Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts

Abstract

The sensitivity of a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (ions formed per number density of analytes) is fundamentally limited by the collision frequency between reagent ions and analytes, known as the collision limit, the ion-molecule reaction time, and the transmission efficiency of product ions to the detector. We use the response of a time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (ToF-CIMS) to N₂O₅, known to react with iodide at the collision limit, to constrain the combined effects of ion-molecule reaction time, which is strongly influenced by mixing and ion losses in the ion-molecule reaction drift tube. A mass spectrometric voltage scanning procedure elucidates the relative binding energies of the ion adducts, which influence the transmission efficiency of molecular ions through the electric fields within the vacuum chamber. Together, this information provides a critical constraint on the sensitivity of a ToF-CIMS towards a wide suite of routinely detected multifunctional organic molecules for which no calibration standards exist. We describe the scanning procedure and collision limit determination, and we show results from the application of these constraints to the measurement of organic aerosol composition at two different field locations.

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016 www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/ doi:10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016 Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Felipe D. Lopez-Hilker1, Siddarth Iyer2, Claudia Mohr1, Ben H. Lee1, Emma L. DAmbro1,3, Theo Kurtn2, and Joel A. Thornton1

1Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195 WA, USA

2Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

3Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195 WA, USA

Correspondence to: Joel A. Thornton ([email protected])

Received: 15 September 2015 Published in Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.: 23 October 2015 Revised: 11 February 2016 Accepted: 18 February 2016 Published: 6 April 2016

Abstract. The sensitivity of a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (ions formed per number density of analytes) is fundamentally limited by the collision frequency between reagent ions and analytes, known as the collision limit, the ionmolecule reaction time, and the transmission efciency of product ions to the detector. We use the response of a time-of-ight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (ToF-CIMS) to N2O5, known to react with iodide at the collision limit, to constrain the combined effects of ionmolecule reaction time, which is strongly inuenced by mixing and ion losses in the ionmolecule reaction drift tube. A mass spectrometric voltage scanning procedure elucidates the relative binding energies of the ion adducts, which inuence the transmission efciency of molecular ions through the electric elds within the vacuum chamber. Together, this information provides a critical constraint on the sensitivity of a ToF-CIMS towards a wide suite of routinely detected multifunctional organic molecules for which no calibration standards exist. We describe the scanning procedure and collision limit determination, and we show results from the application of these constraints to the measurement of organic aerosol composition at two different eld locations.

1 Introduction

The photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere generates a wide array of multifunctional organic molecules which contribute to the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA), hydroxyl radical sources and sinks, and the cycling and fate of reactive nitrogen. Determination of the identities of these organics, and their abundance in the atmosphere, has remained an analytical challenge because of the inherent complexity of the chemical system, which involves a multitude of precursors and signicantly more oxidation products (Bertram et al., 2009; Goldstein and Galbally, 2007). Chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) has become increasingly utilized for the measurement of these types of compounds (Bertram et al., 2011; Brophy and Farmer, 2015; Fortner et al., 2004; Hearn and Smith, 2004; Holzinger et al., 2010; Huey et al., 1995; Jokinen et al., 2012; Jordan et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2014; Lopez-Hilker et al., 2014; Slusher, 2004; Veres et al., 2008, 2010; Yatavelli et al., 2012; You et al., 2014; Yu and Lee, 2012). Typically, a specic reagent ion is generated using a radioactive ion source, X-rays, or corona discharge, and then mixed with ambient air for a xed time. Ionmolecule reactions then lead to the formation of product ions which are separated and counted with a mass spectrometer. Common ionmolecule reaction mechanisms include ligand switching (adduct formation), reactive electron transfer, or proton transfer/abstraction. The benets of CIMS include linearity, reproducibility, sensitivity with some degree of se-

Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.

Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts

I

[bracketrightbig]dt T i(m Q,Bi)

= product ion formation transmission (1)

A neutral molecule that forms a strongly bound cluster with iodide at the collision limit should be detected with relatively high sensitivity given that it will survive transmission through the ion optics which inherently impart energy to the ions via electric elds. In contrast, a molecule might form an iodide adduct at the collision limit, but be so weakly bound that it is not detected due to collision-induced dissociation (declustering) during transit through the vacuum chamber. Thus, knowledge of a clusters binding energy and the collision-limited formation rate can provide a means to further constrain the instruments sensitivity to a broader range of compounds it detects, even if standards do not exist.Experimental constraints on binding energies and collision-limited product ion formation rates are discussed below.

2.1 Collision limit determination of the UW-ToF-CIMS

We have calibrated the iodide adduct ToF-CIMS to many organic and inorganic molecules including hydroxyhydroperoxides, multifunctional acids, diols, triols, tetrols, nitrated aromatics and other oxidized organic molecules in an effort to constrain the instrument response to a variety of different functionalities (Lee et al., 2014). As expected, given constraints imposed by ionmolecule collision frequencies, we empirically nd that there is a maximum sensitivity, which for iodideorganic clusters in our instrument is 19

22 cps pptv1 (per million cps of reagent ion) (see, e.g., Lee et al., 2014). As discussed below, this limit is also consistent with the experimental ionmolecule collision limit of our instrument.

Huey et al. (1995) rst showed that dinitrogen pentoxide (N2O5) reacts with iodide ions at the collision limit (Huey et al., 1995). We therefore use this reaction to determine the upper-limit sensitivity of our instrument (to N2O5) given that the number of product ions detected cannot exceed those produced by the number of iodideN2O5 collisions occurring within the interaction time of ions and molecules.

We generate isotopically labeled 15N2O5 by reacting excess 15NO2 (Scott-Marin) with ozone leading to the formation of 15NO3 and 15N2O5 during transit down a Teon reaction cell held at 207 kPa above ambient pressure by a glass capillary. The output can be modeled (Bertram et al., 2009) and has been independently veried by other techniques such as thermal-dissociation laser-induced uorescence or cavity ring-down spectroscopy (Brown et al., 2001; Day et al., 2002). We use the independently calibrated output concentrations as inputs into the mass spectrometer and monitor the response.

N2O5 reacts with iodide ions at the collision limit (Huey et al., 1995) but via two channels (Kercher et al., 2009). One

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016 www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/

1506 F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS

lectivity, and high time resolution without sample preparation or handling. General disadvantages of CIMS include a lack of isomer or isobaric separation and thus structural information without the coupling of addition separation dimensions, and the range of potential sensitivities which require calibration with authentic standards.

Recently, chemical ionization has been coupled to eld deployable time-of-ight mass spectrometers (ToF-MS) such as the Tofwerk AG high-resolution version, commonly referred to as the HRToF-CIMS (Aljawhary et al., 2013; Huey et al., 1995; Jokinen et al., 2012; Junninen et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2014; Lopez-Hilker et al., 2014; Yatavelli et al., 2012).As a result, hundreds of oxidized organic compounds are now routinely detected in ambient air or photo-oxidation experiments in the laboratory with a single instrument. A major limitation of these instruments thus far is that calibration of the instrument response to many of the detected ions is impossible, as either the sheer number of calibrations required is unrealistic, or calibration standards do not exist.

Herein, we present the maximum sensitivity of an HRToFCIMS using the collision limit for iodide adduct chemical ionization which is becoming widely used by the atmospheric chemistry community (Aljawhary et al., 2013; Huey et al., 1995; Kercher et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2014). We also present an ion adduct declustering scanning procedure which experimentally determines the relative binding energies of the detected ion adducts and therefore their approximate sensitivity. The combination of declustering scanning to determine effective binding enthalpies, which can be compared with theoretical estimates from quantum mechanical calculations, along with the experimentally determined collision limit provides an approximate calibration for many compounds in the mass spectrum which would otherwise be impossible to obtain by traditional methods.

2 Iodide ToF-CIMS sensitivity to organics

Iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry has been described in detail previously (Huey et al., 1995;Kercher et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2014). As summarized in Eq. (1), for adduct ionization, there are essentially two components to the instrument sensitivity that will be specic to a molecule: (i) the rate at which product ions are formed via reagent ionmolecule reactions over the xed interaction time, and (ii) the transmission of the molecular ion to the detector. In Eq. (1), Si is the sensitivity observed for reaction time t, kf is the product ion formation rate constant, [I]

is the concentration of the reagent ions in the ion molecule region (IMR), and T i is the ion-specic transmission efciency, which depends upon the ion mass-to-charge (m/Q), net electric eld strength of the transfer optics ("), and the adduct ion binding energy (Bi).

