It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This article intends to show that in the construction of our legal-labor institutions we have taken up sources that are diverse and strange to our historical conditions, generating hybrid forms of culture that are not always intelligible for legal analysts. This produces permanent contradictions that make the study of the discipline a constant struggle to understand why labor norms have such a low level of application. For this reason, I engage in a critique of Colombian labor dogmatism using conceptual tools rooted in history and anthropology with the aim of making evident the weaknesses of the dogma articulated in my hypothesis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





