolved in 20 mL of 3 m HCl, and K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
Taste and maturity index
Besides, a taste index and the maturity were calculated using the equation proposed by Navez, Letard, Graselly, and Jost (1999) and Nielsen (2003) starting from the Brix degree and acidity values which were determined in a previous paper (Hernandez et al, 2007).
Taste index = ...
Maturity = ...
Chemicals
All chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MQ, USA), Aldrich Chemical Co. (Steinheim, Germany) and Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany).
Data analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS procedure (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) for analyses of variance. Means were compared by Tukey's multiple range test.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Mineral contents
Growing method and cultivar had significant influence on K, Ca, Na or Mg contents (Table 2). The main factor influencing tomato micronutrient content was cultivar (Ordonez-Santos et al, 2011). Our results showed that the potassium content in organic tomatoes (153.05-164.31 mglOOg"1) was higher than in conventional tomatoes (126.79-142.54 mglOOg"1). Organically grown 'Elpida' produced the highest level of potassium in fruit (164.31 mg 100"'g) comparing to the other two cultivars. Potassium concentrations were similar to those (191.42- 236.54 mg- 100g"1) reported by Loiudice et al (1995) and by Hernandez Suarez et al (2007), but higher than those measured by Gundersen et al (2001).
Our results showed that the calcium content in organic tomato (8.08-9.00 mg lOOg"1) was higher than in conventional tomatoes (7.84-8.58 mg lOOg"1). Calcium concentrations reported by Ordonez-Santos et al (2011) were higher (15.97-23.13 mg lOOg"1) than those found in our studies. Kelly and Bateman (2010) found significantly greater concentrations of Ca and Mg in organic tomatoes and Perez-Lopez et al (2007) found significantly greater concentrations of these minerals in organic clementine mandarin fruit.
Magnesium concentrations in organic (17.36-22.22 mg lOOg"1) and conventional tomato (18.75-19.16 mg lOOg"1) were higher than those found by Ordonez-Santos et al (2011) (10.30-11.88 mg lOOg"1), Loiudice et al (1995) and Gundersen et al (2001), but similar to those of Hernandez Suarez et al (2007).
The ranges of measured iron concentration in this study 0.51-0.64 in organic and 0.69-0.72 mg lOOg1 in conventional tomato respectively. Iron concentration reported by Ordonez-Santos et al (2011) were higher 0.54-1.37 mg lOOg"1. We observed no significant influence of growing method, which in the case of iron is in keeping with the findings of Rodriguez et al (2001). On the contrary, Perez-Lopez et al (2007) found significantly greater concentrations of these minerals in organic clementine mandarin fruit, and Kelly and Bateman (2010) found significantly greater concentrations of these minerals in organic tomatoes. Between-cultivar variation in these micronutrients was also reported by Ruiz et al (2005) and Anza et al (2006).
Copper concentration (0.11-0.13 mg- 100g"1) in conventional tomatoes was higher than in organic tomato (0.5-0.7 mg lOOg"1). The ranges of measured copper concentrations (0.05-0.11 mg lOOg"1) in study by Ordonez-Santos et al (2011), were higher than those reported by Gundersen et al (2001) and Hernandez Suarez et al (2007).
We observed no significant differences in zinc concentrations between organic (0.16-0-18 mg- 100g"1) and conventional tomatoes (0.18-0.19 mg- 100g"1). Zinc concentrations (0.14-0.33 mg lOOg"1) reported by Ordonez-Santos et al (2011) were higher than those reported by Gundersen et al (2001) and Hernandez Suarez et al (2007). Like Rodriguez et al (2001), we found growing method to have no influence on zinc content. On the contrary, Perez-Lopez et al (2007) found significantly greater concentrations of Zn in organically grown clementine mandarin fruit, and Kelly & Bateman (2010) found significantly greater concentrations of Zn in organic tomatoes. The significant influence of cultivar was attributed mainly to that found among organically grown tomatoes, among which the cultivar 'Liado' had significantly higher zinc levels than the 'Antillas' cultivar (Table 2). Between-cultivar differences in zinc content have also been reported by Ruiz et al (2005) and Anza et al (2006).