Si =

t

[integraldisplay]

0

kf

F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS 1507

5 x 106

16:10 16:12 16:14 16:16 16:18 16:20 16:22

the total number of charges (ions) in the ionization region remains unchanged over short time periods (controlled by the activity of the 210Po); therefore, any changes to the total number of ions measured at the detector is due to the varying efciency with which ions having different masses are transmitted through the mass spectrometer. By measuring the relative change in total ions detected as a function of mass to charge (m/Q), a linear system of equations can be solved to derive the transmission efciency as a function of mass to charge. The transmission efciency depends on ion optic settings, primarily the two quadrupole ion guides which act as band-pass lters. The lower mass cutoff is most important for our sensitivity determination as 15NO3 (63 Th) is near the low end of the mass transmission window. We tune the transmission function to be as at as possible by adjusting the radio frequency, amplitude and axial voltage gradient along the quadrupole ion guides. As a result, in the mass range of interest (63237 Th), the transmission efciency is approximately constant in our instrument as evidenced by the ion closure shown in the top panel of Fig. 1 (top panel) during N2O5 additions.

Dividing the transmission-efciency-corrected sum of NO3 and IN2O5 count rates by the N2O5 concentration (pptv) sampled, we calculate the total sensitivity to N2O5 to be 2226 cps ppt1 per million reagent ions. Given that

I and N2O5 react at the collision limit, and assuming there are no other product ions (we detect no others with the ToF

CIMS), then this sensitivity represents the maximum possible sensitivity for compounds with collision cross sections similar to N2O5. As noted above, this estimate is also consistent with an empirically determined upper-limit sensitivity for organic compounds, in that we have yet to measure a sensitivity above this value. Some of the organic compounds to which we have calibrated that are near this collision-limited sensitivity include isoprene-derived 2-methyl tetrols (19 cps ppt1), dipentaerythritol (22 cps ppt1), malonic acid (19 cps ppt1) and levoglucosan (20 cps ppt1).

2.2 Distribution iodide adduct binding energies

In our instrument, organic molecules are nearly exclusively detected as molecular clusters with iodide. However, outside of a few of the simplest carboxylic acids, very few binding energies of organic compounds with iodide have been measured or calculated. Binding energies calculated using quantum chemical methods provide valuable information, but carrying out the computationally expensive calculations for the 100s of molecular ions typically identied in our spectra is not feasible, especially when molecular structure is unknown. Therefore, to constrain the effective binding energies of the actual multifunctional organics that are measured, we scan the electric eld strength within the transfer optics in real time while measuring a steady-state distribution of organic compounds. These scans experimentally determine the electric eld strength required to break apart the iodide

www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/ Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016

4

3

Signal counts s1

2

1

16:10 16:12 16:14 16:16 16:18 16:20 16:22

2 x 105

TIC

I

IH2O

15NO3 15N2O5 I

1.5

1

0.5

0

Figure 1. An example of collision-limited sensitivity determination of the ToF-CIMS. Top: the reagent ions and sum of total ions during the addition of high concentrations of 15N2O5 to the inlet of the

ToF-CIMS. By calibrating the output of our N2O5 source independently (in this case by the UC, Berkeley TD-LiF instrument, Day et al., 2002), we are able to derive the collision-limited sensitivity of the instrument by adding the two detection channels as described in the text (Day et al., 2002; Huey et al., 1995). As total ion current (TIC) remains constant during the experiment despite the depletion of reagent ions (I+ IH2O) the mass transmission efciency be

tween 63 and 237 Th is therefore constant.

channel is the formation of an ionmolecule adduct between N2O5 and iodide I(N2O5). This cluster may simply be a stable intermediate on the way to the lowest energy reaction products NO3 and INO2, but it is detected as a major product under weak electric eld settings (weak declustering) in the ion optics used to transmit ions through the vacuum chamber to the mass separation region (Kercher, et al., 2009). The other channel results in NO3+ INO2, presumably from the

dissociation of the iodide adduct. Its contribution can be enhanced by increasing the strength of the electric elds in the atmospheric pressure interface (APi) of the mass spectrometer (Kercher et al., 2009). In the work of Huey et al. (1995) only NO3 is observed due presumably to a combination of low pressure in the ionmolecule reaction drift tube, where the iodideN2O5 collision complex might not be stabilized, and there are strong electric elds in the vacuum chamber. Therefore, to track the formation of product ions from the reaction of I with N2O5, we add the product ion signals from the two detection channels (NO3 and IN2O5). An example time series of this type of experiment is shown in Fig. 1.

As the N2O5 product ions are detected at different mass-to-charge ratios (63 vs. 237 Th), the absolute count rate of the sum of the two ion signals could be inuenced by mass-dependent ion transmission through the ion optics of the instrument. We therefore measured the mass-dependent transmission of our instrument by adding large quantities of known compounds with varying molecular mass to the ionization region (Huey et al., 1995). This method assumes that

1508 F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS

1

Chemical ionization atmospheric pressure interface

Skimmer

Quad 2 Front

Shift together towards (-dV) All other voltages remain constant

(a)

0.8

Fraction remaining

0.4

C H

O C H

O C H

O C H

O C H

O N C H

O N C H

O N

0.6

0.2

0

(b)

0

5

10

15

20

Scan data Optimization region Fit scan

IMR 70 torr

Quad 1 1.5 torr

Quad 2 10-2 torr

Lens stack 10-5 torr

Extraction 10-6 torr

1

dV

S o

dV50

0.5

Figure 2. A schematic of the voltages in the APi region of the Tofwerk ToF-MS. The region of the mass spectrometer that we conduct declustering scanning is between the skimmer (orange) and the entrance to the second quadrupole (red). All voltages upstream of the skimmer are moved incrementally towards more negative voltages to create a stronger declustering eld while keeping mass transmission effects constant by keeping the voltage gradients across each quadrupole constant, typically in steps of 1 V. Iodide adducts

which are formed in the ion molecule region (IMR) interact with the changing electric elds and dissociate based on their ionmolecule binding energy.

organic adducts, which, in turn, are directly related to the binding energy of the adduct.

To assess this approach, we used a steady-state atmospheric simulation chamber at the University of Washington to generate a wide range of oxidized organics from the reaction of -pinene in the presence of ozone and NOx (Lopez-Hilker et al., 2015). While sampling this mixture, we scanned the voltage difference (dV ) between the skimmer and the entrance to the second quadrupole ion guide of the mass spectrometer (see Fig. 2 for schematic). We call these declustering scans because by increasing dV we systematically increase the collisional energy of the iodideorganic adducts above our normal operating dV until the adducts dissociate, mostly into I and a neutral organic molecule. An example of this type of experiment is shown in Fig. 3a, where normalized ion count rates are plotted as a function of dV . During a declustering scan, all potentials upstream of the second quadrupole are moved together towards more negative voltages such that the electric eld and therefore the declustering strength is incrementally changed while maintaining a constant gradient across the quadrupoles to avoid simultaneous changes in the mass transmission function, which depends upon the axial voltage gradient along the quadrupole rods (see Fig. 2 schematic).

We show the survival of a representative set of iodide adducts as a function of electric eld strength in Fig. 3a. A variety of behaviors are observed; however, all adducts follow a similar sigmoidal response to dV , as expected for a threshold-driven process. We nd that some adducts (e.g.,

C10 H16 O

3 I

0

(c)

1

1 / S o

All adducts

I(H O)

I(CH O ) I(C H O

)

I(C H O ) I(C H NO

)

I(C H O

)

0.5

0

0 5 10 15 20

V (volts)

Figure 3. Effective binding energy. Top: declustering scans of gas-phase products measured from the reaction of -pinene in the presence of ozone and NOx. Some iodide adducts dissociate rapidly during the rst few voltage steps. Multifunctional nitrates and highly oxidized C10 molecules show no dependence on the initial voltage steps before dissociating. We infer these compounds to be strongly bound to I, and therefore likely detected at a high sensitivity. Middle: an example of a non-linear least-squares t to the declustering scan is shown for C10H16O3I. The raw scan data are shown in blue circles, the region of optimization for the t is shown in red, and the extrapolated scan curve is shown in black, constraining So. Bottom: the results of tting declustering scans (1/So) shows a plateauing effect as a function of dV50. We use dV50 as a measure of the relative binding energy between compounds. In colored dots, specic molecules are shown which span the binding enthalpy space.

simple monocarboxylic acids, diols) are rapidly dissociated during the rst few voltage steps, while larger multifunctional organics (inferred from the O / C ratio) tend to survive to higher potentials during the scan (e.g., multifunctional organic nitrates in Fig. 3a). The observation that the larger, multifunctional molecules (e.g., C10H15O8N) are detected with the same efciency during the rst few voltage steps implies that they are bound to iodide with sufcient binding energy to be efciently transmitted by the normal operation of the ion optics in the mass spectrometer and are therefore likely to be detected at a sensitivity that depends only on their formation rate, which for lack of a better constraint we would assume to be at the collision limit.

