Content area

Abstract

There are concerns that urgent treatment under section 62 of the Mental Health Act 1983 is being used increasingly because of delays in getting a second opinion. It is therefore of paramount importance that section 62 is used and recorded appropriately. The Mental Health Act code of practice recommends that it should be the approved clinician in charge of treatment who decides what treatment is appropriate and completes the form.

The authors of this article surveyed trainee and consultant psychiatrists to ascertain their understanding of urgent treatment. Results showed the authorisation of urgent treatment was inconsistent and there was ambiguity about who should complete a section 62 form. These uncertainties highlight the need for a national standardised form.

Details

Title
Time to address inappropriate use of section 62 'urgent treatment'
Author
Sollitt, Kirsty; Shenoy, Suraj
First page
26
Publication year
2014
Publication date
Oct 2014
Publisher
Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom
ISSN
14658720
e-ISSN
2047895X
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1784810419
Copyright
Copyright: 2012 (c)2012 RCN Publishing Company Ltd. All rights reserved. Not to be copied, transmitted or recorded in any way, in whole or part, without prior permission of the publishers.