Content area

Abstract

A strong Condorcet winner (SCW) is an alternative, x, that a majority of voters rank higher than z, for every other alternative, z. A weak Condorcet winner (WCW) is an alternative, y, that no majority of voters rank below any other alternative, z, but is not a SCW. There has been some confusion in the voting/social choice literature as to whether particular voting rules that are SCW-consistent are also WCW-consistent. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this issue, clear up the confusion that has developed, and determine whether three additional SCW-consistent voting rules--that as far as we know have not been investigated to date regarding their possible WCW consistency--are indeed WCW-consistent.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Title
Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited
Author
Felsenthal, Dan S; Tideman, Nicolaus
Pages
313-326
Publication year
2014
Publication date
Sep 2014
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
00485829
e-ISSN
1573-7101
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1543417916
Copyright
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014