We observed insignificant differences of manganese content between conventional (0.08-0.09 mg lOOg"1) and organic tomato (0.07-0.08 mg lOOg"1). Manganese concentrations (0.05-0.13 mg lOOg"1) found by Ordonez-Santos et al (2011) were similar to those reported by Gundersen et al (2001) and lower than those measured by Hernandez Suarez et al (2007) and were significantly influenced by both cultivar and growing method. Ruiz et al (2005) and Anza et al (2006) likewise found cultivar to influence Mn content. The influence of growing method was only statistically significant for 'Liado' ' tomatoes, among which Mn levels were higher when organic methods were used (Tables 2). Rodriguez et al (2001) found Mn levels to be unaffected by growing method. Like Rodriguez et al (2001), we found growing method to have no influence on zinc content (Table 2); on the contrary, Perez-Lopez et al (2007) found significantly greater concentrations of Mn in organic clementine mandarin fruit, but Kelly & Bateman (2010) found significantly greater concentrations of Zn in conventional tomatoes. On the other hand, in the present study, one possible hypothesis that may explain the insignificant differences in the majority of the minerals could be that the tomato plants of the two cultivation methods managed to have similar soil conditions and irrigation. Previous studies support such a claim.
Gundersen et al (2001) for example, report the concentrations of Ca, Fe, Mn, Na and Zn were significantly different for tomato fruits grown on the different substrates. Hernandez Suarez et al (2007) report significant differences in the concentration of Na, Ca, Mg and Zn in tomato grown in two different production regions of the island of Tenerife (Spain). Some mineral contents in the tomato fruit must be influenced by the region of production, which is mainly influenced by the mineral contents of the cropping soils and of the water for irrigation (Hernandez Suarez et al, 2007).
On the other hand, considering the same data reported in literature, Dangour et al (2009), reviewing about organic food characteristics and discussing on the suggestion of a possible superiority of organic foods, reported that, in relation to mineral content (Mg, Ca, K, Zn and Cu), no significant differences could be ascribed to production procedures, even if this kind of foods seemed to contain a higher content of phosphorus and a lower of nitrate with respect to conventional ones. At the moment, it appears that more detailed studies on possible differences about mineral content in organic and conventional foods should be carried out. In relation to product quality, Barrett et al (2007) reported on higher content of total soluble solids (TSS), higher titrable acidity and firmness in organic tomatoes (S. lycopersicum L.) when compared with conventional ones.
Greenhouse vegetable production offers advantages compared to production at the open field with regard to quality assurance principally, because the plants are not exposed directly to the rapid changes of climate conditions (Kapoulas et al, 2011). An important role for this purpose is also the cultivar selection by using tomato hybrid varieties with a high yield potential and a good fruit quality. The results of the chemical analysis are presented in Table 3. Organic tomatoes contained on average at all cultivars 4.73°B and at conventional 4.79 of TSS-total soluble solids in fruit. Results obtained showed that the accumulation of TSS (total soluble solid) at different organic and conventional (in average at all cultivars) cultivation system did not show any statistically significant difference. 'Elpida' tomato fruit in organic production system contained the highest level of TSS. Irrespective of the cultivation method used, 'Elpida' in average also contained the highest level of TSS (5.08°Brix) in comparison to the rest of examined tomato cultivars.
The organic acid in a tomato fruit consist of mainly citric and malic acid with a range of 0.3 to 0.6% (Helyes et al, 1999). The obtained results showed that conventional tomatoes contained more organic acids in comparison to those cultivated by organic methods, in all periods of analysis, being approximately about 0.48%. At the same time, it should be noted that 'Elpida' tomatoes were richer in organic acids in comparison to other examined cultivars, independently from the used cultivation system (Table 3).
As with the sugars, the organic acids are crucial to the flavor of the fruits. The average contents Brix degree and acidity were 4.6 and 0.50 g/100 g of citric acid, respectively (Hernandez et al, 2008). There is a continuous variation in the acidity of the fruit during its development and maturation, increasing with the growth of the fruit until it reaches its maximum with the development of coloration and diminishing with the advance of maturation.
Taste index
The taste index is calculated using the values of Brix degree and acidity, applying the equation performed by Navez et al (1999). Hernandez et al (2008) shows the mean values of these two parameters (Brix degree and acidity) according to cultivar, cultivation method and harvest period for the same group of tomatoes.
The Elpida cultivar from organic production system had a mean value (1.1) of the taste index higher (p < 0.05) than those values determined for the organic Robin (0.98) and Amati (1.0) cultivars (table 4). No significant differences were found between the cultivars in the mean taste index obtained for conventional cultivated tomatoes. When using these data, the mean values of the taste index in all the tomatoes belonging to all the cultivars considered were higher than 0.85, which indicates that the tomato cultivars analyzed are tasty. If the value of the taste index is lower than 0.7, the tomato is considered as having little taste (Navez et al, 1999).
Another parameter related with the taste index is maturity index which is usually a better predictor of an acid's flavor impact than Brix degree or acidity alone. Acidity tends to decrease with the maturity of the fruits while the sugar content increases (Raffo et al, 2002).
We found significantly greater maturity index in organic 'Amati' fruit (11.7) and significantly lower maturity index in conventional 'Elpida' fruit (9.6) obtained for conventional and organically cultivated tomatoes. Maturity index in our study (in all cultivars in both production system) were higher than those found by maturity index reported by Hernandez et al (2007) was 9.4 and therefore, it can be deduced that the maturity levels of the analyzed tomatoes were adequate for consumption (Nielsen, 2003). This ratio can also be affected by climate, cultivar and horticultural practices (Nielsen, 2003). However, no significant differences were observed in the mean values of maturity between the tomato cultivars considered.
CONCLUSIONS
There are many factors such as cultivar, cultivation method and region of cultivation that influence the chemical composition of tomatoes. The cultivar is a more influential factor than cultivation methods in the differentiation of the tomato samples according to the chemical characteristics. The main factor influencing tomato mineral content was cultivar. 'Elpida' from organic production had greater concentration of K, Ca, Mg, B content and the best taste index.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study is part of the TR-31027 project entitled "Organic agriculture - Improvement of production using fertilizers, bio-products and biological methods" financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia.
Nikolaos KAPOULAS, Zoran S. ILIC, Lidija MILENKOVIC, Natasa MIRECKI
UTICAJ ORGANSKOGI KONVENCIJALNOG NACINA PROIZVODNJE NA SADRZAJ MINERALNIH MATERIJA I CINIOCA UKUSA PUODA PARADAJZA
SAZETAK
Tri híbrida paradajza (Robin-Fl, Fl-Amati i Elpida-Fl) u plastenicima (Severoistocna Grcka) gajeno je na organskim i konvencionalnim sistemima proizvodnje. Razlike izmedu metoda proizvodnje prisutne su u pogledu sistema zastite i dubrenja. Koriscen je kozji stajnjak (301 ha"1) u organskom sistemu i 400 kg/ ha mineralnog slabo rastvorljivog dubriva NPK 12-12-17 +2 MgO + 8S + mikroelemenati u konvencionalnom sistemu gajenja. Cilj istrazivanja bio je da se ispita da li ima razlika u sadrzaju TSS, limunske kiseline i sadrzaju minerala (K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu) u paradajzu iz organske i konvencionalne proizvodnje. Razlike su vise zavisne od sorti negó od proizvodnog sistema. "Elpida" je imala je najveci sadrzaj mikroelemenata u odnosu na druga dva híbrida gajena pod istim uslovima. Nash smo znatno vece koncentracije P, K, Ca i Mg u organskom paradajzu, ali je u konvencionalno gajenom paradajzu prisutan veci sadrzaj Zn, Fe i Cu. Metod gajenja ne utice na koncentraciju B i Mn u plodu paradajza. "Elpida" je imala najveci sadrzaj TSS i limunske kiseline (0.48%) u odnosu na ostale hibride pod istim uslovima proizvodnje. Takode, indeks ukusa kod "Elpide" iz organske proizvodnje (1.10) je mnogo prijatniji, jer je odnos ukupno rastvorljivih suvih materija i ukupnih kiselina povoljniji onego kod paradajza iz konvencionalne proizvodnje.
Kljucne rijeci: paradajz, proizvodnja, organska, konvencionalna, mikroelementi.
REFERENCES
Anza, M., Riga, P. and Garbisu, C. (2006): Effects of variety and growth season on the organoleptic and nutritional quality of hydroponically grown tomato. Journal of Food Quality. 29: 16-37.
Baldwin, E.A., Nisperos-Carriedo, M.O., Baker, R. and Scott, J. W. (1991): Qualitative analysis of flavor parameters in six Florida tomato cultivars. J. Agrie. Food Chem. 39: 1135-1140.
Barrett, D.M., Weakley, C., Diaz, J.V. and Watnik, M. (2007): Qualitative and nutritional differences in processing tomatoes grown under commercial organic and conventional production systems. Journal of Food Science. 72: C441-C451.
Borguini, R.G. and Torres, E.A.F.S. (2006): Organic food: nutritional quality and food safety. Scguranc, a Alimentar e Nutricional. 13: 64-75.
Bourn, D. and Prescott, J. (2002). A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 42: 1-34.
Caputo, M., Sommella, M.G., Graciani, G. Giordano, L, Fogliano, V., Porta, R. and Mariniello. L. (2004): Antioxidant profiles of corbara small tomatoes during ripening and effects of aqueous extracts on j-774 cell antioxidant enzymes. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 28: 1-20.
Caris-Veyrat, C., Amiot, M.J., Tyssandier, V. et al (2004): Influence of organic versus conventional agricultural practice on the antioxidant microconstituent content of tomatoes and derived purees; consequences on antioxidant plasma status in humans. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 52: 6503-6509.
Chassy, A.W., Bui, L., Renaud, E.N.C., Horn, M.V. and Mitchell, A. (2006): Three- year comparison of the content of antioxidant, microconstituents and several quality characteristics in organic and conventionally managed tomatoes and bell peppers. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 54: 8244-8252.
Dangour, A.D., Dodhia, S.K., Hayter, A., Allen, E., Lock, K. and Uay, R. (2009): Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 90: 680-685.
Dumas, Y., Dadomo, M., Di Lucca, G. and Grober P. (2003). Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 83: 369-382.
Gundersen, V., McCall, D. and Bechmann, I.E. (2001): Comparison of major and trace element concentrations in Danish greenhouse tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Cv. Aromata FQ cultivated in different substrates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 49: 3808-3815.
Heeb A. (2005): Organic or Mineral Fertilization Effects on Tomato Plant Growth and Fruit Quality. Doctoral thesis. Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala
Hernandez Suarez, M., Rodriguez Rodriguez, E.M. and Diaz Romero, C. (2007): Mineral and trace element concentrations in cultivars of tomatoes. Food Chemistry. 104: 489-499.
Hernández Suárez, M., Rodríguez Rodríguez, E.M. and Diaz Romero, C. (2008): Chemical composition of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) from Tenerife, the Canary Islands. Food Chem. 106: 1046-1056.
Kapoulas, N., Ilic, S. Z, Trajkovic, R., Milenkovic, L.and Durovka, M. (2011): Effect of organic and conventional growing systems on nutritional value and antioxidant activity of tomatoes. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10 (71): 15938-15945.
Kelly, S.D. and Bateman, A.S. (2010): Comparison of mineral concentrations in commercially grown organic and conventional crops - tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) and lettuces {Lactuca sativa). Food Chemistry. 119: 738-745.
Loiudice, R., Impembo, M., Laratta, B., Villari, G., Lo Voi, A., Siviero, P., et al (1995): Composition of San Marzano tomato varities. Food Chemistry. 53: 81-89.
Lundegârdh, B.and Mârtensson, A. (2003): Organically produced plant foods- evidence of health benefits, Soil Plant Sei. B. 53: 3-15.
Lugasi, A., Hóvári, J., Biró, L., Brandt, S. and Helyes, L. (2004): Factors affecting lycopene contents of foods and the lycopene ingestion in native population. (Az élelmiszereink likopintartalmát befolyásoló tényezôk és a hazai lakosság likopinbevitele.) Magy. Onk. 48: 131-136.
Milenkovic, L., Ilic, S. Z., Durovka, M., Kapoulas, N., Mirecki, N., Fallik. E. (2012): Yield and pepper quality as affected by light intensity using color shade nets. Agriculture & Forestry 58 (1): 19-23.
Mitchell, A.E., Hong, Y., Koh, E., Barrett, D.M., Bryant, D.E, Denison, R.F.and Kaffka, S. (2007): Ten-Year Comparison of the influence of organic and conventional crop management practices on the content of flavonoids in tomatoes. J. Agrie. Food Chem. 55: 6154-6159.
Navez, B., Letard, M., Graselly, D., and Jost, M. (1999): Les critères de qualité de la tomate. Infos-Ctifl, 155: 41-47.
Nielsen, S. (2003): Food analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic
Ordonez-Santos,L. E., Vazquez-Oderiz, M. L. and Romero-Rodnguez M. A. (2011): Micronutrient contents in organic and conventional tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Inter. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 46: 1561- 1568.
Perez-Lopez, A., Lopez-Nicolas, J.M. and Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A. (2007): Effects of organic farming on minerals contents and aroma composition of Clemenules mandarin juice. European Food Research Technology. 225: 255- 260.
Raffo, A., Leonardi, C., Fogliano, V. et al (2002): Nutritional value of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Cv. Naomi F, ) harvested at different ripening stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50: 6550-6556.
Rodriguez, A., Ballesteros, A., Ciruelos, A., Barreiros, J.M. and Latorre, A. (2001): Sensory evaluation of fresh tomato from conventional, integrated, and organic production. Acta Horticulturae. 542: 277-282.
Ruiz, J.J., Martinez, N., Martinez, S.G. and Serrano, M. (2005): Micronutrient composition and quality characteristics of traditional tomato cultivars in southeast Spain. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 36: 649- 660.
Woese, K., Lange, D., Boess, C. and Bögl, K. W. (1997): A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods - results of a review of the relevant literature. J. Sei. Food Agrie. 74:281-293.
Worthington, V. (2001): Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains. J. Altem. Comp. Medicine. 7:161-173.
Nikolaos KAPOULAS, Zoran S. ILIC, Lidija MILENKOVIC, Natasa MIRECKI1
Nikolaos Kapoulas, Regional Development Agency of Rodopi, 69100 Komotini, Greece, Zoran Ilic, (corresponding author: [email protected]), Lidija Milenkovic, Faculty of Agriculture Pristina - Lesak, Natasa Mirecki, Biotecnical Faculty, University of Montenegro
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty 2013
Abstract
Three tomato varieties (Robin-F,. Amati-F, and Elpida-F, ) were grown in the greenhouse condition (Northeastern Greece) using organic and conventional cultivation methods. The differences between production systems were in the pest control and fertilizer. We used goat manure (301 ha^sup -1^) in organic system and 400 kg/ha slow release mineral fertilizer NPK 12-12-17 + 2MgO + 8S + trace elements in conventional growing system. The objective of this study was to investigate whether there were any differences in the TSS, citric acids and mineral content (K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu) in organic and conventional tomatoes. The differences were more dependent on the cultivars than on the production system. The cultivar 'Elpida' had the highest content of micronutrient compared to the two other varieties grown under the same conditions. We found significantly greater concentrations of P, K, Ca and Mg in organic tomatoes but in conventionally grown tomato we found greater content of Zn, Fe and Cu. Growing method have no influence on concentrations of B and Mn in tomato fruit. 'Elpida' cultivar had the highest content of TSS and citric acid (0.48%) of the three different varieties grown under same conditions. Also, the taste index in organic 'Elpida' (1.10) was much more pleasant because the ratio of total soluble solid and total acid more favorable than the tomatoes from conventional production. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer