It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Land use without adequate soil erosion control measures is continuously increasing the risk of soil erosion by water mainly in developing tropical countries. These countries are prone to environmental disturbance due to high population growth and high rainfall intensity. The aim of this study is to assess the state of soil erosion by water in Uganda at national and district levels, for various land cover and land use (LCLU) types, in protected areas as well to predict the impact of support practices on soil loss reduction. Predictions obtained using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model indicated that the mean rate of soil loss risk in Uganda's erosion-prone lands was 3.2 t*ha-1*y-1, resulting in a total annual soil loss of about 62 million tons in 2014. About 39% of the country's erosion-prone lands were comprised of unsustainable mean soil loss rates >1 t*ha-1*y-1. Out of 112 districts in Uganda, 66 districts were found to have unsustainable estimated soil loss rates >1 t*ha-1*y-1. Six districts in Uganda were found to have mean annual soil loss rates of >10 t*ha-1*y-1: Bududa (46.3 t*ha-1*y-1), Kasese (37.5 t*ha-1*y-1), Bundibugyo (28.9 t*ha-1*y-1), Bulambuli (20.9 t*ha-1*y-1), Sironko (14.6 t*ha-1*y-1) and Kotido (12.5 t*ha-1*y-1). Among the LCLU types, the highest soil loss rates of 11 t*ha-1*y-1 and 10.6 t*ha-1*y-1 were found in moderate natural forest and dense natural forest, respectively, mainly due to their locations in highland areas characterized by steep slopes ranging between 16% to 21% and their high rainfall intensity, ranging from 1255 mm*y-1 to 1292 mm*y-1. Only five protected areas in Uganda were found to have high mean estimated mean soil loss rates >10 t*ha-1*y-1: Rwenzori Mountains (142.94 t*ha-1*y-1), Mount Elgon (33.81 t*ha-1*y-1), Bokora corridor (12.13 t*ha-1*y-1), Matheniko (10.39 t*ha-1*y-1), and Nangolibwel (10.33 t*ha-1*y-1). To manage soil erosion in Uganda's protected areas, there is an urgent need to control wildfires and human-induced disturbances such as timber harvesting and soil compaction from domestic animals. Our study analysis revealed that well-established terraces and strip-cropping could significantly reduce soil loss rates in Uganda's croplands by 80% (from 1.5 t*ha-1*y-1 to 0.3 t*ha-1*y-1) and by 47% (from 1.5 t*ha-1*y-1 to 0.8 t*ha-1*y-1), respectively, well below the sustainable soil erosion tolerance rate (1 t*ha-1*y-1) for land and water conservation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer