It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
According to the Nation’s Report Card (2011), America’s students are not proficient in writing. Because self-efficacy is a primary predictor of the actual outcomes, educational research (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994) has focused on means of developing beliefs of self-efficacy to increase outcomes (Bandura, 1997).
The purpose of this sequential mixed methods single case study was to explore grade 12 students’ perceptions of self-efficacy in terms of academic writing. This study also evaluated the effectiveness of the writing curriculum in increasing students’ self-efficacy with respect to writing and exploring students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the writing process and the Senior Project Research Paper curriculum and highlight necessary changes.
The primary research questions were: 1. What is the relationship of students’ self-efficacy with respect to academic writing competence and writing outcomes? 2. Are there gender differences in pre-test and post-test perceptions of self-efficacy in academic writing and writing outcomes? 3. What are students’ perceptions of the implementation process of the writing program? 4. What are students’ and teachers’ assessments and recommendations of the writing program? The framework for this research was based upon Stufflebeam’s (2007) program evaluation model with emphasis on the implementation of the curriculum and outcomes. The instrument, administered to students ( N=78), revealed a significant correlation between academic writing self-efficacy and outcomes. The results for pre-test Writing Process ( r=.29, r2=.08, p=.010), Creativity (r=.30, r2=.09, p=.008), and Time-Management (r=.29, r 2=.08, p=.012) dimensions and the post-test Writing Process (r=.33, r2=.11, p=.003), Creativity (r=.31, r 2=10, p=.006) and Time-Management (r=.41, r2=.17, p<.001) dimensions were positively related to Actual Grade attainment. Student (N=14) focus group findings indicated that students’ self-efficacy is increased through constructive teacher feedback, incremental goals presented by the curriculum, and topic interest. Teacher (N=5) focus group findings revealed that teachers feel that students are unwilling to meaningfully engage in the writing process, that they wish they had more time to address student needs and provide feedback, and that they value the writing curriculum which promotes collegiality and standardized expectations within the department.
Results of this study will help educational leaders promote effective and meaningful writing instruction to foster student’ academic writing self-efficacy.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