Even at our weakest electric eld settings, many iodide organic adducts are partially declustered, and thus the true sigmoidal declustering scan curve is not observed. In these

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016 www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/

F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS 1509

cases, we calculate an effective maximum sensitivity by using a custom non-linear least-squares tting algorithm to determine the extent to which the ion adduct has been declustered during transit through the mass spectrometers atmospheric pressure interface (APi). The tting algorithm uses a characteristic sigmoidal shape with variable amplitude, So, and location of the voltage at half signal maximum (dV50). If there are isomers or isobaric compounds that contribute signicantly to the ion signal but have different iodide binding energies, then the declustering scan should not have a sigmoidal shape. While this information could be useful with a highly resolved dV scan, and is reected in the t error, herein we remove ion adducts with mean square residual > 10 % from the analysis. So is the relative signal that would be detected under weaker electric eld strengths than we can operate the instrument (dV < 1 V). So is not a measure of the actual sensitivity, which is generally unknown, but instead is a measure of the extent to which declustering during transmission to the detector affects the actual sensitivity.The dV50 is a measure of relative binding enthalpy. Iodide adducts that are tightly bound survive to higher voltage gradients and therefore have a higher dV50 than more weakly bound adducts.

Pinonic acid (assumed to be measured as the C10H16O3I ion) is an example of a compound for which a true sigmoidal curve is not observed (see Fig. 3b). The t for pinonic acid implies that the sensitivity would be enhanced if weaker declustering conditions existed (e.g., 1.4 = So > 1). The sen

sitivity of the instrument to pinonic acid, calibrated by an authentic standard is 15 cps ppt1. Therefore, if weaker declustering conditions existed in the instrument, transmission-optimized sensitivity for pinonic acid would be 15 1.4 =

21 cps ppt1. This value is near the collision limit determined by calibration to N2O5, which suggests that the iodide pinonic adduct is formed at near the collision limit in the IMR, but it is partially declustered during transit through the ion optics of the mass spectrometer, resulting in a lower observed sensitivity during normal operation settings (e.g., Sobs < So).

In Fig. 3c we show similar voltage scanning t results for all iodideorganic adducts (black circles) identied in the mixture produced from -pinene ozonolysis in the presence of NOx. We nd that 1/So, which is related to the maximum possible transmission for each compound, plateaus with increasing dV50, suggesting that iodide adducts with a dV50

6 V or higher, are sufciently bound to transit the ion optics without signicant declustering losses. Adducts having dV50 > 6 V are composed of highly functionalized organics (e.g., Fig. 3c: C10H17NO6 (black) and C20H32O7 (green)), which is consistent with the more strongly bound iodide adducts generally involving one or more hydrogen bonds from a polar hydroxy, hydroperoxy, or carboxylic acid group.We also expect that these compounds are likely formed at near the collision limit as steric effects are unlikely to signif-

Table 1. Compounds used to determine the relationship between dV50% and binding enthalpy derived from quantum calculations (Iyer et al., 2016) at the DLPNO-CCSD(T)//PBE-aug-cc-pVTZ-PP level. The relationship is approximately linear R2 = 0.9 (see Fig. 4).

For details see text.

Compound Composition Binding enthalpy Fit dV50 (V)(kcal mol1)

Glycolic acid C2H4O3 21.1 4.70

Glyoxylic acid C2H2O3 20.8 4.29

Malonic acid C3H4O4 27.8 6.21

Formic acid CH2O2 23.9 5.80

Acetic acid C2H4O2 17.4 4.10

Succinic acid C4H8O4 27.6 6.19

Nitric acid HNO3 22.2 5.50

Nitrous acid HONO 18.7 4.56

icantly limit their formation rate, but this hypothesis remains to be tested.

2.3 Relationship of dV50 to quantum-chemical-derived binding energies

Figure 4 shows the relationship between iodide adduct binding enthalpies from quantum chemical calculations, the dV50 values determined from the ts to the declustering scans (see also Table 1). Assuming the linear relationship (R2 = 0.92)

between the subset of compounds for which we have quantum chemical calculations and experimental determinations holds, the derivation of the binding energy from declustering scans for hundreds of compounds simultaneously is then possible without explicit knowledge of the functional groups or molecular geometry, which is required for quantum calculations. We have shown in a related article that there is a reasonable relationship between theoretical binding enthalpies and measured sensitivity (Iyer et al., 2016). Therefore, by constraining the relationship between quantum calculations and measured scan shape for a subset of compounds, we can use the measured dV50 to estimate the binding enthalpy, and thus instrument sensitivity, for compounds that are too computationally intensive or for which we lack knowledge of molecular structure or cartesian geometries necessary for optimization. As noted above, the binding enthalpy of an adduct alone does not necessarily determine overall sensitivity. The rate of adduct formation and transmission through the mass spectrometer are both important components of the overall sensitivity.

3 Application to atmospheric organic aerosol

As an example of the potential application of the above constraints, we apply the collision-limit sensitivity of 22 cps ppt1 per million reagent ions to organic compounds detected generally as CxHyOzN01I upon temperature-

programmed thermal desorption of ambient submicron aerosol using a FIGAERO-HRToF-CIMS (Lopez-Hilker et

www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/ Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016

1510 F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS

7

15

0 0 5 10 15

100%

50%

6.5

SOAS 2013

BAECC 2014

6

10

dV measured

50

FIGAERO [g m3 ]

5.5

5

5

4.5

4

R2 = 0.9

3.5

30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16

1

Modeled binding energy kcal mol

AMS [g m3]

Figure 4. The relationship between calculated binding enthalpy and dV50 is shown for compounds which were observed from the oxidation of -pinene in the presence of NOx and for which quantum calculations have been performed (see Table 1). The modeled and measured relationship allows estimation of the binding energy of molecules which are too complex or computationally intensive to calculate. Also shown in red is a linear least-squares t to the data (R2 = 0.9).

al., 2014). We compare the resulting sum total mass loadings of all molecular components with the submicron organic aerosol mass concentrations measured by an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) (DeCarlo et al., 2006). Applying the collision-limited sensitivity to all organiciodide adducts to which we have not explicitly calibrated (vast majority of ions) results in a lower limit to mass concentrations measured by the FIGAERO HR-ToF-CIMS. Figure 5 shows the result of this comparison for two different locations: (1) a polluted region in the southeast United States (Brent, Alabama), which is dominated by isoprene, and (2) a remote boreal forest site (Hyytil, Finland) during springtime which is predominantly inuenced by monoterpene emissions. In both locations, the FIGAERO-HRToF-CIMS molecular composition observations explain at least 50 % of the total AMS organic mass. That is, based on our declustering scans and distribution of binding enthalpies (e.g., Fig. 3c) from a similar chemical system (e.g., -pinene ozonolysis in the presence of NOx), we know that not all organic compounds are detected by iodide adduct ionization at the collision limit. It is reasonable to conclude that the underestimate compared to the AMS is because some compounds are detected less sensitively than we assume and not only because there are undetected components. Utilizing the declustering scans during a future eld or chamber experiment would provide in situ constraints on how to better apply the collision-limited sensitivity to the mass spectra as illustrated with pinonic acid example above. Based on the results presented in Fig. 5, we conclude that the FIGAERO in combination with iodide adduct CIMS is able to detect the majority of oxidized organic molecules that thermally desorb from submicron organic aerosol, thereby providing novel and quantitatively

Figure 5. Application of the collision limit to secondary organic aerosol concentration utilizing a FIGAERO inlet. The application of the collision limit allows conversion of detected signals to a lower limit mass loading; despite this assumption, the mass loading explains a large fraction of SOA ( 50 %) and is highly corre

lated with total organic aerosol mass concentrations measured by an AMS (RSOAS = 0.82 and RBEACC = 0.76). The lower correla

tion for BAECC is likely because of lower total organic and perhaps because the AMS was located on the ground, while the FIGAERO was located at the top of a 35 m tower. To attempt to reduce this potential bias, only data points during daytime are plotted for BAECC as surface inversions (below the tower) were regularly observed at night.

useful constraints on the molecular compositions responsible for SOA formation and growth.

4 Conclusions

We present a procedure that allows the determination of the collision-limited sensitivity of an iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometer. We combine this limit with an experimental determination of the binding enthalpies of organiciodide adducts to determine the extent to which collision-induced ion adduct dissociation (i.e., declustering) losses occur during transit through the ion optics of the instrument. We stress that the values of the collision limit or other calibration-derived sensitivity values reported herein are likely unique to the electric elds, IMR geometry, pressures and ows of our instrument. While useful as a relative guide, these values should not be applied to data from other instruments without conducting similar experiments as described here. In the case of adduct formation, steric factors and competitive ligand switching may affect the adduct formation rate, and therefore binding enthalpy alone does not determine sensitivity. For molecules containing a signicant number of hydroxy (or hydroperoxy and carboxylic acid) groups, sterics probably play a minor role, so we expect the overall sensitivity to be collision limited and the adduct transmitted to the detector with minimal declustering losses. Many of these types of molecules are impossible

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016 www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/

F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS 1511

to calibrate using traditional methods of authentic standards, but the combination of declustering scanning and collision-limited sensitivity determination allows for reasonable constraints on the instrument response for hundreds of organic molecules which are now routinely detected in the atmosphere.

Acknowledgements. We would like to thank the Jimenez Group at the University of Colorado, Boulder for the use of AMS data from the SOAS campaign as well as the Virtanen Group at the University of Eastern Finland for AMS data from the BAECC campaign. We would also like to thank Tofwerk AG for useful discussions regarding the tuning of our mass spectrometer. We also thank the Cohen group for calibrating the output of our N2O5 calibration source using TD-LIF during the WINTER campaign.

This work was supported by the US Department of Energy through awards from the Atmospheric System Research (DOE grant DE-SC0006867) and NSF (award number AGS-1360745).

Edited by: M. Sipil

References

Aljawhary, D., Lee, A. K. Y., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: High-resolution chemical ionization mass spectrometry (ToF-CIMS): application to study SOA composition and processing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 32113224, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3211-2013

Web End =10.5194/amt-6-3211-2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3211-2013

Web End = , 2013.

Bertram, T. H., Thornton, J. A., and Riedel, T. P.: An experimental technique for the direct measurement of N2O5 reactivity on ambient particles, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 231242, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-231-2009

Web End =10.5194/amt-2-231-2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-231-2009

Web End = , 2009.

Bertram, T. H., Kimmel, J. R., Crisp, T. A., Ryder, O. S., Yatavelli,R. L. N., Thornton, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Gonin, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: A eld-deployable, chemical ionization time-of-ight mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 14711479, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1471-2011

Web End =10.5194/amt-4-1471-2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1471-2011

Web End = , 2011.

Brophy, P. and Farmer, D. K.: A switchable reagent ion high resolution time-of-ight chemical ionization mass spectrometer for real-time measurement of gas phase oxidized species: characterization from the 2013 southern oxidant and aerosol study, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 29452959, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2945-2015

Web End =10.5194/amt-8-2945-2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2945-2015

Web End = , 2015.

Brown, S. S., Stark, H., Ciciora, S. J., and Ravishankara, A. R.: In-situ measurement of atmospheric NO3 and N2O5 via cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 32273230, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013303

Web End =10.1029/2001GL013303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013303

Web End = , 2001.

Day, D. A., Wooldridge, P. J., Dillon, M. B., Thornton, J. A., and Cohen, R. C.: A thermal dissociation laser-induced uorescence instrument for in situ detection of NO2, peroxy nitrates, alkyl nitrates, and HNO3, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 4-1ACH 4-14, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000779

Web End =10.1029/2001JD000779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000779

Web End = , 2002.

DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne,J. T., Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty,K. S., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 82818289, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n

Web End =10.1021/ac061249n http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n

Web End = , 2006.

Fortner, E. C., Zhao, J., and Zhang, R.: Development of Ion Drift-Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 76, 5436 5440, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0493222

Web End =10.1021/ac0493222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0493222

Web End = , 2004.

Goldstein, A. H. and Galbally, I. E.: Known and unexplored organic constituents in the earths atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 15141521, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es072476p

Web End =10.1021/es072476p http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es072476p

Web End = , 2007.

Hearn, J. D. and Smith, G. D.: A Chemical Ionization Mass Spec-trometry Method for the Online Analysis of Organic Aerosols, Anal. Chem., 76, 28202826, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac049948s

Web End =10.1021/ac049948s http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac049948s

Web End = , 2004. Holzinger, R., Kasper-Giebl, A., Staudinger, M., Schauer, G., and

Rckmann, T.: Analysis of the chemical composition of organic aerosol at the Mt. Sonnblick observatory using a novel high mass resolution thermal-desorption proton-transfer-reaction mass-spectrometer (hr-TD-PTR-MS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1011110128, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10111-2010

Web End =10.5194/acp-10-10111-2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10111-2010

Web End = , 2010.

Huey, L. G., Hanson, D. R., and Howard, C. J.: Reactions of SF6-and I- with Atmospheric Trace Gases, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 5001 5008, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100014a021

Web End =10.1021/j100014a021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100014a021

Web End = , 1995.

Iyer, S., Lopez-Hilker, F. D., Lee, B. H., Thornton, J. A., and Kurtn, T.: Modeling the detection of organic and inorganic compounds using iodide-based chemical ionization, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 120, 576587, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b09837

Web End =10.1021/acs.jpca.5b09837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b09837

Web End = , 2016.

Jokinen, T., Sipil, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Lnn, G., Hakala,J., Petj, T., Mauldin III, R. L., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop,D. R.: Atmospheric sulphuric acid and neutral cluster measurements using CI-APi-TOF, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 41174125, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012

Web End =10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4117-2012

Web End = , 2012.

Jordan, A., Haidacher, S., Hanel, G., Hartungen, E., Herbig, J., Mrk, L., Schottkowsky, R., Seehauser, H., Sulzer, P., and Mrk,T. D.: An online ultra-high sensitivity Proton-transfer-reaction mass-spectrometer combined with switchable reagent ion capability (PTR+SRI-MS), Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 286, 3238,

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.06.006

Web End =10.1016/j.ijms.2009.06.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.06.006

Web End = , 2009.

Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Petj, T., Luosujrvi, L., Kotiaho, T., Kostiainen, R., Rohner, U., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: A high-resolution mass spectrometer to measure atmospheric ion composition, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1039 1053, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010

Web End =10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010

Web End = , 2010.

Kercher, J. P., Riedel, T. P., and Thornton, J. A.: Chlorine activation by N2O5: simultaneous, in situ detection of ClNO2 and N2O5 by chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 193204, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-193-2009

Web End =10.5194/amt-2-193-2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-193-2009

Web End = , 2009.

Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilker, F. D., Mohr, C., Kurtn, T., Worsnop,D. R., and Thornton, J. A.: An Iodide-Adduct High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Chemical-Ionization Mass Spectrometer: Application to Atmospheric Inorganic and Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 63096317, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es500362a

Web End =10.1021/es500362a http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es500362a

Web End = , 2014.

Lopez-Hilker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E.,

Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 9831001, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014

Web End =10.5194/amt-7-983-2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014

Web End = , 2014. Lopez-Hilker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist,E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Carrasquillo, A. J., Daumit, K.E., Hunter, J. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., and Thornton, J. A.: Phase partitioning and volatility of secondary or-

www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/ Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016

1512 F. D. Lopez-Hilker et al.: Sensitivity of iodide adduct CIMS

ganic aerosol components formed from -pinene ozonolysis and OH oxidation: the importance of accretion products and other low volatility compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 77657776, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7765-2015

Web End =10.5194/acp-15-7765-2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7765-2015

Web End = , 2015.

Slusher, D. L.: A thermal dissociationchemical ionization mass spectrometry (TD-CIMS) technique for the simultaneous measurement of peroxyacyl nitrates and dinitrogen pentoxide, J.Geophys. Res., 109, D19315, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004670

Web End =10.1029/2004JD004670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004670

Web End = , 2004.Veres, P., Roberts, J. M., Warneke, C., Welsh-Bon, D., Zahniser,M., Herndon, S., Fall, R., and de Gouw, J.: Development of negative-ion proton-transfer chemical-ionization mass spectrometry (NI-PT-CIMS) for the measurement of gas-phase organic acids in the atmosphere, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 274, 4855, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.032

Web End =10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.032

Web End = , 2008.

Veres, P., Roberts, J. M., Burling, I. R., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J., and Yokelson, R. J.: Measurements of gas-phase inorganic and organic acids from biomass res by negative-ion proton-transfer chemical-ionization mass spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D23302, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014033

Web End =10.1029/2010JD014033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014033

Web End = , 2010.

Yatavelli, R. L. N., Lopez-Hilker, F., Wargo, J. D., Kimmel, J.R., Cubison, M. J., Bertram, T. H., Jimenez, J. L., Gonin, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Thornton, J. A.: A Chemical Ionization High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer Coupled to a Micro Orice Volatilization Impactor (MOVI-HRToF-CIMS) for Analysis of Gas and Particle-Phase Organic Species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 13131327, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.712236

Web End =10.1080/02786826.2012.712236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.712236

Web End = , 2012.

You, Y., Kanawade, V. P., de Gouw, J. A., Guenther, A. B., Madronich, S., Sierra-Hernndez, M. R., Lawler, M., Smith, J.N., Takahama, S., Ruggeri, G., Koss, A., Olson, K., Baumann,K., Weber, R. J., Nenes, A., Guo, H., Edgerton, E. S., Porcelli,L., Brune, W. H., Goldstein, A. H., and Lee, S.-H.: Atmospheric amines and ammonia measured with a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1218112194, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12181-2014

Web End =10.5194/acp-14-12181-2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12181-2014

Web End = , 2014.

Yu, H. and Lee, S.-H.: Chemical ionisation mass spectrometry for the measurement of atmospheric amines, Environ. Chem., 9, 190, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN12020

Web End =10.1071/EN12020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN12020

Web End = , 2012.

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 15051512, 2016 www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1505/2016/