It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
En el presente artículo se mostraran los principales puntos de encuentro y des-encuentro de tres enfoques de la teoría de la argumentación y la forma en que se puede hacer análisis del discurso a partir de cada uno de ellos tomando como referente decisiones de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia.
This paper will show the main points of agreement and disagreement in three approaches of the theory of argumentation, and how they can be used to give an account of actual decisions taken by the Constitutional Court of Colombia.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer