Content area
Full Text
http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7&domain=pdf
Web End = Environ Dev Sustain (2016) 18:617644
DOI 10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7
REVIEW
Giulia Irene Wegner1
Received: 26 June 2014 / Accepted: 20 May 2015 / Published online: 3 June 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015
Abstract Over the past 20 years, payments for ecosystem services (PES) has become increasingly popular as a mechanism to promote environmentally sustainable land-use practices, and a burgeoning literature has been produced on this policy approach. The goal of this paper is to offer a comprehensive review of this literature, and to focus on four major aspects of PES: (1) its efciency in delivering environmental conservation, (2) its impacts on the well-being of local land users, (3) its interaction with local norms of distributive justice and environmental stewardship, and (4) its interplay with broader national policies and socio-economic trends. Two major insights are drawn from this review of the literature. First, the conceptualisation of PES according to the neoclassical economic theory of efcient market transactions and utilitarian human behaviour may be unrealistic and counterproductive. In terms of efcient nancial transactions, the physical properties of public ecosystem services obstruct the voluntary establishment of PES schemes by direct beneciaries, practical constraints exist on the enforcement of outcome-based conditionality, and efciency goals may need to be partly sacriced to prevent the exacerbation of social inequalities. In terms of human behaviour, land users actions are shaped not only by personal utility calculations, but also by intrinsic norms of distributive justice and environmental stewardship; the interaction of PES with these intrinsic norms can negatively impact on its local legitimacy and even crowd out existing motivations for the conservation of nature. The second insight is that land users capacity to shift to sustainable land practices, while inuenced by the direct payments, remains strongly determined by broader socio-economic trends and by national strategies for rural development and institutional reform. On the basis of these insights, a exible, participatory, and integrated conceptualisation of PES that can better account for this range of physical, socio-economic, and normative factors is proposed here as more capable of delivering efcient, equitable, and resilient conservation outcomes.
& Giulia Irene Wegner [email protected]
1 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Zoology, University of Oxford,
Tubney House, Abingdon...