Content area
This article intends to show that in the construction of our legal-labor institutions we have taken up sources that are diverse and strange to our historical conditions, generating hybrid forms of culture that are not always intelligible for legal analysts. This produces permanent contradictions that make the study of the discipline a constant struggle to understand why labor norms have such a low level of application. For this reason, I engage in a critique of Colombian labor dogmatism using conceptual tools rooted in history and anthropology with the aim of making evident the weaknesses of the dogma articulated in my hypothesis.