ARTICLE
Received 2 Jan 2016 | Accepted 20 Apr 2016 | Published 26 May 2016
The Brownian motion of molecules at thermal equilibrium usually has a nite correlation time and will eventually be randomized after a long delay time, so that their displacement follows the Gaussian statistics. This is true even when the molecules have experienced a complex environment with a nite correlation time. Here, we report that the lateral motion of the acetylcholine receptors on live muscle cell membranes does not follow the Gaussian statistics for normal Brownian diffusion. From a careful analysis of a large volume of the protein trajectories obtained over a wide range of sampling rates and long durations, we nd that the normalized histogram of the protein displacements shows an exponential tail, which is robust and universal for cells under different conditions. The experiment indicates that the observed non-Gaussian statistics and dynamic heterogeneity are inherently linked to the slow-active remodelling of the underlying cortical actin network.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 OPEN
Dynamic heterogeneity and non-Gaussian statistics for acetylcholine receptors on live cell membrane
W. He1, H. Song2, Y. Su2, L. Geng3, B.J. Ackerson4, H.B. Peng3 & P. Tong2
1 Nano Science and Technology Program, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 2 Department of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 3 Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 4 Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.T. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701
Cell membranes, which dene cell boundaries and maintain communication with the outside world, display an intriguing array of structural complexes of lipids/
cholesterols and various proteins essential to the existence and functioning of the cell. In the original uid mosaic model1, the cell membrane was thought of as a quasi-two-dimensional uid layer in which proteins are dispersed randomly at a low concentration and can oat unencumbered. From the wealth of new data obtained in recent years, our general view of membrane architecture has evolved into a new paradigm in which the membrane has variable patchiness and thickness and a higher protein occupancy than previously thought2. The lipids and proteins on the membrane are not ideally mixed, and form molecular complexes ranging from nano-scale lipid rafts3,4 and protein clusters to micron-sized stable domains such as caveolae, microvilli and focal adhesions.
Moving in a structured membrane, the proteins do not enjoy continuous and unrestricted lateral diffusion as was originally envisioned5. Instead, proteins diffuse in a very complex landscape with considerable lateral heterogeneity in the membrane6,7. Transmembrane proteins also interact strongly with the underlying cytoskeletal cortex4. Using single-particle tracking (SPT) techniques7,8, one can directly observe and follow the motion of individual proteins. The measured protein trajectories have been found to be quite heterogeneous6,7,9, with some moving fast and appearing to diffuse freely while others are transiently conned to small membrane domains. A main issue in the continuing discussion is whether the dynamic heterogeneity of the transmembrane proteins is caused by the effect of clustering imposed by membrane clusters3,10, such as lipid rafts, or by membrane partitions generated by interactions with the underlying cortical actin network4, such as membrane-skeleton fences7,11,12. Most of the theoretical discussions assumed that membrane organization is governed by equilibrium processes, such as critical thermal uctuations and ligand-binding equilibrium.
The available SPT data are not conclusive because the protein trajectories were sampled over a relatively short time (due to the nite lifetime of the orescent probes used), and thus heavily inuenced by the surrounding molecules without revealing their long-time behaviour and their interactions with distant molecules on the membrane13. In addition, the current analysis of protein motion often focuses on identifying only a few targeted single molecular events, while ignoring other molecular events of possibly equal importance owing to the lack of systematic statistical analysis. Such analysis is extremely important, because stochastic uctuations at the single molecular level are signicant14. The lack of a systematic analysis of the protein motion is partially due to the fact that direct measurement of the statistical properties, such as the probability density function (normalized histogram or PDF) P(Dx) of the protein displacement Dx, often requires a large volume of individual protein trajectories, which are difcult to obtain from living cells. As a result, most previous studies in this area only measured the mean-squared displacement (the lowest moment of P(Dx)), which requires less statistics but is not adequate to describe the complex motion of proteins in a living cell15.
In this paper, we report a systematic study of the lateral motion of a transmembrane protein on live muscle cell membranes cultured from Xenopus embryos. The protein chosen for the study is acetylcholine receptor (AChR), which is a well characterized neurotransmitter receptor for the study of neuromuscular junctions16,17. The lateral mobility of AChRs plays an essential role in determining the response of the postsynaptic membrane to neurotransmitter stimuli. The individual AChRs are labelled by bright and photostable uorescent quantum dots (QDs). With the
help of an advanced single-molecule tracking algorithm, we are able to obtain a signicantly large volume of individual AChR trajectories from more than 360 live cells over a wide range of sampling rates (up to 80 Hz) and long durations (up to 200 s). A central nding of this investigation is that the moving trajectories of the individual AChRs do not follow the Gaussian statistics for normal Brownian diffusion. Instead, we show for the rst time that the measured PDF P(Dx) has an exponential tail, which is robust and universal for cells under different conditions. A theoretical model is developed to explain why the structurally identical AChRs have very different dynamic behaviours with an exponential-like distribution in their diffusion coefcient.
