ARTICLE
Received 27 Dec 2013 | Accepted 10 Apr 2014 | Published 8 May 2014
The pollen wall, an essential structure for pollen function, consists of two layers, an inner intine and an outer exine. The latter is further divided into sexine and nexine. Many genes involved in sexine development have been reported, in which the MYB transcription factor Male Sterile 188 (MS188) species sexine in Arabidopsis. However, nexine formation remains poorly understood. Here we report the knockout of TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT SILENCING VIA AT-HOOK (TEK) leads to nexine absence in Arabidopsis. TEK encodes an AT-hook nuclear localized family protein highly expressed in tapetum during the tetrad stage. Absence of nexine in tek disrupts the deposition of intine without affecting sexine formation. We nd that ABORTED MICROSPORES directly regulates the expression of TEK and MS188 in tapetum for the nexine and sexine formation, respectively. Our data show that a transcriptional cascade in the tapetum species the development of pollen wall.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 OPEN
The tapetal AHL family protein TEK determines nexine formation in the pollen wall
Yue Lou1,*, Xiao-Feng Xu1,*, Jun Zhu1,*, Jing-Nan Gu1, Stephen Blackmore2 & Zhong-Nan Yang1
1 College of Life and Environment Sciences, Development Center of Plant Germplasm Resources, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.
2 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20a, Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Z.-N.Y. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855
The multilayered, structurally complex walls typical of angiosperm pollen grains exhibit a greater level of organizational complexity than those of any other cell
type1. The main roles of the pollen wall are in guiding the male gametophyte development in anthers, protecting the pollen from various environmental stresses and functioning in cellcell recognition during pollination13. The vast morphological diversity exhibited by pollen walls is the basis of the discipline of palynology and there is much interest in understanding how this diversity has arisen4. The pollen wall consists of a specialized outer exine, composed of sporopollenin, and an inner cellulosic intine. Sporopollenin is highly resistant to physical, chemical and biological degradation5,6. Based on cytological and molecular evidence, tapetum lls the role of sporopollenin biosynthesis for exine formation712. In angiosperms, the pollen exine is divided into sexine and nexine. The non-sculptured nexine is distinguished as a distinct layer between the sculptured sexine and an inner intine, which appears to be strongly conserved in seed plants1315. However, apart from its morphological description, knowledge on the formation of the nexine and its function is rather meagre. Therefore, the recognition of nexine formation in pollen wall development not only provides insight into plant phylogeny but also reveals the gene-determined mechanisms that underlie the ontogeny of the major layers of the pollen wall.
Recently, well-characterized genes in which mutations cause male sterile phenotype have enriched our understanding of key events in pollen wall development. Most of them, which are highly expressed in the tapetum, are required for exine formation. In vitro enzyme activity analysis revealed that they synthesize polymers such as sporopollenin precursors1622. The regulatory factors required for tapetum development and function are also important for the pollen wall formation11,12,23. Among them, ve transcription factors form a genetic pathway (DYT1-TDF1-AMSMS188-MS1) that regulates tapetum development and function24. In this pathway, DYSFUNCTIONAL TAPETUM1 (DYT1) encodes a bHLH transcription factor; DEFECTIVE in TAPETAL DEVELOPMENT and FUNCTION1 (TDF1) encodes a R2R3 MYB transcription factor, which both function in the early stages of tapetum development and are essential for the expression of tapetal genes25,26. ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS), an MYC class transcription factor, directly regulates the expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter G26 (ABCG26, also named WBC27), which is a putative transporter of tetraketide sporopollenin precursors for exine formation12,2729. MS188 encodes an R2R3 MYB transcription factor that specially affects sexine formation11.
Here we report the identication of an Arabidopsis mutant transposable element silencing via AT-hook (tek) that is associated with the formation of the nexine layer. The TEK encodes an AT-hook nuclear localized (AHL) protein and is highly expressed in the tapetal layer at tetrad stage. We show that AMS in the tapetum directly regulates TEK and MS188 for nexine and sexine layer formation, and that the presence of an intine layer depends on the formation of the nexine. These results establish a series of transcriptional events that eventually dictate the development of the different layers of the pollen wall.
ResultsTEK knockout leads to male sterility. To identify genes essential for anther development, a sterile mutant was isolated in a collection of T-DNA-tagged lines30. The T-DNA is inserted in At2g42940 (see below), which was previously designated as TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT SILENCING VIA AT-HOOK (TEK). Knockdown of TEK led to late owering31. Here we focus on the
mechanism of the male sterility of tek. The tek mutant was indistinguishable from wild type during vegetative growth, by its short siliques without seeds (Fig. 1a). No pollen was observed on the stamens and stigma of owers (Fig. 1b) and Alexanders staining showed that all pollen grains in the locule were aborted during the late stages of anther development (Fig. 1c). Each mutant tetrad contained four microspores that were similar to those of wild type, indicating that meiosis is normal in tek (Fig. 1d). Reciprocal crosses with wild type indicated that female fertility was not affected in the tek mutant. The fertile and sterile plants of F2 population segregated with 3:1 (281:95) ratio, indicating a single recessive sporophytic mutation for tek.
Anther development in Arabidopsis can be divided into 14 well-ordered stages on the basis of morphological landmarks32. At stage 8, the microspores are released from tetrads. The tek microspores were rounder and larger than those of wild type. At stage 9, microspores of wild-type plant became vacuolated, whereas the cytoplasm of tek microspores was shrunken and disintegrated. During stage 1012, microspores of wild type underwent asymmetric mitotic divisions and gradually developed into mature pollen grains. In the mutant, the microspore cytoplasm further degenerated and nally all microspores were aborted at stage 12 (Fig. 1e). These results show that the defective microspore production during microgametogenesis causes the complete male sterility of tek plant.
Nexine and intine layers are absent in tek. The pollen wall pattern is determined by several essential events at tetrad stage, including callose deposition, primexine matrix secretion and plasma membrane undulation3337. These events were indistinguishable between wild type and tek. The pro-sexine could be observed in both wild type and tek. However, accumulation of osmiophilic materials was signicantly reduced in periplasmic space on the surface of microspores in tek at later tetrad stage (Fig. 2a,h). When callose wall is totally dissolved at stage 8, the nexine layer was clearly present in wild type (Fig. 2b) but completely lacking in the tek microspores (Fig. 2i). In wild-type microspores, the intine layer between the nexine and the microspore plasma membrane could be clearly detected at stage 10 (Fig. 2d), and continues to increase in thicknesses as the pollen grains mature (Fig. 2e,f). In tek anthers, both the nexine and intine were absent despite the formation of a normal sexine (Fig. 2j). Later, the lack of nexine and intine in tek was more distinct (Fig. 2k,l). By stage 12, all pollen grains of the mutant had collapsed, with the framework of the sexine still visible. Some materials with low electronic density were also observed under the sexine layer (Fig. 2m). The surface pattern of the sexine layer in tek was similar to that of the wild type (Fig. 2gn), although the shape of the reticulum was slightly different, perhaps as a result of pollen collapse. These results show that the tek mutant failed to develop both nexine and intine, causing microspore abortion and male sterility.
Intine deposition is dependent on the presence of nexine. Intine development is gametophytically controlled3840. To understand how the sporophytic gene TEK affects the development of intine, we analysed the expression of an intine related gene in tek. Arabidopsis UDP-sugar pyrophosphorylase (AtUSP) was reported to play a critical role in intine synthesis40. The expression level of AtUSP in tek was similar to that of wild type (Supplementary Table 1). In situ hybridization conrmed that the expression pattern of AtUSP was not affected in tek (Fig. 2o). We used Tinopal and diethyloxadicarbocyanine iodide (DiOC2) to stain the intine and exine, respectively (Fig. 2p). In wild type, the intine showed a distinct uorescent ring between
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 ARTICLE
a
b
WT tek
tek
tek
c
WT
WT
d
WT tek
C-tek
e
Stage 7 Stage 8 Stage 9 Stage 10 Stage 11 Stage 12
MSp
MSp
PG PG
DPG
WTtek
Tds EEn MSp
MSp
MSp
MSp
ML
T
T
T
Tds
E
En
ML
T
DPG
Figure 1 | TEK knockout leads to the defective pollen development. (a) The wild type (WT), tek plant with short siliques (tek) and complemented plant with normal siliques (C-tek). (b) The ower of wild type and tek. (c) Alexanders staining of wild-type and tek anther. Scale bar, 100 mm. (d) The tetrad of wild type and tek. Scale bars, 10 um. (e) Sections of wild type and tek showing anther development from stage 712. DPG, degenerated pollen grain;
E, epidermis; En, endothecium; ML, middle layer; MSp, microspore; PG, pollen grain; T, tapetum; Tds, tetrads. Scale bars, 20 mm.
the exine and cytoplasm of pollen. In the locule of atusp/ , half
of the microspores (atusp) are abnormal (Supplementary Fig. 1). The uorescent ring of intine was not observed in the atusp pollen (Fig. 2p). In tek, a dim uorescent ring (aIn) appeared between exine and cytoplasm of pollen. It is likely to be that the materials required for intine formation can be synthesized in tek microspores. However, the deposition of intine is affected by the absence of nexine in tek microspores, suggesting that intine deposition relies on the presence of the nexine layer.
TEK is highly expressed in tapetal cells at tetrad stage. To ascertain the insert location of T-DNA tag, thermal asymmetric interlaced TAILPCR41 was carried out and a genomic DNA fragment anking the left border of T-DNA was recovered. Sequencing of the TAILPCR product showed that the T-DNA was inserted in the only exon of At2g42940, which completely abolished the expression of At2g42940 (Fig. 3b). For genetic complementation, we cloned the 2,277-bp genomic region, including the promoter and 30-untranslated region of
At2g42940 from wild type and transformed it into the tek/
heterozygous plants. Of the 20 transgenic plants with tek/tek
genotype, 19 plants showed the normal fertility (Fig. 1a). Our results demonstrated that At2g42940 was TEK and the phenotypes were caused by the disruption of At2g42940.
TEK encodes an AHL protein with a type I AT-hook motif for matrix attachment region binding and a PPC (Plants and Prokaryotes Conserved) domain evolutionarily conserved in the plant kingdom (Fig. 3c). In Arabidopsis, AHL family contains 29 members of 2 subgroups42 and TEK (AHL16) forms a distinct clade in subgroup I (Supplementary Fig. 2b). TEK homologues exist in both monocots and dicots. In some plants, such as rice and Medicago, there was only one closely related homologue, while two homologues were identied in Populus and soybean (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Arabidopsis AHL family was reported to be located in the nucleus43. We transformed tobacco leaves with p35S:TEK-GFP and found that the uorescence of the TEK-GFP protein was co-localized with the 40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining in nuclei (Fig. 3d), indicating that TEK is localized in the nuclear region.
Reverse transcriptasePCR (RTPCR) analysis showed that TEK was widely expressed in owers, roots and stems, with relatively low expression in leaves (Supplementary Fig. 2a). As TEK functions in anther development, we carried out in situ
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855
Stage 7
Ps
Stage 8 Stage 9 Stage 10 Stage 11 Stage 12 Released pollen
a b c d e f g
Se Se
Se Se
Ne
Ne
PC
PC
Se
Se
PM PM
Ps
Om
MSp MSp MSp
MSp
PM PM
PM
PM
Se
Se
In In
In?
In In
In?
In
In
Ne
Ne
MSp
OmMSp MSp MSp MSp
MSp
WT
PG
PG
PG
PG
Ne
Ne
PM
PM
Pe
Pe
Ne
Ne
PM PM
PM PM
Ne
Ne
CW
CW
T
T
In
In
Ne
Ne
Se
Se
h j
i
k
Se
Se
I
m
n
Se
Se
PM
PM
DPG
DPG
Se
Se
tek
Ps PM
Pe
CW
Ps PM
Pe
CW
MSp
MSp
MSp
MSp
T
MSp
MSp
PM
PM
Se
Se
DPG
DPG
PM
PM
PM
PM
Se
Se
o tek
atusp
Stage 7
Stage 6 Stage 8 Sense
T
T
p
Stage 11
PG DPG
Ex Ex Se
T
WT
T
T
MMC
MMC
Tds
Msp
Msp
Tds T
PG DPG
T
T
T
T
tek
Tds Msp T
WT
In aIn
Figure 2 | Nexine and intine layers are absent in tek (an). TEM images of pollen wall development in wild type (af) and tek (hm) from stage 712. (a,h) Later stage 7, showing the osmiophilic materials is reduced in tek; (b,i), stage 8, showing the nexine layer is absent in tek; (c,j), stage 9;(d,k), stage 10, showing the intine commenced in wild type; (e,l), stage 11, showing the degenerated tek pollen grain; (f,m), stage 12, showing the sexine and material analogues of intine still visible in tek. Scale bars, 500 nm (ac and hj); scale bars, 2 mm (df and km). Scanning electron microscopy of pollen grain of wild-type (g) and tek (n) showed the similar reticulate pattern. Scale bars, 5 mm. (o) AtUSP had its similar expression pattern in wild-type and tek anthers. Scale bars, 20 mm. (p) Cytochemical staining of semi-thin sections of wild-type, atusp/ and tek. All wild-type pollens showed a
pink uorescent ring of the intine layer, while the half pollens of atusp/ showed the absence of intine layer. A dim blue uorescent ring was detected
in the degraded pollen of tek. aIn, abnormal intine; Ca, callose wall; DPG, degenerated pollen grain; In, intine; In?, intine-like materials; MMC, microspores mother cell; MSp, microspore; Ne, nexine; PC, pollen coat; Pe, primexine; PG, pollen grain; PM, plasma membrane; Ps, pro-sexine; Se, sexine; T, tapetum; Tds, tetrads.
hybridization to detect its spatial and temporal expression pattern in wild-type anthers (Fig. 3e). During meiosis (stage 6), a weak hybridization signal was observed in microspore mother cells and tapetum. At the tetrad stage (stage 7), the maximum hybridization signal was seen in the tapetal cells with weak signal in the tetrads. At stage 8, with the microspores released from the tetrad, TEK expression was dramatically reduced in both tapetum and microspores. Thereafter, a hybridization signal was no longer observed. The expression pattern of TEK is in agreement with its function for pollen wall formation during anther development.
AMS directly binds the promoters of TEK and MS188. In the tapetum of Arabidopsis, there is a genetic pathway of DYT1-TDF1-AMS- MYB103-MS1, which is essential for tapetum development and function24. As TEK is mainly expressed in the tapetum at stage 7 (Fig. 3e), we performed in situ hybridization using TEK probe to further understand its position of the genetic pathway. We found that TEK signal could not be detected in ams anther, whereas the expression of TEK is not affected in ms188, supporting the hypothesis that TEK expression was under the regulation of AMS (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Fig. 4). We constructed double mutant of ams tek (Supplementary Fig. 3a,b). The ams tek plant showed male sterile phenotype with normal vegetative growth (Supplementary Fig. 3c). The defective
phenotype of tapetal development in the double mutant was similar to ams (Fig. 4a). These results show that TEK genetically acts downstream of AMS in the tapetum.
To analyse whether AMS directly regulates TEK expression in vivo, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis. AMS was reported to bind to the sequence containing E-box (CANNTG)12. There are four E-box motifs in the TEK promoter region ( 29 to 24, 236 to 231, 262 to 257
and 506 to 501) (Fig. 4b). Polyclonal antibodes against AMS
was used for ChIP with wild-type inorescence. Enrichments were detected with three primer sets in TEK promoters, showing that TEK was positively enriched in AB (antibody) compared
with Ab samples (Fig. 4b). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was further performed to conrm the quantitative ChIP PCR results in vitro. The full-length AMS was cloned into the pMAL plasmid and the recombinant AMS protein was puried from the supernatant. AMS protein can bind to the TEK promoter fragment ( 294 to 12) with the supershift band.
A 60-fold and a 180-fold excess of unlabelled TEK promoter fragment gradually competed for AMS and signicantly reduced the supershifted band. In the negative control, no parallel shift band was detected with the maltose binding protein (MBP) tag only (Fig. 4c). These data show that AMS directly binds to the E-box regions in TEK promoter, suggesting AMS might regulate TEK expression for nexine formation.
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 ARTICLE
a b
Molecule size(bp)
400
300
T-DNA fragment
TAA
WT
tek
ATG
5
3
TEK
TUBULIN
CLP
2.2 Kb
CRP
c
d e
p35S:TEK-GFP
Merge p35S:GFP
DAPI
Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 8
TEK (WT)
T T
MC
MC
Tds
T MSp
T
TEK (ams)
Dt Tds
Dt DMsp
Figure 3 | TEK is highly expressed in tapetal cells in anther. (a) TEK (At2g42940) contained only one exon (black box). The T-DNA insertion site was indicated and DNA fragment for complementation was outlined by primers CLP and CRP. (b) The TEK transcript could not be detected in tek inorescence. (c) Amino acid sequence of TEK contained the PPC domain (underlined) and the AT-hook motif (grey) within GRP motif (black) and type I AT-hook motif (boxed); (d) the uorescence co-localization of p35S:TEK-GFP and DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) indicated TEK was located to the nuclear. The p35S:GFP was used as a control. Scale bars, 10 mm. (e) TEK transcript was mainly detected in tapetal cell at stage 7 in wild-type, whereas this signal could not be detected in ams mutant. Stage 57, scale bars, 20 mm; Stage 811, scale bars, 50 mm.
Sexine autouorescence can be directly observed under the ultraviolet light. In wild-type and tek, the autouorescence was clearly observed, indicating the existence of the sexine layer. However, this autouorescence can not be detected in the ms188 mutant (Fig. 5a), further supporting the previous transmission electron microscopic (TEM) observation11 that the sexine layer is completely abolished in ms188. Previous data showed that MS188 was not expressed in ams mutants, and that the phenotypes of ms188 ams double mutants were similar to those of ams instead of ms188 (ref. 24). Using ChIP and EMSA analysis, we found that AMS can also bind to the MS188 promoter (Fig. 5b,c). In addition, the expression of TEK and MS188 was not affected by each other (Supplementary Fig. 4). Microarray data show that genes responsible for the sexine are not affected by TEK (Supplementary Table 1). Thus, these results suggest that sexine and nexine formation are independent, although both are under control of AMS in the tapetum.
DiscussionNexine is a conserved structure of the pollen wall in vascular land plants based on the observation under TEM4,1315. In this work, TEM analysis showed that osmiophilic materials were accumulated in periplasmic space on the surface of microspores in wild type. Later, the nexine layer was quickly formed surrounding the microspore surface after microspore released from the tetrad. However, the nexine formation had not been detected in tek and sexine failed to adhere or anchor to the microspore surface. In addition, the intine was absent in tek;
however, the intine gene expression was not affected and the materials for intine formation seemed to be synthesized. These results indicate that TEK acts as a regulator controlling nexine formation during pollen development. The intine formation is gametophytically controlled3840. However, the TEK gene was expressed in the tapetum under sporophytic control. Thus, we suppose that the intine formation depends on the presence of the nexine, which is consistent with the fact that the intine is formed after the nexine during the pollen wall development. This work provides a potential material for further investigation of nexine formation and function.
TEK encodes a member of the AHL family protein. It is reported to function in the maintenance of genome integrity by silencing transposable element and repeat-containing genes in Ler ecotype31. However, the function of TEK in relation to pollen development has not been investigated. Our results demonstrate that TEK is essential for nexine formation. The members of the AHL family, including AHL16 (TEK), AHL21 (GIK), AHL25 (AGF1) and AHL15 (AGF2), were reported to maintain genome integrity. They also act as a molecular node to regulate the downstream gene expression through binding to the cis-acting sequence44,45. TEK is likely to regulate the expression of genes essential for the nexine formation. The identication of these target genes of TEK should facilitate the understanding of the nexine composition and function.
Recent investigations revealed that several tapetal-specic genes participated in exine formation, such as ACOS5, CYP703A2/704B1, TKPR1/2, LAP5/6 and MS2 for sporopollenin biosynthesis1622 and ABCG26 for precursor transportation2729.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855
a
Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 11
MC
Tds
ams ams/tek
T
DT
MMC
Dt
MC
Tds
T
MMC
Dt
Dt
b c
Probe
Competitor
Protein
MBP ctrl.
+
+
P1 P2 P3
355 173
548 400
+ +
x60
+
+
133
0
x180
5 3
ATG
+
+
Relative enrichment
12
10
8
6
4
2 1
P1 P2 P3
Figure 4 | AMS directly binds to the promoter of TEK. (a) Sections of anther development show the phenotype of ams tek double mutant is similar with ams, indicating TEK functions downstream of AMS. DMSp, degenerated microspores; Dt, degenerated tapetum; MC, meiotic cell. Scale bars, 20 mm. (b) The
TEK promoter region contains four predicted E-boxes (bone). The enrichments of TEK promoter were conrmed by ChIPquantitative PCR (qPCR) with the primer sets (P1, P2, P3). Fold enrichment calculations from two replicates qPCR assays in three independent ChIP experiments. Error bars represent s.d. (n 3). (c) EMSA assay shows AMS can bind to P2 fragment in the TEK promoter. Non-labelled competitors are able to reduce the visible shift signicantly
(arrow).
However, the molecular mechanisms how these tapetal genes regulate exine development are not clear. As regulatory genes were identifed in tapetal genetic pathway (DYT1-TDF1-AMS-MS188-MS1), the identication of other pollen wall-related genes would further reveal elaborate mechanism for tapetum to control the synthesis and transportation of exine materials. In this work, we found that AMS can directly bind to TEK promoter, showing that the regulatory pathway (DYT1-TDF1-AMS-TEK) in tapetum is required for nexine layer formation. On the other hand, MS188 is the key regulator for sexine formation. Therefore, the direct binding of AMS to MS188 promoter represents the tapetal regulatory pathway (DYT1-TDF1-AMS-MS188) for sexine layer formation. These two genetic
pathways in the tapetum strongly conrm the previous studies that exine, including both sexine and nexine, is sporophytically controlled by the tapetum812.
The molecular cloning of TEK and identication of the genetic pathways for pollen wall formation allow us to further understand the pollen wall development (Fig. 6). As both the key regulators Male Sterile 188 (MS188) and TEK for sexine and nexine formation, respectively, are directly targeted by AMS, the formation of sexine and nexine probably initiates at the same time inside the tetrad. TEM analysis showed the absence of sexine in ms188 mutant with normal nexine layer11 and the normal sexine in tek mutant without nexine. In addition, the expression of MS188 is independent of TEK. All these suggest that these two
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 ARTICLE
a
WT ms188
Protein MBP ctrl.
tek
PF PF
Stage 10
CF
b c
Probe Competitor
+
S1 S2 S3
375 242 0
+
+
+
+ + x40
+
x150
+
1,439
5 3
1,053
1,279
848
ATG
Relative enrichment
30
25
20
15
10
5
1
S1 S2 S3
Figure 5 | AMS directly binds to the promoter of MS188. (a) Cytochemical staining of anther sections show autouorescence of sexine in wild-type and tek but not in ms188. CF, callose uorescence; PF, pollen wall autouorescence. Scale bars, 20 mm. (b) The enrichments of MS188 promoter were conrmed by ChIPquantitative PCR (qPCR) with the primer sets (S1, S2, S3), suggesting MS188 is a direct target of AMS. Fold enrichment calculations from two replicates qPCR assays in three independent ChIP experiments. Error bars represent s.d. (n 3). (c) EMSA assay shows AMS is able to bind to
S2 fragment in the MS188 promoter. Non-labelled competitors are able to reduce the visible shift signicantly (arrow).
DYT1
TDF1
AMS
TEK MS188
Ps
PE
Tet
Ba
Ne
Int
Cal
Cal
Ne Int PM
PE
PM
Se
Figure 6 | Diagrammatic representation of the pollen wall development. The AMS activated the expression of MS188 and TEK in tapetum. In tetrad, four microspores were surrounded by callose. The materials produced in tapetum were transported to form the pro-sexine and nexine in the primexine. The mature pollen wall contains sexine (bacula and tectum), nexine and intine layers. Ba, bacula; Cals, callose; Int, intine; Ne, nexine; PE, primexine; PM, plasmamembrane; Ps, pro-sexine; SE, sexine; Tet, tectum.
layers are independently formed, although both of them are under regulation of AMS. The nexine layer is already formed when microspores are released from the tetrad, while sporopollenin continues to accumulate outside the nexine to form the mature sexine. The intine is formed after the nexine, which can be observed at stage 10. We propose that the nexine may play a role in protecting the released microspore until the intine is formed and act as a template for the accumulation of materials during intine formation.
Methods
Plant material. Arabidopsis, ecotype Columbia-0, was the source of both the wild-type and mutant plants. Plants were grown under long-day conditions (16-h of light/8-h of dark) in a growth room at B22 C. The tek mutant was isolated from
T-DNA lines provided by Dr Zu-hua He. The herbicide Basta was used to monitor the segregation of the T-DNA inserts.
Microscopy. Plants were photographed with a Cybershot T-20 digital camera (Sony, Japan). Flower images were taken using a dissecting microscope with an DP70 digital camera (Olympus, Japan). Alexanders solution was made by the
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855
following reagents46: ethanol, 10 ml; 1% malachite green in 95% ethanol, 1 ml; distilled water, 50 ml; glycerol 25 ml; phenol, 5 g; chloral hydrate, 5 g; acid fuchsin 1% in water, 5 ml; orange G, 1% in water 0.5 ml and glacial acetic acid, 14 ml. Staining the anthers overnight at room temperature. Plant material for the semi-thin sections was prepared and embedded in Spurrs resin47. Semi-thin sections were prepared by cutting the plant material into 1-mm thick sections, and then were stained and photographed by bright-eld microscopy. For intine layer observation, the sections were stained with Toluidine blue 5 min (10 mg ml 1), Tinapol 15 min (10 mg ml 1) (Sigma, USA) and DiOC2 5 min (5 ml ml 1) (Sigma). For scanning electron microscopic examination, fresh pollen grains were coated with 8 nm of gold and observed under JSM-840 microscopy (JEOL, Japan). For TEM observation, the same-stage buds of wild type and mutant grown at the same condition were dissected to avoid experimental deviation. Arabidopsis buds from the inorescence were xed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v), then washed several times before being dehydrated through a series of acetone/water mixtures. Finally, the ower buds were embedded into the fresh mixed resin and polymerized in molds (60 C, 24 h)37. Ultrathin sections (70100 nm thick) were observed using TEM microscopy (JEOL, Japan). Green uorescent protein (GFP) uorescence was detected under an IX70 inverted microscope system (Olympus).
Identication and complementation of the TEK gene. The identication of the T-DNA insertion was performed using primers that specically amplify the BAR gene of T-DNA (Bar-F and Bar-R). For TAILPCR, the T-DNA left border primer (AtLB1, AtLB2 and AtLB3), and genomic DNA of the mutant plants were used. Identication of the T-DNA insertion site was analysed with AtLB3 and plant-specic primers (ILP and IRP). A DNA fragment of 2,277 bp, including 725 bp upstream and 778 bp downstream sequences, was amplied by primers of CLP-F and CRP-R using KOD polymerase (Takara Biotechnology, Japan). The fragment was cloned into a pCAMBIA1300 binary vector (CAMBIA, Australia) and veried by sequencing. The plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 and then introduced into the heterozygous mutant plants. Transformants were selected using 20 mg l 1 hygromycin. The backgrounds of the transformants were veried by primers of AtLB3, IRP, CLPV-F and CRPV-R. Oligonucleotide sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 2.
Expression analysis and in situ hybridization. Full-length complementary DNA of the TEK cloned from wild-type plants without the stop codon was cloned for the GFP fusion with primers GFP-F and GFP-R. The PCR product was cloned into the PMON530 vector with enhanced GFP and transformed into newly formed tobacco leaves with injection48; the GFP uorescence of transgenic plants was observed with a Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope. For RTPCR, RNA was extracted from the root, stem, rosette leaves, 21-day-old seedlings and inorescences using a Trizol kit (Invitrogen, USA). RTPCR for 28 cycles was used to analyse the expression level of the TEK gene by primers (RTTEK-F and RTTEK-R). Non-radioactive RNA in situ hybridization was performed with using the Digoxigenin RNA Labeling Kit (Roche, USA) and the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche). A 450-bp TEK cDNA fragment was amplied using TEK-specic primers (TEK-F and TEK-R). A 417-bp fragment was amplied using AtMYB103-specic primers (MS188-F and MS188-R). A 334-bp fragment was amplied using AtUSP-specic primers (USP-F and USP-R). The PCR products were cloned into the pbluescriptSK vector and conrmed by sequencing. Plasmid DNA were completely digested and used as the template for transcription with T3 or T7 RNA polymerase, respectively49. Oligonucleotide sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 2.
Microarrays. Closed buds collected from wild-type and tek mutant plants were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Three biological replicates of independently grown materials were used. Total RNA was amplied and labelled by Low RNA Input Linear Amplication kit (catalogue number 5184-3523, Agilent Technologies, USA), 5-(3-aminoallyl)-UTP (catalogue number AM8436, Ambion, USA), Cy3 NHS ester (catalogue number PA13105, GE Healthcare Biosciences, USA), Cy5 NHS ester (catalogue number PA15100, GE Healthcare Biosciences) followed the manufacturers instructions. Labelled cRNA were puried by RNeasy mini kit (catalogue number 74106, QIAGEN, Germany). Each 44 K Arabidopsis oligo microarray slide was hybridized with 825 ng Cy3-labelled cRNA and 825 ng Cy-5 labelled cRNA using Gene Expression Hybridization Kit (catalogue number 5188-5242, Agilent Technologies) in Hybridization Oven (catalogue number G2545A, Agilent Technologies), according to the manufacturers instructions. Slides were scanned by Agilent Microarray Scanner (catalogue number G2565BA, Agilent Technologies) and Feature Extraction software 10.7 (Agilent Technologies) with default settings. Raw data were normalized by Lowess (locally weighted scatter plot smoothing) algorithm, Gene Spring Software 11.0 (Agilent Technologies). The spots that displayed an expression ratio (tek/wild type) of o0.5 (for downregulated genes) and 42 (for upregulated genes), a Signal/Noise value 42.6 and a pValueLogRatio o0.05 in three independent experiments were selected.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation. ChIP assay was performed according to ref. 50 with minor modications. A total of 0.81.0 g inorescence of wild-type plant were collected and crosslinked in the buffer containing formaldehyde. After isolating the
nuclei and shearing the chromatin with ultrasonic, the majority of the DNA fragments have a size between 200800 bp. After pre-immuneserum with sheared salmon sperm DNA/proteinA agarose mix (Millipore, USA) for 1 h, the super-natants were incubated with polyclonal antibody against AMS (GL Biochem, China) at 4 C overnight with 1:100 dilution. Forty microlitres of magnetic beads protein G (Invitrogen) were added to precipitate the antibodyprotein/DNA complexes. The DNA fragments were eluted after reverse crosslinking by boiling at 100 C for 10 min. The remaining steps for purication of DNA were carried out according to the manufacturers instructions. Real-time PCR were performed on an ABI PRISM 7300 detection system (Applied Biosystems, USA) with SYBR Green I master mix (TOYOBO, Japan)51. All PCR experiments were performed as the following conditions: 95 C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 95 C for 10 s and 62 C for1 min. Under the same conditions, we calculated the DCt values (Ct of each sample Ct of the NoAb control) and took 2 DCt as the fold enrichment.
The relevant primers were listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay. To obtain puried AMS protein for the EMSA experiments, the full-length fragment of the AMS gene was amplied using the primer pairs AMSpMAL-F and AMSpMAL-R, and cloned into the pMAL-p5X vector (NEB, USA) to produce the (Maltose Binding Protein) MBP-AMS construct. Expression and purication of the fusion protein were performed according to the manufacturers instructions. The DNA fragment containing the E-box (CANNTG) in the TEK and MS188 regulatory region were generated by specic primers (ETEK-F/ETEK-R and EMS188-F/EMS188-R) that were used to generate a biotin-labelled and competitor probe, respectively. The EMSA assay was performed with a LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (Thermo Scientic, USA). Reactions were performed in binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol), at room temperature for 20 min. The subsequent processes were performed according to the manufacturers instructions. The image was caught by Tanon-5500 Chemiluminescent Imaging System (Tanon, China).
Protein structure prediction and phylogenetic analysis. The TEK protein sequence was used to search for TEK homologues using BLAST. Multiple sequence alignment of full-length protein sequences was performed using ClustalX 2.0. Phylogenetic trees were constructed and tested by MEGA3.1 based on the neigh-bour-joining method (http://www.megasoftware.net/
Web End =http://www.megasoftware.net/).
References
1. Scott, R. J. in: Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Plant Reproduction. (eds Scott,R. J. & Stead, M. A.) 4981 (University Press, 1994).2. Zinkl, G. M., Zwiebel, B. I., Grier, D. G. & Preuss, D. Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: a species-specic interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine. Development 126, 54315440 (1999).
3. Ariizumi, T. et al. Disruption of the novel plant protein NEF1 affects lipid accumulation in the plastids of the tapetum and exine formation of pollen, resulting in male sterility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 39, 170181 (2004).
4. Blackmore, S., Wortley, A. H., Skvarla, J. J. & Rowley, J. R. Pollen wall development in owering plants. New Phytol. 174, 483498 (2007).
5. Guilford, W. J., Schneider, D. M., Labovitz, J. & Opella, S. J. High resolution solid state C NMR spectroscopy of sporopollenins from different plant taxa. Plant Physiol. 86, 134136 (1988).
6. Scott, R. J., Spielmana, M. & Dickinsonb, H. G. Stamen structure and function. Plant Cell 16, 4660 (2004).
7. Heslop-Harrison, J. Origin of exine. Nature 195, 10691071 (1962).8. Dickinson, H. G. & Heslop-Harrison, J. Common mode of deposition for the sporopollenin of sexine and nexine. Nature 220, 926927 (1968).
9. Mariani, C., De Beuckeleer, M., Truettner, J., Leemans, J. & Goldberg, R. B. Induction of male sterility in plants by achimeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347, 737741 (1990).
10. Piffanelli, P., Ross, J. H. E. & Murphy, D. J. Biogenesis and function of the lipidic structures of pollen grains. Sex Plant Reprod. 11, 6580 (1998).11. Zhang, Z. B. et al. Transcription factor AtMYB103 is required for anther development by regulating tapetum development, callose dissolution and exine formation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 52, 528538 (2007).
12. Xu, J. et al. The ABORTED MICROSPORES regulatory network is required for postmeiotic male reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22, 91107 (2010).
13. Erdtman, G. Pollen walls and angiosperm phylogeny. Bot. Notiser. 113, 4145 (1960).
14. Hesse, M. et al. Pollen terminology: An Illustrated Handbook (Springer, 2009).15. Weber, M. & Ulrich, S. The endexine: a frequently overlooked pollen wall layer and simple method for detection. Grana 49, 8390 (2010).
16. de Azevedo Souza, C. et al. A novel fatty Acyl-CoA synthetase is required for pollen development and sporopollenin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 507525 (2009).
17. Morant, M. et al. CYP703 is an ancient cytochrome P450 in land plants catalyzing in-chain hydroxylation of lauric acid to provide building blocks for sporopollenin synthesis in pollen. Plant Cell 19, 14731487 (2007).
8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 ARTICLE
18. Dobritsa, A. A. et al. CYP704B1 is a long-chain fatty acid omega-hydroxylase essential for sporopollenin synthesis in pollen of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 151, 574589 (2009).
19. Dobritsa, A. A. et al. LAP5 and LAP6 encode anther-specic proteins with similarity to chalcone synthase essential for pollen exine development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 153, 937955 (2010).
20. Chen, W. et al. Male Sterile2 encodes a plastid-localized fatty acyl carrier protein reductase required for pollen exine development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 157, 842853 (2011).
21. Grienenberger, E. et al. Analysis of TETRAKETIDE a-PYRONE REDUCTASE function in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a previously unknown, but conserved, biochemical pathway in sporopollenin monomer biosynthesis. Plant Cell 22, 40674083 (2010).
22. Kim, S. S. et al. LAP6/POLYKETIDE SYNTHASE A and LAP5/POLYKETIDE SYNTHASE B encode hydroxyalkyl-pyrone synthases required for pollen development and sporopollenin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22, 40454066 (2010).
23. Ma, H. Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in owering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56, 393434 (2005).
24. Zhu, J., Lou, Y., Xu, X. & Yang, Z. N. A genetic pathway for tapetum development and function in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53, 892900 (2011).
25. Zhang, W. et al. Regulation of Arabidopsis tapetum development and function by DYSFUNCTIONAL TAPETUM1 (DYT1) encoding a putative bHLH transcription factor. Development 133, 30853095 (2006).
26. Zhu, J. et al. Defective in Tapetal Development and Function 1 is essential for anther development and tapetal function for microspore maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 55, 266277 (2008).
27. Quilichini, T. D., Friedmann, M. C., Samuels, A. L. & Douglas, C. J. ATP-binding cassette transporter G26 is required for male fertility and pollen exine formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 154, 678690 (2010).
28. Choi, H. et al. An ABCG/WBC-type ABC transporter is essential for transport of sporopollenin precursors for exine formation in developing pollen. Plant J. 65, 181193 (2011).
29. Dou, X. Y. et al. WBC27, an adenosine tri-phosphate-binding cassette protein, controls pollen wall formation and patterning in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53, 7488 (2011).
30. Qin, G. et al. Obtaining and analysis of anking sequences from T-DNA transformants in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 165, 941949 (2003).
31. Xu, Y. et al. A matrix protein silences transposons and repeats through interaction with retinoblastoma-associated proteins. Curr. Biol. 23, 345350 (2013).
32. Sanders, P. M. et al. Anther developmental defects in Arabidopsis thaliana male-sterile mutants. Sex Plant Reprod. 11, 297322 (1999).
33. Heslop-Harrison, J. Wall pattern formation in angiosperm microsporogenesis. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 25, 277300 (1971).
34. Sheldon, J. M. & Dickinson, H. G. Determination of patterning in the pollen wall of Lilium henryi. J. Cell Sci. 63, 191208 (1983).
35. Blackmore, S. & Barnes, S. Pollen wall morphogenesis in Tragopogon porrifolius (Compositae: Lactuceae) and its taxonomic signicance. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 52, 233246 (1987).
36. Southworth, D. & Jernstedt, J. A. Pollen exine development precedes microtubule rearrangement in Vigna unguiculata (Fabaceae): a model for pollen wall patterning. Protoplasma 187, 7987 (1995).
37. Chang, H. S. et al. No primexine and plasma membrane undulation is essential for primexine deposition and plasma membrane undulation during microsporogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158, 264272 (2012).
38. Li, J., Yu, M., Geng, L. L. & Zhao, J. The fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein gene, FLA3, is involved in microspore development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 64, 482497 (2010).
39. Huang, L. et al. The polygalacturonase gene BcMF2 from Brassica campestris is associated with intine development. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 301313 (2009).
40. Schnurr, J. A., Storey, K. K., Jung, H. J., Somers, D. A. & Gronwald, J. W. UDP-sugar pyrophosphorylase is essential for pollen development in Arabidopsis. Planta 224, 520532 (2006).
41. Liu, Y. G., Mitsukawa, N., Oosumi, T. & Whittier, R. F. Efcient isolation and mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insert junctions by thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR. Plant J. 8, 457463 (1995).
42. Aravind, L. & Landsman, D. AT-hook motifs identied in a wide variety of DNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 44134421 (1998).43. Fujimoto, S. et al. Identication of a novel plant MAR DNA binding protein localized on chromosomal surfaces. Plant Mol. Biol. 56, 225239 (2004).
44. Ng, K. H., Yu, H. & Ito, T. AGAMOUS controls GIANT KILLER, a multifunctional chromatin modier in reproductive organ patterning and differentiation. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000251 (2009).
45. Matsushita, A., Furumoto, T., Ishida, S. & Takahashi, Y. AGF1, an AT-hook protein, is necessary for the negative feedback of AtGA3ox1 encoding GA 3-oxidase. Plant Physiol. 143, 11521162 (2007).
46. Alexander, M. P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 44, 117122 (1969).
47. Owen, H. ,A. & Makaroff, C. A. Ultrastructure of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. ecotype Wassilewskija (Brassicaceae). Protoplasma 185, 721 (1995).
48. Vionnet, M. & Rostan, O. [Idiopathic spontaneous hemoperitoneum]. Swiss Surg. 9, 184186 (2003).
49. Guan, Y. F. et al. RUPTURED POLLEN GRAIN1, a member of the MtN3/ saliva gene family, is crucial for exine pattern formation and cell integrity of microspores in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 147, 852863 (2008).
50. Bowler, C. et al. Chromatin techniques for plant cells. Plant J. 39, 776789 (2004).
51. Yang, J. et al. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for pollen wall pattern formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 162, 720731 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2013CB945100), the National Science Foundation of China (31100227). We thank Professor Sheila McCormick and Professor Yunde Zhao for critical reading and revising of the manuscript.
Author contributions
The project leader is Z.-N.Y. X.-F.U. contributed Figs 1, 2an,p, 3, 4a, 5a. Y.L. andX.-F.X. contributed Figs 4b,c, 5b,c. J.-N.G. contributed Fig. 2p and construction of the MBP-AMS fusion plasmid. J.Z. contributed Fig. 6. X.-F.X., J.Z. and Y.L. designed the experiments. Y.L. and J.Z. wrote the paper together. S.B. contributed to interpretation and discussion of the observations.
Additional information
Accession codes: Microarray data has been deposited in GEO repository under accession number GSE56497.
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Lou, Y. et al. The tapetal AHL family protein TEK determines nexine formation in the pollen wall. Nat. Commun. 5:3855 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4855 (2014).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3855 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4855 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 9
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2014
Abstract
The pollen wall, an essential structure for pollen function, consists of two layers, an inner intine and an outer exine. The latter is further divided into sexine and nexine. Many genes involved in sexine development have been reported, in which the MYB transcription factor Male Sterile 188 (MS188) specifies sexine in Arabidopsis. However, nexine formation remains poorly understood. Here we report the knockout of TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT SILENCING VIA AT-HOOK (TEK) leads to nexine absence in Arabidopsis. TEK encodes an AT-hook nuclear localized family protein highly expressed in tapetum during the tetrad stage. Absence of nexine in tek disrupts the deposition of intine without affecting sexine formation. We find that ABORTED MICROSPORES directly regulates the expression of TEK and MS188 in tapetum for the nexine and sexine formation, respectively. Our data show that a transcriptional cascade in the tapetum specifies the development of pollen wall.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer