ARTICLE
Received 19 Mar 2016 | Accepted 11 Jul 2016 | Published 17 Aug 2016
Telomeres are transcribed generating long non-coding RNAs known as TERRA. Deciphering the role of TERRA has been one of the unsolved issues of telomere biology in the past decade. This has been, in part, due to lack of knowledge on the TERRA loci, thus preventing functional genetic studies. Here, we describe that long non-coding RNAs with TERRA features are transcribed from the human 20q and Xp subtelomeres. Deletion of the 20q locus by using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology causes a dramatic decrease in TERRA levels, while deletion of the Xp locus does not result in decreased TERRA levels. Strikingly, 20q-TERRA ablation leads to dramatic loss of telomere sequences and the induction of a massive DNA damage response. These ndings identify chromosome 20q as a main TERRA locus in human cells and represent the rst demonstration in any organism of the essential role of TERRA in the maintenance of telomeres.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 OPEN
Telomeric RNAs are essential to maintain telomeres
Juan Jos Montero1,*, Isabel Lpez de Silanes1,*, Osvaldo Grana2 & Maria A. Blasco1
1 Telomeres and Telomerase Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
2 Bioinformatics Group, Structural Biology and Biocomputing Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain.* These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.A.B. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534
TERRA transcripts are nuclear long non-coding RNAs that are transcribed from the subtelomere towards the telomere1,2. They are transcribed by RNA polymerase II,
giving rise to transcripts that contain UUAGGG-repeats, being the presence of this repeat their main features. They are also heterogeneous in size (0.210 kb in humans and mice) as indicated by the smear detected in TERRA northern blots1,2. On the other hand, detection of TERRA by RNA-uorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) renders a clear spotted pattern in the nucleus and the number of spots varies in different cell types. Approximately 30% of these spots co-localize with telomeres1,3.
Lack of TERRAs subtelomeric sequence information has been an important shortcoming to understand the role of TERRA, as most the functional studies published to date are based on the use of the UUAGGG-tract to detect TERRA. Thus, TERRAs have been implicated in telomere protection35, heterochromatin formation4, telomere replication by sequestering hnRNPA1 from telomeres to allow RPA-to Pot1 switching, a process that it is altered in alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) cells lacking ATRX6,7, and in telomere elongation by homologous recombination through the formation of DNA-TERRA hybrids8,9. TERRAs are also proposed to bind the telomerase core components, TERC and TERT, but their role in telomerase function is unclear. On one hand, TERRA can inhibit telomerase activity in vitro2,10. On the other hand, in yeast, TERRAs are induced at short telomeres and form TERRA-TERC RNA clusters that co-localize with the telomere of origin during S phase, suggesting that TERRA may play a role in the spatial organization of telomerase activity at telomeres11.
In yeast, several TERRA transcription start sites have been identied at different chromosome ends. In the mouse, by using a genome wide RNA-seq approach, we recently identied that transcripts showing bona de TERRA features mainly arise from the chromosome 18 subtelomere, and to a lesser extent from the subtelomere of chromosome 9 (ref. 3). Furthermore, we found that chromosome 18-TERRA associate in trans with the remaining telomeres and are important for telomere protection3. TERRA loci in human cells have been more elusive. First, a putative TERRA promoter was proposed to consist of a 61-29-37 repeat (a conserved region that contains three different repetitive DNA tracts of 61, 29 and 37-bp), which is present at 20 different chromosomes12. However, transcript sizes and their regulation were not identical to those of TERRA, suggesting that they may constitute a fraction of TERRA molecules12. More recently, a similar RNA-seq approach to that used by us in mice, identied 10 distinct human chromosome ends where putative TERRA transcription started as far as 510 kb away from the telomere, as well as eight additional chromosome ends where transcription started in close proximity to the telomere13. The authors, however, did not address whether these transcripts showed TERRA features, dened as the presence of UUAGGG-repeats within their sequence, their heterogeneity in size and the nuclear spotted pattern in which some spots co-localize with the telomere.
Here, we study whether these human transcripts have the above-mentioned TERRA features with the nal goal of functionally deleting them to unveil the role of TERRA. We found that, out of the 18 proposed TERRA loci in humans, only transcripts arising from 20q and Xp loci have TERRA features. We then used the CRISPR-Cas9 technology to genetically delete these two potential TERRA loci in humans to study whether they are indeed the origin of TERRA. Only deletion of the 20q locus caused a dramatic decrease in TERRA levels, while deletion of the Xp locus did not result in decreased TERRA levels. Importantly, deletion of the 20q-TERRA locus leads to telomere shortening and telomere uncapping as indicated by increased telomere
damage foci or TIFs. These unprecedented ndings demonstrate that TERRA transcripts are essential for the maintenance of a functional telomere cap.
ResultsIdentication of the human TERRA locus. A number of subtelomeric transcripts identied in samples that underwent UUAGGG-transcript enrichment have been recently proposed to represent the human TERRA transcriptome, although further conrmation that these transcripts had TERRA features (see the rst section) was lacking13. These RNAs arose from 10 distinct chromosome ends where transcription started as far as 510 kb upstream of the subtelomere-telomere boundary (referred here as 10-kb TERRA) and from 8 chromosome ends in which transcription started in close proximity to the telomere (referred here as 1-kb TERRA)13.
Here, we set out to study whether these subtelomeric transcripts have indeed TERRA features (see the rst section), and if so, to generate functional knock-outs by using the CRISPRCas9 technology. With this approach, we aimed to unravel the role of TERRA in human cells.
First, we studied the genetic structure of the different identied sequences by aligning them against two different human assemblies, the UCSC human browser GRch37/hg19 and the subtelomeric specic assembly14. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that 83.3% of these transcripts arise from DNA regions that are structurally conserved. Thus, the 10-kb TERRA loci contain three different conserved DNA elements, a repetitive region known as TAR1 (UCSC RepeatMasker track; Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0, http://www.Repeatmasker.Org
Web End =www.Repeatmasker.Org . 19962010) and two additional conserved DNA regions which encode for two long non-coding RNA families of pseudogenes derived from the primate genes WASH and DDX11 (refs 15,16), respectively (Fig. 1a). From now on, we will refer to these three conserved DNA regions as TAR1, WASH and DDX regions/loci, and to the transcripts arising from these regions as TAR1, WASH and DDX transcripts. The 1-kb TERRA contained only the TAR1 repetitive region (Fig. 1a). Surprisingly, the DDX region is transcribed in the opposite direction from what expected for a TERRA transcript15,16 (TERRA is transcribed from the subtelomere towards the telomere)1, thus suggesting that they are not likely to correspond to TERRA (Fig. 1b). Thus, transcripts arising from the subtelomeres of chromosomes 1p, 9p, 12p, 15q, 16p, 19p, Xq are unlikely to be bona de TERRAs.
Nevertheless, we designed RNA-FISH and northern blot probes against the transcripts arising from each of the DNA structurally conserved regions, TAR1, DDX and WASH (Fig. 1c) and compared their signals to that of a probe detecting the TERRAs-UUAGGG-tract, as it is the TERRA main feature (see the rst section). Sequence degeneration at subtelomeres allowed us to simultaneously detect transcripts arising from various subtelomeres (see probe specicity in Supplementary Tables 14). In double RNA-FISH experiments, we failed to see co-localization of sense (S) and antisense (AS) probes against TAR1, DDX and WASH RNAs with transcripts detected with the TERRAs-UUAGGG probe (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Sense and antisense probes were used since TAR1, DDX and WASH transcripts are not transcribed with the same orientation. Moreover, probes against TAR1 transcripts rendered a strong cytoplasmic signal, in contrast to the known nuclear localization of TERRA transcripts (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Of note, in the case of the DDX locus, whose transcripts are transcribed in the opposite direction than what is expected for a TERRA transcript, we failed to see co-localization with TERRA when using either the sense or the antisense DDX probes. As control, RNAse treatment erased all
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 ARTICLE
a
c
10 Kb TERRA
1 Kb TERRA
p-arm q-arm p-arm q-arm
TAR1 DDX WASH
Chr1
Chr12 Chr13
Chr15
Chr2 Chr5 Chr6 Chr9 Chr10
Chr16 Chr17
Chr19 Chr20 Chr21 Chr22
ChrX
TAR1
b
Chr. 9p
Probe TAR1 DDX WASH
IP
Input
Refseq
10 Kb TERRA
1 Kb TERRA
TAR1 probe
DDX probe
WASH probe
d
Chr17p
MERGE
Chr20q ChrXp
TERRA
MERGE
MERGE
100
% Colocalization of subtelomeric
transcripts foci with TERRA foci/nuclei
Nuclei: 117 Chr.X foci: 488
80
60
Nuclei: 119 Chr.20 foci: 1,387
40
Chr20q
TERRA
ChrXp
Chr17p
20
Nuclei: 97 Chr.17 foci: 100
0
20q Xp
17p : Chr
17p : Chr
100
% Colocalization of TERRA foci with
subtelomeric transcripts foci/nuclei
80
Nuclei: 117 TERRA foci: 767
20q Xp
Nuclei: 97 TERRA foci: 405
60
TERRA
Nuclei: 119 TERRA foci: 1,406
40
20
0
Figure 1 | Transcripts arising from the subtelomere of chromosomes 20q and Xp co-localize with TERRA. (a) Schematic of the three motifs in the structurally conserved TERRA loci proposed in Porro et al.,13, the repetitive region TAR1 and the two lncRNA families, DDX11L and WASH. (b) Example of the position of the probes against the structurally conserved motifs in the subtelomere of chromosome 9p. The alignment of the RNA-seq reads obtained in a TERRA-IP compared with the input13 and an annotated Ref seq in this region is also shown. (c) Schematic of the position of TERRA loci proposed in Porro et al.,13 within all chromosomes. The 10 kb TERRA is coloured in grey and the 1-kb TERRA with stripes. The position of the probes against TAR1, DDX11L and WASH is also indicated in different colours. (d) Confocal microscopy images of double RNA-FISH using probes targeting either subtelomere 20q, Xp or 17p transcripts (red) and TERRAs telomeric tract (green). The representative images are the merge of four individual confocal images. Co-localization events were only counted as positive when detected in the individual confocal images. Arrowheads indicate real co-localization events detected in the individual confocal images. (Top graph) The percentage of co-localization of either subtelomere 20q foci or subtelomere Xp foci with TERRA foci with respect the total number of 20q or Xp foci is represented (means.d., n number of nuclei). Total number of nuclei and foci are also indicated. (Bottom graph) The
percentage of co-localization of TERRA foci with either subtelomere 20q foci or subtelomere Xp foci with respect the total number of TERRA foci is also represented (means.d., n number of nuclei). Total number of nuclei and foci are also indicated. Scale bar, 10 mm.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534
these different RNA-FISH signals conrming the specicity of the different probes to defect RNA and not DNA (Supplementary Fig. 1B). By using the northern blot analysis, we conrmed that transcripts arising from the TAR1, DDX and WASH loci did not show the expected TERRA pattern (Supplementary Fig. 1C).
Furthermore, we did not detect any specic signal from the TAR1 probe, only the unspecic cross-hybridization with the 18S and 28S rRNAs (Supplementary Fig. 1C).
Next, we took advantage of the known effect of DNA methylation on regulating human TERRA levels to evaluate
a
b
n.s.
Chr. 20q
IP
Input
POL2A
CTCF
n.s.
*
***
***
Putative Promoter
180
Firefly/Renilla (a.u.)
Pr1 Pr2 Pr3 Pr4
S2 E1
gRNA
Gen. coord.
Gen. coord.
160
IP
Input
POL2A
CTCF
40
20
0
- p21 Pr1 Pr2 Pr3 Pr4
Chr. XpYp
HCT116
:Insert
n.s.
gRNA S2 E2
680
n.s.
***
***
*
Firefly/Renilla (a.u.)
660
640
60
40
20
c
0
Hela
d
- p21 Pr1 Pr2 Pr3 Pr4
U2OS
:Insert
WT 20q KO
100
% Viability of
homozygous clones
80
60
n= 6
40
n= 4
20
0
n= 4 n= 7 n= 2 n= 3
Hela HCT116 U2OS Hela HCT116 U2OS
20q Xp
e
Chr20q
Clone#:WT
CRISPR allele
WT allele
U2OS
ChrXp
WT
Clone#:
300 bp
100 bp
500 bp 500 bp
400 bp
300 bp
200 bp
500 bp
CRISPR allele
WT allele
U2OS
400 bp
200 bp
f
Locus 20q
CRISPR allele:
Clone C4
Clone A2 allele 1
Clone A2 allele 2
Clone B4 allele 1
Clone B4 allele 2
gRNA
End1
CAGGCTGGCGCGACGTGCGG CCCACCACCTTAGCGGATCA
CACCCCACGCCGGCGCGGGCACAGAGAGGCCCACCGCGCCGGCGCAGGCGCGCACAGGCTGGCGCGACGTGCGC//8.1KB//CCCACCACCTTAGCGGATCAAGGCACAGTAG
CACCCCACGCCGGCGCGGGCACAGAGAGGCCCACCGCGCCGGCGCAGGCGCGCACAGGCTGGCGCGACGTG---------8.1KB---------------TCAAGGCACAGTAG
CACCCCACGCCGGCGCGGGCACAGAGAG----ACCCCGCCGG--------------------------------------8.1KB----------------CAAGGCACAGTAG
CAC-----------------------------------------------------------------------------8.2KB------------------------AGTAG
CACCCCACGCCGGCGCGGGCACAGAGAGGCCCACCGCGCCGGCGCAGGCGCGCACAGGCTGGCGCGACGTGCGGGGGA-8.1KB------------------AGGCACAGTAG
CAC-----------------------------------------------------------------------------8.2KB------------------------AGTAG
gRNA Start2
WT allele:
Locus XP
CRISPR allele:
Clone D8
gRNA Start2
gRNA End2
TCCGAGTATGATATGGTGGC GGATGAAGCCGGTGTAGACC
TGGCCATGATTGTCCTTCCGAGTATGATATGGTGGC//9.5KB//TGATCCAGGATGAAGCTGTTGTAGACCGCC
TGGCCATGATTGTCCTTCCG---------------9.5KB---------------TGAAGCTGTTGTAGACCGCC
WT allele:
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 ARTICLE
TERRA features in WASH, TAR1 and DDX transcripts. In particular, DNA demethylating agents are known to increase human TERRA levels12. To this end, we studied TERRA levels in the HCT116, Hela and U2OS human cell lines before and after treatment with the demethylating agent 50 azacytidine (Aza), as well as in HCT116 cells double decient for DNMT1 and DNMT3b (double knockout, DKO cells) as a positive control17. In marked contrast to TERRA transcripts, which were upregulated on Aza treatment, we failed to see induction of DDX, WASH and TAR1 transcripts on Aza treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1C,D), indicating that they do not show the expected TERRA behaviour12.
As none of the transcripts arising from the DNA structurally conserved loci TAR1, DDX and WASH showed features of TERRA (see the rst section), we next studied the TERRA properties in the transcripts arising from the remaining non-conserved loci located at chromosomes 17p, 20q and Xp, which also showed read enrichment in the described TERRA-IP13. Interestingly, in double RNA-FISH experiments, we found co-localization of transcripts arising from 20q and Xp subtelomeres with TERRA transcripts (detected with a probe against TERRAs-UUAGGG), suggesting that they could correspond to genuine TERRA transcripts (Fig. 1d). In particular, B40% of signal spots from the 20q locus co-localized with TERRA signals, reaching 60% in the case of the Xp locus (Fig. 1d, top graph). From the total TERRA spots, 40% co-localized with spots from either 20q or Xp loci (Fig. 1d, bottom graph). Transcripts arising from the 17p locus, however, did not show co-localization with TERRA transcripts (Fig. 1d), thus ruling out that they contribute to TERRA. Note that the co-localizations were counted as positive only when detected in the individual confocal layers (see graphs). Apparent co-localizations between Chr17-RNAs and TERRA in the representative images of Fig. 1d were not counted, as they are the result of a visual effect of image superposition of individual confocal layers. Real co-localization events for Chr20q and
Xp-RNAs with TERRA are indicated with arrowheads and were detected in individual confocal layers (Fig. 1d). As control, RNAse treatment also erased these RNA-FISH signals, thus conrming the specicity of the different probes (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
Transcripts arising from the 20q locus are bona de TERRA. To further demonstrate that transcripts arising from 20q and Xp loci are genuine TERRA transcripts, we set to genetically delete the loci from which they are transcribed by using the CRISPRCas9 system in the HCT116, Hela and U2OS human cancer cell lines, as well as in the non-transformed IMR90 human broblast cell line. First, we performed a detailed transcriptional analysis of the regions to be deleted (Fig. 2a). Previously reported chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq data showed the presence of active RNA polymerase II and CTCF binding sites at both the 20q and Xp loci14. Thus, we assessed the presence of promoter activity in these regions by cloning different fragments upstream of the RNA-seq read enriched regions into promoter-free luciferase reporter vectors (Fig. 2a,b). We found a strong promoter activity for the 20q locus in the vicinity of the telomere (region Pr1) and to a lower extent in a region 4.7-kb away from the telomere (region Pr2) both in HCT116 and U2OS human cell lines (Fig. 2b). The p21 promoter was included as positive control (Fig. 2b). In the case of the Xp locus, we were unable to clone fragments of interest to assess its promoter activity owing to the highly repetitive content of this region. Collectively, these ndings conrm strong transcriptional activity within the 20q locus.
Next, in order to delete these putative TERRA loci, we designed guide RNA (gRNAs) for both loci. In particular, we set to delete a8.1-kb region in the 20q locus, which includes the promoter regions, and a 9.5-kb region in the Xp locus. Of note, these regions were the ones showing enrichment of RNA-seq reads in the previously described TERRA-IP13 (Fig. 2a). Using the online CRISPR designer tool18, two different gRNAs showing the lower off-target mutation score were selected for each of the aking regions (gRNA-start 1 and start 2 for the region closer to the telomere and gRNAs-end 1 and end 2 for the region more distal from the telomere) (Supplementary Table 5). We tested the best combination of gRNAs by transfecting two plasmids, each of them containing the Cas9 and the GPF reporter but a different gRNA each, corresponding to each of the anking regions (Supplementary Table 6). Two days post transfection, the presence of the deletion was studied by PCR using specic primers (Supplementary Table 7). For all the four human cell lines, we successfully detected different deletions of the 20q and Xp loci except for the Xp locus in HCT116 cells (Supplementary Fig. 2A). Next, we set up the conditions to select single clones with the deletion of interest. To this end, we transfected the most efcient combination of gRNAs for each anking region. Each gRNA was within a plasmid containing the Cas9 and a green
Table 1 | Number and percentage of clones obtained for each genotype on deletion of the 20q and Xp loci with the CRISPR-Cas9 system.
No. clones
No. /
(%)
No. /
(%)
No. /
(%)
20q
U2OS 55 7 (12.7) 11 (20) 37 (67.3)
HeLa 63 25 (39.8) 34 (53.9) 4 (6.3)HCT116 47 37 (78) 3 (6) 7 (16)
XpYp
U2OS 70 50 (71.4) 16 (22.9) 4 (5.70)
HeLa 49 42 (86.1) 5 (9.8) 2 (4.10)HCT116 32 22 (68.7) 0 (0) 10 (31.3)
Figure 2 | Deletion of the 20q-TERRA locus in different human cell lines using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. (a) Snapshot depicting, from top to bottom, putative promoter regions (Pr1, Pr2, Pr2 and Pr4), gRNA position, genomic coordinates, RNA-seq from TERRA IP and input13, and RNA polymerase 2A (POL2A) and CTCF ChIP-seq data. S2, E1, S2 and E2 are the names of the different gRNAs. (b) Graph shows the relative fold increase in rey luciferase activity seen in the pGL3-containing promoter regions (Pr1-4) relative to the empty vector after normalization to renilla activity. (Mean valuess.e.m., n 3 independent experiments). p21 promoter serves as positive control. One-way Anova with the Dunnetts post test was used for statistical analysis
(*Po0.05 and ***Po0.001). (c) Representative image of the HeLa clones homozygous for the 20q-TERRA deletion during expansion. Zoom areas are shown. Scale bar, 500 mm and (zoom) 250 mm. (d) Percentage of viability of the different homozygous clones for the 20q and Xp deletion on expansion of the three different cell lines. (e) Ethidium bromide gels showing the CRISPR allele for the deletion of the 20q and Xp loci detected by PCR in different clones of the U2OS cells. The white strips in the gels indicate the removal of irrelevant samples from that gel. (f) Schematic of the sequencing of the CRISPR allele for the deletion of the 20q (clones A2, B4 and C4) and Xp (clone D8) loci compared with the WT allele. Slashes (//) represent omitted DNA sequence. The size of the omitted sequence is shown. Dashes (-) represent the deleted sequence. The size of the deleted sequence is shown. gRNAs are shown in blue.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534
uorescent protein (GFP) reporter. Two days post transfection, the top 10% GFP brightest cells were sorted by ow cytometry and seeded into 96-wells plates (1, 3, 5 or 10 cells per well). Two weeks after wells were checked for clonal cell expansion, and only
those coming from single clones were genotyped by PCR (Supplementary Table 7). Clonal cell expansion was successful in all cell lines except for the non-transformed IMR90 broblasts (see the number and percentage of clones obtained for each
a b
Xp-KO 20q-KO Xp-KO
WT A2 B4 C4 D8
20q-KO
C4
WT D8
WT A2 4 g
B4
TERRA
18 S
2 g
4 g 2 g
6.0 Kb
ns
150
150
4.0 Kb
*
*
* *
**
n = 3
n = 3
3.0 Kb
TERRA
n = 2
% TERRA levels (a.u.)
(norm by 18 S)
% TERRA levels (a.u.)
(norm by 18S)
100
100
2.0 Kb
1.5 Kb
1.0 Kb
50
n = 2 n = 2
50
0.5 Kb
n = 2
0.2 Kb
0 WT A2 B4 C4
0 WT
D8
20q-KO
Xp-KO
18 S
c
20q-KO Xp-KO
A2 B4 C4 WT D8
WT
MERGE MERGE MERGE MERGE MERGE MERGE
TERRA TERRA TERRA TERRA TERRA
TERRA
d e
ns
* ***
n = 3 188 cells
WT D8
Xp-KO 20q-KO
40 **
n = 3 Nuc:193
n = 3 Nuc:188
***
n = 3 193 cells
550
TERRA No. spot per nucleus
100
n = 3 311 cells
n = 3 189 cells
n=3 230 cells
TERRA % spot intensity
per nucleus area
TERRA 20q transcripts (qPCR1)
(a.u.) (norm. by GAPDH)
500
30
**
ns ***
450
20
n = 3 311 cells
n = 3 230 cells
n = 3 189 cells
400
***
*
50
150
*****
n = 3
100
n = 3 206 cells
10
n = 3 206 cells
50
n = 3 n = 3 n = 3
20q-KO
n = 3
D8
Xp-KO
0 WT A2 B4 C4
0 WT A2 B4 C4 D8
Xp-KO
0 WT A2 B4 C4
20q-KO
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 ARTICLE
was also conrmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Fig. 3e;
Supplementary Table 8).
To ascertain whether the changes in TERRA levels and in the phenotype observed (see below) could be due to the presence of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target mutations, we performed TIDE (Tracking of Indels by DEcomposition) analysis for each of the gRNAs used to generate the 20q-deletion (named Start1 and End1). We selected for study the ve regions with the highest off-target mutation score but only the rst four could be studied because of the impossibility to amplify the fth region for each gRNA, probably owing to sequence differences between the U2OS genome and the human reference genome (GRCh38/hg38). The analysis was performed on DNA pools from either WT cells or cells bearing the 20q-deletion, named C3 (from which the clones A2, B4 and C4 were obtained). We did not nd off-target mutations for any of the gRNAs except for the gRNA END1/off-target3 (Supplementary Fig. 5A). To verify whether this off-target mutation was present in the 20q-KO clones A2, B4 and C4, we carried out TIDE analysis on DNA from these clones. The 20q-KO clone A2 was free of gRNA END1/off-target3 but the clones B4 and C4 revealed 37% presence of off-target mutations (Supplementary Fig. 5B). It is unlikely that this was a real off-target mutation (vs the result of poor quality sequencing) because:(i) if an off-target mutation was present in these clones the percentage of off-targets should be 50 or 100% owing to the clonality of the cells, and (ii) comparison with DNAs from cells untreated with CRISPR revealed a similar percentage of off-target mutations (Supplementary Fig. 5B). Nevertheless, to conrm absence of off-target mutations, we performed T7-endonuclease digestion on DNA PCR amplied from the region of interest in both non-CRISPR-treated cells and from the CRISPR 20q-KO pool and clones (pool C3 and clones A2, B4 and C4). As a positive control, we used two identical DNAs except for a C to G mutation (DNAs were named C and G). As expected, two digestion bands were seen in the C G digestion but no digested
bands were observed neither in the C C digestion nor in the
cells that underwent the CRISPR deletion of the 20q locus (pool C3 and clones A2, B4 and C4) (Supplementary Fig. 5C). This assay conrms the absence of off-target 3 in the 20q-KO clones treated with the END1 gRNA. Note that the sequence alignment for the START2/off-target2 and for the END1/off-target4 regions was poor due to technical problems during sequencing because of the presence of long tracks of C or G within the sequences of these regions (Supplementary Figure 5A). Although we did not nd off-targets mutations in the TIDE analysis of these regions, we further conrmed this nding with the T7-endonuclease assay (Supplementary Figure 5C).
Collectively, these data indicate that transcripts arising from the 20q locus are genuine human TERRA transcripts, which account for a large proportion of TERRA levels, while we failed to see TERRA downregulation when deleting the Xp locus. From now on we will refer to the 20q transcripts as 20q-TERRA transcripts.
Figure 3 | Deletion of the TERRA-20q locus dramatically affects TERRA expression. (a) RNA from the U2OS cells WT or from the three 20q-KO clones (A2, B4 and C4) and the Xp-KO (D8) clone was isolated and used for TERRA detection by RNA dot-blot with a probe against the TERRA-UUAGGG-tract; 18S serves as loading control. (Graph) TERRA quantication normalized by 18S (mean valuess.e.m.). (b) Northern blotting using 32P-dCTP-labelled probe against TERRA-UUAGGG-tract in the U2OS cells WT or KO for the 20q or Xp loci. 18S was included as a loading control. *Unspecic band due to cross-hybridization with rRNA 18S and 28S. (c) Representative confocal microscopy images of RNA-FISH against TERRA-UUAGGG-tract (green) in the U2OS cells WT and KO for the 20q (clones A2, B4 C4) and the Xp (clone D8) loci. Scale bar, 10 mm. (d) The graphs show (left) the quantication of the total spot intensity per nucleus normalized by nucleus area, (right) the total number of spots per nucleus in the three 20q-KO clones and in the Xp-KO clone D8 (mean valuess.e.m., n 3 independent experiments). (e) Detection of the 20q-TERRA transcripts by qPCR (primers were designed in the
subtelomeric region). The percentage of enrichment of the 20q-TERRA transcripts in WT and in the 20q-KO clones (clones A2, B4 and C4) and in the Xp-KO (clone D8) normalized by GAPDH is shown. One-way Anova with Dunnetts post test was used for the statistical analysis of the 20q clones and the Students t-test for the Xp clone (*Po0.05, **Po0.01 and ***Po0.001).
genotype in Table 1). We then set to expand clones homozygous for the 20q and Xp deletions from Hela, HCT116 and U2OS cell lines. During expansion of Hela clones with the 20q-deletion, three out of four homozygous clones developed intense vacuolization and died (Fig. 2c,d). The remaining homozygous clones bearing either the 20q or the Xp deletion from the three cell lines (Hela, HCT116 and U2OS), except for few U2OS clones (see below), either did not grow or were found to be heterozygous for the deletion on the re-genotyping performed after expansion (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig.3A). Thus, we were unable to isolate viable clones with deletions in either 20q or Xp in both Hela and HCT116 cell lines, indicative of strong lethality of the deletions (Fig. 2d). Only in the case of U2OS cells, we were able to expand three clones out of six bearing the 20q-deletion (only six clones were expanded from the original 37 KO clones obtained; Table 1) and one clone out of four with the Xp deletion, which were conrmed to be homozygous both by PCR and by Sanger sequencing (clones A2, B4 and C4 for the 20q locus and clone D8 for the Xp) (Fig. 2e,f). The smear observed in the detection of the CRISPR-Cas9 alleles in clones A2 and B4 can be resolved in two distinct bands (Supplementary Fig. 3B) and it is due to two different deletions in each of the alleles of these clones within the 20q locus (see sequences displayed in Fig. 2f). Interestingly, we observed that U2OS cells display higher basal levels of TERRA compared with Hela and HCT116 cells (Supplementary Fig. 1B,C), which may explain the differential effects of TERRA abrogation on cell viability of the three different human cell lines studied.
Next, we checked the expression of total TERRA levels by RNA dot-blot and northern blot in the individual clones deleted for the 20q and Xp loci. Deletion of the 20q locus resulted in a dramatic reduction in total TERRA levels in all three clones isolated from U2OS cells (see clones A2, B4 and C4 deleted for the 20q locus in Fig. 3a,b). In contrast, deletion of the Xp locus did not result in changes in total TERRA expression (Fig. 3a,b; Supplementary Fig. 4). The lack of TERRA downregulation as the result of the Xp deletion, may indicate that this is not a major locus for TERRA production in human cells. Alternatively, this may be related to the fact that the region deleted in the Xp locus was smaller than that deleted in the 20q locus, owing the impossibility to design gRNAs in the vicinity of the Xp telomere due to its highly repetitive nature.
Next, we conrmed TERRA downregulation owing to the deletion of the 20q locus but not of the Xp locus by several other independent techniques. In particular, RNA-FISH using probes that detect the TERRAs-UUAGGG-tract also demonstrated a dramatic decrease of the total TERRA spot intensity per nucleus in the 20q locus deleted clones but not in the Xp locus deleted one when compared with wild-type (WT) cells (in Fig. 3c,d, left graph). This was paralleled by a signicant decrease in TERRA spots per nucleus in the 20q locus deleted clones but not in the Xp deleted one (Fig. 3d, right graph). Downregulation of TERRA levels in the 20q-deleted clones but not in the Xp deleted clone,
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534
20q-TERRA locus deletion leads to loss of telomeric sequence. Identication of 20q as one of the major locus for human TERRA generation allows us to address the role of TERRA in telomere biology. Thus, we set to assess the impact of the 20q-TERRA locus deletion in telomere length and telomere protection. As shown in Fig. 4a, deletion of the 20q-TERRA locus resulted in a dramatic loss of telomeric sequences in all three clones (A2, B4
and C4) as seen by a signicant decrease in individual telomere uorescence intensity as determined by quantitative telomere FISH (Q-FISH) on single telomeres from metaphase spreads (see lack of detectable telomere signals in metaphasic chromosomes in Fig. 4a, and the dramatic change in the distribution of individual telomere signals), as well as by a signicant increase in the percentage of signal-free ends per metaphase and in the
20q-Ko
a
WT A2 B4 C4
Telomeres Telomeres Telomeres Telomeres
2
% Frequency
U2OS WTMean length: 16,014.3 (a.u.)
No. telomeres/metaphases:4,262/20
ns ***
1.5
1
20,000
n=20 Tel:4,262
* ***
**
30
**
n=20 Tel:2,957
Mean telomere length (a.u.)
0.5
15,000
0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000
n=20 Tel:2,957
% Ofshort telomeres
20
n=20 Tel:4,198 n=20
Tel:4,276
10,000
2
n=20 Tel:4,262
10
% Frequency
U2OS 20q-KO A2Mean length: 12,971.9 (a.u.) hases:4,198/20
1.5
5,000
1
0.5
0 WT A2 B4 C4
0 WT A2 B4 C4
0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000
20q-KO
20q-KO
*****
2
250 ***
n=20 Tel:8,119
% Frequency
U2OS 20q-KO B4Mean length: 13,397.1 (a.u.)
No. telomeres/metaphases:4,276/20
1.5
200
No. ofsignal free ends
per metaphase
1
0.5
150
100
0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000
n=20 Tel:5,555
2
50
1.5
% Frequency
(a.u.) hases:2,957/20
1
0 WT A2 B4 C4
0.5
20q-KO
0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000
b c
* **
No T-SCE
T-SCE
% OfT-SCE per chromosome
% Of telomere-containing double minute chromosomes per metaphase
4 n=30
*
8
* *
Merge
TelG
TelC
*
n=30
3
6
n=30 n=30 n=30
2
n=30 n=30 n=30
4
1
2
TDMs
0
0 WT A2 B4 C4
WT A2 B4 C4
20q-KO
20q-KO
8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 ARTICLE
percentage of short telomeres as determined by low telomere uorescence (short telomeres are considered those in the 10% percentile of the total telomere length distribution) (Fig. 4a and graphs). Given that U2OS cells lack telomerase activity and elongate telomeres via a telomerase-independent mechanism that relies on homologous recombination, the so-called ALT19,20, we set to address whether the dramatic telomere shortening induced by deletion of 20q-TERRA locus was accompanied by decreased recombination events between telomeres. To this end, we measured the rates of telomeric sister chromatid exchanges (T-SCE) by using chromosome orientation FISH or CO-FISH21. Although we found T-SCE events in all the 20q-TERRA KO U2OS clones, their frequency was signicantly decreased compared with the non-deleted U2OS controls (Fig. 4b). We also observed a signicant decrease in telomere-containing double minute chromosomes on 20q-TERRA deletion in all three clones, a chromosomal aberration also associated with ALT (Fig. 4c)22. These results are in line with the proposed role of TERRA in telomere recombination8,9. However, the extremely short telomeres present in 20q-TERRA deleted cells, even in the presence of low but detectable telomere recombination events, suggests a more general role for TERRA in the maintenance of proper telomere homoeostasis.
