Cortical Thickness, Surface Area and Subcortical Volume Differentially Contribute to Cognitive Heterogeneity in Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is often associated with cognitive deficits, although their severity varies considerably between patients. Recently, we used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to show that individual differences in gray matter (GM) volume relate to cognitive heterogeneity in PD. VBM does, however, not differentiate between cortical thickness (CTh) and surface area (SA), which might be independently affected in PD. We therefore re-analyzed our cohort using the surface-based method FreeSurfer, and investigated (i) CTh, SA, and (sub)cortical GM volume differences between 93 PD patients and 45 matched controls, and (ii) the relation between these structural measures and cognitive performance on six neuropsychological tasks within the PD group. We found cortical thinning in PD patients in the left pericalcarine gyrus, extending to cuneus, precuneus and lingual areas and left inferior parietal cortex, bilateral rostral middle frontal cortex, and right cuneus, and increased cortical surface area in the left pars triangularis. Within the PD group, we found negative correlations between (i) CTh of occipital areas and performance on a verbal memory task, (ii) SA and volume of the frontal cortex and visuospatial memory performance, and, (iii) volume of the right thalamus and scores on two verbal fluency tasks. Our primary findings illustrate that i) CTh and SA are differentially affected in PD, and ii) VBM and FreeSurfer yield non-overlapping results in an identical dataset. We argue that this discrepancy is due to technical differences and the subtlety of the PD-related structural changes.

About the Authors:

Niels J. H. M. Gerrits

Contributed equally to this work with: Niels J. H. M. Gerrits, Anita C. van Loenhoud

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, VU University medical center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Anita C. van Loenhoud

Contributed equally to this work with: Niels J. H. M. Gerrits, Anita C. van Loenhoud

Affiliations Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, VU University medical center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Psychiatry, VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Stan F. van den Berg

Affiliation: Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, VU University medical center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Henk W. Berendse

Affiliations Department of Neurology, VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Elisabeth M. J. Foncke

Affiliation: Department of Neurology, VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Martin Klein

Affiliation: Department of Medical Psychology, VUmc, Amsterdam

Diederick Stoffers

Affiliation: Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Ysbrand D. van der Werf

¶‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, VU University medical center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Odile A. van den Heuvel

¶‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences, VU University medical center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Psychiatry, VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Introduction

In addition to typical motor symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability, patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) often experience non-motor symptoms. Among these non-motor symptoms are cognitive deficits, which predominantly exist in the domain of executive functions, memory and visuospatial performance [1, 2]. Cognitive deficits are common, even in early stage PD [2], and up to 80% of all patients suffer from dementia at the end-stage of the disease [3]. The onset and rate of cognitive decline, however, differs considerably between patients.

Recently, we showed that differences in brain structure may contribute to cognitive heterogeneity in PD [4]. In that VBM study patients had relatively small areas of decreased gray matter (GM) volume in cortical areas such as the parietal, temporal, and frontal cortex, and in the cerebellum. Within the PD group, we found positive correlations between GM volume and cognitive performance for (i) parahippocampal gyrus and occipital lobe and verbal memory, (ii) medial temporal lobe and putamen and visuospatial memory, (iii) middle temporal gyrus and frontal lobe and verbal fluency, and (iv) inferior parietal lobe and cognitive flexibility. These VBM results suggest that in addition to the diffuse structural changes that affect the PD population in general, between-patient differences in regional GM volume may play a role in cognitive heterogeneity.

Despite the advantages of this voxel-based technique, VBM suffers from a major drawback: it does not distinguish between different cortical morphological properties [5]. GM volume is the product of cortical thickness (CTh) and surface area (SA) [6]. There is evidence to suggest that CTh and SA are differentially affected in normal aging [7] and Alzheimer’s disease [8]. Similarly, recent studies suggest that a separate consideration of these two components of GM volume may also be more informative in the context of PD [9–11]. We therefore employed FreeSurfer, a surface-based technique, to measure CTh, SA, and (sub)cortical GM volume in the PD and HC groups originally analyzed with VBM [4]. This approach provided the opportunity to i) investigate specific structural changes related to PD, ii) study the contribution of different aspects of brain structure to cognitive heterogeneity in PD, and iii) compare the use of two common neuroimaging techniques for structural analyses in an identical dataset. We hypothesized to find structural decreases in PD patients when compared with controls, which could be (partly) explained by differences in CTh and SA. Similarly, we expected to find correlations between task performance and structural measures in brain areas that would (partly) overlap with those found in our previous VBM study within the PD sample. Although VBM and FreeSurfer are complementary (i.e. they do not measure the same (sub)cortical characteristics) we expected to replicate the most robust cortical and subcortical effects we found in our previous study.

Material and Methods

Participants

A detailed description of the selection procedure of our participants is provided in Gerrits et al (2013). Briefly, we selected 93 idiopathic PD patients from a large, well-documented cohort of the outpatient clinic for movement disorders at the VU University medical center (VUmc), as well as 46 demographically age- and sex-matched HC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and demographic information, such as age and sex, were collected for the entire sample. Due to incorrect cortical reconstruction, we excluded one control participant, resulting in a sample that is almost, but not entirely, identical to the sample used in the VBM study [4]. Within the PD group, we evaluated education level using a scaled Dutch classification system ranging from 1 (did not finish primary school) to 7 (university degree) [12]. We assessed severity of motor symptoms and stage of illness with the motor subscore of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) and Hoehn & Yahr scales [13], respectively. Disease duration was defined as the subjective time interval between the first reported classical motor symptoms and the moment of clinical assessment. We evaluated mood and anxiety symptoms with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [14] and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) [15], respectively. The cognitive status of our PD cohort was assessed by trained neuropsychologists as part of the standard diagnostic procedure. Of the 93 PD patients, 75 patients did not show evident cognitive impairments, eight patients fulfilled the criteria for mild cognitive impairment and four patients were diagnosed with PD dementia. Six patients could not be classified. All participants gave written informed consent according to the declaration of Helsinki to the protocol, which was approved by the local ethics committee of the VUmc. To summarize, we used the structural scans of 93 patients and 46 healthy participants in our previous VBM study, and used the same scans of all 93 patients, and 45 (out of 46) healthy participants in our current study.

Neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychological data were available only for the PD group, and not all patients participated in each cognitive task (see table 1). To evaluate global cognitive status, we used the mini-mental status examination (MMSE) [16, 17]. We assessed verbal memory with the Dutch version of the Rey auditory verbal learning task (RAVLT) and measured both the total number of immediately recalled items after five presentations and the number of items retrieved after a delay [18]. The delayed recall condition of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test (ROCFT) was used to evaluate visuospatial memory [19]. We administered the Category fluency task (naming as many animals as possible in 60 seconds) to examine semantic fluency and the Letter fluency task (naming as many words possible starting with D, A and T in 3 trials of 60 seconds each) to assess phonemic verbal fluency. We examined executive functioning with the Stroop color word test [20] and the Trail making test [21]. Interference susceptibility was measured as the time needed for card III of the Stroop Color-Word Test minus the average completion time of Card I (speed of word reading) and II (speed of color naming). We subtracted the completion time on TMT-A from the completion time of TMT-B (TMTB-A) to obtain a measure of cognitive flexibility. The procedures for neuropsychological assessment followed those described by Lezak and colleagues [22].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Demographic and clinical features of the PD and HC group, and PD subgroups for each neuropsychological test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148852.t001

MRI acquisition and preprocessing

High-resolution structural MRI scans were obtained at the VUmc, using a GE Signa HDxt 3.0-Tesla MRI-scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) with an 8-channel head coil. We acquired structural MRI data using a sagittal 3-dimensional gradient-echo T1-weighted sequence (256 x 256 matrix; field of view = 25cm; slice thickness = 1mm; voxel size = 1 x 0.98 x 0.98 mm; TR = 7.8 ms; TE = 3.0 ms; view angle = 12°). Image analysis was carried out with the stable version (v.5.3.0) of the FreeSurfer software (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) [23–25]. In short, the procedure included: motion correction, intensity normalization, Talairach registration, skull stripping, segmentation of subcortical white matter, tessellation of the GM/white matter (WM) boundary, automated topology correction, and surface deformation. We used a 10 mm (full-width at half-maximum) Gaussian kernel to smooth maps. Finally, FreeSurfer created a surface 3D model of the cortex using intensity and continuity information.

Cortical analysis

We visually checked the cortical reconstruction of each subject for inaccuracies and manually corrected major topological inaccuracies with vertex edits or control points and subsequently repeated the processing. CTh was calculated as the shortest distance between the GM/WM boundary and pial surface at each vertex across the cortical mantle, measured in millimeters (mm). In addition to vertex-based reconstruction, FreeSurfer automatically parcellated the cortex into 34 gyral-based regions-of-interest (ROIs) per hemisphere, according to the Desikan-Killiany atlas. For each of the 68 cortical parcellations, FreeSurfer calculates i) the average CTh (in mm), ii) total cortical SA of the pial (in mm²), and iii) the cortical GM volume (in mm³).

Subcortical analysis

Subcortical volumes were calculated with FreeSurfer’s automated procedure for volumetric measures. Each voxel in the normalized brain volume was assigned to one of 40 labels, using a probabilistic atlas obtained from a manually labeled training set [26]. The labels we used for further analysis were the putamen, caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, nucleus accumbens, brainstem, thalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, ventral diencephalon and the ventricular system. In contrast to our VBM study, the cerebellum was excluded and volumetric measures of the ventricles were included. Last, a measure of total GM (tGM) (in mm³) was also computed, consisting of both surface-based cortical GM volume calculations and subcortical voxel counts.

Statistical analyses

To assess differences in demographic variables between the PD and HC group and PD subgroups for each task, we performed t-tests (for continuous data) and chi-square tests (for categorical data). We checked assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance with the Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. To correct for non-normal distribution, all values of ventricle volume, the TMTB-A score, and Stroop color word interference test scores were log-transformed. We used t-tests and Pearson correlations since parametric assumptions were met for 74% of the data.

Group differences

A number of statistical tests was performed to assess between-group differences in structural measures. First, we performed a vertex-wise analysis of differences in CTh in FreeSurfer’s statistical program QDEC 1.5, using Monte Carlo-simulations with 10.000 iterations to correct for multiple comparisons and a cluster-wise p-value of .05 to display results. Second, surface (i.e. SA per parcellation) and volumetric analyses (i.e. sub-cortical volume estimates calculated by FreeSurfer, and the manually calculated volume estimate per cortical parcellation) were performed in SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). For SA and cortical volume, we performed independent t-tests using the 68 parcellations (34 per hemisphere) as dependent variables, group as between-subject factor, and tGM volume as a nuisance variable [8]. Between-group differences in subcortical volume were investigated with the volume of the 23 automatically segmented subcortical regions as dependent variable, group as between-subject factor, and tGM as a nuisance variable. We applied a Bonferroni correction by dividing our p-value by the number of cortical areas per hemisphere (p < (.05/34) = ~.001) and by the number of sub-cortical structures per hemisphere (p < (.05/13) = ~.004) in order to correct for multiple comparisons.

Correlations with cognitive performance

Since neuropsychological data were only available for the PD patients, correlations between cognitive performance and structural measurements were restricted to this group. We used a GLM model in QDEC 1.5 to correlate CTh at each vertex with scores on the six neuropsychological tasks, while including age, sex, and education as covariates, and applying Monte Carlo-simulations to correct for multiple comparisons. We used a ‘different-onset-same-slope’ model, which assumes that no sex*age interaction exists. For SA, cortical GM, and sub-cortical volume, we computed partial correlations in SPSS 20.0 using each segmentation/parcellation as criterion, neuropsychological test score as predictor, and age, sex, education, and tGM level as covariates. Again, Monte Carlo-simulations (in QDEC) and Bonferroni corrections (in SPSS) were applied to correct for the multiple comparisons.

Results

The PD and HC group were matched for age (p = .19) and sex (p = .52). In addition, the PD subgroups for each task were similar regarding education, disease-related variables (i.e. UPDRS III score, Hoehn and Yahr stage, disease duration, dopamine replacement therapy), global cognitive functioning and measures of mood (i.e. depression and anxiety level) (see table 1). On average, patients had a UPDRS III score of 24, a Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2 and a median disease duration of 3 years. The majority of the PD group was still unmedicated at the time of scanning (i.e. only 34% received dopamine replacement therapy).

Group differences

The vertex-wise CTh analysis showed cortical thinning in PD patients compared with HC in the left pericalcarine gyrus, extending to the cuneus, precuneus and lingual areas, in the left inferior parietal cortex, bilateral rostral middle frontal cortex, and right cuneus (see table 2 and Fig 1a–1d). In addition, PD patients showed enlargement of the third, and bilateral lateral ventricles and left inferior lateral ventricle when compared with HC. For SA, we found that the PD patients had increased cortical SA of the pars triangularis in the right hemisphere (see table 3). No group differences in cortical GM volume were found.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Vertex-wise cortical thickness group analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148852.t002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. (Sub)cortical volume + cortical pial surface area group analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148852.t003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Between-group differences in cortical thickness and thickness and correlation with task performance.

HC had increased cortical thickness in the left pericalcarine gyrus, extending to cuneus, precuneus and lingual areas left inferior parietal cortex, bilateral rostral middle frontal cortex, and right cuneus, when compared with PD patients (a-d). Within the PD sample, we found a negative correlation between the left lateral occipital and lingual gyrus and performance on the RAVLT (e-f). Clusters were significant after multiple comparison correction with Monte Carlo simulations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148852.g001

Correlations with cognitive performance

Vertex-wise analysis revealed a negative correlation between CTh in left lateral occipital and lingual areas and performance on the RAVLT immediate recall condition (see Fig 1e and 1f). The volume of the right thalamus showed a negative correlation with performance on the Letter and Category fluency task. The volume and SA of the left pars opercularis correlated negatively with performance on the ROCFT (see table 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Partial correlations of (sub)cortical volume and surface area with neuropsychological task performance, corrected for age, sex, education, and tGM volume.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148852.t004

Discussion

In this study, we used a surface-based analysis method to investigate structural brain changes in PD and the role of distinct morphological properties on cognitive heterogeneity among patients. Compared with controls, PD patients showed cortical thinning in the right cuneus, left lateral occipital areas, left inferior parietal cortex and the bilateral rostral middle frontal cortex, ventricular enlargement, and increased cortical surface area in the right pars triangularis. Within-group variance in volume of the thalamus, CTh of the left lateral occipital and lingual areas, and cortical volume and SA of the left pars opercularis related to heterogeneity fluency, verbal memory, and visuospatial memory, respectively. As in our VBM study, brain areas showing group differences in morphological properties did not overlap with brain areas in which structural changes were related to cognitive performance. Thus, while PD patients as a group showed atrophy in various regions compared with the HC, cognitive heterogeneity among patients was associated with between-patient structural differences in other regions. These differences may reflect subtle PD-related structural changes that affect only a subgroup of patients. Alternatively, they represent premorbid differences that may have caused some patients to be less vulnerable than others to cognitive impairment as a consequence of the PD-related structural changes observed at a group level.

Various structural imaging studies have consistently shown a negative correlation between structural brain measures (i.e. cortical thickness and / or GM volume), and cognition in PD [27–31]. PD patients with MCI, for example, have faster rates of cortical thinning when compared with patients without MCI [32]. Furthermore, non-demented PD patients who developed PDD within two years after baseline assessment showed a faster rate of cortical thinning than those who did not develop PDD [33]. These two studies further corroborate the relation between brain structure and cognition in a longitudinal design. Within groups of PD patients, correlations have been found between task performance on neuropsychological tests and GM structure, thereby also strengthening the relation between brain structure and cognition [34]. Our study also found associations between cortical thickness / cortical surface area / GM volume and task performance on several neuropsychological tests. Furthermore, we found relatively small areas of reduced cortical thickness in our cohort of patients, which corresponds with findings from other investigations in groups of cognitively preserved PD patients [35–37], although it is important to emphasize that our cohort was not selected to represent a unitary cognitive status (e.g. not cognitively impaired / cognitively impaired).

Despite a lack of overall consensus, neuro-pathological studies have suggested that differences in cortical thickness and GM volume primarily represent differences in neuronal structural complexity (i.e. synapses and dendritic arborisation) and not neurons per se, although the influence of (mircro)glia, blood vessels and, neuronal size cannot be fully excluded [38]. This hypothesis concurs with other longitudinal observations in which GM volume [39, 40] and cortical thickness [41] increased after training in task-related areas and further supports the relation between structure and function [42]. Relating this hypothesis to our current findings suggests that an optimal structural complexity (i.e. synaptic efficiency) in certain areas leads to an increased task performance on some neuropsychological tasks.

Although we used the same dataset in the current study as in our previous VBM analysis [4], there was surprisingly little overlap between the studies in the areas in which we found significant effects. Since our study was not designed to specifically investigate between-technique differences, we will only shortly discuss a number of possible explanations why the current findings deviate from our previous results. i) In our VBM study, we applied an uncorrected p-value of .001 with an extent threshold of 50 voxels, whereas the present study employs Monte Carlo simulations and Bonferroni corrections, which are statistically more stringent [43]. To exclude the effects of potential false-positive findings, we reanalyzed our data using both techniques while employing an FDR correction. For the VBM analysis, no effects survived the statistical threshold, whereas in the FreeSurfer analyses we found clusters of decreased cortical thickness in the left parietal, occipital and frontal areas when comparing patients with controls. So also when employing a similar statistical threshold, the results between our two studies still differ. ii) Whereas FreeSurfer calculates the total volume of a cortical parcellation or subcortical segmentation, VBM assesses GM volume on a voxel-by-voxel basis. VBM might, therefore, be more sensitive to detect small local effects that may be ‘averaged out’ when measured over a larger area. However, volume-based techniques, such as VBM, are prone to partial volume effects, which might lead to erroneous segmentation and registration, and thereby to an overestimation of GM differences [44, 45]. Also minor methodological variations, such as different spatial transformations or smoothing procedures can alter results in a way similar to the biologic differences under investigation [46]. Since FreeSurfer is a surface-based technique, and thereby differentially affected by these important preprocessing steps, this further hinders the between-technique comparison. iii) Cortical GM volume as a measure of brain structure is different from CTh and SA. Our FreeSurfer results show, in accordance with earlier studies [9–11], that CTh and SA are differentially affected in PD. Since the product of their combined influence is not uniform across the cortex, cortical GM volume may not show overlap with either measure, or effects (e.g. increased SA / decreased CTh) in opposite directions may cancel each other out. iv) This cohort of patients was, overall, still in an early disease stage, and cognitively relatively well-preserved. Several other studies have investigated structural changes in early stage PD, and found little or no atrophy in cognitively preserved cohorts, comparable to ours [35, 37]. The areas in which atrophy was described varied considerably between studies, thus suggesting that the atrophy is subtle and topographically non-specific, in contrast with, for example, hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. We argue that if the structural differences had been more pronounced, both techniques would have detected them. Our results confirm previous studies by showing that there is indeed atrophy in relatively early stage PD, but that it is, if anything, subtle and spread over various brain areas. Also the enlargement of the third and lateral ventricles indicates a diffuse and non-specific degenerative process.

Several results are consistent with previous data obtained using FreeSurfer in PD, mainly concerning CTh reductions in the bilateral rostral middle frontal cortex, bilateral cuneus and left inferior parietal areas [47–49], as well as the enlargement of the third and lateral ventricles [50, 51]. Also the positive correlation between SA of the left medial orbitofrontal cortex and Stroop task performance is in accordance with the involvement of this area in response inhibition [52]. In contrast, the negative correlation between verbal memory performance and CTh of the lateral occipital and lingual cortex is not in line with earlier findings. Pellicano et al. [53] reported a positive correlation between verbal memory performance and thickness in occipital areas (i.e. the fusiform area) in PD. Also the negative correlations between the left pars opercularis and the right thalamus with visuospatial memory and verbal fluency, respectively, are difficult to interpret, although numerous cognitive processes have been associated with these areas [54] [55–57]. Future studies should replicate these findings before any definite statements can be made. In addition, since both VBM [58] and FreeSurfer [59] have problems segmenting the thalamus from the surrounding WM, we advise caution when interpreting the correlation between the thalamus and verbal fluency we found in the current, but not the previous, (VBM) study, since these conflicting results could indicate a spurious finding. Replication in future research is therefore warranted.

One could speculate that the negative correlations can be interpreted as a form of pruning to get a more efficient organisation, and thus less thickness equals more efficiency, thereby leading to a better task performance. This, however, is not in line with findings in which an increase in thickness is found after (cognitive) training in task-related areas (see e.g. [41]. Future studies should therefore replicate these negative correlations findings before any definite statements can be made.

To our knowledge, this is the first study that compared VBM and FreeSurfer data in the same cohort of PD patients to study the relation between brain structure and cognitive performance. Strengths of our study include our relatively large and well-powered [60] sample and the fact that we controlled for various confounding factors such as age, sex and education. An important limitation, however, is the absence of neuropsychological test scores from HC. Conclusions based on the correlations between brain structure and cognitive performance should therefore be interpreted with caution, as they may not be specific to PD. Furthermore, FreeSurfer, by default, calculates cortical thickness as the shortest (Euclidian) distance between two nearest vertices; once from the pial surface to the GM/WM boundary, and once from the GM/WM boundary to the pial surface. These two values are then averaged to produce a thickness value at that node. Although there is no golden standard or general consensus as to which measure is best [61, 62], it is important to keep in mind that shortest distance is not the only way to calculate cortical thickness. Some have argued that other measures, such as linked-distance, might be more sensitive to differences in thickness (see e.g. [63]).

Future research should include a longitudinal approach to gain more insight into how structural changes relate to cognitive status over time. It would also be insightful to include patients with a more diverse cognitive profile to make the sample more heterogeneous, or subdivide the sample into subgroups based on cognitive status (e.g. cognitively not impaired; cognitively impaired; demented).

Conclusions

The results of the current study suggest that PD is associated with cortical thinning and ventricular enlargement, and that cognitive heterogeneity within the PD population is associated with subtle differences in CTh, SA, and (sub)cortical GM volume. Our results obtained with FreeSurfer support the hypothesis that CTh and SA are differentially affected by the disease, and have diverse associations with cognition. This underlines the necessity to take distinct morphological properties of brain areas into account in the context of PD. By comparing GM volume effects obtained with FreeSurfer and VBM, we have provided evidence that their methodological and technical differences can yield non-overlapping results in the same cohort of participants. We think researchers should be aware of the consequences of the choice of technique on their results, and we recommend that future research should further investigate why two structure-based analysis techniques yield different findings.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Kim Olde Dubbelink, MD, PhD, Froukje de Vries, MD, and Stella de Wit, MD, for providing us with the structural scans of the healthy controls, and Marianne Hofman, MSc, for helping us selecting the structural scans and ordering the demographics and neuropsychological test scores.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OvdH YvdW HB. Performed the experiments: HB EF MK. Analyzed the data: NG AvL SvdB DS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DS. Wrote the paper: NG AvL YvdW OvdH.

Citation: Gerrits NJHM, van Loenhoud AC, van den Berg SF, Berendse HW, Foncke EMJ, Klein M, et al. (2016) Cortical Thickness, Surface Area and Subcortical Volume Differentially Contribute to Cognitive Heterogeneity in Parkinson’s Disease. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0148852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148852

References

1. Kehagia AA, Barker RA, Robbins TW. Neuropsychological and clinical heterogeneity of cognitive impairment and dementia in patients with Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Dec;9(12):1200–13. pmid:20880750

2. Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B. Cognitive profile of patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2005 Oct 25;65(8):1239–45. pmid:16247051

3. Hely MA, Reid WG, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JG. The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson's disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord. 2008 Apr 30;23(6):837–44. pmid:18307261

4. Gerrits NJ, van der Werf YD, Hofman M, Foncke EM, Klein M, Berendse HW, et al. Gray matter differences contribute to variation in cognitive performance in Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurol. 2013 Sep 21.

5. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1238–43. pmid:11707080

6. Winkler AM, Kochunov P, Blangero J, Almasy L, Zilles K, Fox PT, et al. Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies. Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 15;53(3):1135–46. pmid:20006715

7. Lemaitre H, Goldman A, Sambataro F, Verchinski B, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger D, et al. Normal age-related brain morphometric changes: Nonuniformity across cortical thickness, surface area and grey matter volume? Neurobiology of aging. 2012 Mar;33(3):617.e1–9.

8. Dickerson BC, Feczko E, Augustinack JC, Pacheco J, Morris JC, Fischl B, et al. Differential effects of aging and Alzheimer's disease on medial temporal lobe cortical thickness and surface area. Neurobiology of aging. 2009 Mar;30(3):432–40. pmid:17869384

9. Jubault T, Gagnon JF, Karama S, Ptito A, Lafontaine AL, Evans AC, et al. Patterns of cortical thickness and surface area in early Parkinson's disease. NeuroImage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):462–7. pmid:21184830

10. Pereira JB, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Marti MJ, Compta Y, Junque C, Bargallo N, et al. Assessment of cortical degeneration in patients with Parkinson's disease by voxel-based morphometry, cortical folding, and cortical thickness. Human brain mapping. 2012 Nov;33(11):2521–34. pmid:21898679

11. Hanganu A, Bedetti C, Jubault T, Gagnon JF, Mejia-Constain B, Degroot C, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with increased cortical degeneration. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2013 Sep;28(10):1360–9.

12. Verhage F. Het coderen van het opleidingsniveau voor researchdoeleinden [Educational classification system for research purposes: revised version]. Internal publication Groningen, the Netherlands: Academic Hospital Groningen, State University Groningen. 1983.

13. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967 May;17(5):427–42. pmid:6067254

14. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):588–97. pmid:8991972

15. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893–7. pmid:3204199

16. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–98. pmid:1202204

17. Cummings JL. Mini-Mental State Examination. Norms, normals, and numbers. Jama. 1993 May 12;269(18):2420–1. pmid:8479071

18. Rey A. L′examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1964.

19. Osterrieth PA. Le test du copie d’une figure complexe. Arch Psychol. 1944;30:206–356.

20. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643–62.

21. Reitan RM. The relation of the trail making test to organix brain damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955;19:393–4. pmid:13263471

22. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004.

23. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):272–84. pmid:10619420

24. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):11050–5. pmid:10984517

25. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Segonne F, Salat DH, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):11–22. pmid:14654453

26. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341–55. pmid:11832223

27. Melzer TR, Watts R, MacAskill MR, Pitcher TL, Livingston L, Keenan RJ, et al. Grey matter atrophy in cognitively impaired Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;83(2):188–94. pmid:21890574

28. Nishio Y, Hirayama K, Takeda A, Hosokai Y, Ishioka T, Suzuki K, et al. Corticolimbic gray matter loss in Parkinson's disease without dementia. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17(8):1090–7. pmid:20298422

29. Pereira JB, Svenningsson P, Weintraub D, Bronnick K, Lebedev A, Westman E, et al. Initial cognitive decline is associated with cortical thinning in early Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2014 Jun 3;82(22):2017–25. pmid:24808018

30. Segura B, Baggio HC, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, Compta Y, Garcia-Diaz AI, et al. Cortical thinning associated with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2012 Oct;29(12):1495–503.

31. Song SK, Lee JE, Park HJ, Sohn YH, Lee JD, Lee PH. The pattern of cortical atrophy in patients with Parkinson's disease according to cognitive status. Mov Disord. 2011 Feb 1;26(2):289–96. pmid:21370255

32. Hanganu A, Bedetti C, Degroot C, Mejia-Constain B, Lafontaine AL, Soland V, et al. Mild cognitive impairment is linked with faster rate of cortical thinning in patients with Parkinson's disease longitudinally. Brain. 2014 Apr;137(Pt 4):1120–9. pmid:24613932

33. Compta Y, Pereira JB, Rios J, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Junque C, Bargallo N, et al. Combined dementia-risk biomarkers in Parkinson's disease: a prospective longitudinal study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Aug;19(8):717–24. pmid:23643469

34. Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Junque C, Marti MJ, Tolosa E. Brain structural MRI correlates of cognitive dysfunctions in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2011 Nov 15;310(1–2):70–4. pmid:21864849

35. Dalaker TO, Zivadinov R, Larsen JP, Beyer MK, Cox JL, Alves G, et al. Gray matter correlations of cognition in incident Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Apr 15;25(5):629–33. pmid:20213820

36. Martin WR, Wieler M, Gee M, Camicioli R. Temporal lobe changes in early, untreated Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2009 Oct 15;24(13):1949–54. pmid:19606493

37. Menke RA, Szewczyk-Krolikowski K, Jbabdi S, Jenkinson M, Talbot K, Mackay CE, et al. Comprehensive morphometry of subcortical grey matter structures in early-stage Parkinson's disease. Human brain mapping. 2014 Apr;35(4):1681–90. pmid:23861334

38. Freeman SH, Kandel R, Cruz L, Rozkalne A, Newell K, Frosch MP, et al. Preservation of neuronal number despite age-related cortical brain atrophy in elderly subjects without Alzheimer disease. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology. 2008 Dec;67(12):1205–12. pmid:19018241

39. Driemeyer J, Boyke J, Gaser C, Buchel C, May A. Changes in gray matter induced by learning—revisited. PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2669. pmid:18648501

40. Ilg R, Wohlschlager AM, Gaser C, Liebau Y, Dauner R, Woller A, et al. Gray matter increase induced by practice correlates with task-specific activation: a combined functional and morphometric magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16;28(16):4210–5. pmid:18417700

41. Engvig A, Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Moberget T, Sundseth O, Larsen VA, et al. Effects of memory training on cortical thickness in the elderly. Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 1;52(4):1667–76. pmid:20580844

42. Alexander-Bloch A, Giedd JN, Bullmore E. Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):322–36. pmid:23531697

43. Lieberman MD, Cunningham WA. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2009 Dec;4(4):423–8. pmid:20035017

44. Kennedy KM, Erickson KI, Rodrigue KM, Voss MW, Colcombe SJ, Kramer AF, et al. Age-related differences in regional brain volumes: a comparison of optimized voxel-based morphometry to manual volumetry. Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Oct;30(10):1657–76. pmid:18276037

45. Callaert DV, Ribbens A, Maes F, Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N. Assessing age-related gray matter decline with voxel-based morphometry depends significantly on segmentation and normalization procedures. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2014;6:124. pmid:25002845

46. Henley SM, Ridgway GR, Scahill RI, Kloppel S, Tabrizi SJ, Fox NC, et al. Pitfalls in the use of voxel-based morphometry as a biomarker: examples from huntington disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):711–9. pmid:20037137

47. Tinaz S, Courtney MG, Stern CE. Focal cortical and subcortical atrophy in early Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Feb 15;26(3):436–41. pmid:21462259

48. Pagonabarraga J, Corcuera-Solano I, Vives-Gilabert Y, Llebaria G, Garcia-Sanchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, et al. Pattern of regional cortical thinning associated with cognitive deterioration in Parkinson's disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54980. pmid:23359616

49. Lyoo CH, Ryu YH, Lee MS. Topographical distribution of cerebral cortical thinning in patients with mild Parkinson's disease without dementia. Mov Disord. 2010 Mar 15;25(4):496–9. pmid:20108369

50. Segura B, Baggio HC, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, Compta Y, Garcia-Diaz AI, et al. Cortical thinning associated with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2014 Oct;29(12):1495–503.

51. Dalaker TO, Zivadinov R, Ramasamy DP, Beyer MK, Alves G, Bronnick KS, et al. Ventricular enlargement and mild cognitive impairment in early Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2011 Feb 1;26(2):297–301.

52. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Rajaram S. Addiction changes orbitofrontal gyrus function: involvement in response inhibition. Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 8;12(11):2595–9. pmid:11496155

53. Pellicano C, Assogna F, Piras F, Caltagirone C, Pontieri FE, Spalletta G. Regional cortical thickness and cognitive functions in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients: a pilot study. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jul 19.

54. Chein JM, Fissell K, Jacobs S, Fiez JA. Functional heterogeneity within Broca's area during verbal working memory. Physiol Behav. 2002 Dec;77(4–5):635–9. pmid:12527011

55. O‘Mara SM. The Anterior Thalamus Provides A Subcortical Circuit Supporting Memory And Spatial Navigation. 2013.

56. Klostermann F. Functional Roles of the Thalamus for Language Capacities. 2013.

57. Van Der Werf YD, Tisserand DJ, Visser PJ, Hofman PA, Vuurman E, Uylings HB, et al. Thalamic volume predicts performance on tests of cognitive speed and decreases in healthy aging. A magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis. Brain research Cognitive brain research. 2001 Jun;11(3):377–85. pmid:11339987

58. Focke NK, Trost S, Paulus W, Falkai P, Gruber O. Do manual and voxel-based morphometry measure the same? A proof of concept study. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2014;5:39. pmid:24782790

59. Eggert LD, Sommer J, Jansen A, Kircher T, Konrad C. Accuracy and reliability of automated gray matter segmentation pathways on real and simulated structural magnetic resonance images of the human brain. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45081. pmid:23028771

60. Pardoe HR, Abbott DF, Jackson GD. Sample size estimates for well-powered cross-sectional cortical thickness studies. Human brain mapping. 2012 Nov;34(11):3000–9. pmid:22807270

61. Das SR, Avants BB, Grossman M, Gee JC. Registration based cortical thickness measurement. Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 15;45(3):867–79. pmid:19150502

62. Aganj I, Sapiro G, Parikshak N, Madsen SK, Thompson PM. Measurement of cortical thickness from MRI by minimum line integrals on soft-classified tissue. Human brain mapping. 2009 Oct;30(10):3188–99. pmid:19219850

63. Lerch JP, Evans AC. Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation. Neuroimage. 2005 Jan 1;24(1):163–73. pmid:15588607