It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Social media have been praised as an expedient resource for individuals to rapidly circulate information across networks, and thus circumvent traditional, mass media control of information flow. However, scholars continue to argue the merits of social media and how much power should be attributed to it. In light of this power dynamic debate, I investigate how social media, as "online tools", are used to mobilize individuals into "offline action"—and what influences its effectiveness. ("Offline action" I define broadly as a physical activity in support of a political cause.) I selected two case studies that illustrate two different examples of political movement in America, to see how social media's ability to mobilize depends on the context in which it is used. Specifically, I selected a presidential campaign, and an ongoing protest movement. Presidential campaigns are highly structured movements run by individuals already in positions of power. Presidential campaigns possess a single leader, specific calls to action from that leader, and a finite timeframe for action. Presidential campaigns are largely founded on traditional top-down flows of information: from the leader to the citizens. Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign has been credited with successful leveraging of social media. My analysis of his campaign shows how social media's network reach was effectively exploited to acquire a large volume of donations and votes. (Glimpsing at social media's role in governance, I also analyze Obama's social media use as president, revealing social media's contextual limitations.) Protest movements challenge those in power, relying on bottom-up flow of information: demands from the citizens to the leader(s). Unlike presidential campaigns, protests can be more loosely organized: they can have multiple leaders, varying calls to action, and undetermined timeframes. The Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement is such an example: a leaderless movement with various demands and widespread participants. Social media have played a critical role for OWS by spreading critical information online, coordinating crowds offline, and maintaining momentum as traditional media coverage wanes. My research has shown that—in both election and protest contexts—social media can provide individuals important political content online, and inspire those individuals into offline action. This is achieved through social media's network architecture, integration of multimedia (i.e., text, images, and video), and circumvention of traditional media outlets.
America, Barack Obama, Occupy Wall Street, politics, social media
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer