Received 12 Mar 2013
Accepted 25 Sep 2013
Keywords
Toxoplasma gondii,
ELISA,
IgG Avidity,
Iran
Abstract
Background: Toxoplasma specific IgM antibodies; the common serologic marker in diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis has its own limitations. Confirmatory testing with other markers, introduced as a complementary tool in distinguish acute and chronic infections is unusual in Iran. In the present study, we investigated die correlation between die results of IgM ELISA, IgA ELISA, and IgG avidity tests in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis to demonstrate die necessity of confirmatory testing in serodiagnosis of infection in the country.
Methods: A total of 107 positive Toxoplasma IgG and IgM sera were obtained from patients referred to private laboratories and stored at -20 °C for futures use. Sero-logic tests were set up in duplicate to analyze die serum levels of IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgG avidity antibodies using commercial ELISA kits. The results were presented as semi quantitative for IgG, IgM and IgA ELISA, and Relative Avidity Index in percentage for IgG avidity test. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r^sub p^) was applied to analyze die data.
Results: Of 107 serum samples, T. gondii specific IgM and IgA antibodies were positive in 67.3% and 53.3%, respectively. Besides, 29.9% of the sera displayed low avidity for IgG antibodies. The r^sub p^ was - 0.572 (P<0.01) between die IgG avidity and IgM ELISA, - 0.364 between die IgG avidity and IgA ELISA (P<0.01), and 0.564 between die IgM and IgA ELISA (P<0.01).
Conclusion: The study strongly highlights die necessity of confirmatory testing in differential diagnosis of acute and chronic toxoplasmosis in Iran.
Introduction
Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a ubiquitous protozoan parasite that infects at least 30% of humans in most parts of Iran (1). Infections with T. gondii in immunocompetent subjects are most often presented as asymptomatic however approximately 10 to 20% of the acquired infections are associated with clinical syndromes without pathognomonic signs for toxoplasmosis. Moreover, the parasite is a main opportunistic pathogen of humans and life-threatening in immunocompromised patients. On the other hand, in primary Toxoplasma infections during pregnancy, the tachyzoites of T. gondii may transplacentally transmit to fetus and cause severe damages in brain and eyes (2). The parasite can persist lifelong in various organs of hosts, especially brain and muscle, as tissue cyst (chronic infection), which is responsible for the durability of antibody response in chronic phase of infection, and reactivation in immunocompromised cases (3).
Seroconversion from a negative to positive titer and a four-fold rise in antibodies titer over a 3-week interval are considered as the most reliable indicators for acute toxoplasmosis (4-6). However, the former is mainly restricted to monitoring program of women during pregnancy which is unusual in developing countries. Limitation of the latter is related to antibody level in serum samples of patients at the time of sampling which is usually at maximum. In spite of remarkable development in the serology of toxoplasmosis, distinguishing between acute and chronic infections is also a main challenge in serodiagnosis of the disease. T. gondii specific IgM, IgA, IgE, and low IgG avidity antibodies, which are considered as the serologic markers for recently acquired infections, have a common limitation that tend to persist in chronic phase of infection (7-12).
An IgG avidity test has been widely used to differentiate between the recent and latent infections of T. gondii, especially during pregnancy (13 -23). In this test, a high avidity index can certainly exclude the occurrence of infection within recent 3 to 5 months and therefore it is considered as a reliable indicator to rule out acquired infection during pregnancy during the first trimester (15). However, a low avidity index which regards the infection as acquired recently may persist for more than one year and thus cannot be used as a definite marker for recent infections with Toxoplasma (17, 21). Protracted low avidity of IgG antibodies that is attributed to delayed maturation of IgG avidity antibodies (17) may affect the ?a\i\-Toxoplasma therapy in pregnant women (24). A high IgG avidity is considered as a single reliable marker to exclude the acquired infections during pregnancy in women who are tested within the first trimester (14-16, 19-21).
In view of the limitations propounded for each of the serological markers in differentiating the recent and past infections of T. gondii, the complementary testing is considered as a tool for increasing the accuracy in the detection of clinical toxoplasmosis or to determine primary infections during pregnancy (10-21). In USA, a panel of serological tests may be used to confirm Toxoplasma IgM positive samples in a serology reference laboratory (25), whereas in Iran, the simultaneous measurement of IgG and IgM antibodies in a single serum is the only criterion for judging and making a decision over toxoplasmosis. In a report from Iran, only 18 serum samples with positive results for IgM antibodies to T. gondii were evaluated with IgG avidity test (26), a sample size insufficient to show an importance for complementary tests in diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in the country. The present study was performed to clarify the necessity for confirmatory testing in serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis in Iran. To achieve the objective of the study, the authors evaluated IgA ELISA and IgG avidity as confirmatory tests in diagnosis of recently acquired infections of T. gondii in specimens with positive results for IgM antibodies to T. gondii.
Material and Methods
Serum samples
A total of 131 serum samples were collected from patients suspected of having toxoplasmosis and referred to 3 private laboratories in Tehran and Qazvin Province, located 150 km northwest of Tehran, during 2011 to 2012. The sera were unknown in the existing clinical settings and stored at -20 °C until use. Initially, all serum samples were examined for anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in reference lab and those negative for antibody, excluded from the study. Of 131 serum samples, 107 were found positive in the initial screening of specimen and thus used for the measurement of T. gondii IgM, IgA, and IgG avidity antibodies.
IgG, IgM, and IgA ELISA
Anti-T. gondii IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies were detected by commercial kits (Euroimmun, Germany). The tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were tested in duplicate. The optical density (OD) of wells was measured in a microplate reader (Awareness, Stat Fax 3200, USA) at 450 nm while a wavelength of 620 nm was used as reference. The results were expressed semi-quantitatively by calculating the ratio of the extinction value of the control or patient sample over the extinction value of calibrator and considered positive for ratio>l.l, negative<0.8, and borderline>0.8 - <1.1 for all three classes of antibodies.
IgG Avidity ELISA Test
Avidity determination of IgG antibodies against T. gondii was conducted by ELISA method using commercial kits (Euroimmun, Germany). Serum samples were examined according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results obtained were presented by calculating the percentage of relative avidity index (RAI %) of the extinction of sample treated with urea over the extinction of sample without urea treatment. A RAI of <40% was indicative of low antibodies; a RAI of >60% indicated the presence of high avidity antibodies; and a RAI of 40%-60% considered as borderline.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 13 statistical package. The descriptive results were presented as mean± SD (standard deviation). Also, Kappa coefficient, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r ) and regression were used. P<0.05 were considered as significance level.
Results
Of 107 serum samples from patients suspected of having toxoplasmosis, specific IgM and IgA antibodies to T. gondii were positive in 67.3% (n=72) and 53.3% (n=57), respectively. Similarly, 29.9% (n=32) of the sera displayed low avidity for IgG antibodies. The minimum, maximum, and mean+SD of ratio indexes for positive sera were 1.20, 8.56, and 4.47+1.64 for IgG antibodies; 1.10, 9.12, and 2.65+1.70 for IgM antibodies, and 1.10, 6.82; and 2.83+1.52 for IgA antibodies, respectively. In addition, the minimum, maximum, and mean+SD of RAI% for sera with low avidity were 6.9, 38.2, and 20.4+7.89, respectively.
In 24.3% (n=26) of serum samples, both IgM and IgA antibodies were positive while the avidity index showed low reaction for IgG antibodies. On the other hand, 14% (n=15) of the sera were negative for both IgM and IgA antibodies, demonstrating a high avidity reaction for the IgG avidity (Table 1).
Pearson's correlation coefficient (rp) between the RAI% of IgG avidity and the ratio index of IgM was -0.572 (P<0.01) and the equation of regression line was drawn as (IgG avidity- 70.16-8.2 x (IgM ratio)}, i.e. it is expected that one unit increase in IgM ratio to be accompanied with reduction of RAI% by 8.2 units (Fig. 1).
The rp was calculated at -0.364 between the indexes of IgG avidity and IgA (P<0.01) with the equation of regression line drawn as (IgG avidity= 63.18 - 5.43x (IgA ratio)}. Also, the rp between the IgM ratio and IgA ratio was 0.564 (P<0.01), and the equation of regression line drawn as (IgM ratio= 0.98 + 0.59 x (IgA ratio)} (Fig. 2).
The results of IgM ELISA and IgG avidity were completely in agreement with the findings obtained for 45.8% (n=49) of samples. Of 72 specimens with positive IgM ELISA results, 41.6% (n=30) demonstrated low IgG avidity whereas among those with negative IgM ELISA results (n=21), 85.7% (n=18) showed high IgG avidity.
On the other hand, none of the 21 samples with negative results for IgM did not show low avidity reaction (Table 2). Kappa coefficient between the results of two tests was 0.192.
The results of IgA ELISA and IgG avidity showed a full agreement in 54.2% (n=58) of cases. In other words, 47.4% (n=27) out of 57 specimens with positive results for IgA ELISA, showed low IgG avidity whereas a high level IgG avidity was found in 73.2% (n=30) out of 41 serum samples whose results for IgA ELISA were negative. However, 7.3% (n=3) of samples with negative results for IgA antibodies displayed low avidity (Table 3). Kappa coefficient between the results of two tests was calculated at 0.264.
The highest agreement was observed between the results of IgM and IgA ELISA, i.e., 66.4% (n=71) of 107 cases demonstrated similar patterns. Of 72 serum samples positive for IgM ELISA, 69.4% (n=50) also showed positive results for IgA ELISA. Of 57 samples with positive results for IgA ELISA, 87.7% (n=50) also found to be positive for IgM ELISA. Moreover, 85.7% (n=18) of the 21 specimens whose IgM ELISA were negative, had similar results for IgA ELISA. Of 41 samples with negative results for IgA antibodies, 43.9% (n=18) showed negative results for IgM ELISA. Kappa coefficient between the results of IgM and IgA ELISA was 0.406.
Of 72 specimens positive for IgM to T. gondii, the ratio indexes were 1.1-2 in 32.7% (n=35), 2-4 in 23.4% (n=25), and > 4 in 11.2% (n=12) cases. Of 35 samples with ratio indexes of 1.1-2, 17.1% (n=6) demonstrated low avidity reaction whereas the reaction rate of 83.3% (n=10) from 12 samples with IgM ratio indexes > 4 showed low avidity for IgG antibodies. On the other hand, of 57 serum samples with positive results for IgA ELISA, the ratio indexes were 1.1-2 in 42.1 (n=24), 24 4 35.1% (n=20), and > 4 in 22.8% (n=13) cases. Of 24 samples with IgA ratio indexes of 1.1-2, 33.3% (n=8) had low avidity reaction whereas the avidity reaction of 61.5% (n=8) from 13 samples with IgA ratio indexes > 4, was low.
Discussion
In the present study, there was a remarkable difference between IgA ELISA and IgG avidity tests in confirming the specimens with positive IgM antibodies against T. gondii. In other words, almost 70% of IgM positive samples were confirmed by IgA whereas nearly 40% of the specimens showed low avidity for IgG antibodies. Higher frequency of positive samples for IgM and IgA antibodies in comparison with low avidity for IgG antibodies has been also shown in other studies (7, 10), a finding probably due to difference in durability of the antibodies in chronic phase (10) and diversity in sensitivity of the assays (18). In a study by Kodym et al., Toxoplasma IgM and IgA antibodies remained positive for 12-18, and 6-9 months, respectively (10), and Auer et al. reported a higher sensitivity for IgM ELISA compared with IgA ELISA (18). Hence, it seems that the measurement of IgM antibodies has superiority to other serological markers for the initial diagnosis of T. gondii infections.
Our findings support other studies that emphasize on confirmatory testing in serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis (4-6,15, 16, 18, 19, 21), however, the interpretation of the test results is difficult in some cases. At present, there is no unique serological pattern for confirming toxoplasmosis. The limitations of serological tests and their interpretive problems in distinguishing between acute and latent infections require the primary results to be confirmed in a reference laboratory. At Toxoplasma Serology Laboratory in Palo Alto Medical Foundation, known as the reference laboratory for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a battery of tests as Toxoplasma serology profile (TSP) is used which is slightly different in clinical settings. The TSP has been demonstrated to be a useful tool to distinguish between acute and chronic infections (2).
We showed a significant association between increasing the IgM and IgA antibodies indexes and decreasing the avidity index for IgG antibodies, a finding in agreement with the results of previous studies (16, 21, 27, 28). In our study, a low avidity was demonstrated in 83.3% (10/12) and 61.5% (8/13) of samples with index > 4 for IgM and IgA antibodies, respectively. It seems that a high IgM antibody index is a more reliable marker than a high IgA antibody index in confirming acute toxoplasmosis. However, our results cannot argue with certainty which of the IgA ELISA and IgG avidity tests is more appropriate to conform the positive samples for IgM to T. gondii. To answer this question, serum samples of known history and clinical setting is required which was a main limitation of the present study.
Considering high avidity as an indicator to rule out recent infections in samples with positive results for IgM antibodies to T. gondii, 38.9% of 72 IgM positive samples in our study may have been implicated in latent infections. However, a high avidity for IgG antibodies cannot be regarded as a definite criterion for excluding acute toxoplasmosis in individuals who are positive for IgM antibody to the parasite. For example, lymphadenitis due to T. gondii may sustain for more than 6 months, whereas, the avidity index of IgG antibodies may convert from low to high prior to the time when the swollen lymph nodes in the disease subside (11, 19, 30). Also, the results of high IgG avidity test can be misleading in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis caused by reactivation of T. gondii (31).
The frequency of a high IgG avidity in serum samples containing specific T. gondii IgM antibodies has been diverse in different studies, for example, 66.3% (18), 51.9% (21), 48.7% (15), 56% (32), and 61.3% (20). These differences have been attributed to several possible factors, including; heterogeneity in clinical setting of toxoplasmosis, heterogeneity in population, function of immune system at time of blood collection, interval between sampling time and beginning of infection, lack of standardization of serological tests, diversity in antigen preparation, ?a\i\-Toxcplasma therapy, and variations in calculating the avidity index (33).
In Iran, a developing country located in western Asia, where at least 30% of the populations, widely scattered in many parts of the country, are seropositive for T. gondii (34, 35), and the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is facing two main challenges. Firstly, clinicians may be unaware of sérodiagnostic problems of the parasitic infection. Secondly, there is not a reference center for confirmatory testing of the disease in the country. Therefore, management of patients suspected of having toxoplasmosis and making a decision about pregnant women who are screened for congenital toxoplasmosis may lead to unnecessary interventions with anti-toxoplasma drugs which are mostly with adverse impact on hematopoiesis (2).
Conclusion
The results of our study highlight a necessity for confirmatory testing in diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in Iran. We recommend the Toxoplasma serology laboratory to be established within the university reference centers in all provinces of the country while being supervised by a specialist in parasitology. Also, training courses for clinicians will help enhance their knowledge in the field.
Acknowledgment
We greatly appreciate Dr. Hamid Reza Sadeghipour Roodsari, from Noor Laboratory in Tehran; Dr. Mohammad Javad Gharavi, from Fardis Medical Laboratory in Karaj; Dr. Hossein Aghili, from Razi Laboratory in Qazvin; Dr. Saeideh Shojaei, from Tehran University of Medical Sciences for their kind assistance in collecting the serum samples. There is no conflict of interest neither between the authors themselves, the Research Department of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences as the sole financial supporting body (No. 366), or any pharmaceutical company regarding the materials used in our study.
References
1. Assmar M, Amirkhani A, Piazak N, Hovanesian A, Kooloobandi A, Etessami R. [Toxoplasmosis in Iran. Results of a seroepidemiological study]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1997; 90(1): 19-21.
2. Montoya JG, BoothroydJC, Kovacs JA. Toxoplasma gondii. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livigstone; 2010. P. 3495-526.
3. Fernandes RC, Vasconcellos VP, Araújo LC, Medina-Acosta E. Vertical transmission of HIV and Toxoplasma by reactivation in a chronically infected woman. Braz J Infect Dis. 2009; 13(1): 70-1.
4. Remington JS, Thulliez P, Montoya JG. Recent developments for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(3): 941-5.
5. Suzuki LA Rocha RJ, Rossi CL. Evaluation of serological markers for die immunodiagnosis of acute acquired toxoplasmosis. J Med Microbiol. 2001; 50(1): 62-70.
6. Lappalainen M, Hedman K. Serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. The impact of measurement of IgG avidity. Ann 1st Super Sanita. 2004; 40(1): 81-8.
7. Ashbum D, Joss AW, Pennington TH, HoYen DO. Do IgA, IgE, and IgG avidity tests have any value in die diagnosis of Toxoplasma infection in pregnancy? ] Clin Padiol. 1998; 51(4): 312-5.
8. Bobic B, Sibalic D, Djurkovic-Djakovic O. High levels of IgM antibodies specific for Toxoplasma gondii in pregnancy 12 years after primary Toxoplasma infection. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991; 31(3): 182-4.
9. Faure AK, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Pelloux H, Bost-Bru C, Goullier-Fleuret A, AmbroiseThomas P. Lack of value of specific IgA detection in die postnatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. J Clin Lab Anal. 1999; 13(1): 27-30.
10. Kodym P, Machala L, Rohácová H, Sirocká B, Malÿ M. Evaluation of a commercial IgE ELISA in comparison widi IgA and IgM ELISAs, IgG avidity assay and complement fixation for die diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007; 13(1): 40-7.
11. Montoya JG, Huffman HB, Remington JS. Evaluation of die immunoglobulin G avidity test for diagnosis of toxoplasmic lymphadenopadiy. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(1): 4627-31.
12. Nascimento FS, Suzuki LA, Rossi CL. Assessment of die value of detecting specific IgA antibodies for die diagnosis of a recendy acquired primary Toxoplasma infection. Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28(8): 749-52.
13. Hedman K, Lappalainen M, Seppäiä I, Mäkelä O. Recent primary Toxoplasma infection indicated by a low avidity of specific IgG. J Infect Dis. 1989; 159(4): 736-40.
14. Candolfi E, Pastor R, Huber R, Filisetti D, Villard O. IgG avidity assay firms up die diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis on die first serum sample in immunocompetent pregnant women. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 58(1): 83-88.
15. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O, Kinney S, Press C, Remington JS. VIDAS test for avidity of Toxoplasma-specific immunoglobulin G for confirmatory testing of pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(7): 250^F8.
16. Jenum PA, Stray-Pedersen B, Gundersen AG. Improved diagnosis of primary Toxoplasma gondä infection in early pregnancy by determination of mfi-Toxoplasma immunoglobulin G avidity. J din Microbiol. 1997; 35(8): 1972-7.
17. Lefever-Pettazzoni M, Le Cam S, Wallon M, Peyron F. Delayed maturation of immunoglobulin G avidity: implication for die diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women. Eur J din Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006; 25(11): 687-93.
18. Auer H, Vander-Möse A, Picher O, Walochnik J, Aspöck H. dinical and diagnostic relevance of die Toxoplasma IgG avidity test in die serological surveillance of pregnant women in Austria. Parasitol Res. 2000; 86(12): 965-70.
19. Tanyuksel M, Guney C, Araz E, Saracli MA, Doganci L. Performance of die immunoglobulin G avidity and enzyme immunoassay IgG /IgM screening tests for differentiation of die clinical spectrum of toxoplasmosis. J Microbiol. 2004; 42(3): 211-5.
20. Igbal J, Klialid N. Detection of acute Toxoplasma gondä infection in early pregnancy by IgG avidity and PCR analysis. J Med Microbiol. 2007; 56(Pt 11): 1495-9.
21. Liesenfeld O, Montoya JG, Kinney S, Press C, Remington JS. Effect of testing for IgG avidity in die diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondä infection in pregnant women: experience in a US reference laboratory. J Infect Dis. 2001; 183(8): 1248-53.
22. Lachaud L, Calas O, Picot MC, Albaba S, Bourgeois N, Prationg F. Value of 2 IgG avidity commercial tests used alone or in association to date toxoplasmosis contamination. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 64(3): 267-74.
23. Yamada H, Nishikawa A, Yamamoto T, Mizue Y, Yamada T, Morizane M, Tairaku S, Nishiliira J. Prospective study of congenital toxoplasmosis screening widi use of IgG avidity and multiplex nested PCR mediods. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(7): 2552-6.
24. Meroni V, Genco F, Tinelli C, Lanzarini P, Bollani L, Stronati M, et al. Spiramycin treatment of Toxoplasma gondä infection in pregnant women impairs die production and die avidity maturation of T. gondä-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2009; 16(10): 1517-20.
25. Liesenfeld O, Press C, Montoya JG, Gill R, Isaac-Renton JL, Hedman K, et al. False-positive results in immunoglobulin M (IgM) Toxoplasma antibody tests and importance of confirmatory testing die Platelia Toxo IgM test. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35(1): 174-8.
26. Ralibari AH, Keshavarz H, Shojaee S, Mohebali M, Rezaeian M. IgG avidity ELISA test for diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis in humans. Korean J Parasitol. 2012 ; 50(2): 99-102.
27. Reis MM, Tessaro MM, D'Azevedo PA. Toxoplasma-lgM and IgG-avidity in single samples from areas widi a high infection rate can determine die risk of modier-to-child transmission. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2006; 48(2): 938.
28. Leite M, Siciliano S, Rocha LS, Justa ML, César KR, Granato CF. Correlation between specific IgM levels and percentage IgG-class antibody avidity to Toxoplasma gondä. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2008; 50(4): 237-42.
29. Bobic B, Klun I, Vujanic M, Nikolic A, Ivovic V, Zivkovic T, et al. Comparative evaluation of diree commercial Toxoplasma-specific IgG antibody avidity tests and significance in different clinical settings, j Med Microbiol. 2009 ; 58(Pt 3): 358-64.
30. Paul M. Immunogjobulin G avidity in diagnosis of toxoplasmic lymphadenopadiy and ocular toxoplasmosis, din Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999; 6: 514-8.
31. Suresh S, Nor-Masniwati S, Nor-Idaliriani MN, Wan-Hazabbali WH, Zeehaida M, Zunaina E. Serological IgG avidity test for ocular toxoplasmosis. Clin Ophdialmol. 2012; 6(4): 147-50.
32. Kaul R, Chen P, Binder SR. Detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies specific for Toxoplasma gondä widi increased selectivity for re- cendy acquired infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(12): 5705-9.
33. Rossi CL. A simple, rapid enzyme-linked im-munosorbent assay for evaluating immuno-globin G antibody avidity in toxoplasmosis. Di-agn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998; 30(1): 25-30.
34. Hashemi HJ, Saraei M. Seroprevalence of Toxo-plasma gondii in unmarried women in Qazvin, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2010; 16(1): 24-8.
35. Hajsoleimani F, Ataeian A, Nourian A, Mazloomzadeh S. Seroprevalence of Toxo-plasma gondii in Pregnant Women and Bioas-say of IgM Positive Cases in Zanjan, North-west of Iran. Iranian J Parasitol. 2012; 7(2): 82-6.
?Mehrzad SARAEI b2-3, Seyedeh Zeinab FATTAHI 3, Mojtaba SHAHNAZI Afshin AFSHARI 4, Safar Ali ALIZADEH 5, Hassan JAHANIHASHEMI 6
/. Dept, of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Qaydn University of Medical S deuces, Qaydn, Iran
2. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Qaydn University of Medical Sciences, Qaydn, Iran
3. Reference Uaboratoy, Qaydn University of Medical Sciences, Qaydn, Iran
4. Dept, of Micmbiologi and Immunology, School of Mediane, Qaydn University of Medical Sdences, Qaydn, Iran
5. Dept. ofPathobiologi, School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sdences, Tehran,
6. Dept, of Community Mediane, School of Mediane, Qaydn University of Medical Sciences, Qaydn, Iran
Correspondence Email:
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Dr Ali Akbari Sari, Director of The Commission for Accreditation & Improvement of Iranian Medical Journals Oct-Dec 2013
Abstract
Toxoplasma specific IgM antibodies; the common serologic marker in diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis has its own limitations. Confirmatory testing with other markers, introduced as a complementary tool in distinguish acute and chronic infections is unusual in Iran. In the present study, we investigated die correlation between die results of IgM ELISA, IgA ELISA, and IgG avidity tests in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis to demonstrate die necessity of confirmatory testing in serodiagnosis of infection in the country. A total of 107 positive Toxoplasma IgG and IgM sera were obtained from patients referred to private laboratories and stored at -20 °C for futures use. Sero-logic tests were set up in duplicate to analyze die serum levels of IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgG avidity antibodies using commercial ELISA kits. The results were presented as semi quantitative for IgG, IgM and IgA ELISA, and Relative Avidity Index in percentage for IgG avidity test. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r^sub p^) was applied to analyze die data. Of 107 serum samples, T. gondii specific IgM and IgA antibodies were positive in 67.3% and 53.3%, respectively. Besides, 29.9% of the sera displayed low avidity for IgG antibodies. The r^sub p^ was - 0.572 (P<0.01) between die IgG avidity and IgM ELISA, - 0.364 between die IgG avidity and IgA ELISA (P<0.01), and 0.564 between die IgM and IgA ELISA (P<0.01). The study strongly highlights die necessity of confirmatory testing in differential diagnosis of acute and chronic toxoplasmosis in Iran.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer