Thermal and Osmotic Tolerance of ‘Irukandji’ Polyps: Cubozoa; Carukia barnesi

Abstract

This research explores the thermal and osmotic tolerance of the polyp stage of the Irukandji jellyfish Carukia barnesi, which provides new insights into potential polyp habitat suitability. The research also targets temperature, salinity, feeding frequency, and combinations thereof, as cues for synchronous medusae production. Primary findings revealed 100% survivorship in osmotic treatments between 19 and 46‰, with the highest proliferation at 26‰. As salinity levels of 26‰ do not occur within the waters of the Great Barrier Reef or Coral Sea, we conclude that the polyp stage of C. barnesi is probably found in estuarine environments, where these lower salinity conditions commonly occur, in comparison to the medusa stage, which is oceanic. Population stability was achieved at temperatures between 18 and 31°C, with an optimum temperature of 22.9°C. We surmise that C. barnesi polyps may be restricted to warmer estuarine areas where water temperatures do not drop below 18°C. Asexual reproduction was also positively correlated with feeding frequency. Temperature, salinity, feeding frequency, and combinations thereof did not induce medusae production, suggesting that this species may use a different cue, possibly photoperiod, to initiate medusae production.

About the Authors:

Robert Courtney

* E-mail: [email protected]

Current address: Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Division of Tropical Health & Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Affiliation: Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Division of Tropical Health & Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Sally Browning

Affiliation: Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Division of Tropical Health & Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Tobin Northfield

Affiliation: Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Jamie Seymour

Affiliation: Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Division of Tropical Health & Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Introduction

Tropical Australian cubozoans are highly seasonal, with the medusa stage usually arriving along the tropical coastlines during the monsoonal summer months [1–7]. This ‘stinger season’ in Australia is typically between November and May, which has been reported to begin earlier, and last longer, in warmer areas closer to the equator such as in the Gulf of Carpentaria [3,8,9]. At least part of the observed seasonality of the medusa stage is thought to be driven by the complex life cycle of cubozoans.

Cubozoans have a metagenic life cycle that alternates between benthic polyps, which reproduce asexually, and pelagic medusae, that reproduce sexually [2,4,10–16]. Medusa production in cubozoans is variable and can be in the form of complete metamorphosis of the polyp into a medusa [11,12,16–20], metamorphosis that leaves behind a small amount of regenerative material which is able to develop into a polyp (residuum) [21], and monodisc strobilation that leaves behind a polyp able to continue asexual reproduction of more polyps [22,23]. Some cubozoan polyps are known to use environmental factors, such as temperature [19,24,25], a combination of temperature and light intensity [18], photoperiod [3], or reduced food availability [26], as a cue to induce synchronous medusa production. It is thought that once medusa production is initiated, it can be punctuated by significant rainfall events, for example Chiropsella bronzie, or is continuous, as in Chironex fleckeri [2,3]. Therefore, medusae production by the polyps is considered to be one factor that drives the seasonal fluctuation in abundance of the medusae stage [2–4,20].

The medusa stage of Carukia barnesi, the Irukandji jellyfish, often causes painful and potentially fatal stings [1,6,7,27,28]. A sting from C. barnesi is also renowned for causing Irukandji syndrome which often requires hospitalization for treatment [1,27,28]. Considerable costs are associated with treating sting victims and lost revenue to the tourism industry annually is believed to be substantial [1]. Although only the medusa stage of this cubozoan poses a threat to humans, the polyp stage is expected to contribute to the seasonal periodicity through the synchronous timing of medusae production causing the start of the stinger season. Similarly, the abundance of medusae present during the season may be reflective of the success of the polyp stage.

The polyp stage also contributes to the abundance of medusae present by asexually reproducing more polyps, thus increasing the number of polyps able to produce medusae at any one time. Thermal, osmotic and food availability parameters are known to influence the rate of asexual reproduction of the polyp stage of Alatina nr mordens [26,29] and Carybdea marsupialis [30–32]. However, in most instances, the in situ parameters of the polyps are not known due to the unknown location of the polyps, and to date, cubozoan polyps have only been discovered in situ for two species: C. fleckeri and C. marsupialis [4,12,20,32]. Because of this, laboratory-based cultures of cubozoan polyps are essential for exploring the factors that affect polyp survivorship and proliferation in order to deduce where the polyps may reside, which may also shed light on the factors affecting the seasonal influx of medusae.

Carukia barnesi, like other Australian cubozoans, exhibits a marked seasonality. Little is known about the ecology of the early life stages of this species [22], even though it was discovered as causing Irukandji syndrome over 50 years ago [6,33,34]. The medusa stage of C. barnesi is considered oceanic and is typically found around coral reefs and islands and under certain condition along beaches [1,5,6,34,35]. However, nothing is known about the thermal and osmotic preference or the location of the polyp stage in situ. Therefore, a series of temperature, salinity, and feeding frequency experiments were conducted on the polyp stage in order to gain a better understanding of the ecology of this species.

The primary aims of this research were: 1) to determine the thermal and osmotic tolerance of the polyps, and use these data to discuss where these polyps may live; 2) to explore the effects of feeding frequency on survivorship and asexual reproduction and discuss intrinsic population growth rates under different feeding regimes; 3) to determine the effect of thermal and osmotic parameters, and combinations thereof, as well as feeding frequency, as cues for medusae production.

Method

Specimen Identification

Carukia barnesi is a small species in the family Carukiidae. The medusa stage has a bell height of up to 35 mm and tentacles up to 1.2 m long [6,34–37] with a single tentacle that extends from each of the four pedalia; rhopaliar niches with horns; and tentacles that have an alternating pattern of large and small nematocyst crescents that resemble “neckerchiefs” [6,34–36]. The polyps of C. barnesi average 0.9 mm in length and have 11 capitate tentacles on average. The polyps asexually reproduce ciliated swimming polyps and produce medusae through monodisc strobilation (see [22]). Little is known about the distribution of this species; however, medusae are often present along the north-eastern coast of Australia during the warm monsoonal months (November to May) between Lizard Island and Fraser Island [5,6,34–36].

Experimental Design and Pre-treatment

This project consisted of two separate experiments in which polyps of C. barnesi were exposed to different temperature, salinity and/or feeding frequency treatments that were monitored for survivorship, population increase through asexual reproduction, and medusae production following a previously published method [26]. The C. barnesi polyps were derived from the laboratory-based culture outlined in Courtney et al. [22], which was established approximately six months prior to these experiments from wild caught adult medusae. This polyp culture was maintained at a constant temperature of 28°C ± 0.5°C and a salinity level of 33‰ ± 0.5‰.

Both of the experiments presented here were conducted in 24 well sterile micro-plates and only 12 of the wells within each plate were used to allow for blank wells between different treatments. Each well had a surface area of 11.5 cm² and a volume of 3.5 ml. The mature polyps of C. barnesi produce swimming stage polyps through lateral budding [22]. These swimming polyps were harvested from the primary cultures and transferred into the 24 well micro-plates at a density of approximately 15 swimming polyps per well. As these polyps settled and developed into secondary polyps, they were fed freshly hatched Artemia sp. nauplii to satiation (approximately 20 Artemia sp.) every seven days. A complete water exchange was carried out 24 hours post each feeding event with filtered artificial seawater. The water quality parameters were maintained at the original culture parameters (28°C ± 0.5°C and 33‰ ± 0.5‰) for four weeks prior to any experimental trials to allow the polyps to acclimate, grow to maturity, and begin asexual reproduction. During this time, and during all experiments, a photoperiod of 13 hours light: 11 hours dark was maintained. These polyps were then exposed to one of the conditions outlined below; polyps were only exposed to one treatment, there was no mixing of water between replicates or treatments, and all treatments in each experiment were conducted simultaneously.

The first experiment consisted of 80 thermal and osmotic treatments (see Method: Thermal and Osmotic Effects on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction), which were monitored using a binocular dissection microscope, for polyp survival, asexual reproduction, and medusae production over a six-week period. Each treatment comprised six independent replicates and each replicate consisted of an average of 18.63 polyps at the beginning of the experiment (i.e., = 18.63, SD = 5.87 polyps; housed in each of 480 wells). Each replicate (well) was fed approximately 20 Artemia nauplii once per week and this quantity was increased as the polyp numbers increased (i.e., approximately one Artemia per polyp per week). Each feeding event was followed by a complete water exchange with artificial seawater of the same parameters as each experimental treatment (temperature and salinity).

The second experiment required a further five treatments to determine the effects of feeding frequency on asexual reproduction, survivorship, and medusae production (see Method: The Effects of Feeding Frequency on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction). This experiment was conducted at the original polyp culture conditions of 28°C ± 0.5°C and 33‰ ± 0.5‰ over a six-week period. Each treatment comprised six replicates and each replicate consisted of an average of 20.5 polyps at the beginning of the experiment (i.e., = 20.50, SD = 2.79 polyps; housed in each of 30 wells). Each replicate (well) was fed approximately 20 Artemia sp. nauplii per feeding event and this quantity was increased as the polyp numbers increased (i.e., one Artemia per polyp per feeding event).

Thermal and Osmotic Effects on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction

To determine the thermal and osmotic tolerance of C. barnesi polyps, and the effects these treatments had on survival, asexual reproduction and medusae production, replicates of polyps (as described above) were exposed to an 80 combination matrix of eight temperatures (11, 14, 18, 21, 25, 28, 31, and 34°C ± 0.5°C) and ten salinities (16, 19, 22.5, 26, 29, 33, 36, 39, 42.5, and 46‰ ± 0.5‰) over a period of six weeks. Each incubation temperature was maintained by partially submerging each test plate into one of eight temperature controlled water baths for the duration of the experiment. The range of temperatures selected encompasses the potential thermal regime a polyp may experience in the Coral Sea (temperatures commonly below 11°C at depths of approximately 500 m) and along the adjacent Australian coastline including estuarine environments (temperatures commonly occur above 34°C in shallow estuarine pools). The salinity range tested encompasses common salinities found in the Coral Sea and also included both hypersaline and hyposaline conditions that are commonly found in estuarine environments. These environmental parameters were explicitly targeted to deduce the thermal and osmotic tolerance of the polyp stage. Prior to the beginning of this experiment each replicate was photographed and the number of polyps in each well was determined. Every seven days during the six-week experiment, each replicate was fed and water exchanged (as described above). Each replicate was again photographed and the number of polyps in each well was determined in seven-day intervals during the six-week experiment.

To determine the thermal and osmotic tolerance of polyps, the change in population numbers was determined in seven-day intervals during the six-week experiment. To allow for comparisons between treatments, a model was fitted across all treatments that described final polyp density as a function of initial density, temperature, and salinity. We assumed that the final polyp density was proportional to the initial density, functions of temperature F(T) and salinity G(S), and a parameter a which describes the maximum population change at optimal conditions such that,(1)Thus, we assume independent effects of temperature and salinity on growth rates. Preliminary analyses suggested including interactive effects between temperature and salinity did not qualitatively change the results. We model F(T) and G(S) as asymmetrical modified Gaussian functions centered around the optimal temperature and salinity, respectively such that,(2)(3)where T_opt and S_opt describe the optimal temperature and salinity, respectively. The σ_i,j² parameters represent the slope for independent variable i (temperature or salinity) and j, the side of the curve (low, or high). We assume that the final polyp density follows a negative binomial distribution, and fit the models and calculated the log-likelihood, maximum likelihood estimates and 95% maximum likelihood profile confidence limits using the bbmle package, version 1.0.18 [38], in the statistical package R, version 3.2.4 [39,40]. The raw data file and R code has been included in Supporting Information (S1 Dataset and S1 R Code). To evaluate the effects of salinity and temperature, we used AIC values (Akaike Information Criterion) to compare the full model with models containing only temperature or salinity (i.e., P_final = aF(T) P_initial or P_final = aG(S)P_initial). Here, large changes in AIC (presented as ΔAIC) with removal of temperature or salinity suggest the importance of the respective environmental component for reproduction and/or survival. Although there is no standard cut-off value for AIC, like there is for p-values, we used a conservative value of ΔAIC = 7, which corresponds to significance levels in the vicinity of 0.003 for nested models [41].

Effects of Feeding Frequency on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction

In order to determine the effect of feeding frequency on survivorship and asexual reproduction, polyps were exposed to five feeding regimes over a six-week period while held at the original culture conditions of 28°C ± 0.5°C and 33‰ ± 0.5‰. The five feeding regimes consisted of feeding every 1, 3, 7, or 14 days and a no food treatment over a six week period. Each feeding event consisted of food saturation for 24 hours (approximately one Artemia sp. nauplii per polyp per feeding event as outlined above) followed by a 100% water exchange 24 hours post feeding event with artificial pre acclimated sea water of 28°C ± 0.5°C and 33‰ ± 0.5‰. In the 14-day and no food treatments, water exchanges were conducted every seven days during the six-week experiment. Each replicate was photographed and the number of polyps in each replicate was determined at the start and in seven-day intervals during the experiment. Polyp density was analysed with a generalised linear mixed model with feeding frequency, time and the interaction between time and feeding frequency as fixed effects and replicate number as a random effect. This was analysed via proc glimmix in SAS, version 9.4 [42], using the ar(1) covariance matrix to describe temporal autocorrelation, and we assumed polyp density followed a negative binomial distribution with a log-link function, typical for count data [43]. We evaluated statistical inference tests with Wald F tests conducted in proc glimmix. The raw data file has been included in Supporting Information (S2 Dataset).

Environmental Cues for Medusae Production

To explore feeding frequency, temperature, salinity and combinations thereof as potential cues for medusae production, each of the previously described six-week experiments was also monitored for medusae production. Medusae production for this species is in the form of monodisc strobilation [22] and each polyp was monitored for a change in body shape, formation of statoliths, attached and free swimming medusae. At the end of the six-week experiments each replicate of each treatment (80 temperature and salinity treatments and five feeding frequency treatments) was rapidly returned (shocked) back to the original culture condition of 28°C ± 0.5°C and 33‰ ± 0.5‰ and were monitored for a further four weeks (i.e., six weeks in treatment and four weeks post treatment). During this additional four-week period, the polyps were fed once per week followed by a complete water exchange 24 hours post feeding event.

Results

Thermal and Osmotic Effects on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction

Polyp survivorship and asexual reproduction rates significantly decreased as environmental values moved away from the optimal temperature and salinity, and removal of parameters describing the effects of each environmental variable suggested each variable was important (effect of removing temperature parameters by setting F(T) = 1: ΔAIC = 594, and effect of removing salinity parameters by setting G(S) = 1: ΔAIC = 164). These ΔAIC values are distinctly higher than our conservative baseline of ΔAIC = 7, and suggest that temperature and salinity alone are not sufficient to explain the data, and polyp survival and/or reproduction is indeed a function of both temperature and salinity. Summary statistics describing the data used to generate the model are provided in Supporting Information (S1 Table). The optimal temperature and salinity for polyp proliferation occurred at 22.9°C and 26.0‰, respectively, where the population increased by over 10 times during the six-weeks (see Table 1) compared to 100% mortality associated with both high and low temperatures and very low salinity levels. The temperature and salinity range that allowed for population stability (i.e., equal to or greater than 100% of the starting population) consisted of thermal treatments between 18°C and 31°C at salinity levels between 19‰ and 46‰. Although asexual reproduction was high at temperatures that commonly occur in the waters of the Great Barrier Reef, this was not the case with salinity, where the highest polyp proliferation was not encompassed by salinity levels that occur in the waters of the Great Barrier Reef (see Fig 1). While variation in population growth surrounding the optimum temperature and salinity was relatively symmetrical with respect to temperature (σ_tl = 3.47, σ_th = 5.01), population reproduction showed a steeper decrease with lower salinity (σ_sl = 5.19) than higher salinity (σ_sh = 31.07).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Parameters Describing Proportional Change in Polyp Density of Carukia barnesi, After Six Weeks, Modelled as a Function of Temperature and Salinity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.t001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Maximum likelihood estimated proportional change in polyp density after six weeks plotted as a function of temperature and salinity from best-fit model.

Model output describes proportional change in polyp density for different temperature and salinity values as described in Eq 1. Solid black line represents values of 1, where polyp density is expected to remain constant. The area encompassed by the dashed line indicates sea surface temperature and salinity levels that commonly occur within the waters of the Great Barrier Reef [44,45]. Models were fit to data collected from a matrix of eight temperature and ten salinity treatments, each replicated six times. Summary statistics describing the data used to generate the model are provided in Supporting Information (S1 Table).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.g001

Effects of Feeding Frequency on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction

Feeding frequency significantly increased asexual reproduction (F_{4, 25} = 16.76, p < 0.001). In addition, there was significant temporal variation in polyp proliferation (F_{6, 149} = 78.65, p < 0.001) and the positive effect of feeding frequency became incrementally stronger over time (F_{24, 149} = 5.21, p < 0.001). Polyps that were fed daily increased mean population numbers by over three times during the six-weeks, and polyps that were unfed increased in population by 0.5 times over the same time frame (Fig 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. The relative change in Carukia barnesi polyp density, over six weeks of exposure, to five feeding regimes.

The feeding levels consisted of: fed every day (dark circles); fed every three days (light squares); fed every seven days (dark triangles); fed every 14 days (light circles); unfed for 42 days (dark squares). Each of the five feeding treatments consisted of six independent replicates, each of which consisted of a mean staring polyp density of 20.5 polyps per well (n = 30, = 20.5, SD = 2.8). The values for each time sequence were calculated as the proportional change in polyp density from the starting population density at time zero, where values of one indicate no population change and values above one indicate polyp proliferation through asexual reproduction. Values are reported as means and error bars represent 95% CI assuming a normal distribution. All counts were conducted in seven-day intervals however the values have been graphed offset on the time axis for clarity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.g002

Environmental Cues for Medusae Production

Temperature, salinity, and feeding frequency, and variations thereof, did not trigger medusae production during the six-week experiments or during the four-week post treatment monitoring period. Only one polyp went through medusae production during the ten-weeks. This occurred in the 31°C and 46‰ treatment and was identified during week five of the experiment. As a percentage, one polyp undergoing medusae production during this experiment was not significant. Returning the polyps to the original culture conditions of 28°C ± 0.5°C and 33‰ also did not cause medusae production over the four-week post experiment monitoring period.

Discussion

Carukia barnesi polyps had a high tolerance to osmotic treatments with 100% survivorship from treatments between 18 and 46‰ (Fig 1), which indicates that this species may inhabit areas with a high degree of osmotic variation. The osmotic treatment that yielded the highest degree of polyp proliferation was 26‰. Salinity levels this low do not occur in the waters of the Great Barrier Reef or in the Coral Sea, however these low salinity conditions are a common occurrence in estuarine systems [46–49]. These results indicate that although the polyp stage does not seem restricted to low salinity waters, the observed increase in asexual reproduction under low salinity conditions suggests that the polyp stage is probably an estuarine inhabitant. Cubozoans that have coastal or estuarine polyp stages have previously been reported for two species; C. fleckeri polyps were located in situ attached to the underside of rocks near a river mouth in Queensland [4], and polyps of C. marsupialis were once located attached to bivalve shells in a mangrove habitat in Puerto Rico [12]. To date, these are the only two discoveries of cubozoan polyps in situ globally, however at least one other Australian cubozoan polyp, those of C. bronzie, has also been suggested to be estuarine [2]. The possibility that C. barnesi has an estuarine polyp stage has not previously been considered primarily due to their distinctly oceanic medusa stage [5,6,34] compared to species which are known to be primarily coastal, such as C. fleckeri and C. bronzie [2,3,50–52]. There have been no reported sightings, or documented stings caused by C. barnesi from estuaries; however this does not discount the possible presence of medusae in these areas when they are newly detached and small. It is currently unknown how the polyps enter low salinity habitats and nothing is known about the osmotic tolerance of the medusa stage or where or when the medusae spawn. In speculation, due to there being no reports of adult C. barnesi medusae within estuarine systems, it is plausible that the eggs, that are known to have a long encapsulated planula stage from six days to six months [22], are transported inshore on currents. Future research is required on the medusa stage, such as determining their osmotic tolerance, to better understand how the life cycle is completed in situ.

Temperature also affected both the survivorship and asexual reproduction rate of C. barnesi polyps. There was notable symmetry between the high and low temperature curves with a modelled optimum temperature of 22.9°C (Table 1). As the thermal treatments moved away from optimum the amount of polyp proliferation through asexual reproduction was reduced. The minimum and maximum thermal constraints of the polyps were between 18°C and 31°C, which indicates that the polyp stage has a suitable operating envelope of approximately 13 degrees, whereby positive population growth is possible over a period of six weeks.

The southern distribution limit of the medusa stage of C. barnesi is not well established. However, at present it is considered to be near Fraser Island based on sting and capture records (Seymour unpublished). The winter (July) sea surface temperature near Fraser Island typically averages 20°C and increases to 27°C during the summer (February) [45], which is within the thermal capacity range for population growth of the polyp stage and encompasses their thermal optimum of 22.9°C. Although the temperature profile of C. barnesi polyps seems to fit well with the water temperature near Fraser Island, it is expected that the water temperature in estuarine systems near river mouths, which are predominately large river systems along the eastern coast of Queensland, to be significantly lower in temperature than the adjacent open ocean. For example, temperatures near the mouth of the Noosa Rivers (approximately 100km south of Fraser Island) are known to average as low as 18°C during the winter [53] compared to 20°C in the open ocean near Fraser Island [45]. Therefore, the polyp stage of C. barnesi may be restricted to warmer estuarine areas where the winter water temperature does not drop as low as 18°C north of Fraser Island. This suggests that the medusa stage may limit the southern distribution of this species, though no data exists on the thermal tolerance of the medusa stage to confirm this.

The observed rate of asexual reproduction of C. barnesi during these experiments was high compared to another cubozoan polyp, A. nr mordens [26]. For example, a maximum polyp population increase of 50% was recorded for A. nr mordens over six weeks [26] compared to over 1000% in C. barnesi during this replicated experiment (Fig 1). This high rate of reproduction is expected to increase the number of polyps able to produce medusae at any one time and in turn influence the abundance of medusae present. Highly reproductive populations are expected to make use of rapid environmental changes [54–56]. Purely in speculation, and assuming these polyps are estuarine and require hard substrate for attachment similar to other cnidarian polyps [57–60], increasing manmade structures within marine environments (e.g., marinas, boat ramps and mooring platforms), may increase the available hard substrate for polyp attachment. This anthropogenic effect has been suggested to positively impact on scyphozoan polyp populations [61–65]. Not surprisingly, increased asexual reproduction was correlated with increased feeding frequency. Therefore, changes in estuarine trophic dynamics, primarily eutrophication, may lead to increased copepod density [66,67], presumably a primary food source for polyps and early stage medusae, which may influence polyp proliferation and in turn affect medusae abundance.

Some cubozoan polyps are known to use environmental factors, such as temperature [19,23–25], or reduced food availability [26], as a cue for medusae production. However, temperature, salinity, feeding frequency, and combinations of these factors, did not trigger medusae production in C. barnesi. This suggests that the polyps may use a different cue for synchronous medusae production. Because of the consistency of the first arrival of the medusae stage over the last 50 years [68], it is possible that this species uses increasing photoperiod as a cue due to the interannual variation in environmental parameters such as temperature and salinity. This type of cue has also been suggested for C. fleckeri due to the consistency of occurrence during a seven-year study [3]. There is also evidence that the stinger season length has increased over the last 50 years from 15 days to 151, which has been speculated to be caused by increasing global sea temperatures [68]. Therefore it is possible that C. barnesi polyps use photoperiod to initiate synchronous medusae production but continue to produce medusae throughout the season until the winter water temperature becomes too low.

Future research should pursue determining the thermal and osmotic parameters of the medusa stage of C. barnesi, and experimentally determine possible environmental cues for medusae production. Understanding the contributing factors that lead the spatial and temporal variability in medusae abundance may in turn prove valuable to predicting future C. barnesi abundance, and/or distributional range extensions, under projected sea temperature rise scenarios.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Dataset. Carukia barnesi Polyp Count Data Associated With “Thermal and Osmotic Effects on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction”.

Variable list/description: Sample identification number; Well number; Treatment number; Temperature (°C); Salinity (‰); Time (weeks) (e.g., Time 0 indicates start of experiment and Time 6 indicates after 6 weeks; Total (total number of polyps counted); Proportion (proportional change in polyp density), this variable was calculated as Total polyps at Time 6/Total polyps at Time 0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.s001

(CSV)

S2 Dataset. Carukia barnesi Polyp Count Data Associated With “Effects of Feeding Frequency on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction”.

Variable list/description: Sample identification number; Time (weeks) (e.g., Time 0 indicates start of experiment and Times 1–6 indicate after 1–6 weeks; Well number; Temperature (°C); Salinity (‰);Total (total number of polyps counted); Proportion (proportional change in polyp density), this variable was calculated as Total polyps at Times 1–6/Total polyps at Time 0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.s002

(CSV)

S1 R Code. The R Code Used for Analysis of “Thermal and Osmotic Effects on Survivorship and Asexual Reproduction”.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.s003

(TXT)

S1 Table. Mean Values and Standard Errors of the Number of Polyps Present after Six Weeks Exposure to a Matrix of Eight Temperatures and Ten Salinity Treatments.

All values were calculated as the relative change in polyp density and are presented as proportional change, where values above one indicate population increase through asexual reproduction and values below one indicate polyp mortality. There were six independent replicates for each treatment, therefore n = 6 for all means presented below and standard errors were calculated assuming a normal distribution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380.s004

(RTF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Richard Fitzpatrick, Jessica Sleeman, Bjoernar Haug, Julian Davis-Deutsch and Kaja Fjaertoft, for assistance in the field and in the laboratory, Nik Sachlikidis and Rhondda Jones for project assistance, and The Australian Lions Foundation for providing the research vessel and collection equipment.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RC JS. Performed the experiments: RC SB. Analyzed the data: RC TN JS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RC JS. Wrote the paper: RC JS.

Citation: Courtney R, Browning S, Northfield T, Seymour J (2016) Thermal and Osmotic Tolerance of ‘Irukandji’ Polyps: Cubozoa; Carukia barnesi. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159380

References

1. Carrette TJ, Underwood AH, Seymour JE. Irukandji syndrome: a widely misunderstood and poorly researched tropical marine envenoming. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 2012;42(4): 214–223. pmid:23258458

2. Gordon MR, Hatcher C, Seymour J. Growth and age determination of the tropical Australian cubozoan Chiropsalmus sp. Hydrobiologia. 2004;530(1–3): 339–345.

3. Gordon M, Seymour J. Growth, development and temporal variation in the onset of six Chironex fleckeri medusae seasons: a contribution to understanding jellyfish ecology. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(2): e31277. pmid:22384009

4. Hartwick RF. Distributional ecology and behavior of the early life stages of the box-jellyfish Chironex fleckeri. In: Williams RB, Cornelius PFS, Hughes RG, Robson EA editors. Coelenterate biology: Recent research on Cnidaria and Ctenophora. Belgium: Kluwer Academic Press; 1991. pp. 181–188.

5. Kingsford MJ, Seymour JE, O’Callaghan D. Abundance patterns of cubozoans on and near the Great Barrier Reef. Hydrobiologia. 2012;69: 257–268.

6. Kinsey BE. More Barnes on box jellyfish. Townsville, QLD, Sir George Fisher Centre for Tropical Marine Studies, James Cook University. 1988.

7. Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF. Venomous and poisonous marine animals: a medical and biological handbook. Coogee, NSW: UNSW Press; 1996.

8. Jacups SP. Warmer waters in the Northern Territory-Herald an earlier onset to the annual Chironex fleckeri stinger season. EcoHealth. 2010;7(1): 14–17. pmid:20376549

9. Nickson CP, Waugh EB, Jacups SP, Currie BJ. Irukandji syndrome case series from Australia's tropical Northern Territory. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2009;54(3): 395–403. pmid:19409658

10. Arai NM. A functional biology of Scyphozoa. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.

11. Arneson AC, Cutress CE. Life history of Carybdea alata Reynaud, 1830 (cubomedusae). In: Mackie GO editor. Coelenterate ecology and behavior. New York: Springer; 1976. pp. 227–236.

12. Cutress CE, Studebaker JP. Development of the Cubomedusae, Carybdea marsupialis. Proceedings of the Association of Island Marine Laboratories of the Caribbean. 1973; 9: 25.

13. Hartwick RF. Observations on the anatomy, behavior, reproduction and life cycle of the cubozoan Carybdea sivickisi. In: Williams RB, Cornelius PFS, Hughes RG, Robson EA editors. Coelenterate biology: Recent research on Cnidaria and Ctenophora. Belgium: Kluwer Academic Press;1991. pp. 171–179.

14. Toshino S, Miyake H, Ohtsuka S, Okuizumi K, Adachi A, Hamatsu Y, et al. Development and polyp formation of the giant box jellyfish Morbakka virulenta (Kishinouye, 1910) (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) collected from the Seto Inland Sea, western Japan. Plankton and Benthos Research. 2013;8(1): 1–8.

15. Toshino S, Miyake H, Iwanaga S. Development of Copula sivickisi (Stiasny, 1926) (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeidae: Tripedaliidae) collected from the Ryukyu Archipelago, southern Japan. Plankton and Benthos Research. 2014;9(1): 32–41.

16. Werner B, Cutress CE, Studebaker JP. Life cycle of Tripedalia cystophora Conant (cubomedusae). Nature. 1971;232: 582–583. pmid:16063105

17. Carrette T, Straehler-Pohl I, Seymour J. Early life history of Alatina cf. moseri populations from Australia and Hawaii with implications for taxonomy (Cubozoa: Carybdeida, Alatinidae). PLOS ONE. 2014;9(1): e84377. pmid:24454725

18. Straehler-Pohl I, Jarms G. Morphology and life cycle of Carybdea morandinii, sp. nov. (Cnidaria), a cubozoan with zooxanthellae and peculiar polyp anatomy. Zootaxa. 2011;2755: 36–56.

19. Stangl K, Salvini-Plawen LV, Holstein TW. Staging and induction of medusa metamorphosis in Carybdea marsupialis (Cnidaria, Cubozoa). Vie et milieu. 2002; 52(4): 131–140.

20. Yamaguchi M, Hartwick R. Early life history of the sea wasp, Chironex fleckeri (Class Cubozoa). In Tardent P, Tardent R, editors. Development and cellular biology of coelenterates. Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier; 1980. pp.11–16.

21. Straehler-Pohl I, Jarms G. Life cycle of Carybdea marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) reveals metamorphosis to be a modified strobilation. Marine Biology. 2005;147(6): 1271–1277.

22. Courtney R, Browning S, Seymour J. Early life history of the ‘Irukandji’jellyfish Carukia barnesi. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0151197. pmid:26954781

23. Toshino S, Miyake H, Ohtsuka S, Adachi A, Kondo Y, Okada S, Hiratsuka T. Monodisc strobilation in Japanese giant box jellyfish Morbakka virulenta (Kishinouye, 1910): a strong implication of phylogenetic similarity between Cubozoa and Scyphozoa. Evolution and Development. 2015;17(4): 231–239. pmid:26174099

24. Laska-Mehnert G. Cytologische veränderungen während der metamorphose des Cubopolypen Tripedalia cystophora (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) in die meduse. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1985;39(2):129–64.

25. Werner B. Die metamorphose des polypen von Tripedalia cystophora (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) in die meduse. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1983;36(3):257–76.

26. Courtney R, Seymour J. Seasonality in polyps of a tropical cubozoan: Alatina nr mordens. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(7): e69369. pmid:23922707

27. Little M, Pereira P, Mulcahy R, Cullen P. Severe cardiac failure associated with presumed jellyfish sting. Irukandji syndrome? Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2003; 31(6): 642.

28. Pereira P, Barry J, Corkeron M, Keir P, Little M, Seymour JE. Intracerebral hemorrhage and death after envenoming by the jellyfish Carukia barnesi. Clinical Toxicology. 2010;48(4): 390–392. pmid:20507250

29. Klein SG, Pitt KA, Rathjen KA, Seymour JE. Irukandji jellyfish polyps exhibit tolerance to interacting climate change stressors. Global Change Biology. 2014;20(1), 28–37. pmid:24323533

30. Acevedo MJ, Fuentes VL, Olariaga A, Canepa A, Belmar MB, Bordehore C, Calbet A. Maintenance, feeding and growth of Carybdea marsupialis (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2013;439:84–91.

31. Canepa A, Purcell JE, Belmar MB, Acevedo M, Gentile M, Fuentes V. Salinity effects on asexual reproduction of Carybdea sp.(Cnidaria: Cubozoa). Journal of Plankton Research. 2014;36(2):585–90.

32. Fischer AB, Hofmann DK. Budding, bud morphogenesis, and regeneration in Carybdea marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 (Cnidaria: Cubozoa). Hydrobiologia. 2004;530(1–3): 331–337.

33. Fenner PJ. Jellyfish responsible for Irukandji syndrome. An International Journal of Medicine. 2006;99(11):802–3.

34. Southcott RV. Revision of some Carybdeidae (Scyphozoa: Cubomedusae) including a description of the jellyfish responsible for the 'Irukandji syndrome'. Australian Journal of Zoology. 1967;15(3): 651–671.

35. Underwood AH, Seymour JE. Venom ontogeny, diet and morphology in Carukia barnesi, a species of Australian box jellyfish that causes Irukandji syndrome. Toxicon. 2007;49(8): 1073–1082. pmid:17395227

36. Bentlage B, Lewis C. An illustrated key and synopsis of the families and genera of carybdeid box jellyfishes (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeida), with emphasis on the “Irukandji family” (Carukiidae). Journal of Natural History. 2012;46(41–42): 2595–2620.

37. Courtney R, Sachlikidis N, Jones R, Seymour J. Prey capture ecology of the Cubozoan Carukia barnesi. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(5): e0124256. pmid:25970583

38. Bolker B, and R Development Core Team. bbmle: Tools for General Maximum Likelihood Estimation. R package version 1.0.18. 2016. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bbmle

39. Bolker BM. Ecological models and data in R. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008.

40. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2016. Available: https://www.R-project.org/.

41. Murtaugh PA. In defence of P values. Ecology. 2014;95(3):611–7. pmid:24804441

42. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, United States of America. 2015.

43. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Heange SW, Poulsen JT, Stevens MHM, et al. Generalized linear mixed methods models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2005; 24(3): 127–135.

44. Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). Sea Water Temperature Logger Data at Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef From 24 Nov 1995 To 30 Mar 2015. 2016. Available: http://data.aims.gov.au/metadataviewer/faces/view.xhtml?uuid=446a0e73-7c30-4712-9ddb-ba1fc29b8b9a, accessed 28/04/2016.

45. Ban NC, Pressey RL, Weeks S. Conservation objectives and sea‐surface temperature anomalies in the Great Barrier Reef. Conservation Biology. 2012;26(5):799–809. pmid:22808910

46. Cyrus DP, Blaber SJ. Turbidity and salinity in a tropical northern Australian estuary and their influence on fish distribution. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 1992;35(6):545–63.

47. Mao Y, Ridd PV. Sea surface temperature as a tracer to estimate cross‐shelf turbulent diffusivity and flushing time in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2015;120(6):4487–502.

48. Wolanski E, Elliott M. Estuarine Ecohydrology: An Introduction. (2nd ed) Elsevier; 2015.

49. Yu Y, Zhang H, Lemckert C. Salinity and turbidity distributions in the Brisbane River estuary, Australia. Journal of Hydrology. 2014;519:3338–52.

50. Barnes JT, Kinsey B. Barnes on box jellyfish. Sir George Fisher Centre for Tropical Marine Studies, James Cook University of North Queensland; 1986.

51. Mooney CJ, Kingsford MJ. The influence of salinity on box jellyfish (Chironex fleckeri, Cubozoa) statolith elemental chemistry. Marine Biology. 2016;163(5):1–3.

52. Southcott RV. Studies on Australian Cubomedusae, including a new genus and species apparently harmful to man. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1956;7(2):254–80.

53. Coles RG, Greenwood JG. Seasonal movement and size distribution of three commercially important Australian prawn species (Crustacea: Penaeidae) within an estuarine system. Marine and Freshwater Research. 1983;34(5):727–43.

54. Chevin LM, Lande R, Mace GM. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(4):e1000357. pmid:20463950

55. Merilä J, Hendry AP. Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evolutionary Applications. 2014;7(1):1–4. pmid:24454544

56. Sommer S, Piscia R, Manca MM, Fontaneto D, Ozgul A. Demographic cost and mechanisms of adaptation to environmental stress in resurrected Daphnia. Journal of Limnology. 2016;75(s2).

57. Brewer RH. Larval settling behavior in Cyanea capillata (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa). Biological Bulletin. 1976; 150:183–199.

58. Brewer RH. Larval settlement behavior in the jellyfish Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus) (Scyphozoa: Semaeostomeae). Estuaries. 1978; 1:120–122.

59. Brewer RH. The influence of the orientation, roughness, and wettability of solid surfaces on the behavior and attachment of planulae of Cyanea (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa). Biological Bulletin. 1984; 166:11–21.

60. Holst S, Jarms G. Substrate choice and settlement preferences of planula larvae of five Scyphozoa (Cnidaria) from German Bight, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2006; 151: 863–871.

61. Duarte CM, Pitt KA, Lucas CH, Purcell JE, Uye SI, Robinson K, et al. Is global ocean sprawl a cause of jellyfish blooms? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2012;11(2):91–7.

62. Purcell JE. Jellyfish and ctenophore blooms coincide with human proliferations and environmental perturbations. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2012;4:209–35. pmid:22457974

63. Purcell JE, Uye SI, Lo WT. Anthropogenic causes of jellyfish blooms and their direct consequences for humans: a review. Marine Ecology-Progress Series-. 2007;350:153.

64. Richardson AJ, Bakun A, Hays GC, Gibbons MJ. The jellyfish joyride: causes, consequences and management responses to a more gelatinous future. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2009;24(6):312–22.

65. Feng S, Lin J, Sun S, Zhang F. Artificial substrates preference for proliferation and immigration in Aurelia aurita (sl) polyps. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology. 2015;1–0.

66. Nittrouer CA, Brunskill GJ, Figueiredo AG. Importance of tropical coastal environments. Geo-Marine Letters. 1995;15(3–4):121–6.

67. Suchy KD, Avila TR, Dower JF, Bianchini A, Figueiredo GM. Short-term variability in chitobiase-based planktonic crustacean production rates in a highly eutrophic tropical estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2016;545:77–89.

68. Carrette TJ, Seymour JE. Long-term analysis of Irukandji stings in Far North Queensland. Diving and hyperbaric medicine. 2013;43(1):9–15. pmid:23508658