Content area
Full Text
The Bloodgate saga is finally being resolved for the two medical team members involved (the doctor was given a warning, while the physiotherapist was initially struck off). But were the differences in punishments justified, and by focusing on the individuals, are we missing the real problem?
The term Bloodgate was given to events that occurred in April 2009 when, during a rugby match between Leinster and Harlequins, a Harlequins player (Tom Williams) faked a blood injury in order to be replaced by a specialist kicker in an attempt to win the match. The physiotherapist and doctor were both closely involved in the scam. At the behest of the coach, the physiotherapist (appointed England Rugby team physiotherapist) gave the blood capsule to Williams. 1 The doctor later cut the inside of Williams' mouth to 'demonstrate a real injury'. 2 Their actions were brought to the attention of their respective professional bodies. In August 2010, Dr Wendy Chapman was given a warning by the General Medical Council (GMC) (listed on her registration). 2 In September 2010, the Health Professions Council (HPC) struck off physiotherapist Stephen Brennan. 3 This decision was overturned by the High Court in January 2011. 4
The initial penalties for each seem inequitable. Chapman caused physical injury to Williams and she and Brennan both engaged in deception after the event. 1 2 Yet, Chapman emerged with a significantly lighter penalty. Physiotherapists and doctors in sport work under similar circumstances, and yet the decisions by their respective professional bodies indicate that the norms to which they are held differ.
The GMC regarded Chapman as a reluctant party to this event, having been placed under pressure from Williams to cut his mouth. 5 Furthermore, in Chapman's defence, her lawyers are reported...