Content area

Abstract

To date, no randomized control trial has been performed comparing open appendectomy (OA) to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in complicated appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2010 concluded LA is advantageous to OA with less surgical site sepsis in complicated appendicitis; however, the level of evidence is weak (level 3a). The aim of the study was to determine whether LA is safe in the treatment of complicated appendicitis. Primary outcome included all-cause mortality and procedure-related mortality; secondary outcomes included intra-operative duration, rates of wound sepsis and re-intervention, length of hospital stay and re-admission rates.

One hundred and fourteen patients were randomized prospectively to either OA or LA using a computer-generated blind method. Patients who were either less than 12 years of age, had previous abdominal surgery or were pregnant were excluded. A team of senior surgeons capable of doing both OA and LA performed all procedures.

The intra-operative duration, the rate of wound sepsis, the number of re-operations, the length of hospital stay and the rate of re-admissions between the OA and LA groups did not differ statistically.

Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe in complicated appendicitis. Current Control Trials (ISRCTN92257749)

Details

Title
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety
Author
Thomson, John-edwin; Kruger, Deirdré; Jann-kruger, Christine; Kiss, Akos; Omoshoro-jones, J A; O; Luvhengo, Thifheli; Brand, Martin
Pages
2027-2032
Publication year
2015
Publication date
Jul 2015
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
09302794
e-ISSN
14322218
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1689559526
Copyright
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015