Content area

Abstract

Unfortunately, the latter description was published too late to be incorporated into the standard Hittite grammar (H.A. Hoffner and H.C. Melchert, A Grammar of the Hittite Language I. Reference Grammar, Winona Lake, 2008), which led to the current, confusing, situation where the best synchronic description is not to be found in the most detailed grammar, but in an etymological dictionary. [...]the author's project, a thorough Hittite grammar in French, the second part of which is reviewed here, provides an excellent opportunity to overcome this problem. A major problem of the book is the sometimes inconsistent rendering of Hittite orthography, even though it is phonologically relevant. [...]the geminated spelling was entirely neglected for the endings, in many cases distorting their representation: all endings starting with geminated dental or laryngeal (mi-conjugation: 3sg pres., 2pl. The presentation of the endings has further shortcomings, such as neglecting some attested variants (e.g. medial °Äri-endings in New Hittite) but containing unattested (though expected) forms (*-wastari [1pl.pres.med] is not "rare" (p. 19), but unattested, *-ddumati [2pl.pret.med]), without notifying the reader. Since the present volume neither adopts nor adapts a pre-existing classificatory system, but proposes its own without refuting the earlier ones, it does not replace them.

Full text

Turn on search term navigation

Copyright © SOAS, University of London 2014