Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- The Evidence Base
- Developing TII: Bystander Theories
- Advantages of Framing Participants as Bystanders
- Bystander Organizing Framework
- Bystander Theories and the TTM as Applied to the Prevention of Violence Against Women
- The First Three Stages for Bystander Intervention: Noticing the Problem, Interpreting It as Problematic, and Feeling Responsible
- Social Norms Theory
- Possessing the Skills to Act
- Good Pedagogy for Effective Prevention
- Comprehensive, Dosage, and Timing
- Varied Teaching Methods and Fostering Relationships
- Sociocultural Relevance
- Well-Trained Staff
- Outcome Evaluation
- Conclusion and Future Directions for Research
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Objective: In recent years there has been a growing awareness of the prevalence of sexual violence in U.K. university student populations, yet prevention efforts are in their infancy. Evidence from the United States shows that empowering bystanders to intervene to prevent violence rather than focusing on perpetrators or victims is a promising strategy particularly suited to university settings. Public Health England commissioned a bystander program, The Intervention Initiative, for U.K. universities. This paper discusses the theoretical underpinnings of the bystander approach and the challenges for practical implementation in Europe. Method: We review findings from research relating to bystander theories, social norms theory, and effective prevention programming that inform the development of maximally effective bystander programs. Results: Bystander programs are complex, multifaceted interventions based on taking participants through the different stages required for an individual to move from inaction to action as described by Latané and Darley, 1969, 1970 in their organizing framework for bystander intervention and incorporating a social norms element. Programs that adhere to the principles for effective prevention as set out by Nation et al. (2003) are most likely to be effective. We demonstrate how these criteria informed the cultural specificity of The Intervention Initiative to U.K. university settings and the challenges in adapting the approach for European settings. Conclusion: More research is needed to develop and test bystander programs in different European countries to build an evidence base for effective prevention programming.
It is widely acknowledged that universities are significant sites for violence against women (DeGue, 2014; Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 2000) and environments where risk factors for violence converge (Powell, 2011; Schwartz, DeKeseredy, Tait, & Alvi, 2001; Schwartz &...