ResultsCharacterization of the AChR trajectories. In the experiment, we obtain the AChR trajectories from consecutive images of the QDs, and nd their position r(t) (and hence the position of AChRs) at time t using a homemade SPT program with a spatial resolution of B20 nm. Because the viscosity of the plasma membrane is B1,000 times higher than that of the extracellular medium, the motion of the QD-labelled AChRs is determined primarily by their transmembrane domains18. From the AChR trajectories, we compute the statistics of the two-dimensional displacement vector, Dr(t) r(t t) r(t), over delay time t,
such as the mean-squared displacement (MSD) hDr2(t)i and
the PDF P(Dx) of the x-component of Dr. We also compute the radius of gyration Rg of the AChR trajectories Rg2(t)
(1/N)
PiN[(xi hxi)2 (yi hyi)2], where N is the total number of time steps in each trajectory, xi and yi are the projection of the position of each trajectory step on the x- and y-axis, respectively, and hxi and hyi are their mean values. Physically, Rg quanties
the size of an AChR trajectory generated during the time lapse t.
Figure 1a shows a representative collection of 130 AChR trajectories over a time interval of 60 s. These identical AChRs exhibit a huge amount of dynamic heterogeneity as evidenced by the large variation in trajectory sizes; some being mobile (red trajectories) and others nearly immobile (black trajectories). Among the mobile AChRs, some move fast (with a large trajectory size) and others slower (with a smaller trajectory size). The situation shown in Fig. 1a is in great contrast with the Brownian motion of colloidal particles in a simple uid, as show in Fig. 1b. The distribution of the Brownian trajectories is much more uniform than that of the AChR trajectories.
To have a quantitative description of the AChR trajectories, we calculate their normalized radius of gyration R0g Rg=hRgi, where
hRgi is the mean value of Rg. For Brownian diffusion, one has
Rg(t) [(2/3)D0t]1/2 with D0 being the diffusion coefcient
(see Supplementary Note 1 for more details). For live cells, we dene hRgi [(2/3)hDLit]1/2, where hDLi is the long-time
diffusion coefcient averaged over 365 cells (see more discussions on Fig. 4 below). The use of the normalized R0g allows us to compare the AChR trajectories taken over different t and/or under different sample conditions. Figure 2 shows the measured PDF (normalized histogram) hR0g of R0g for the AChR
trajectories taken under different sample conditions. All of the measured hR0g0s collapse onto a single master curve,
once the normalized R0g is used. The PDFs from different frogs and embryos and from cells cultured for different days and sampled at different t exhibit a universal form (for clarity, some of the curves are not shown here). The measured hR0g has a peak
at R0g 0:15 followed by an exponential tail (black solid line).
For silica spheres undergoing the Brownian motion, their hR0g
has a narrow distribution peaked at R0g 1 (blue dashed line, see
Supplementary Note 1 for more discussions). Figure 2 reveals that there are many fast moving AChRs, whose R0g is larger than that
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 ARTICLE
a
60
40
100
101
102
103
104
50
h(Rg)
y(m)
30
20
0
2 4 6
Figure 2 | Normalized histogram of the radius of gyration of AChR trajectories. Measured PDF hR0g of the normalized R0g for the AChR
trajectories taken under different sample conditions: cultured for 1 day after dissection (red circles), cultured for 4 days (magenta triangles), and cultured for 8 days (green diamonds). Each hR0g is obtained by averaging
the data from 10 cells cultured under the same condition. The black circles are obtained by averaging the data from 70 cells. Their statistics is considerably improved with small error bars indicating the standard deviations. The solid black line shows the exponential function,hR0g 1:1 exp 1:35R0g. The dashed blue line shows the measured hR0g
for silica spheres undergoing Brownian diffusion. The vertical red line indicates the cutoff value R0gc 0:3 used to dene the immobile
trajectories.
Rg
10
0 0 20 40 60
x (m)
b
40
y(m)
20
0
0 20 40
x (m)
Figure 1 | Observed dynamic heterogeneity in the AChR trajectories. (a) Overall 130 representative AChR trajectories with 300 time steps(60 s). These trajectories are taken from the bottom membrane of a Xenopus muscle cell. Red trajectories indicate fast moving AChRs and black ones indicate nearly immobile AChRs. (b) A total of 52 representative trajectories of silica spheres 2.14 mm in diameter undergoing Brownian diffusion in water over a at substrate with 1,000 time steps (47 s).
for normal Brownian diffusion. The vertical red line indicates the cutoff value R0gc 0:3 used in the experiment, below which the
AChR trajectories are treated as immobile ones (black trajectories in Fig. 1).
Mean-squared displacement. Figure 3 shows the measured MSD
hDr2(t)i as a function of t for the AChR trajectories taken at two
sampling rates of 80 and 5 frames per second (fps). The red and
black dashed lines obtained at the two different sampling rates do not superimpose with each other in the common region of t between 0.2 and 3 s. To achieve the higher sampling rate, the viewing area of the camera is cropped. Because of the spatial inhomogeneity of the immobile AChR distribution, we nd the number ratio g of the mobile AChR trajectories to the total number of trajectories obtained at the two sampling rates is different. Once the immobile trajectories are removed from the ensemble average, the measured hDr2(t)i becomes reproducible
and the two curves (red and black circles) superimpose well with each other. The nal MSD curve (circles) in the loglog plot is not a linear function and goes as hDr2(t)iBta with 0.4oao0.9 in
the small-t range 0.01251 s. Only at the long-time limit (t44 s), does the measured MSD become diffusive with aC1 (blue solid line). In this case, hDr2(t)iC4DLt, where DL is the long-time
diffusion coefcient of the AChRs.The long-time behaviour of hDr2(t)i is best presented in the
linear plot as shown in the inset of Fig. 3. Because of the high efciency of our tracking algorithm (see Supplementary Methods for more details), we are able to obtain long-time trajectories of the AChRs with adequate statistics. About 1,160 samples are used to obtain hDr2(t)i at the largest delay time tC160 s. The statistics
for hDr2(t)i at smaller values of t are even better with the error
bars smaller than the size of the symbols used in Fig. 3. In the wide range of t between 4 and 160 s in which the AChRs have diffused more than 750 times of their own diameter, the measured hDr2(t)i can be well described by a linear function of
t (red solid line). From the slope of the tted solid line, we obtain DL 0.05 mm2 s 1.
Figure 4 and its inset show, respectively, the nal statistics of the measured DL and the mobile ratio g for the AChRs from different frogs and from cells cultured with different days.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701
<r ( )> ( m )
40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150
10
Number ratio
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.000.0 0.2 0.4
35 28 21 14 7 0
Cell number
<r2 ( )> ( m2 )
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.000.00
Number ratio
72
54
36
18
0
Cell number
1
0.6 0.8 1.0
(s)
0.1
0.01
0.03 0.06
DL (m2 s1)
0.09 0.12
90
0.01
0.1
1
10
(s)
Figure 4 | Cell-to-cell variations in the measured long-time diffusion coefcient DL and mobile ratio c of the AChRs. Distribution of the measured DL of AChRs. Inset shows the distribution of the measuredg of the AChRs. The total number of cells used in the statistics is 365.
Figure 3 | Crossover from sub-diffusion to normal diffusion observed from the MSD curve. Measured hDr2(t)i as a function of delay time t for
the AChR trajectories taken at two sampling rates of 80 fps (red dashed line and circles) and 5 fps (black dashed line and circles). Data from a single cell are used in the ensemble average. The red and black dashed lines are obtained when both the mobile and immobile trajectories are included in the calculation. The red and black circles are obtained when only the mobile trajectories are included in the ensemble average. The green triangles are obtained when only the immobile trajectories are included in the ensemble average. The blue solid line indicates the relationship hDr2(t)iBt with a
slope of unity in the loglog plot. Inset shows a linear plot of the measured hDr2(t)i as a function of t and the red solid line is a linear t to
the data points.
0.25
The value of DL has a fairly narrow distribution with
hDLi 0.0410.015 mm2s 1. The distribution of g is broader
with hgi 0.640.17. These mean values are obtained from 365
cells. The value of g tends to be smaller for unhealthy cells and for cells cultured over a long period of time. We also examined the MSD curves obtained in different regions of the membrane in the same cell, both on the upper (away from the substrate) and lower (facing the substrate) portions of the membrane. The measured MSD in different regions remains approximately the same, suggesting that the AChRs on the same membrane have approximately the same value of DL, which can be used as a parameter to characterize the mobility of membrane proteins in living cells. Because the bottom portion of the membrane has a large planer view with more than 100 QDs in each frame, we used this imaging setup to collect more data for a better statistical analysis.
Probability density function. Another important quantity to characterize the motion of AChRs is the PDFs (normalized histograms), P(Dx0) and P(Dy0), of the x- and y- components of Dr(t) at a xed value of t. Here, Dx0 Dx/(2DLt)1/2 and
Dy0 Dy/(2DLt)1/2 are the displacements normalized by the
diffusion length (2DLt)1/2. Figure 5 shows the measured P(Dx0) and P(Dy0) for mobile AChRs obtained under different sample conditions. Although the measured DL varies considerably under different cell conditions, the PDFs collapse onto a single master curve, once the normalized Dx0 (and Dy0) is used. Except for a sharp peak near the origin, all of the PDFs have an exponential tail (red solid line). The error bars show the standard deviation of the black circles averaged over 10 cells. Because of the reduced number of data points, the diamonds have relatively larger experimental uncertainties. Figure 5 thus reveals that AChRs have a heavy-tailed distribution in their mobility, and this distribution
is universal among the cells under different sample conditions. Similar P(Dx0) (and P(Dy0)) are also found for the AChRs on the upper portion of the membrane away from the substrate (see Supplementary Fig. 7 for more details). Evidently, the exponential PDF is a leptokurtic distribution, which has a higher peak and a heavier tail compared with the Gaussian PDF19.
Immobile trajectories and statistical sampling conditions. Figure 3 reveals that the measured hDr2(t)i under two different
sampling conditions (red and black dashed lines) has different values in the common region of t. We nd that the immobile trajectories have a dominant role in determining the value of
hDr2(t)i. The measured hDr2(t)i for the immobile AChRs (green
triangles) is about two orders of magnitude smaller than the value of hDr2(t)i in the long-time regime (t\4 s) for the mobile
AChRs (black circles) and thus contributes many near-zero values to the ensemble average. At the higher sampling rate (80 fps), the viewing area of the camera is cropped and the number of immobile trajectories recorded in the movie becomes different from that obtain at the lower sampling rate (5 fps). This is caused by the spatial inhomogeneity of the immobile AChR distribution. As shown in Fig. 3, once the immobile trajectories are removed from the ensemble average, the measured hDr2(t)i under two
different sample conditions becomes identical in the common region of t (red and black circles).
By carefully examining the AChR trajectories, we also nd that even the mobile trajectories still have some immobile segments of varying lengths (durations). As shown in the Supplementary Movie, the AChRs often move for a while and are transiently conned to a small region on the membrane for a different amount of time (up to seconds) and then move again. The transient connement of AChRs is also reected in the measured hR0g in Fig. 2, P(Dx0) in Fig. 5 and PDF f(d) of the
instantaneous diffusion coefcient d in Fig. 6 below. For a xed delay time t, the immobile segments in a mobile trajectory tend to have smaller values of R0g, Dx0, and d and hence give rise to a peak in the corresponding histograms at small values of R0g, Dx0 and d.
We believe that the transient connement of AChRs is caused by the transient binding of the AChRs to the underlying cortical actin network. A similar effect was also observed for the Kv21 channel proteins in HEK 293 cells20.
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 ARTICLE
101
100
101
102
103
104
105
0
100
Day 1
Day 3
Day 6
P (x), P(y)
101
102
103
f()
1s, x
10s, x
20s, x
4s, x
4s, y
Other cells, 4s, x
2 4 6 8 10
12 14
4.5
3.0 1.5 0.0
x ,y
1.5 3.0
4.5
Figure 5 |
Non-Gaussian behaviour of the normalized histogram of AChRs
displacements. Measured PDFs P(Dx0) and P(Dy0) of the normalized
displacements Dx0 and Dy0 for the trajectories of mobile AChRs. Data are
obtained from 10 cells under each sample condition: (i) Dx0(t)
with t 1 s
(black triangles), 4 s (black circles), 10 s (black squares) and 20 s (black
diamonds); (ii) Dy0(t) with t 4 s (blue circles) and (iii) Dx0(t)
with t 4 s
for a group of 10 cells from a different frog (green crosses). The red solid line is an exponential t to the data points, P(Dx0)Ca exp
( b|(Dx0)|), with a 0.6 and b 1.4.
Figure 6 | Normalized histogram of the instantaneous diffusion coefcient of mobile AChRs. Measured PDF f(d0) of the normalized diffusion coefcient d0 d/DL for the mobile AChR trajectories. Data are
obtained from three groups of 10 cells each cultured for (i) 1 day (black circles), (ii) 3 days (blue triangles) and (ii) 6 days (green diamonds). The error bars show the standard deviation of the blue triangles averaged over 10 cells. The red solid line is an exponential t to all data points, f(d0)C0.22
exp ( 0.75d0). The blue dashed line shows the measured f(d0) for the
silica spheres undergoing normal Brownian diffusion.
The above observation of non-reproducible hDr2(t)i resulting
from different sampling of the immobile AChR trajectories may shed light on the problem of nonergodicity between the time- and space-averaged MSDs, which has been observed for a number of molecules in live cells, such as Kv21 channel proteins20, messenger RNAs in Escherichia coli21 and lipid granules in yeast cells22. The origin of the nonergodicity in live cells has remained elusive2024. The immobile trajectories may have an important role in determining the difference between the time- and space-averaged hDr2(t)i, because the immobile
trajectories are typically included in the space-averaged
hDr2(t)i, whereas in the time-averaged hDr2(t)i, one usually
only samples the mobile trajectories2022.
Crowding effects and anomalous diffusion. In the original model of membrane diffusion5, the cell membrane was considered as a continuum uid layer, which is true only if the membrane is homogenous and the diffusing particle is much larger than the surrounding membrane molecules. For AChRs, however, their size is comparable to that of the surrounding membrane proteins and lipids, and their motion is hindered by the direct interactions with the surrounding macromolecules. In a crowded molecular solution, a tracer molecule faces a heterogeneous environment and its MSD is no longer a simple linear function of t. Instead, the MSD often exhibits a sub-diffusive behaviour with hDr2(t)iBta, where ao1
(refs 15,24,25). Such anomalous diffusion has been observed in a variety of dense uid systems, such as colloidal diffusion near its glass transition26,27 and over an external random potential28.
Membrane proteins in live cells were also found to exhibit anomalous diffusion7,11,20,29. Because of the limited number and time span of the protein trajectories obtained, the measured MSD in some previous studies, however, only revealed a sub-diffusive regime without showing a crossover to the long-time diffusion. Some of the measurements also suffered relatively large statistical uncertainties at large delay times t. The MSD shown in Fig. 3
clearly reveals a crossover behaviour from sub-diffusion to long-time diffusion with the crossover time tLC4 s. In the
long-time diffusion regime as shown in the inset of Fig. 3, the measured MSD remains as a linear function of t up to the longest tracking time 160 s, indicating that the membrane is very uidic for AChRs. During this time, the AChRs diffuse more than 6 mm (or about 860 times of their own diameter) and no permanent fence is found at this length scale to conne the motion of AChRs.
In the short-time sub-diffusion regime (to4s), the measured
hDr2(t)i decreases with decreasing t and reaches an asymptotic
value hDr2i0C24.4 10 3 mm2 for the mobile AChRs. The value
of hDr2iA for the immobile AChRs is about half the value for the
mobile AChRs with hDr2iAC12.4 10 3mm2. At the t-0 limit,
the measured MSD becomes the mean square uctuation,
hDr2i0 P
i(hDr2i0)i, which is a sum of (hDr2i0)i from all
independent uctuation sources i. By subtracting out the background noise, hDr2iBC3.11 10 3mm2, from the
immobile QDs, which are physically attached to the glass substrate, we nd the immobile AChRs jiggle in a typical range R0 [hDr2iA hDr2iB]/4]1/2C48.2 nm. This 48.2-nm-ranged
jiggling may result from the agitation of the underlying cortical actin network, which the immobile AChRs are bound to (see more discussions below). With this understanding, one may dene the net MSD of the mobile AChRs without the inuence of independent agitations of the actin network as (ref. 30), hDr2(t)iAChR hDr2(t)i hDr2iA, which differs from
the measured hDr2(t)i in Fig. 3 only in the small-t range
(tt0.5 s). The resulting hDr2(t)iAChR still goes as ta, but the
value of a varies in a narrower range 0.70.9 with a typical value aE0.8. We note that the above analysis can only remove the effect of independent agitations from the actin network and the correlated effect with the cortical network still remains in the measured MSD of the mobile AChRs.
Theoretical models of anomalous diffusion of membrane proteins have considered the effects of diffusion obstruction by permanent or transient obstacles and connement by transient
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701
binding of diffusing proteins to a hierarchy of traps7,15,25,31. In the latter case, the time that the protein molecules are conned in the traps was assumed to have a power-law distribution15,24,32, which gives rise to a non-converging mean trapping time. While these models can predict certain aspects of anomalous diffusion, such as the sub-diffusion exponent a, the present experiment reveals some new features of membrane diffusion, which have not been considered in the previous models. The new features of membrane diffusion include the persistent exponential tail in the measured P(Dx0) (and P(Dy0)), which is invariant with delay time t, and a crossover to apparently normal diffusion (in terms of MSD) at long-delay times (t44s) but with non-Gaussian statistics. One could introduce a crossover to normal diffusion by assuming that the trapping time of the protein molecules has an upper bound at equilibrium and thus their correlation time is nite. In this case, the protein trajectories would eventually be randomized at the long-time limit, and their displacement Dx0 (and Dy0) would follow the Gaussian statistics.
Therefore, a new crossover mechanism is needed in order to explain the non-Gaussian diffusion dynamics of AChRs on live cell membrane in both the short- and long-time regimes.
Dynamic heterogeneity and non-Gaussian statistics. Figure 5 clearly demonstrates that the lateral motion of AChRs on the live cell membrane does not follow the Gaussian statistics. For the rst time, we have obtained a universal PDF with its amplitude varied by more than three decades. With such a large number of statistics, we are able to pin down the functional form of P(Dx0)
(and P(Dy0)). The t shown in Fig. 5 (red solid line) reveals that the measured P(Dx0) has a simple exponential form, P(Dx0)Cexp ( b|Dx0|), with b 1.4 (which is a straight line in the semi-log
plot). The obtained exponential PDFs are found to be universal independent of delay time t, the measured value of DL, and the origin and cultured days of the cells.
In fact, the observed exponential form of P(Dx0) is directly linked to the dynamic heterogeneity in the diffusion coefcient. Assuming that the entire ensemble of mobile AChRs can be divided into independent subgroups, and that each subgroup obeys the Gaussian statistics with a diffusion coefcient d:
gDx; d
1 e Dx2=4dt; 1
and let d have an exponential-like distribution, f0(d)
(1/DL)exp( d/DL), where DL is the mean value of d measured
in the inset of Fig. 3. The ensemble averaged P(Dx0) then takes the form,
PDx0 Z
p j Dx0 j ; 2
where Dx0 Dx/(2DLt)1/2 is the normalized displacement.
Equation (2) thus explains the exponential PDF shown in
Fig. 5. The predicted decay rate b 2
1 gDx; df0ddd
1
4DLt1=2
e
2
p is in excellent agreement with the measured b 1.4.
To further test equation (2), we directly measure the instantaneous diffusion coefcient d hDr2(t)it/(4t) with the
delay time set at t 1 s and the averaging time t 4.2 s, above
which the measured MSD becomes diffusive (see Fig. 3). Figure 6 shows the measured PDF f(d0) of the normalized diffusion coefcient d0 d/DL for three groups of cells under different
culture conditions. The measured PDFs for the cells from different embryos or cultured on different days all collapse onto a single master curve, once the normalized d0 is used in the plot.
They have a universal shape with a sharp peak for small values of
d0 followed by an exponential-like tail (red solid line). Figures 5 and 6 thus conrm the theoretical prediction in equation (2).
Because of sampling uctuations, the measured d0 (or d) will have its own distribution f(d0) even for Brownian diffusion without any dynamic heterogeneity33,34. The blue dashed line in Fig. 6 shows the measured f(d0) for the silica spheres undergoing normal Brownian diffusion, which is a narrowly peaked function with its most probable value at d0C1. It is found that the measured f(d0) for Brownian diffusion obeys the w2-distribution, which depends sensitively on the number 2N of degrees of freedom for the statistical variable d0 (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for more details). In our case, we have 2N 8, where N (t t0)/
t 4 and t0 0.2 s is the sampling time used in the experiment.
Compared with Brownian diffusion, the measured f(d0) for the AChRs reveals a heavier tail with many AChR trajectories having large values of d0. In addition, the measured f(d0) for the
AChRs is found to be insensitive to the change of 2N (see Supplementary Fig. 5 for more details). These ndings further conrm that the exponential-like distribution of AChRs diffusion coefcient, as shown in Fig. 6, has its own dynamic origin and does not result from the sampling statistics (see Supplementary Discussion for more discussions).
DiscussionFigure 6 reveals that the AChRs on live cell membrane have an exponential-like distribution in their diffusion coefcient d, even though they are structurally identical. There are two possible causes for the observed dynamic heterogeneity in d. One is that the AChRs form equilibrium clusters (or domains) with the surrounding proteins/lipids; and the other is that the motion of AChRs involves some active (non-equilibrium) process with a long correlation time to which the central limit theorem does not apply. There are several hypotheses in the literature on equilibrium membrane organization. One is the lipid raft model, which conceives the membrane to be compartmentalized by cholesterol organized glycolipoprotein nano-domains3. The typical size of the lipid rafts was estimated as 2613 nm35 and they oat freely in the membrane bilayer36. However, our results in Figs 5 and 6 cannot be explained by these features of the lipid rafts. If AChRs diffuse together with the lipid rafts, the difference in raft size is not enough to produce an exponential distribution of d. This is because d scales with the domain size a as ln(1/a)
(ref. 5), which is essentially a constant for a moderately narrow distribution of raft size. As a result, the PDF P(Dx0) for lipid rafts of similar size should be of Gaussian form at the limit of long delay times, as they diffuse on the membrane at equilibrium with only a nite correlation time. In fact, this argument also applies to other models of membrane organization involving phase separation and critical uctuations in membrane at equilibrium37,38.
Another hypothesis is the picket-fence model7,11,12, which envisions that the membrane is compartmentalized by cortical actin fences and anchored transmembrane protein pickets. For short times, the motion of membrane proteins and lipids is transiently conned in the corrals made of the protein pickets. Over long times, the proteins and lipids can hop among different corrals following a thermal activation process. Although this model of hop diffusion can qualitatively explain some previous SPT results, it contains two key assumptions that are inconsistent with the ndings of the present experiment. First, the model assumes that the corrals are quasi-periodic with a size ranging from 32 to 230 nm depending on the cell type7,11,12. As mentioned above, it is difcult to produce an exponential f(d)
with motion conned by corrals with a narrow size distribution. Second, the model assumes that the hopping of membrane
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 ARTICLE
molecules among different corrals is made by thermal uctuations, an equilibrium process with a nite correlation time which is unlikely to produce the non-Gaussian statistics shown in Fig. 5.
On the basis of the above experimental results, we propose a dynamic picket-fence model involving slow-active remodelling of the cortical actin network to explain the observed dynamic heterogeneity. In this model, we postulate that the anchored transmembrane proteins (both immobile and transiently conned proteins) have a dominant role in determining the diffusion dynamics of other (mobile) membrane molecules. We nd that 36% of the AChRs, on average, are immobile during the experimental observation time (1015 min). For other transmembrane proteins with stronger interactions with the cortical actin network, this ratio may be even larger. Due to the abundance of membrane proteins2, the anchored proteins can form a continuous random network, partitioning the membrane into domains (corrals) of various sizes. Within each corral, the motion of the membrane molecules is strongly hindered by the rigid boundary of the protein network, giving rise to a local diffusion coefcient d, which is strongly inuenced by the size of the corral. Because the protein network on the membrane is anchored to the underlying cortical actin network, the two networks should share the same topological structure and dynamics. Without external stimulations, the protein network on the membrane will be randomly orientated having a large variety of meshes (corrals) of different sizes39. For short times, the mobile proteins and lipids on the membrane can move within the corrals, and over long times they also move between different corrals as the network remodels.
Our hypothesis has important biological implications, as it provides a mechanism of membrane organization for live cells to actively control the membrane uidity and regulate the molecular transport on the membrane. It has specic predictions that can be tested in future experiments. First, the membrane protein network is not permanently stationary, as this would provide permanent barriers inhibiting the mobile proteins and lipids from moving over long distances, which is inconsistent with the measurements shown in the inset of Fig. 3. Although thermal uctuations and ligand-binding equilibrium may provide some mobility for the protein network, these are Gaussian-like agitations and cannot produce the exponential (non-Gaussian) PDF as shown in Fig. 5. Under the dynamic picket-fence model, the dynamics of the protein network (and hence the long-time diffusion of the mobile proteins and lipids) is determined by the dynamics of the underlying cortical actin network, which is under constant active remodelling4043. The slow-active remodelling of the cortical network (and hence the protein network) is caused by the activity of molecular motors (for example, myosin II motors) and other non-equilibrium cellular processes44,45, and thus is capable of producing uctuations with a long correlation time, to which the central limit theorem does not apply.
Second, the long-time non-Gaussian statistics shown in Fig. 5 should be a universal behaviour for all mobile molecules on the membrane including lipids and lipid-tethered proteins on the outer leaet of the membrane, which do not have direct interactions with the underlying cortical actin network. In a recent experiment (W. He et al., manuscript in preparation), we studied the lateral motion of ganglioside GM1, which is a glycosphingolipid residing on the outer leaet of the Xenopus muscle-cell membrane. The GM1s was found to have a similar non-Gausian behaviour as that of the AChRs. Finally, because the non-Gaussian dynamics of the membrane molecules is regulated by the active remodelling of the cortical actin network, it will change sensitively with the dynamics of the cortical network. Various drug manipulations of the actin network, such as
depletion of adenosine triphosphate and inhibition of myosin II motors, may be used to further test this prediction.
Methods
Cell culture. The AChR is a cation-selective, ligand-gated ion channel and consists of ve subunits with diameter dC7 nm. It is an integral membrane protein that responds to the binding of acetylcholine, which is a neurotransmitter. The AChR spans the membrane of muscle cells with most of its mass in the extracellular space46. Xenopus muscle cells are dissected from myotomes of the fertilized Xenopus embryos developed at the stages 2022, following the protocol described in ref. 47. The dissected muscle cells are seeded on the glass cover slips coated with Entactin, Collagen-IV, and Laminin (ECL, purchased from Upstate Co.), which are immersed in a culture medium composed of 88% Steinbergs solution, 10% L-15 medium (purchased from Leibovitz Co.), 1% foetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin/gentamincin47. The muscle-cell cultures are maintained at 23 C and can be stored for 3 weeks if they are not contaminated.
QD labelling. To track the AChRs on a live muscle cell membrane, the individual AChRs are labelled by bright and photostable uorescent QDs8,17. This is achieved by rst labelling the AChRs with biotinylated a-bungarotoxin (biotin-BTX, purchased from Invitrogen Co.) for 10 min. The cells are then washed with the culture medium three times (5 min each). The concentration of biotin-BTX applied to the cells is adjusted according to the nal labelling density of the QDs required. Typically, for a fast movie recording (for example, 80 and 5 fps), 0.5 nM biotin-BTX is used. For a slow movie recording (for example, 0.33 fps), 0.25 nM biotin-BTX is used. Lower QDs concentration is used to reduce tracking ambiguities between the consecutive images of the QDs. After repeated washing to remove unbounded biotin-BTX, 2.5 nM streptavidin-conjugated Qdot 655 solution (purchased from Invitrogen Co.) is added to the cells for 10 min after which the cells are washed with the culture medium three times (5 min each). The entire staining process requires B1.5 h. Xenopus muscle cells in the primary culture present a large area for optical observation, typically 0.05 mm2 on the bottom membrane and 0.002 mm2 on the top apical membrane. QD-labelled AChRs are abundant on the membrane of the quiescent muscle cells. This is true even for sparsely labelled samples to avoid trajectory entanglement. In the experiment, several hundreds of AChRs are tracked concurrently. For a typical bottom membrane tracking at 5 fps, 200 QDs are labelled.
Other experimental details about the optical imaging and SPT are given in Supplementary Methods.
Data availability. The data that support the ndings of this study (such as gure source data and supplementary information les) are available from the corresponding author (P.T.) upon request.
References
1. Singer, S. J. & Nicolson, G. L. The uid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175, 720731 (1972).
2. Engelman, D. M. Membranes are more mosaic than uid. Nature 438, 578580 (2005).
3. Lingwood, D. & Simons, D. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327, 4650 (2010).
4. Munro, S. Lipid rafts: elusive or illusive? Cell 115, 377388 (2003).5. Saffman, P. G. & Delbrck, M. Brownian motion in biological membranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 31113113 (1975).
6. Jacobson, K., Sheets, E. D. & Simson, R. Revisiting the uid mosaic model of membranes. Science 268, 14411442 (1995).
7. Kusumi, A., Umemura, Y., Morone, N. & Fujiwara, T. in Anomalous Transport: Foundations and Applications (eds Klages, R., Radons, G. & Sokolov, I. M.) ch19, 545574 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2008).
8. Bannai, H., Lvi, S., Schweizer, C., Dahan, M. & Triller, A. Imaging the lateral diffusion of membrane molecules with quantum dots. Nat. Protoc. 1, 26282634 (2006).
9. Gelles, J., Schnapp, B. J. & Sheetz, M. P. Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision. Nature 331, 450453 (1988).
10. Simons, K. & Sampaio, J. L. Membrane organization and lipid rafts. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a004697 (2011).
11. Ritchie, K. et al. Detection of non-Brownian diffusion in the cell membrane in single molecule tracking. Biophys. J. 88, 22662277 (2005).
12. Kraft, M. L. Plasma membrane organization and function: moving past lipid rafts. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 27652768 (2013).
13. Crocker, J. C. et al. Two-point microrheology of inhomogeneous soft materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 888891 (2000).
14. Hoffman, B. D., Massiera, G., Van Citters, K. M. & Crocker, J. C. The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1025910264 (2006).
15. Hing, F. & Franosch, T. Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 046602 (2013).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701
16. Geng, L., Zhang, H. L. & Peng, H. B. The formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters visualized with quantum dots. BMC Neurosci. 10, 80 (2009).17. Geng, L. Visualization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor trafcking with quantum dots in Xenopus muscle cells. PhD Thesis, HKUST (2006).
18. Alcor, D., Gouzer, G. & Triller, A. Single-particle tracking methods for the study of membrane receptors dynamics. Eur. J. Neurosci. 30, 987997 (2009).
19. Walck, C. Internal Report SUFPFY/9601 (University of Stockholm, 2007).20. Weigel, A. V., Simon, B., Tamkun, M. M. & Krapfa, D. Ergodic and nonergodic processes coexist in the plasma membrane as observed by single-molecule tracking. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 64386443 (2011).
21. Golding, I. & Cox, E. C. Physical nature of bacterial cytoplasm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006).
22. Jeon, J. H. et al. In vivo anomalous diffusion and weak ergodicity breaking of lipid granules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 048103 (2011).
23. Barkai, E., Garini, Y. & Metzler, R. Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells. Phys. Today 65, 2935 (2012).
24. Meroz, Y. & Sokolov, I. M. A toolbox for determining subdiffusive mechanisms. Phys. Rep. 573, 129 (2015).
25. Saxton, M. J. A biological interpretation of transient anomalous subdiffusion. I. Qualitative model. Biophys. J. 92, 11781191 (2007).
26. Ghosh, A., Chikkadi, V., Schall, P. & Bonn, D. Connecting structural relaxation with the low frequency modes in a hard-sphere colloidal glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 188303 (2011).
27. Hunter, G. L. & Weeks, E. R. The physics of the colloidal glass transition. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 066501 (2012).
28. Hanes, R. D., Dalle-Ferrier, C., Schmiedeberg, M., Jenkinsa, M. C. & Egelhaaf, S. U. Colloids in one dimensional random energy landscapes. Soft Matter 8, 27142723 (2012).
29. Smith, P. R., Morrison, I. E., Wilson, K. M., Fernndez, N. & Cherry, R. J. Anomalous diffusion of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on heLa cells determined by single particle tracking. Biophys. J. 76, 33313344 (1999).
30. Martin, D. S., Forstner, M. B. & Kas, J. A. Apparent subdiffusion inherent to single particle tracking. Biophys. J. 83, 2109 (2002).
31. Soula, H., Car, B., Beslon, G. & Berry, H. Anomalous versus slowed-down Brownian diffusion in the ligand-binding equilibrium. Biophys. J. 105, 20642073 (2013).
32. Wong, I. Y. et al. Anomalous diffusion probes microstructure dynamics of entangled F-actin networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 178101 (2004).
33. Bauer, M., Valiullin, R., Radons, G. & Karger, J. How to compare diffusion processes assessed by single-particle tracking and pulsed eld gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 144118 (2011).
34. Heidernatsch, M., Bauer, M. & Radons, G. Characterizing N-dimensional anisotrpic Brownian motion by the distribution of diffusivities. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 184105 (2013).
35. Pralle, A., Keller, P., Florin, E. L., Simons, K. & Hrber, J. K. Sphingolipidcholesterol rafts diffuse as small entities in the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 148, 9971008 (2000).
36. Simons, K. & Ehehalt, R. Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease. J. Clin. Invest. 110, 597603 (2002).
37. Veatch, S. L. et al. Critical uctuations in plasma membrane vesicles. ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 287293 (2008).
38. Heberle, F. A. et al. Bilayer thickness mismatch controls domain size in model membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 68536859 (2013).
39. Novikov, D. S., Fieremans, E., Jensen, J. H. & Helpern, J. A. Random walks with barriers. Nat. Phys. 7, 508514 (2011).
40. Gowrishankar, K. et al. Active remodeling of cortical actin regulates spatiotemporal organization of cell surface molecules. Cell 149, 13531367 (2012).
41. Luo, W. W. et al. Analysis of the local organization and dynamics of cellular actin networks. J. Cell. Biol. 202, 10571073 (2013).
42. Guo, M. et al. Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell 158, 822832 (2014).
43. Parry, B. R. et al. The Bacterial cytoplasm has glass-like properties and is uidized by metabolic activity. Cell 156, 112 (2014).
44. Brangwynne, C. P., Koenderink, G. H., MacKintosh, F. C. & Weitz, D. A. Cytoplasmic diffusion: molecular motors mix it up. J. Cell. Biol. 183, 583587 (2008).
45. Prost, J., Jlicher, F. & Joanny, J. F. Active gel physics. Nat. Phys 11, 111117 (2015).
46. Unwin, N. Neurotransmitter action: opening of ligand-gated ion channels. Cell Suppl. 72 Suppl 3141 (1993).
47. Peng, H. B., Baker, L. P. & Chen, Q. Tissue culture of Xenopus neurons and muscle cells as a model for studying synaptic induction. Methods Cell Biol. 36, 511526 (1991).
Acknowledgements
We thank X.-G. Ma for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Hong Kong RGC under Grant Nos. HKUST-604310 and 16305214.
Author contributions
H.B.P. and P.T. designed and jointly supervised research; W.H. performed research; H.S. and L.G. developed new tools for imaging processing, SPT and QD labelling; W.H., Y.S. and B.J.A. analyzed data; and W.H., Y.S. and P.T. wrote the paper with further revisions from B.J.A. and H.B.P.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: He, W. et al. Dynamic heterogeneity and non-Gaussian statistics for acetylcholine receptors on live cell membrane. Nat. Commun. 7:11701 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11701 (2016).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:11701 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11701 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2016
Abstract
The Brownian motion of molecules at thermal equilibrium usually has a finite correlation time and will eventually be randomized after a long delay time, so that their displacement follows the Gaussian statistics. This is true even when the molecules have experienced a complex environment with a finite correlation time. Here, we report that the lateral motion of the acetylcholine receptors on live muscle cell membranes does not follow the Gaussian statistics for normal Brownian diffusion. From a careful analysis of a large volume of the protein trajectories obtained over a wide range of sampling rates and long durations, we find that the normalized histogram of the protein displacements shows an exponential tail, which is robust and universal for cells under different conditions. The experiment indicates that the observed non-Gaussian statistics and dynamic heterogeneity are inherently linked to the slow-active remodelling of the underlying cortical actin network.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer