Content area
Full text
In her study of postcolonial trauma, Victoria Burrows investigates and often contests Cathy Caruth's contention that traumatic psychopathology, by virtue of its universality, can both bridge cultural difference and challenge culturally determined hierarchies of power. Burrows addresses Caruth's assertion that "psychoanalysis, psychiatry, sociology, and even literature are beginning to hear each other anew in the study of trauma ... [by] listening through the radical disruption and gaps of traumatic experience" ("Introduction," American 2), contending "such a statement manifestly ignores power structures" (163). For Burrows, the negotiation between trauma and postcolonial politics is difficult:
Amalgamating trauma theory and postcolonialism is not, therefore, just about individual traumatic experiences not being assimilated at the time of the occurrence. The synthesis is complicated by cultural imbalances that are bound by issues of psychic and material domination inherent in ethnocentrism and the invisible power structures of whiteness.
(164)
In effect, Burrows' skepticism encourages us to question Caruth's later assertion that trauma "may provide the very link between cultures" ("Trauma" 11). This essay tests the capacity of trauma as a mental wound1 to negotiate cultural difference and equalize power hierarchies within a specific colonial context, namely the Vietnam War, particularly as it is depicted in David Bergen's 2005 Giller Prize-winning novel The Time in Between .2 Various critics, such as Kalí Tal, Robert Jay Lifton, and Judith Herman, have located Vietnam literature within discourses of trauma; indeed, the Vietnam War is intrinsic to the development of trauma theory in the late twentieth century (Herman 27).3 However, as Renny Christopher argues, the debilitating power dynamics inherent in colonial relationships were also an element of the Vietnam War. This intersection between trauma and colonial relationships in the Vietnam War is also apparent in The Time in Between , and therefore, an analysis of the novel offers a useful forum of investigation that ascertains the degree to which trauma can erode cultural differences between victims. In other words, this essay engages in the kind of postcolonial study of trauma Burrows describes but does so by examining how The Time in Between represents trauma as able--or unable--to bridge cultural difference between sufferers, most particularly those who have internalized an ideological apparatus that is informed by colonial relationships and power structures.4
In...





