About the Authors:
Yani Zhang
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Qisheng Zuo
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Zhiyong Liu
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Dong Li
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Beibei Tang
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Tian-rong Xiao
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Chao Lian
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Yingjie Wang
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Kai Jin
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Yilin Wang
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Wenhui Zhang
Affiliation: College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Bichun Li
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliations College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China, Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding Reproduction and Molecular Design for Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, China
Introduction
Stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8 (Stra8) is a specific gene that is expressed in mammalian germ cells during transition from mitosis to meiosis and plays a key role in the initiation of meiosis in mammals and birds. When Stra8 is deleted, germ cells are unable to complete meiosis [1, 2]. Germ cells in male rats in which Stra8 is deleted cannot enter meiotic prophase. Female germ cells also do not show features of meiosis in the absence of Stra8, indicating that Stra8 plays a key role in the initiation of meiosis [3]. Only germ cells are activated to express Stra8 by retinoic acid (RA) and then enter the meiosis phase from mitosis [4–7]. The research have show that RA and Stra8 gene combination can promote the male ESC differentiation to germ cell direction synactic that was proved by both significant cellular morphological changes and also the highly expressed germ cell marker genes[8].
The biological activity of RA is mediated through the retinoic receptor (RAR) and retinoid receptor (RXR) [9]. RARs and RXRs are encoded by different genes, which each produce α, β, and γ subtypes. The physiological function of RA is regulated by different RAR isoforms, which combine with RXRs to form dimers. RXR may play a role as a scaffold protein to promote the binding of DNA to the receptor. However, a variety of coactivators and corepressors may bind to RARE and hinder the formation of the RAR-RXR-RA compound [10]. In the absence of RA, RAR/RXR dimers recruit corepressor complexes containing histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity and induce transcriptional repression [11]. In the presence of RA, RA can bind with RAR/RXR dimers, followed by alteration of the corepressor by an HDAC activity coactivator, which can induce the transcriptional activation and epigenetic modification that occurs with RA-responsive gene induction and inhibition [12].
Tamibarotene (Am80) is an activator of RARα that can specifically bind with RARα [13]. The activity of Am80 is about ten times that of all trans-retinoic acid (ATRA). HDAC can bind with RARE of the Stra8 promoter, causing chromatin condensation and subsequent silencing of gene transcription [14]. Trichostatin A (TSA) can bind with HDAC, which inactivates HDAC. ATRA is the common inducer in research involving Stra8, although we do not know whether the other inducers can induce the expression of Stra8. Thus, the purpose of this study was to use bioinformatics analysis and the dual luciferase activity detection system to search for regulatory elements that are associated with the transcription of Stra8, to test the influence of Am80 and TSA on the promoter activity of Stra8 and embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation, and to provide a reference for screening for the inducer of Stra8.
Results
Comparison of the activity of fragments of different lengths of the chicken Stra8 promoter and analysis of transcriptional regulatory elements
Studies have shown in our laboratory that Stra8 plays a key role in the initiation of meiosis in birds chicken (Fig 1). To analyze the promoter activity of the core region of Stra8, the DF-1 and GC-1 cell lines were transfected with recombinant plasmids and the pRL-SV40 plasmid (as an internal control). The pGL3-basic plasmid was used as a negative control. The promoter activity was detected with the dual-luciferase assay. The promoter activity of chicken Stra8 showed the same trend in these two cell lines. The recombinant plasmid pGL3-P2 (−500/+54) had the highest promoter activity. Almost no difference was seen between pGL3-P4 (−1055/+54) and pGL3-P2 (−500/+54). The promoter activity of pGL3-P1 (−201/+54) was sharply decreased compared to pGL3-P2 (−500/+54), indicating that the core promoter region was between −554 bp and −255 bp (Fig 2A).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 1. Schedule of meiosis-related marker genes during chicken ovarian development.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262.g001
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 2. Activity of the deletion fragments of the chicken Stra8 promoter and binding sites for regulatory elements at −1955 to +45 bp.
A: Activity of the deletion fragment of the chicken Stra8 promoter in DF-1 and GC-1 cells. B: Prediction of binding sites for regulatory elements at −1955 to +45 bp of Stra8.C:The result of Stra8- EGFP transfection in DF-1.Left:The blank group. Mid: Transfected with N1-EGFP. Right,Transfected with Stra8-EGFP.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262.g002
The regulatory elements RARα, RXRα, and RARβ were identified by TFsearch and AliBaba online software (Fig 2B). Combined with the activity of different promoter fragments, the recombinant plasmid pGL3-P4 (−1055/+54) was selected to construct the recombinant plasmid Stra8-EGFP, and we find that Stra8-EGFP can express green fluorescent protein, it shows that the fragment in −1055/+54 of Stra8 promoter can promote the expression of genes(Fig 2C).
Screening of inducers based on the transcriptional regulatory elements of the chicken Stra8 promoter
Am80 is an activator of RARα and can specifically combine with RARα. TSA can combine with HDAC and inactivate HDAC. The recombinant plasmid pGL3-P4 (−1055/+54) was transfected into DF-1 cells, which were treated with different concentrations of Am80 and TSA. The reporter activity was the highest when the concentrations of Am80 and TSA were 10−5 mol/L and 10−6 mol/L, respectively (Fig 3A). Because the functions of Am80 and TSA are different, DF-1 cells were transfected with pGL3-P4 (−1055/+54) and treated with Am80 and TSA alone or together. The reporter activity was increased significantly when Am80 and TSA were added together; treatment with both compounds induced a 94-fold increase compared with ATRA induction (Fig 3B). All the result showed that Am80 and TSA can increase the promoter activity of Stra8.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 3. Effects of the induction of Am80 and TSA on the Stra8 promoter activity.
A: Effect of different concentrations of Am80 and TSA on Stra8 promoter activity. B: Effect of Am80 (10−5 mol/L) or TSA (10−6 mol/L) on Stra8 promoter activity. **P < 0.01.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262.g003
The regulatory function of Am80 and TSA for Stra8
DF-1 cells were treated with ATRA, Am80, or TSA after the cells were transfected with Stra8-EGFP for 4 hours. After 36 hours of induction, the cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope. The highest green fluorescence intensity was obtained when Am80 and TSA were used together for induction (Fig 4A). The trend in fluorescence intensity for the different treatment groups was consistent with the relative luciferase values, suggesting that Am80 and TSA can induce the expression of Stra8 at the cellular level as well.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 4. The regulatory function of Am80 and TSA induction on the expression of Stra8.
A: 1. ATRA induction group; 2. Am80 induction group; 3. TSA induction group; 4. Am80 and TSA combination induction group. B: 1: Stra8; 2: Scp3. **P < 0.01.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262.g004
The left ovary was removed when the embryo was hatched into 12.5 days, and the ovary was cultured in tissue culture medium for 48 hours. During the culture process, an inducer was added to the different experimental groups. RNA was extracted from the ovary, and the meiotic marker genes Stra8 and Synaptonemal complex protein 3(Scp3) were detected with quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). The expression levels of Stra8 and Scp3 following treatment with Am80 or TSA were significantly higher than with ATRA, regardless of whether Am80 and TSA were used individually or together (Fig 4B), indicating that Am80 and TSA can be used as inducers to enhance the promoter activity of Stra8.
ESC differentiate following Am80 and TSA induction
The in vitro induction experiment showed that morphological changes were induced in chicken ESC with ATRA(10−5 mol/L), Am80 (10−5 mol/L), and TSA (10-6mol/L). ESC grew slowly in basic medium. Two or three cells grouped together on the 2nd day of culture, a few cells began to conglomerate on the 4th day of culture, a small colony appeared on the 6th day of culture, and the number of cell colonies was increased by the 8th day culture. For Am80 and TSA induction, a few embryoid bodies appeared on the 4th day of induction and became large in volume by the 8th day of induction. A few SSC-like cells were observed by the 10th day. However, in the Am80 + TSA induction group, a few SSC-like cells appeared on the 8th day of induction, and the number of SSC-like cells were increased on the 10th day (Fig 5A). Integrinβ1 protein was expressed on the 10th day of induction (Fig 5B), indicating that Am80 and TSA can promote the differentiation of ESC into SSCs. The specific marker gene of germ cells was detected during the different induction days, demonstrating that Am80 and TSA can promote ESC differentiation into SSC-like cells. More SSC-like cells were observed with a combination of induction by Am80 and TSA compared to induction with an individual compound (Fig 5C).qRT—PCR results showed that expression of integrinβ1 and integrinα6 in the Am80 group, TSA group and Am80+TSA group were significantly increased compared with control group, and Am80+TSA group was aslo significantly increased than Am80 group and TSA group,It suggests that treatment of Am80 and TSA can promote the ESC differentiation into SSC-like.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 5. The effect of Am80 and TSA on ESC differentiation.
A: Differentiation of chicken ESCs into SSCs is induced by Am80 and TSA; B: Immunohistochemical detection of integrinβ1 protein expression in chicken ESC treated with Am80 and TSA; C: qRT-PCR detection of specific marker genes for germ cells at different days after Am80 and TSA induction.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262.g005
Discussion
Stra8 is an important gene for induction of differentiation of mouse P19 teratocarcinoma cells by ATRA [15], and Stra8 plays an key role in the process of induction of meiosis and normal meiotic prophase. ATRA is the natural isomer of RA and is mainly metabolized to active products through isomerases such as 11cis-RA, 13cis-RA, and 9cis-RA. Cis-retinoic can bind with RARs and regulate cell proliferation and differentiation at the mRNA level [16]. Stra8 gene performed function through the six ligand with RA, including three RAR transcription factor (RARα, RARβand RARγ) and three RXR transcription factor (RXRA and RXRB and RXRG) [17,18].Stra8 can be activated to enter into the nucleus by bindding RAR receptor, and then start meiosis of sperm through specific gene[19]. Mice which knocked out RARγ and RARα receptor have a low expression of Stra8 gene and appear VAD-like phenotype[20–22].Tsutomu Endo et al. firstly found that the lack of Stra8 gene and RA can stimulte undifferentiated spermatagonial stem cells in mice to Sperm Cells [23]
Am80 and TSA were used to explore regulation of the Stra8 promoter in this study. Am80 is an active metabolic product of vitamin A and an analog of ATRA, which can specific to combine with RARα receptor[24–26], it aslo can induce RARα to express[27], it has reported that approximately 10-fold greater effective biological activity than ATRA[28]. Histones are required for chromosomal folding, and the degree of combination (loose or close) is thought to be a key factor in transcription factor binding to promoters [29]. In the nucleus, histone acetylation and histone deacetylation occur in a dynamic balance and are regulated by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and HDAC [30]. TSA is the most effective inhibitor of HDAC [31]. It has been reported that treatment with the inhibitor of histone deacetylases activity (trichostatin A; TSA) in cloned embryos of mouse, rabbit, and pig can regulate acetylation levels of certain histone residues[32],it aslo can improve embryo to develop to the blastocyst stage [33–38],and increase the number of live offspring after transfer to foster mothers[39–41].
TSA binds to HDAC and inhibits its activity, allowing the RAR/RXR dimer to recruit HAT. This leads to auxiliary activation and results in epigenetic modification that induces gene expression via chromatin remodeling. In this study, DF-1 cells were transfected with the recombinant plasmid pGL3-P4 and treated with Am80 and ATRA. The relative luciferase activity values of the Am80-treated group were higher than with ATRA induction. When Am80 and TSA were used together, the relative luciferase activity values were much higher than with ATRA induction. Meanwhile, DF-1 cells were transfected with the recombinant plasmid pEGFP-Stra8 and treated with ATRA and TSA alone or in combination, the green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression intensity in the group treated with both Am80 and TSA was higher than in the cells treated with ATRA alone. These results show that the synergistic effect of Am80 and TSA can significantly regulate the activity of the Stra8 promoter.
When ESC were treated with Am80 and TSA, germ cells were readily generated. Integrinβ1 protein was expressed on the 10th day of induction, and the specific marker gene of germ cells was detected after different days of induction, demonstrating that Am80 and TSA can promote ESC to differentiate into PGC-like and SSC-like cells and that both compounds were effective inducers, which may improve the efficiency of generation of germ cells.
Conclusion
In this study, the regulatory elements (RAR and RXR) of the Stra8 promoter were identified with the dual luciferase reporter gene assay system and bioinformatics analysis. The regulatory function of Am80 and TSA at the Stra8 promoter was verified. The optimal induction concentrations of Am80 and TSA were 10−5 mol/L and 10−6 mol/L, respectively. Am80 and TSA can promote ESC to differentiate into PGC-like and SSC-like cells.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
Procedures involving animals and their care conformed to the U.S. National Institute of Health guidelines (NIH Pub. No. 85–23, revised 1996) and were approved by the laboratory-animal management and experimental-animal ethics committee of Yangzhou University. The Suqin yellow chickens used in this study were provided by the Institute of Poultry Science, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences. The animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yangzhou University.
Materials
The pEGFP-N1 vector was constructed in our laboratory. E. coli DH5α competent cells, gel extraction kit, and miniprep kits were purchased from the Tiangen Company (Beijing, China). DL5000 DNA Marker Prime STARMax DNA Polymerase, T4 DNA ligase, and restriction endonuclease were purchased from Takara (Dalian, China). The expression vector pGL3.0-Basic, pRL-SV40, and the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System were purchased from Promega Corporation. LipofectamineTM2000 was purchased from Invitrogen Corporation. ATRA, Tamibarotene (Tamibarotene, Am80), and TSA were purchased from SIGMA Company. The chicken embryo fibroblast cell line, DF-1, and Mouse spermatogonial cell line, GC-1,were purchased from ATCC. Primer synthesis and sequencing were conducted by the Invitrogen Company of Shanghai (China).
Isolation and cultivation of chicken ESC
The blastodermal cells at stage X Suqin yellow chicken embryos were collected using the spoon method, transferred to tissue culture dishes, and rinsed with Ca2+- and Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove the yolks and vitelline membrane. After washing with PBS, ESC were transferred into a fresh centrifuge tube and then gently mechanically dissociated. The dissociated cells were collected by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 8–10 min and suspended in ESC complete medium. The cells were seeded on inactivated chicken embryonic fibroblasts (CEF) feeder cells and incubated at 37.0°C in 5% CO2. The medium was replaced daily with fresh medium. After 5–6 days, the cell colonies with undifferentiated morphology were rinsed three times with PBS and digested at 37.0°C for 2–3 min with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco, UK). The dissociated ESC clusters were suspended with pipetting and sub-cultured at 37.0°C in 5% CO2 on the feeder cell layer. Half the medium was replaced daily with fresh medium.
Analysis of bioinformatics.
The online TFsearch software programs (http://www.cbrc.jp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html) and (http://www.gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2/index.html) were used to predict and analyze the promoter region and potential transcription factor binding sites of Stra8.
Construction of expression vectors for a series of Stra8 promoter deletions and Stra8-EGFP
A series of Stra8 promoter deletions which were cloned from the genome of chicken and pGL3-basic were digested with KpnI and HindIII, respectively. The purified enzyme fragment was ligated with T4 DNA ligase and transformed into DH5α cells. The vectors were verified with double enzyme digestion and sequencing. The new plasmids were named pGL3-P1 (−201/+54), pGL3-P2 (−500/+54), pGL3-P3 (−739/+54), pGL3-P4 (−1055/+54), pGL3-P5 (−1209/+54), pGL3-P6 (−1629/+54), and pGL3-P7 (−1901/+54). pGL3-P4 (−1055/+54) was used as the template for PCR. Both of the PCR product and pEGFP-N1 were digested with AseI and HindIII then connected by DNA ligase to construct Stra8-EGFP. primers used to construct the Stra8 vectors refer to S1 Table.
Cell transfection and dual-luciferase assay
DF-1 or GC-1 cells (2.5 × 105) were plated in 24-well plates before transfection. The cells were grown to 80–90% confluency and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000. The ratio of reconstruction plasmid and pRL-SV40 was 25:1, and pGL3-basic was used as the negative control. After transfection for 6 hours, Am80 and TSA were added at various concentrations. ATRA (10−6 mol/L) was used as the control. After induction for 48 hours, the Dual-Luciferase®Reporter Assay was performed. Cells were collected in PBS and placed in 96-well plates. After 15 min, 100 μL Dual-Glo® Luciferase Buffer was added to detect the firefly luciferase activity values, and then 100 μL Dual-Glo® Stop & Glo® Buffer was added to obtain the renilla luciferase activity values. The relative luciferase activity for the promoter activity was calculated as the firefly luciferase value/renilla luciferase value. All assays were repeated three independent times, and results are shown with standard errors.
ESC differentiate following Am80 and TSA induction
To validate the induction effect of Am80 and TSA, chicken ESC were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well. Four groups of cells were studied: (1) cells grown in basic DMEM (Control group), (2) cells grown in normal DMEM and treated with ATRA (10−5 mol/L) induction, (3) cells treated with Am80 (10−5 mol/L) induction, (4) cells treated with TSA (10−6 mol/L) induction, and (5) cells treated with both Am80 (10−5 mol/L) + TSA (10−6 mol/L) induction. The cells were observed every 2 days by microscope after treatment. The induction experiments were done using three replicates.
qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted with Trizol Reagent after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days of induction. cDNA was synthesized by using the Revert Aid first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (ChinaGen Biological Technology). qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR green PCR Master Mix (ChinaGen Biological Technology) on an ABI 7300 instrument. The mRNA level in ESC was normalized to the level of β-actin. PCR was performed in duplicate, and error bars in charts represent the corresponding standard deviations.
Immunofluorescence Assay
Cell suspensions were allowed to adhere to poly-l-lysine-coated slides and fixed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde. After blocking in 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h, antibodies against anti-integrin β1 (Millipore) were added at a 1:200 dilution in 10% BSA in PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C. After washing in 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS three times, FITC-labeled secondary antibodies (Biosynthesis Biotechnology CO., LTD.) were added at a 1:100 dilution for 2 h. After washing again with 10% BSA-PBS, cells were observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (IX51 from Olympus).
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was evaluated using a one-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test with GraphPad Prism5 statistics software (*: P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01).
Supporting Information
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
S1 Table. The sequences of primers used to construct the Stra8 vectors.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262.s001
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the Poultry Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Experimental Poultry Farm for providing experimental materials.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YZ BL. Performed the experiments: YZ QZ. Analyzed the data: YZ QZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZL DL TX CL BT Yilin Wang KJ Yingjie Wang WZ. Wrote the paper: YZ.
Citation: Zhang Y, Zuo Q, Liu Z, Li D, Tang B, Xiao T-r, et al. (2015) The Induction Effect of Am80 and TSA on ESC Differentiation via Regulation of Stra8 in Chicken. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0140262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140262
1. Mark M, Jacobs H, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Dennefeld C, Féret B, Vernet N, et al.Stra8-deficient spermatocytes initiate, but fail to complete, meiosis and undergo premature chromosome condensation. J Cell Sci, 2008, 121: 3233–3242.
2. Saba R, Wu Q, Saga Y. CYP26B1 promotes male germ cell differentiation by suppressing STRA8-dependent meiotic and STRA8-independent mitotic pathways[J]. Developmental biology, 2014, 389(2): 173–181.
3. Kumar S, Duester G. SnapShot: retinoic acid signaling[J]. Cell, 2011, 147(6): 1422.
4. Smith C A, Roeszler K N, Bowles J. Onset of meiosis in the chicken embryo; evidence of a role for retinoic acid. BMC Dev Biol, 2008, 8:85.
5. Baltus A E, Menke D B, Hu Y C, Goodheart M L, Carpenter A E, De Rooij D G, et al. In germ cells of mouse embryonic ovaries, the decision to enter meiosis precedes premeiotic DNA replication[J]. Nature genetics, 2006, 38(12): 1430–1434.
6. Bowles J., Knight D., Smith C., Wilhelm D., Richman J., Mamiya S, et al. Retinoid signaling determines germ cell fate in mice[J]. Science, 2006, 312(5773): 596–600.
7. Bowles J., Feng C. W., Spiller C., Davidson T. L., Jackson A., & Koopman P.FGF9 suppresses meiosis and promotes male germ cell fate in mice[J]. Developmental cell, 2010, 19(3): 440–449.
8. Desimio M. G., Campolo F., Dolci S., De Felici M., & Farini D. SOHLH1 and SOHLH2 directly down-regulate Stimulated by Retinoic Acid 8 (STRA8) expression[J]. Cell Cycle, 2015, 14(7): 1036–1045.
9. Zhentao Z, Dang W, Qingqing S. Effect of Combination of Retinoic Acid and StraS Gene on Male cESCs.Differentiation.Journal of animal husbandry and veterinary,2014,45(1): 38–45.
10. Evans R M. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily[J]. Science, 1988, 240(4854): 889–895.
11. Ziouzenkova O., Orasanu G., Sharlach M., Akiyama T. E., Berger J. P., Viereck J, et al. Retinaldehyde represses adipogenesis and diet-induced obesity[J]. Nature medicine, 2007, 13(6): 695–702.
12. Germain P., Iyer J., Zechel C., Gronemeyer H. Co-regulator recruitment and the mechanism of retinoic acid receptor synergy[J]. Nature, 2002, 415(6868): 187–192.
13. Nakagomi M, Shudo K, Nakatani-Pawlak A. Synthetic retinoid Am80 results in improved exploratory and emotional behavior in the P8 substrain of senescence-accelerated mice[J]. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2013, 104: 1–9.
14. Hogarth C A, Amory J K, Griswold M D. Inhibiting vitamin A metabolism as an approach to male contraception[J]. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011, 22(4): 136–144. pmid:21277790
15. Bouillet P., Oulad-Abdelghani M., Vicaire S., Garnier J. M., Schuhbaur B., Dollé P., et al. Efficient cloning of cDNAs of retinoic acid-responsive genes in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells and characterization of a novel mouse gene, Stra1 (mouse LERK-2/Eplg2)[J]. Developmental biology, 1995, 170(2): 420–433.
16. Kanatsu-Shinohara M., Lee J., Inoue K., Ogonuki N., Miki H., Toyokuni S., et al. Pluripotency of a single spermatogonial stem cell in mice[J]. Biology of reproduction, 2008, 78(4): 681–687.
17. Kashyap V., Laursen K. B., Brenet F., Viale A. J., Scandura J. M., Gudas L. J. RARγ is essential for retinoic acid induced chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation in embryonic stem cells[J]. Journal of cell science, 2013, 126(4): 999–1008.
18. Cunningham T J, Duester G. Mechanisms of retinoic acid signalling and its roles in organ and limb development[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2015, 16(2): 110–123.
19. Shikun M, Jiaqian G, Ze Zl. Research Progress of Stra8 in Spermatogenesis[J].Medical Recapitulate,2015,(21)14:2500–2502.
20. Gely-Pernot A., Raverdeau M., Célébi C., Dennefeld C., Feret B., Klopfenstein M., et al. Spermatogonia differentiation requires retinoic acid receptor γ[J]. Endocrinology, 2011, 153(1): 438–449.
21. Jørgensen A, Meyts R D. Regulation of meiotic entry and gonadal sex differentiation in the human: normal and disrupted signaling[J]. Biomolecular concepts, 2014, 5(4): 331–341.
22. Childs A. J., Cowan G., Kinnell H. L., Anderson R. A., & Saunders P. T. Retinoic Acid signalling and the control of meiotic entry in the human fetal gonad[J]. PloS one, 2011, 6(6): e20249.
23. Endo T., Romer K. A., Anderson E. L., Baltus A. E., de Rooij D. G., & Page D. C.. Periodic retinoic acid–STRA8 signaling intersects with periodic germ-cell competencies to regulate spermatogenesis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(18): E2347–E2356.
24. Gudas L J. Emerging roles for retinoids in regeneration and differentiation in normal and disease states[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 2012, 1821(1): 213–221.
25. Miwako I, Kagechika H. Tamibarotene[J]. Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain: 1998), 2007, 43(8): 563–568.
26. Hashimoto Y, Kagechika H, Shudo K. Expression of retinoic acid receptor genes and the ligand-binding selectivity of retinoic acid receptors (RAR's)[J]. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 1990, 166(3): 1300–1307.
27. Xinhua Z. Molecular Mechanism of Am80-reduced Interaction of KLF5 with RARα in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Hebei medical university, 2009.
28. Kagechika H. Novel synthetic retinoids and separation of the pleiotropic retinoidal activities[J]. Current medicinal chemistry, 2002, 9(5): 591–608.
29. Struhl K. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms[J]. Genes & development, 1998, 12(5): 599–606.
30. Spencer V A, Davie J R. Role of covalent modifications of histones in regulating gene expression[J]. Gene, 1999, 240(1): 1–12.
31. De Ruijter A., Van Gennip A., Caron H., Kemp S., van Kuilenburg A. B. B. J. Histone deacetylases (HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family[J]. Biochem. J, 2003, 370: 737–749.
32. Iager A. E., Ragina N. P., Ross P. J., Beyhan Z., Cunniff K., Rodriguez R. M., et al. Trichostatin A improves histone acetylation in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer early embryos[J]. Cloning and stem cells, 2008, 10(3): 371–380.
33. Beebe L F S, McIlfatrick S J, Nottle M B. Cytochalasin B and trichostatin a treatment postactivation improves in vitro development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos[J]. Cloning and stem cells, 2009, 11(4): 477–482.
34. Costa-Borges N, Santaló J, Ibáñez E. Comparison between the effects of valproic acid and trichostatin A on the in vitro development, blastocyst quality, and full-term development of mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos[J].Cellular Reprogramming (Formerly" Cloning and Stem Cells"), 2010, 12(4): 437–446.
35. Li J., Svarcova O., Villemoes K., Kragh P. M., Schmidt M., Bgh I. B., et al. High in vitro development after somatic cell nuclear transfer and trichostatin A treatment of reconstructed porcine embryos[J]. Theriogenology, 2008, 70(5): 800–808.
36. Shao G. B., Ding H. M., Gao W. L., Li S. H., Wu C.F., Xu Y.X., et al. Effect of trychostatin A treatment on gene expression in cloned mouse embryos[J]. Theriogenology, 2009, 71(8): 1245–1252.
37. Zhang Y., Li J., Villemoes K., Pedersen A. M., Purup S., & Vajta G., el al. An epigenetic modifier results in improved in vitro blastocyst production after somatic cell nuclear transfer[J]. Cloning and stem cells, 2007, 9(3): 357–363.
38. Zhao J., Hao Y., Ross J. W., Spate L. D., Walters E. M., Samuel M. S.,et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos[J]. Cellular Reprogramming (Formerly “Cloning and Stem Cells”), 2010, 12(1): 75–83.
39. Wakayama T. Production of cloned mice and ES cells from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer: how to improve cloning efficiency?[J]. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 2007, 53(1): 13–26.
40. Kishigami S., Mizutani E., Ohta H., Hikichi T., Van Thuan N., Wakayama S. et al. Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer[J]. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2006, 340(1): 183–189.
41. Shi L. H., Miao Y. L., Ouyang Y. C., Huang J.C., Lei Z.L., Yang J.W., et al. Trichostatin A (TSA) improves the development of rabbit‐rabbit intraspecies cloned embryos, but not rabbit‐human interspecies cloned embryos[J]. Developmental Dynamics, 2008, 237(3): 640–648.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Stra8 encodes stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8, a protein that is important for initiation of meiosis in mammals and birds. This study was aimed at identifying the active control area of chicken STRA8 gene core promoter, to screen optimum inducers of the STRA8 gene, thus to enhance the differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) into spermatogonial stem cells. Fragments of chicken STRA8 gene promoter were cloned into fluorescent reporter plasmids and transfected into DF-1 cells. Then Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System was used to identify the activity of the STRA8 gene under different inducers. Our studies showed that the promoter fragment −1055 bp to +54 bp of Suqin chicken Stra8 revealed the strongest activity. The dual-luciferase® reporter showed that Tamibarotene (Am80) and TrichostatinA (TSA) could significantly enhance STRA8 transcription. The in vitro inductive culture of chicken ESCs demonstrated that spermatogonial stem cells (SSC)-like cells appeared and Integrinβ1 protein was expressed on day 10, indicating that Am80 and TSA can promote ESCs differentiation into SSCs via regulation of Stra8.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer