Content area
Full Text
niccolò machiavelli would have undoubtedly secured enduring fame for any one of the roles he played during his life in and out of Renaissance Florence: historian, diplomat, military strategist, civil servant, poet, playwright. However, it was in his capacity as a political thinker that Machiavelli earned eternal renown. His political writings sparked some of the most intense scholarly controversies in Western intellec- tual history and raised fundamental questions that every participant in politics throughout the globe would henceforth have to confront. Not without reason, many commentators consider Machiavelli the father of modern political thought or modern political science-some even ordain him the founder of "modernity" itself.
Yet the specific content and precise objectives of his political writings remain elusive half a millennium after their circulation. Was Machiavelli an advisor of tyranny or a partisan of liberty? A neutral tech- nician of power politics or an Italian patriot? An anticlerical reviver of pagan virtue or a devious initiator of modern nihilism? To what extent was Machiavelli a "Machiavellian"? What would Machiavelli, the self- proclaimed and widely reputed master of political prudence, say about contemporary political problems? Intriguing answers to some of these provocative questions are offered by the esteemed contributors to this special issue of Social Research, which commemorates the five hundredth anniversary of the composition of Machiavelli's most famous work, On Principalities (1513-1514)-or, as it was titled by others, The Prince.
This "little book," as Machiavelli called his short treatise on the means of gaining, holding, and expanding political power, certainly an- nounced a dramatic break with previous political doctrines anchored in substantively moral and religious systems of thought. Unlike his classical or medieval predecessors, who took their political bearings from transcendentally valid or divinely sanctioned conceptions of jus- tice, the author of The Prince oriented himself to the "effectual truth" of politics; how the world actually "is" rather than how it "ought" to be. Indeed, Machiavelli's often brutally "realistic" advice-meticu- lously analyzed here with surprising results by contributor Erica Ben- ner-seems intended to contravene all previous, socially respectable forms of political reflection.
For instance, Machiavelli boldly declares that it is safer for a prince to be feared rather than loved (if he must choose between these two forms of regard) because subjects love at...