Diagn Interv Radiol 2015; 21: 483487
Turkish Society of Radiology 2015
INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Geometrical characteristics after Y-stenting of the basilar bifurcation
Muzaer Salam Osman Kzlkl Vania Anagnostakou Blent YldzNaci KoerCivan Ilak
PURPOSE
We aimed to investigate the angular changes after Y-stenting of the basilar bifurcation aneurysms.
METHODS
A total of 19 patients (age range, 2780 years; mean age, 52.5 years) underwent Y-stent coiling for basilar bifurcation aneurysm. Three vascular angles (, 1, 2) were measured in the anteroposterior plane. 1 and 2 represented the angles between the basilar artery and the proximal P1 segments of the right and left posterior cerebral arteries, respectively. represented the complementary angle between the 1 and 2 angles. Angles were measured before and after stent deployment. Diameters of the basilar artery and P2 segment of the posterior cerebral artery were measured at both sides. Correlation between vascular diameter and angular change of the basilar bifurcation was investigated.
RESULTS
Statistically signicant , 1, and 2 angle changes were found after stent deployment (P < 0.001). There was no statistically signicant relationship between the diameter of the basilar artery and the , 1, 2 angle changes (P > 0.05). There was no statistically signicant relationship between the diameter of the posterior cerebral artery and the angle change (P > 0.05). We found a statistically signicant inverse correlation between pre-stent angle and post-stent angle change (right side, P = 0.008; left side, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Y-stenting narrows the eective neck and straightens the vascular bifurcation angle. Most of the angular remodeling occurs on the side that had a more acute angle before stent deployment.
The basilar artery (BA) bifurcation is the most common site for aneurysms arising from the posterior circulation (1). Hemodynamic stress at the basilar bifurcation causes elevated wall shear stress and predisposes aneurysm formation in the vessel (2, 3). The
crossing Y-stenting technique has highly encouraging technical and clinical results in wide-neck basilar bifurcation aneurysms. Y-stent coiling narrows the eective neck and straightens the vascular bifurcation angle (angular remodeling). Straightening of the vascular bifurcation angle results in statistically signicant migration of the ow impingement zone to the distal vessel as well as a narrowing of its width (4, 5). In this study, we have investigated the angular changes just after Y-stent coiling of basilar bifurcation aneurysms.
Methods
From the Department of Radiology (M.S. [email protected]), GATA Haydarpaa Training and Research Hospital, stanbul, Turkey; Divisionof Neuroradiology (O.K., N.K., C.I.), Department of Radiology, stanbul University Cerrahpaa School of Medicine, stanbul, Turkey; Department of Radiology (V.A.), Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece; Department of Radiology (B.Y.), Tekirda State Hospital, Tekirda, Turkey.
Received 8 December 2014; revision requested 11 January 2015; nal revision received 30 April 2015; accepted 21 May 2015.
Published online 4 September 2015.
DOI 10.5152/dir.2015.14523
Patient population
Between May 2010 and April 2014, 19 patients (13 females and six males; age range, 2780 years; mean age, 52.5 years) underwent Y-stent coiling to treat wide-neck basilar bifurcation aneurysm using intracranial nitinol self-expanding stent with the closed-cell design, Enterprise stent (Enterprise, Codman & Shurtle; n=17) and LVIS Jr. stent (LVIS Jr, MicroVention; n=2). The institutional ethics committee approved this retrospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Most of the aneurysms were un-ruptured, except for two. Patients presented with headache (n=14), recurrence of previously balloon-assisted aneurysm (n=1), and acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=2). In two patients the aneurysms were found incidentally. Patient demographics and aneurysm characteristics are listed in Table 1.
483
Y-stent coiling procedure
All patients, except for two ruptured patients, were premedicated with antiplatelet therapy consisting of 300 mg/day aspirin and 75 mg/day of clopidogrel or 10 mg/day prasugrel in case of clopidogrel resistance. In two ruptured patients, a loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel was given through the nasogastric catheter just after the placement of stents. The clopidogrel response was investigated in all patients before the procedure using the rapid platelet function assay VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12, Accu-metrics), and a ratio between 30% and 70% was found in all.
All interventions were performed under general anesthesia. A 6F long sheath was introduced into the V1 segment of the vertebral artery (VA). In some cases a 6F intracranial guiding catheter was inserted into the V2-V3 segment of the VA due to access tortuosity to provide backup support. After 3D rotational angiography with reconstruction images, the working projections were obtained, and the more challenging posterior cerebral artery (PCA) branch that has a more acute angle relative to the BA was selected to be catheterized rst. A microcatheter (Prowler Select Plus, Cordis) with a 0.016-inch microguidewire (GT wire, Terumo) was used to catheterize the designated branch, under roadmapping guidance. Then, the rst stent was deployed inside the rst branch extending from P2 segment of the PCA to the BA. After deployment of the rst stent, the same mi-
crocatheter with the same microguidewire was advanced into the other PCA through the interstices of the rst stent. After stabilization of the microcatheter within the second branch, a second microcatheter (Headway 17, MicroVention/Terumo) with a 0.014-inch microguidewire (X-pedion, Covidien/EV3 Neurovascular) was inserted into the aneurysm sac. After catheterization of the aneurysm sac, the second stent was deployed with one half of the stent in the second branch and the other half within the lumen of the rst stent. Thus, the second microcatheter was jailed between two proximal halves of the two stents. At this step, a at panel detector CT (Vaso-CT) was performed for morphological assessment and visualizing adaptation of the stents to the wall. The second stent which passes through the interstices of the rst stent always showed a tubular narrowing at the cross-point (Fig. 1). Then, the aneurysm sac was coiled with dense packing. For two patients, LVIS Jr. stent was used through the Headway 17 microcatheter. During the procedure and at least 12 hours after the procedure all patients received intravenous heparin with the goal of elevating the activated clotting time to two
to three times the baseline value. Puncture site hemostasis was achieved by manual compression. Low-molecular-weight heparin was administered subcutaneously for three days, and the patients were discharged on life-long aspirin and clopidogrel or prasugrel for six months.
Table 1. Demographic, clinical, and technical data for included patients
Patient Age (y)/sex Aneurysm size (mm) Dome-to-neck ratio Ruptured Stents used
1 28/F 5.3 1.2 Yes Enterprise
2 51/F 7.3 1.4 Yes Enterprise
3 58/M 14.8 1.2 No Enterprise
4 58/M 17.6 2.8 No Enterprise
5 27/M 7 1.1 No Enterprise
6 63/F 9.6 1 No Enterprise
7 50/F 12.6 1.6 No Enterprise
8 49/F 14.3 1.6 No Enterprise
9 80/F 12 1.2 No Enterprise
10 38/F 14 1.2 No Enterprise
11 69/F 15.1 1 No Enterprise
12 57/M 19.1 1.9 No Enterprise
13 52/M 18.2 1.4 No Enterprise
14 55/F 14.1 1.4 No Enterprise
15 57/F 9.7 1.4 No Enterprise
16 48/F 7.1 1 No Enterprise
17 64/F 6.6 1.3 No Enterprise
18 54/M 4.7 1 No LVIS Jr.
19 59/F 6.4 1 No LVIS Jr.
F, female; M, male.
Main points
The basilar bifurcation is the most common site for aneurysms arising from the posterior circulation, and among the bifurcation aneurysms, basilar bifurcation aneurysms have a higher prevalence of rupture than internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms.
The crossing Y-stenting technique has highly encouraging technical and clinical results in wide-neck basilar bifurcation aneurysms.
There is no statistically signicant relationship between diameter of the basilary artery and , 1, 2 angle changes after Y-stenting.
There is no statistically signicant relationship between diameter of the posterior cerebral artery and angle change on both sides after Y-stenting.
A smaller pre-stent angle corresponds to a larger angle change after stent deployment.
Figure 1. Flat-detector CT image of the two crossing closed-cell stents deployed in a Y-conguration with an extensive tubular collapse of the second stent (arrow) due to the xed cell of the rst stent at the crossing point. Two proximal half of the stents were placed in a telescopic conguration. The microcatheter was jailed between the two proximal halves of the stents.
484 NovemberDecember 2015 Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Salam et al.
Figure 2. Volume rendering of three-dimensional volumetric dataset before stent deployment in a Y-conguration.
Figure 3. Thick-slab at-detector CT imageafter stent deployment in the same patient. The pretreatment angles 1 and 2 between the basilar artery and the right and left posterior cerebral artery increased immediately after the stent deployment.
Results
3D modeling and vascular angle measurement
All interventions were performed with biplane 2D digital subtraction angiography, 3D rotational angiography, and Vaso-CT guiding on the same system (Allura Xper FD20, Philips Healthcare). After 3D rotational angiography of the basilar bifurcation, the 3D volumetric datasets were automatically transferred to the workstation (XtraVision, Philips Healthcare) and analyzed. Three interventional neuroradiologists having at least six years of experience performed all measurements and the decisions were made on consensus. Pretreatment aneurysm size and neck size were measured. The volumetric dataset of each patient was visualized using multiplanar reconstruction on coronal plane, orienting to the basilar bifurcation. After deployment of the stents, thick-slice Vaso-CT images were used for the same purpose. The vascular angles (, 1, and 2) were measured
in the anteroposterior plane. 1 and 2 represented the angle between the BA and the proximal P1 segments of the right and left PCAs, respectively. represented the complementary angle between the 1 and 2 angles. Angles were measured before and after the stent deployment (Figs. 2, 3). The same multiplanar reconstruction on coronal plane was used to measure the diameter of the BA at midsegment and the diameter of the P2 segments of the left and right PCAs. Probable relationships between the , 1, and 2 angles and the diameter of the BA, left and right PCAs, and the side of the second stent were investigated.
Statistical analysis
Because of the relatively small sample size, we used nonparametric statistical tests with descriptive statistics (median, minimum, and maximum). Correlation analyses were performed between diameters of the BA
and the right and left PCAs, and , 1, and 2 angles and Spearman correlation coefficient was computed. Side of the second stent and , 1, and 2 angle changes were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for comparing pre-stent and post-stent angle values. Correlation between pre-stent angle and post-stent angle change was performed with
Spearman correlation coefficient. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the agreement of measurements between the three neuroradiologists. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc.). Statistical signicance was set at P < 0.05.
An excellent agreement was established between the three neuroradiologists (averages measures ICC, 0.991). Aneurysm size ranged from 4.4 mm to 17.7 mm (mean standard deviation [SD], 10.304.27 mm) and the neck ranged from 4.3 mm to 14.8 mm (meanSD, 8.202.97 mm). Statistically signicant , 1, and 2 angle changes were found after stent deployment (P < 0.001). Descriptive statistics regarding , 1, and 2 angle changes after the stent deployment are summarized in Table 2. There was no statistically signicant relationship between the diameter of the BA and the , 1, and 2 angle changes (P = 0.699, P =
0.604, and P = 0.856, respectively). There was no statistically signicant relationship between the diameter of the right PCA and the 1 angle change and also between the diameter of the left PCA and the 2 angle change (P = 0.196 and P = 0.587, respectively). The second stent was located at the right side in six patients and at the left side in 13 patients. There was no statistically signicant relationship between the side of the second stent and the , 1, and 2 angle changes (Table 3). There was a signicant dierence between pre-stent and post-stent angle values (P < 0.001). We found a statistically signicant reverse correlation between pre-stent angle and post-stent angle change (i.e., the smaller the pre-stent angle, the bigger the angle change after stent deployment; P = 0.008, r= -0.591 for 1
and P < 0.001, r= -0.733 for 2).
Table 2. Measurements of the , 1, and 2 angles before and after stent deployment (n=19)
Angle Radiologist Pre-stent () Post-stent () Angle change () Median (min, max) Median (min, max) Median (min, max)
1 177 (101, 263) 122 (73, 212) 41 (8, 122)
2 177 (103, 259) 120 (75, 201) 48 (15, 132)
3 175 (101, 253) 122 (74, 202) 45 (14, 124)
1 1 89 (36, 119) 117 (60, 137) 27 (3, 74)
2 86 (41, 117) 119 (66, 133) 28 (7, 74)
3 86 (42, 113) 113 (67, 131) 26 (5, 67)
2 1 103 (57, 158) 121 (88, 160) 13 (2, 67)
2 100 (56, 154) 124 (92, 158) 18 (2, 72)
3 104 (51, 159) 126 (91, 161) 17 (2, 78)
Discussion
Our results show that Y-stenting of basilar bifurcation narrowed the vascular bifurca-
Geometrical characteristics after Y-stenting of the basilar bifurcation 485
Table 3. Relationship between the side of the second stent and the angle change
angle change 1 angle change 2 angle change P P P
Radiologist 1 0.293 0.792 0.095
Radiologist 2 0.312 0.759 0.065
Radiologist 3 0.313 0.792 0.095
Second stent was located on the right side in six patients and on the left side in 13 patients.
tion angle. The diameter of the BA did not aect the , 1, and 2 angle changes and similarly the diameter of PCA did not aect the angle change. We also observed that most of the angular remodeling occurred on the side that had a smaller angle before stent deployment.
Basilar bifurcation is the most common site for aneurysms arising from the posterior circulation. Among the bifurcation aneurysms, basilar bifurcation aneurysms have a higher prevalence of rupture than internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms (1). The apex of arterial bifurcations is the site of maximal hemodynamic stress; the blood ow velocity is fastest in the middle of the vessel. This ow velocity impinges directly at the bifurcation apex. So, the arterial bifurcation apex faces highly variable regions of wall shear stress, characteristic of ow separation. It is believed that the elevated wall shear stress causes injury to the endothelial cells of the vessel wall and predisposes the vessel to aneurysm formation (2, 3).
The treatment of wide-neck basilar bifurcation aneurysms with Y-stenting technique has highly encouraging technical and clinical results. In the literature, three types of Y-stenting conguration have been described: kissing Y-stenting, in which the second stent is not advanced through the struts of the rst stent, but rather proximal portions of the two stents are placed parallel in the main trunk; crossing Y-stenting, in which the second stent is advanced through the interstices of the rst stent; and nonoverlapping Y-stenting, in which the rst stent is placed from the main trunk to the left distal vessel and another stent is placed within the right distal vessel without overlapping the second stent (69). We have used the crossing Y-stenting technique in all patients, because it was observed to have the greatest reduction in velocity or wall shear stress (8). It was also shown that angular remodeling is more signicant just after Y-stenting and during
the rst six months of follow-up. After that, a steady-state is seen because the potential energy of the stent is mostly released (10).
Y-stent coiling narrows the eective neck and straightens the vascular bifurcation angle (angular remodeling), which may effectively convert the morphology of a bifurcation aneurysm closer to that of a sidewall type. It preserves patency of the parent artery while serving as a buttress to prevent coil prolapse and allowing increased packing density (11). The degree of angular remodeling after Y-stenting seems to be different at various bifurcations. The greatest angular remodeling is seen at the anterior communicating artery, followed by the BA, the middle cerebral artery, and the internal carotid artery bifurcation (10). In our study, mean angle changes in , 1, and 2 angles were determined as 47.3, 27.9, and 19.4, respectively. We also noticed that more angular remodeling occurs on the side that had a more acute angle before stent deployment.
Straightening the vascular bifurcation angle results in statistically signicant migration of the ow impingement zone to the distal vessel as well as narrowing its width which, in eect, fundamentally alters the underlying wall shear stress and decreases the pressure at the bifurcation (4, 5). Additionally, it is known that, the ow vortices at the arterial bifurcation tend to be larger if the combined size of the distal vessels is much larger than the parent artery or if the bifurcation angle is large (2). So, Y-stenting may also contribute to decrease the ow vortices at the arterial bifurcation by straightening the vascular bifurcation angle. Blood ow at high velocities causes static pressure to the apical point of the bifurcation. After Y-stenting, the bifurcation angle decreases; the incoming blood ow narrows its area of impingement on the apical point of the bifurcation, and the focus of increased pressure narrows at the bifurcation. In a study by Gao et al. (10), vessel diameter played a determinant role
on the angular remodeling: smaller proximal vessel diameter was related with a bigger angular increase caused by Y-stenting, suggesting that a vessel with a bigger diameter has more resistance against the straightening force of the stent. On the other hand, there was no signicant relationship between the distal diameter of the stented-vessel and angular remodeling. In contrast to the above study, we did not nd any statistically signicant relationship between the diameters of the BA and the right and left PCAs and , 1, and 2 angle changes. Y-stenting may also promote progressive aneurysm occlusion compared with coiling alone by ow remodeling eect and enhancing endothelialization (1214). Flow remodeling eect is achieved by narrowing of structures, which lowers the porosity of stents and redirects ow (8).
This study has a few limitations, such as its retrospective nature, the limited number of patients, and dierent angiographic and clinical follow-up period in each patient due to changing patient follow-up protocols with increased experience. Pre- and post-stent angle measurements could have been oriented to the skull of each patient for standardization. Finally, we had a patient population with a wide age range of 27 to 80 years; it is not clear how vessel elasticity and atherosclerosis might aect the angular remodeling in dierent age groups.
In conclusion, Y-stenting narrows the eective neck and straightens the vascular bifurcation angle. Most of the angular remodeling occurs on the side that had a more acute angle before stent deployment.
Conict of interest disclosure
The authors declared no conicts of interest.
References
1. Van der Kolk NM, Algra A, Rinkel G. Risk of aneurysm rupture at intracranial arterial bifurcations. J Cerebrovasc Dis 2010; 74:2935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000313441
Web End =[CrossRef]
2. Hademenos GJ, Massoud TF. Biophysical mechanisms of stroke. Stroke 1997; 28:20672077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.10.2067
Web End =[CrossRef]
3. Takeuchi S, Karino T. Flow patterns and distributions of uid velocity and wall shear stress in the human internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries. World Neurosurg 2010; 73:174 185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.030
Web End =[CrossRef]
4. Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Malek AM. Angular remodeling in single stent-assisted coiling displaces and attenuates the ow impingement zone at the neck of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013; 72:739748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318286fab3
Web End =[CrossRef]
5. Meng H, Swartz DD, Wang Z, et al. A model system for mapping vascular responses to complex hemodynamics at arterial bifurcations in vivo. Neurosurgery 2006; 59:10941100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000245599.92322.53
Web End =[CrossRef]
486 NovemberDecember 2015 Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Salam et al.
6. Henkes H, Kirsch M, Mariushi W, Miloslavski E, Brew S, Khne D. Coil treatment of a fusiform upper basilar trunk aneurysm with a combination of kissing Neuroform stents, TriSpan-, 3D-and bered coils, and permanent implantation of the microguidewires. Neuroradiology 2004; 46:464468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-004-1192-4
Web End =[CrossRef]
7. Klisch J, Eger C, Sychra V, Strasilla C, Basche S, Weber J. Stent-assisted coil embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms using solitaire ab: preliminary experience. Neurosurgery 2009; 65:258266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000348295.44970.C8
Web End =[CrossRef]
8. Kono K, Terada T. Hemodynamics of 8 dierent congurations of stenting for bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34:1980 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3479
Web End =[CrossRef]
9. Zhao KJ, Yang PF, Huang QH, et al. Y-conguration stent placement (crossing and kissing) for endovascular treatment of wide-neck cerebral aneurysms located at 4 dierent bifurcation sites. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:13101316. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2961
Web End =[CrossRef]
10. Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Cohen AD, Malek AM. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms leads to immediate and delayed intracranial vascular angle remodeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:649654. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2841
Web End =[CrossRef]
11. Bendok BR, Parkinson RJ, Hage ZA, Adel JG, Gounis MJ. The eect of vascular reconstruction device-assisted coiling on packing density, eective neck coverage, and angiographic outcome: an in vitro study. Neurosurgery 2007; 61:835840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000298913.24625.26
Web End =[CrossRef]
12. Fargen KM, Hoh BL, Welch BG, et al. Long-term results of enterprise stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2012; 71:239244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182571953
Web End =[CrossRef]
13. Cekirge HS, Yavuz K, Geyik S, Saatci I. A novel Y stent ow diversion technique for the endovascular treatment of bifurcation aneurysms without endosaccular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:12621268. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2475
Web End =[CrossRef]
14. Lawson MF, Newman WC, Chi YY, Mocco JD, Hoh BL. Stent-associated ow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011; 69:598603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181c2b
Web End =[CrossRef]
Geometrical characteristics after Y-stenting of the basilar bifurcation 487
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI. Nov 2015
Abstract
PURPOSE
We aimed to investigate the angular changes after Y-stenting of the basilar bifurcation aneurysms.
METHODS
A total of 19 patients (age range, 27-80 years; mean age, 52.5 years) underwent Y-stent coiling for basilar bifurcation aneurysm. Three vascular angles (α, β1, β2) were measured in the anteroposterior plane. β1 and β2 represented the angles between the basilar artery and the proximal P1 segments of the right and left posterior cerebral arteries, respectively. α represented the complementary angle between the β1 and β2 angles. Angles were measured before and after stent deployment. Diameters of the basilar artery and P2 segment of the posterior cerebral artery were measured at both sides. Correlation between vascular diameter and angular change of the basilar bifurcation was investigated.
RESULTS
Statistically significant α, β1, and β2 angle changes were found after stent deployment (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between the diameter of the basilar artery and the α, β1, β2 angle changes (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between the diameter of the posterior cerebral artery and the β angle change (P > 0.05). We found a statistically significant inverse correlation between pre-stent β angle and post-stent angle change (right side,
P = 0.008; left side, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Y-stenting narrows the effective neck and straightens the vascular bifurcation angle. Most of the angular remodeling occurs on the side that had a more acute angle before stent deployment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





