Content area
Full Text
DIPLOMACY
When Goldman Sachs traders coined the term BRIC-an acronym for the emerging Brazil, Russia, India, and China-in 2001 it was just handy shorthand for a flashy new investment opportunity. Now, the BRICS (which, since 2010, have included South Africa) are a real, functioning diplomatic network. On July 15, the BRICS countries signed a treaty providing for the establishment of the New Development Bank (NDB), a multilateral institution intended as an alternative to the IMF and the World Bank, two bodies in which the BRICS countries have long pushed for more influence. Its architects are hopeful that it can compete with its Westerndominated counterparts, changing the power balance of the international system. But can the NDB really disrupt the status quo?
At the turn of the millennium, the BRIC countries caught the attention of major financial institutions as promising locations for new investments. Most of these investments paid off. Between 2003 and 2008, the BRIC countries experienced monumental growth. Soon, "BRIC" became part of the wider lexicon, indicating four breakout nations that were changing the landscape of the world financial system. There was a sense that this was something historic-that Brazil, Russia, India, and China were rising from the poor and middle class of the world to join the elite, ending Western dominance over the global economy.
However, influence in the world economy is based on more than GDP and sphere of commerce. Since the Bretton Woods conference of 1945, the IMF and the World Bank have wielded tremendous sway over the global system, especially in issues pertaining to developing countries like the BRICS. While...