Next, we addressed the effects of TERRA deletion on telomere protection and chromosomal instability. First, we assessed telomere protection by determining the presence of either gH2AX or 53BP1
DNA damage foci at telomeres (the so-called telomere induced foci or TIFs). To this end, we performed double immunouorescence with either gH2AX or 53BP1 antibodies to detected DNA damage foci combined with TRF2 immunouorescence to detect telomeres. We found a signicant increase in total DNA damage as indicated by increased gH2AX and 53BP1 uorescence levels in all three clones except for the clone B4 in the case of 53BP1 (Fig. 5a, b). Interestingly, in all three clones and using both gH2AX and 53BP1, we found a signicant increase in telomere damage foci or TIFs compared with WT controls (Fig. 5c,d). Finally, in agreement with short telomeres and increased telomere damage, phenotypes that were particularly severe in clone C4, we also found signicantly increased end-to-end fusions in this clone (Fig. 5e). We further conrmed increased chromosomal instability in the 20q-TERRA KO C4 clone by comparative genome hybridization (CGH). We found dramatic genome reorganizations in the 20q-KO C4 cells compared with WT controls (Fig. 5f). In particular, we found chromosomal gains in chromosomes 7, 9, 14 and 19 along with large chromosomal losses in chromosomes 4, 6, 10, 15 and 21, including the complete loss of one of the arms in chromosomes 6 and 18, in the 20q-KO cells with respect WT cells. Some other smaller losses were also detected in chromosomes 3, 12, 18 and 19 (Fig. 5f). A complete list of the genomic coordinates of
the different chromosomal gains and losses can be found in Supplementary Table 9.
Finally, to ascertain whether TERRA deletion led to changes in the telomere binding proteins or shelterins, we determined the amounts of TRF1 and TRF2 telomere binding proteins at telomeres by either ChIP or immunouorescence (Supplementary Fig. 6A,B). We observed a reduced abundance of both TRF1 and TRF2 at telomeres by ChIP in all 20q-KO clones compared with WT controls, which was more dramatic in the C4 clone, in agreement with shorter telomeres and higher chromosomal instability in this clone (Supplementary Fig. 6A). The 20q-KO C4 clone also showed a signicant reduction in TRF1 and TRF2 uorescence (Supplementary Fig. 6B), in agreement with increased telomere damage and telomere aberrations23.
Transcript identity between 20q-TERRA- and Xp-RNAs. Given the fact that we observed co-localization of the transcripts arising from the Xp locus with TERRA, we next tested the possibility of sequence similarities between the 20q-TERRA transcripts and those arising from the Xp locus. To that end, we use the RNA-seq data from Porro et al.,13 to generate modelled-transcripts (see Methods section) for the 20q and Xp loci (Supplementary Fig. 7). We next performed pairwise alignments between the modelled-transcripts from each locus to calculate the percentage of identity between them (Supplementary Fig. 7; Supplementary Table 10). By doing this, we found 5080% identity between some of the 20q and Xp modelled-transcripts (Supplementary Table 10). However, we cannot rule out that this transcript similarity is due to either the small transcript size or to the presence of repeats within the sequence of the modelled-transcripts (there are multiple annotated repeats within the transcribing regions of the modelled-transcripts showing higher identity) or to both (Supplementary Table 11). To counteract the transcript size effect, we bioinformatically generated one single-transcript for each of the 20q and Xp regions that encompasses all the previously modelled-transcripts for each region (see above and Supplementary Table 12). Next, we performed pairwise comparison between the single-transcripts corresponding to each region. As expected, the percentage of identity between the 20q and Xp single-transcripts decreased to o40%, thus conrming the dependency of the sequence identity with the transcript size (Supplementary Fig. 7D).
We also found that transcripts arising from the Xp locus are more abundant than those arising from the 20q-TERRA locus (Supplementary Fig. 8A). Interestingly, the transcripts arising from the 20q locus were dramatically increased on deletion of the Xp locus as determined with three different pairs of primers designed within the 20q locus (Supplementary Fig. 8B). This
Figure 4 | Deletion of the 20q-TERRA locus decreases telomere length and protection in U2OS cells. (a) Q-FISH images obtained from metaphases spreads from U2OS cells WT and KO for the Chr20q-TERRA locus (clones A4, B4 and C4). (Left graphs) Frequency graphs of telomere length (a.u.) distribution measured in WT and in the 20q-KO cells (clones A4, B4 and C4) from three independent experiments. The mean telomere length and the number of telomeres and metaphases analyzed is shown. The red lines are arbitrary lines placed in the exact same position in each frequency graph to visualize differences between the 20q-KO clones and the WTcontrols (right graphs) The mean telomere length, the percentage of short telomeres and the quantication of signal-free ends per metaphase are also represented. Short telomeres are considered those in the 10% percentile of the total telomere length distribution. Total number of metaphases used for the statistical analysis is indicated. Scale bar, 10 mm and (zoom) 1 mm. (b) WT and 20q-KO cells were analyzed for T-SCE events with G-rich (green) and C-rich (red) PNA probes. The fraction of chromosome ends with T-SCE obtained from three different experiments was quantied and graphed as the mean valuess.e.m., n 30 metaphases. The number of metaphases analyzed is shown. Only
events in which interchange of both colours were quantied (see examples of no-T-SCE and T-SCE). The quantication was carried out by counting the number of events in the same chromosome or in different chromosomes and then normalizing it by the total number of chromosomes observed in each metaphase. Scale bar, 1 mm. (c) Quantication of DNA-containing double minute chromosomes (TDMs) in WT and 20q-KO cells from three different experiments (mean valuess.e.m., n 30 metaphases). An example of TDMs is shown. One-way Anova with Dunnetts post test was used for all
statistical analysis (*Po0.05, **Po0.01 and ***Po0.001). Scale bar, 1 mm.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 9
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534
nding is consistent with a compensation by the 20q-TERRA transcripts on deletion of the Xp locus explaining the absence of effects on total TERRA levels on deletion of the Xp locus (Fig. 3a,b). Deletion of the 20q locus also increased the Xp
transcripts, mainly in the region in which the Xp deletion was generated (primer Xp/qPCR2) but not in the Xp region that was not deleted (primer Xp/qPCR1) (Supplementary Fig. 8B). Although these ndings suggest a direct inuence of the
a b
*** ****
***
ns ***
20
188 cells 125 cells
120 cells
87 cells
15
H2AX intensity per nucleus area (a.u.)
53BP1 spot intensity
per nucleus area (a.u.)
15
10
10
5
5
0 WT A2 B4 C4
20q-KO
0 WT A2 B4 C4
20q-KO
c d
20q-Ko
WT
A2 B4 C4
MERGE
-H2AX -H2AX -H2AX -H2AX
TRF2
MERGE
MERGE
MERGE
*****
***
9
n=3 136 cells
TRF2-H2AX TIF per cell
n=3 216 cels
n=3 144 cells
6
3
n=3 254 cells
TRF2
TRF2
TRF2
0 WT A2 B4 C4
20q-KO
D
20q-Ko
WT
A2 B4 C4
MERGE
53BP1
MERGE
53BP1
MERGE
53BP1
MERGE
53BP1
1.5
******
***
95 cells
TRF2-53BP1 TIF per cell
114 cells
101 cells
1
0.5
126 cells
TRF2
TRF2
TRF2
TRF2
0 WT A2 B4 C4
20q-KO
e f
***
2.0
Chromosome fusions
per metaphase
1.5
1.0
0.5
n=36 met
n=28 met
0 WT
20qKO (C4)
Chromosome-type end-to-end fusions
Gain in TERRA-20q KO vs WT
Loss in TERRA-20q KO vs WT
10 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 ARTICLE
homozygous clones for the 20q-deletion in three independent human cell lines (Hela, HCT116 and U2OS) suggests an essential role of TERRA for cell survival in the majority of cell lines studied here. Only the U2OS cell line, which expresses higher basal levels of TERRA (this paper; refs 7,8), could bear the 20q-deletion suggesting that the cell needs to maintain a minimum amount of TERRA levels to survive. Importantly, we found a dramatic loss of telomeric sequences in U2OS cells on deletion of the 20q-TERRA locus, indicating that TERRA is essential for telomere maintenance. This dramatic telomere shortening was accompanied by telomere uncapping as indicated by increased telomeric damage and increased telomere fusions. Interestingly, U2OS cells are known to maintain telomeres by homologous recombination, a process in which TERRA has been suggested to participate79. In line with this, we found detectable but signicantly decreased telomere recombination frequencies as indicated by T-SCE frequency. Together, these results indicate an essential role for TERRA in cellular viability and in the maintenance of telomeres, even in cells that maintain telomeres by recombination.
Interestingly, deletions and amplications of the 20q subtelomere have been found in patients with different types of hematopoietic malignancies and with mental retardation2427.Although some of these deletions also include coding genes, it is tempting to speculate a specic role of the 20q-TERRA on these malignancies. Finally, the nding of the human 20q-TERRA locus described here warrants future studies to analyze of a possible association of 20q-TERRA to these and other human diseases.
Methods
Cells and treatments and transfection. Human HCT116, HeLa, U2OS (ATCC) and HCT116 DKO17 were cultured according to the ATCCs recommendations. 50 Azacytidine treatment was performed at 1 mM for 3 days. Plasmids were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Scientic) except for the IMR90 cell line that was electroporated using the Neon Transfection System (Invitrogen), in both cases following the manufacturers protocol.
RNA-deep sequencing alignment. Raw data from RNA-seq sampleswas downloaded from GEO (GSE56727) and analyzed with the nextpresso pipeline, as follows: sequencing quality was checked with FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
Web End =http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Due to a decrease in nucleotide quality at the end of the reads across the samples, the last 31 nucleotides were trimmed. Reads were then aligned to the human genome (GRCh37/hg19) with TopHat-2.0.10 (ref. 28), using Bowtie 1.0.0 (ref. 29) and Samtools 0.1.19 (ref. 30), allowing 4 mismatches and 5 multihits. In a similar way, reads were aligned to the human subtelomeric reference sequences downloaded from the H.C. Riethman lab web page (http://www.wistar.org/lab/harold-c-riethman-phd/page/subtelomere-assemblies
Web End =http://www.wistar.org/lab/harold-c-riethman-phd/page/ http://www.wistar.org/lab/harold-c-riethman-phd/page/subtelomere-assemblies
Web End =subtelomere-assemblies ).
RNA-FISH. Cells grown on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips (Becton Dickinson) were placed in cytobuffer (100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM pipes pH 6.8) for 30 s, washed in cytobuffer with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 s, washed in cytobuffer for 30 s and then xed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were dehydrated in 70, 80, 95 and 100% ethanol, air dried and hybridized overnight at 50 C with RNA probes in
Figure 5 | Deletion of the 20q-TERRA locus decreases telomere protection in U2OS cells. (a) Quantication of the total gH2AX signal per nucleus (mean valuess.e.m., n number of cells) is shown. The total number of cells analyzed is indicated. (b) Quantication of the total 53BP1 spot signal per
nucleus (mean valuess.e.m., n number of cells is shown). The total number of cells analyzed is indicated. (c) Graphs showing the quantication of the
co-localization (TIF) between TRF2 and either gH2AX or 53BP1 in WTcells and in all 20q-KO clones (mean valuess.e.m., n 3 independent experiments
for gH2AX and n number of cells for 53BP1) per cell is shown. The total number of nuclei analyzed is indicated. (d) Representative images of the average
number of TIFs found on double inmunostain to detect the telomere protein TRF2 (green) and either the DNA damage markers phospho-Histone gH2AX or 53BP1 (red) in the U2OS cells WT or deleted for the 20q locus. Arrowheads indicate co-localization events. Scale bar, 10 mm. (e) Quantication of chromosomal end-to-end fusions in WTand in the 20q-KO cells from three independent experiments (mean valuess.e.m., n metaphases). Examples of
end-to-end fusions are shown as well. Scale bar, 1 mm. (f) Array-CGH analysis was performed on hybridization on the same membrane of DNA differentially labelled from WT and 20q-KO cells. The chromosomal gains and losses in 20q-KO cells normalized by WT cells are represented. The chromosomal gains are shown in green and in red the chromosomal losses. One-way Anova with Dunnetts post test was used for all statistical analysis except for the quantication of chromosomal fusions in which the Students t-test was used (*Po0.05, **Po0.01 and ***Po0.001).
transcription of the 20q-TERRA locus on the Xp locus and vice versa, with the current Xp CRISPR deletion in the clone D8 we cannot conclude that the transcripts arising from the Xp locus are genuine TERRA transcripts. Additional studies will be needed to understand whether the transcripts arising from the Xp contribute to TERRA.
DiscussionHere, we identied a major locus for human TERRA transcription at the subtelomere of the chromosome 20q. The genetic deletion of this locus allowed us to demonstrate for the rst time in any organism the essential role of TERRA in the maintenance of functional telomeres.
In a previous report, eighteen different human subtelomeres were proposed to contain TERRA loci, although the authors did not study whether these transcripts had indeed TERRA features13. Here, we found that only two out of the eighteen loci have TERRA features, in particular, those corresponding to 20q and Xp subtelomeres. Furthermore, on genetic deletion of these loci by using CRISPR-Cas9, only the 20q locus was conrmed to be a bona de TERRA locus since it resulted in almost complete abrogation of TERRA expression. Failure to decrease TERRA levels on Xp deletion may be explained by the impossibility to delete the entire Xp locus due to the highly repetitive nature of this region, or may indicate that this is not a bona de TERRA locus. Alternatively, our nding that 20q-TERRAs are increased on deletion of the Xp locus, may also explain the fact that Xp deletion did not result in decreased TERRA levels. In any case, the fact that deletion of the 20q locus results in dramatically reduced TERRA levels demonstrates that this locus is a major TERRA locus in human cells.
Interestingly, the nding of one (or two at most) TERRA locus in human cells resembles the situation recently described by us in the case of mouse TERRA3. In particular, by using a similar approach to that used in humans (RNA-seq following UUAGGG-transcript enrichment), we identied mouse transcripts arising from thirteen different chromosome ends but only those transcribed from the subtelomere of chromosome 18 and 9 were conrmed to be bona de TERRA transcripts, being the chromosome 18 locus responsible for the majority of TERRA transcripts3. Thus, both in human and mouse, TERRAs are transcribed from one or two subtelomeres, a nding that was not anticipated since it was widely accepted that TERRA were arising from all chromosome ends. It remains to be deciphered whether TERRA transcripts play different roles depending on the locus of origin.
Importantly, here we describe the rst genetic deletion of TERRA performed in any organism. The ndings are striking as they clearly demonstrate an essential role of TERRA in cellular viability as well as in telomere maintenance and telomere capping. In particular, the impossibility to expand most of the
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 11
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534
hybridization buffer (2 sodium saline citrate (SSC)/50% formamide). Coverslips
were washed two times for 15 min in hybridization buffer at 53 C, two times for 10 min in 2 SSC at 53 C, 10 min in 1 SSC at 53 C, 5 min in 4 SSC at room
temperature, 5 min in 4 SSC containing 0.1% Tween-20 and DAPI (Molecular
Probes) at room temperature and 5 min in 4 SSC at room temperature. Signals
were visualized in a confocal ultraspectral microscope SP5-WLL (Leica). TERRA signal was quantied using the Deniens Developer XD.2 software RNA-FISH probes were generated from PCR products by in vitro transcription (Ambion) using Cy3-labelled CTP (Amersham); primers available in SupplementaryTable 13. Quantication of the percentage of co-localization in double RNA-FISH was done by counting the average number of co-localization events detected in the individual confocal layers with respect to the total number of foci per nucleus arising from the RNA to be quantied. The percentage of co-localization was then represented (Fig. 1d).
Northern blot and dot-blot. Northern blot and dot-blot analyses were performed using standard protocols. TERRA probe was obtained from a 1.6-kb (TTAGGG)n cDNA insert excised from pNYH3 (kind gift from T. de Lange, Rockefeller University, NY, USA). Northern was normalized using 18S probes and quantied using ImageJ. Probes against subtelomere transcripts were prepared from PCR products from total cDNA (see primers used in Supplementary Table 13). The probes were labelled using the commercial Random Prime Labelling System Rediprime II (Amersham).
Plasmids and reporter assays. For construction of the reporter plasmid, PCR products were prepared with primers spanning the promoter regions of interest (Supplementary Table 14) and cloned into the plasmid pGL3-basic (Promega). Firey and Renilla Luciferase activities were measured in cells harvested 2 days after transfection with the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega), following the manufacturers instructions.
Generation of TERRA KO clones using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. The sequence for each gRNA (Supplementary Table 5) were obtained using a online CRISPR Design Tool18 and those with the best score for ruling out off-target mutations were chosen. Each gRNA was cloned into the plasmid pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP (PX458) (Gift from Feng Zhang) (Addgene plasmid #48138) using the protocol described in Hsu et al.,18. Cells were transiently co-transfected with two of this plasmid containing each one the Cas9 and a specic gRNA. Single cell clones were obtaining by sorting. To this end, two days after transfection cell were trypsinized and washed with dPBS, 1, 3, 5 or 10 cells of the 10% GFP brightest ones were sorted using the FACS ARIA IIU (Becton Dickinson) into 96-wells plates. Two weeks later, wells were checked for monoclonal cell expansion and that cells were genotyped by PCR. Homozygous monoclonal cell lines were expanded. PCR primer can be found in Supplementary Table 7.
PCR and Sanger sequencing. For sequencing, samples were amplied using the GoTaq polymerase (Promega) and cloned into the commercial plasmid pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen) following the manufacturers instructions. Samples were sequences using the Sanger-style BigDye terminator chemistry on an ABI 3730 l
sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Telomere QFISH and chromosomal aberrations on metaphases. Colcemide (Gibco) was added to cells at a concentration of 0.1 mg ml 1 during 4 h. After hypotonic swelling in 0.03 M sodium citrate for 25 min at 37 C, cells were xed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1). After 23 xative changes, the cell suspension was dropped onto clean, wet microscope slides and dried overnight. Then, slides were washed with PBS and xed for 2 min in 4% formaldehyde. Slides were washed three more times with PBS and treated with pepsin (1 mg ml 1, pH 2) at 37 C for10 min. Formaldehyde xation and washing steps were repeated, then slides were incubated in 0.4 M HCl for 10 min, rinsed in PBS, dehydrated in an ethanol series (70, 90 and 100%) and air dried. The Cy-3-labelled (CCCTAA)3 PNA probe (Panagene) was dissolved in hybridization buffer containing 70% formamide/10 mM Tris pH 7 and 0.25% (w/v) blocking reagent (0.5 mg ml 1) (Roche). The hybridization mixture was placed onto the slides and a coverslip was applied, followed by DNA denaturation (3 min, 80 C). After hybridization (2 h, room temperature), slides were washed twice with 70% formamide/10 mM Tris pH 7.2 for 15 min, followed by a 5 min washing in 0.05 M Tris/0.15 M NaCl pH 7.5/0.05% Tween-20. Slides were dehydrated in an ethanol series and air dried. Finally, slides were counterstained with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). The cut-off used in the determination of the percentage of short telomeres was determined by averaging the results obtained after subtracting the 10% percentile from the mean telomere length value in the WT condition. For analysis of chromosomal aberrations, metaphases were analyzed by superimposing the telomere image on the DAPI image using TFL-telo.
Immunouorescence. Cells grown on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips (Becton Dickinson) were placed in cytobuffer (100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM pipes pH 6.8) for 30 s, washed in cytobuffer with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 s, washed in cytobuffer for 30 s for and then xed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cells were blocked with 100% FBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were incubated with primary antibody dissolved in Dako antibody Diluent (Dako) overnight in a humid chamber at 4 C. Next day, coverslips were washed 3 times for 30 min in 1 PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20.
Cells were incubated with Alexa secondary antibody (Life Technologies, A11017) dissolved in Dako antibody Diluent (Dako) for 1 h in a humid chamber at room temperature. Cells were washed three times for 30 min in 1 PBS. Samples were
mounted in Prolong with Dapi (Invitrogen). Signals were visualized in a confocal ultraespectral microscope SP5-WLL (Leica). The following antibodies were used: anti-phospho-Histone gH2AX (05-636, Millipore) diluted 1:200, anti-53BP1 (NB-100-304, Novus) diluted 1:200, anti-TRF1 (TRF78, Abcam) diluted 1:200 and anti-TRF2 (clone 4A794, Millipore) diluted 1:200.
CGH array. Oligo array-CGH analysis was performed using an Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH 60 K microarray (AMADID 021924 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) spanning the entire human genome at a median resolution of 41 kb. Totally, 500 ng of genomic DNA from the 20q-KO and WT cells were differentially labelled by random priming with Cy5-dCTP and Cy3-dCTP. The hybridization was carried out according to the manufacturers protocol. Arrays were scanned using an Agilent DNA Microarray scanner G2565CA (Agilent Technologies). Microarray data were extracted and visualized using Feature Extraction software v10.7 and Agilent Genomic Workbench (AGW) software v7.0 (Agilent Technologies). Copy number altered regions were detected using the Aberration Detection Method 2 (ADM-2) algorithm set as 6, with a minimum number of three consecutive probes.
Chromosome orientation FISH (CO-FISH). Exponentially growing cells were sub-cultured in the presence of 50-bromo-20-deoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma) at a nal concentration of 1 10 5 M, and then allowed to replicate their DNA once at
37 C for 24 h. Colcemide (Gibco) was added at a concentration of 0.1 mg ml 1 during the last 4 h. Cells were then recovered and metaphases prepared (see
Q-FISH methods). The slides were treated with 0.5 mg ml 1 RNase A for 10 min at 37 C, stained with 0.5 mg ml 1 Hoechst 33258 (Sigma) in 2 SSC (0.3 M NaCl,
0.03 M sodium citrate) for 15 min at room temperature and then exposed to365 nm UV light (Stratalinker 1800 UV irradiator) for 2530 min. Enzymatic digestion of the BrdU/BrdC-substituted DNA strands with 3 U ml 1 of Exonuclease III (Promega) in buffer supplied by the manufacturer (50 mM TrisHCl,5 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM dithiothreitol, pH 8) was allowed to proceed for 10 min at room temperature. An additional denaturation in 70% formamide, 2 SSC at
70 C for 1 min was performed in order to ensure complete removal of the newly replicated bromo-substituted strands and followed by dehydration in a cold ethanol series (70, 85, 100%). A hybridization mixture containing 0.4 mg ml 1 of CY3-labelled PNA probe against the telomeric lagging strand (Panagene) in 30%
formamide and 2 SSC was applied to slides. Following 4 h of hybridization in a
moist chamber at 37 C, the slides were washed 5 times for 15 min each in 2 SSC
at 42 C. The same hybridization step was performed with a hybridization mixture containing 0.4 mg ml 1 of Fluoresceine-labelled PNA probe against the telomeric leading strand (Panagene). Finally, slides were counterstained with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). T-SCE events were counted when interchange of both probes was seen.
Bioinformatic analysis of the probe specicity. The bioinformatic prediction of the regions amplied by the different primers to generate the probes was calculated using the in silico PCR tool from the UCSC human genome browser GRCh38/ hg38. The homology of the best amplicon for each pair of primers was calculated using the NCBI nucleotide BLAST aligning the sequence of the rst 15-kb from each subtelomere sequence obtained from the subtelomeric browser from Stong et al.,14 against all the possible amplicons sequence.
Transcript identity studies. Reads from RNA-seq samples13 were aligned to the human subtelomeric reference sequences downloaded from the H.C. Riethman lab web page (http://www.wistar.org/lab/harold-c-riethman-phd/page/subtelomere-assemblies
Web End =http://www.wistar.org/lab/harold-c-riethman-phd/page/subtelomere- http://www.wistar.org/lab/harold-c-riethman-phd/page/subtelomere-assemblies
Web End =assemblies ). To study transcript identity, alignments were used to obtain transcripts modelled by Cufinks inside the chr.20q and chr.Xp subtelomeric regions of interest (corresponding to the regions to be deleted with CRISPR/Cas9) and their FASTA sequences retrieved. A one-exon transcript was generated that spans all the different transcripts modelled by Cufinks for each of the conditions. Next, we performed pairwise alignments among them, using either the Emboss Emboss Water tool or the Emboss Needle tool32, to calculate the local or global sequence identity, respectively. Local comparison was performed for the modelled-transcripts and global comparison for the one-exon transcripts.
Off-target mutation analysis. DNA regions bearing predicted off-target mutations were amplied by PCR (see primers in Supplementary Table 15) and TIDE analysis32. DNA from cells that were not transfected with CRISPR-Cas9 was used as reference. T7-endonuclease assay was performed as follows: a DNA
12 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 ARTICLE
heteroduplex formation was perfomed in a 20 ml reaction containing 300 ng of DNA and 2 ml of buffer 2 (NEB). The conditions for the reaction of the DNA heteroduplex formation are indicated in Ran et al.32. On DNA heteroduplex formation, digestion was performed with 2 ml of endonuclease T7 (NEB) for 30 min at 37 C. The digestion was stopped with EDTA and the DNA products visualized in 2% agarose (Nusieve) gels.
Raw gels and blots. Full gels and blots from the main gures can be found in
Supplementary Figure 9.
Data availability. Raw data from RNA-seq samples was downloaded from GEO (GSE56727). All relevant data are available from the authors.
References
1. Azzalin, C. M., Reichenbach, P., Khoriauli, L., Giulotto, E. & Lingner, J. Telomeric repeat containing RNA and RNA surveillance factors at mammalian chromosome ends. Science 318, 798801 (2007).
2. Schoeftner, S. & Blasco, M. A. Developmentally regulated transcription of mammalian telomeres by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 228236 (2008).
3. Lopez de Silanes, I. et al. Identication of TERRA locus unveils a telomere protection role through association to nearly all chromosomes. Nat. Commun. 5, 4723 (2014).
4. Deng, Z., Norseen, J., Wiedmer, A., Riethman, H. & Lieberman, P. M. TERRA RNA binding to TRF2 facilitates heterochromatin formation and ORC recruitment at telomeres. Mol. Cell 35, 403413 (2009).
5. Lopez de Silanes, I., Stagno dAlcontres, M. & Blasco, M. A. TERRA transcripts are bound by a complex array of RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Commun. 1, 33 (2010).
6. Flynn, R. L. et al. TERRA and hnRNPA1 orchestrate an RPA-to-POT1 switch on telomeric single-stranded DNA. Nature 471, 532536 (2011).
7. Flynn, R. L. et al. Alternative lengthening of telomeres renders cancer cells hypersensitive to ATR inhibitors. Science 347, 273277 (2015).
8. Arora, R. et al. RNaseH1 regulates TERRA-telomeric DNA hybrids and telomere maintenance in ALT tumour cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5220 (2014).
9. Balk, B. et al. Telomeric RNADNA hybrids affect telomere-length dynamics and senescence. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 11991205 (2013).
10. Redon, S., Reichenbach, P. & Lingner, J. The non-coding RNA TERRA is a natural ligand and direct inhibitor of human telomerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 57975806 (2010).
11. Cusanelli, E., Romero, C. A. & Chartrand, P. Telomeric noncoding RNA TERRA is induced by telomere shortening to nucleate telomerase molecules at short telomeres. Mol. Cell 51, 780791 (2013).
12. Nergadze, S. G. et al. CpG-island promoters drive transcription of human telomeres. RNA 15, 21862194 (2009).
13. Porro, A. et al. Functional characterization of the TERRA transcriptome at damaged telomeres. Nat. Commun. 5, 5379 (2014).
14. Stong, N. et al. Subtelomeric CTCF and cohesin binding site organization using improved subtelomere assemblies and a novel annotation pipeline. Genome Res. 24, 10391050 (2014).
15. Costa, V. et al. DDX11L: a novel transcript family emerging from human subtelomeric regions. BMC Genomics 10, 250 (2009).
16. Linardopoulou, E. V. et al. Human subtelomeric WASH genes encode a new subclass of the WASP family. PLoS Genet. 3, e237 (2007).
17. Rhee, I. et al. DNMT1 and DNMT3b cooperate to silence genes in human cancer cells. Nature 416, 552556 (2002).
18. Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specicity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827832 (2013).
19. Conomos, D., Pickett, H. A. & Reddel, R. R. Alternative lengthening of telomeres: remodeling the telomere architecture. Front. Oncol. 3, 27 (2013).
20. Draskovic, I. & Londono Vallejo, A. Telomere recombination and alternative telomere lengthening mechanisms. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 18, 120 (2013).
21. Bailey, S. M., Brenneman, M. A. & Goodwin, E. H. Frequent recombination in telomeric DNA may extend the proliferative life of telomerase-negative cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 37433751 (2004).
22. Zhu, X. D. et al. ERCC1/XPF removes the 30 overhang from uncapped telomeres and represses formation of telomeric DNA-containing double minute chromosomes. Mol. Cell 12, 14891498 (2003).
23. Bandaria, J. N., Qin, P., Berk, V., Chu, S. & Yildiz, A. Shelterin protects chromosome ends by compacting telomeric chromatin. Cell 164, 735746 (2016).
24. Courtens, W. et al. A de novo subtelomeric monosomy 11q (11q24.2-qter) and trisomy 20q (20q13.3-qter) in a girl with ndings compatible with Jacobsen syndrome: case report and review. Clin. Dysmorphol. 16, 231239 (2007).
25. Gray, B. A., Corneld, D., Bent-Williams, A. & Zori, R. T. Translocation (X;20)(q13.1;q13.3) as a primary chromosomal nding in two patients with myelocytic disorders. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 141, 169174 (2003).
26. Kroep, T., Petek, E., Schwarzbraun, T., Kroisel, P. M. & Plecko, B. Mental retardation in a girl with a subtelomeric deletion on chromosome 20q and complete deletion of the myelin transcription factor 1 gene (MYT1). Clin. Genet. 73, 492495 (2008).
27. Okada, M. et al. Microarray CGH analyses of chromosomal 20q deletions in patients with hematopoietic malignancies. Cancer Genet. 205, 1824 (2012).
28. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562578 (2012).
29. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efcient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
30. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 20782079 (2009).
31. Li, W. et al. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W580W584 (2015).
32. Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 22812308 (2013).
33. Llanos, S., Efeyan, A., Monsech, J., Dominguez, O. & Serrano, M. A high-throughput loss-of-function screening identies novel p53 regulators. Cell Cycle 5, 18801885 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to R. Torres and S. Rodriguez for advice in the CRISPR-Cas9 technology
and helpful discussions. We thank D. Megas for the quantication of confocal image
signals and to O. Dominguez for troubleshooting with cloning and sequencing. We thank
S. Llanos for the p21 promoter reporter (described in ref. 33). Research in the Blasco lab
is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Project (SAF2013-
45111-R), the Madrid Regional Government Project S2010/BMD-2303 (ReCaRe),
Fundacin Botn (Spain) and AXA Research Fund (AXA 2011, Spain).
Author contributions
M.A.B. conceived the original idea. J.J.M. and I.L.d.S. conducted and analyzed the
experiments and O.G. did the bioinformatic analysis. M.A.B., J.J.M and I.L.d.S. designed
the experiments. M.A.B and I.L.d.S. wrote the manuscript.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/
http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interest.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/
http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Montero, J.J. et al. Telomeric RNAs are essential to maintain
telomeres. Nat. Commun. 7:12534 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12534 (2016).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise
in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license,
users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material.
To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
r The Author(s) 2016
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12534 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12534 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 13
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2016
Abstract
Telomeres are transcribed generating long non-coding RNAs known as TERRA. Deciphering the role of TERRA has been one of the unsolved issues of telomere biology in the past decade. This has been, in part, due to lack of knowledge on the TERRA loci, thus preventing functional genetic studies. Here, we describe that long non-coding RNAs with TERRA features are transcribed from the human 20q and Xp subtelomeres. Deletion of the 20q locus by using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology causes a dramatic decrease in TERRA levels, while deletion of the Xp locus does not result in decreased TERRA levels. Strikingly, 20q-TERRA ablation leads to dramatic loss of telomere sequences and the induction of a massive DNA damage response. These findings identify chromosome 20q as a main TERRA locus in human cells and represent the first demonstration in any organism of the essential role of TERRA in the maintenance of telomeres.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer